| Literature DB >> 29977294 |
Alaa Gamaleldin Sulieman1, Elhadi Mohieldin Awooda1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic dental injury (TDI) is a challenging public health problem. Its incidence and prevalence vary within countries, states, and different social groups. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in primary incisors among 3-5-year-old Sudanese preschool children and associated factors such as age, sex, and size of overjet and anterior open bite.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29977294 PMCID: PMC5994279 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2135381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Distribution of the study sample according to the type of the traumatized tooth.
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Right maxillary central incisor | 39 | 35.1 |
| Right maxillary lateral incisor | 24 | 21.6 |
| Right maxillary canine | 3 | 2.7 |
| Left maxillary central incisor | 22 | 19.8 |
| Left maxillary lateral incisor | 12 | 10.8 |
| Left maxillary canine | 1 | 0.9 |
| Left mandibular central incisor | 4 | 3.6 |
| Left mandibular lateral incisor | 1 | 0.9 |
| Left mandibular canine | 3 | 2.7 |
| Right mandibular central incisor | 2 | 1.8 |
| Total | 111 | 100.0 |
Distribution of the study sample according to the type of dental trauma to the anterior teeth.
| Code |
| % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No injury seen | 1 | 0.9 |
| 2 | Treated dental injury | 1 | 0.95 |
| 3 | Enamel fracture only | 83 | 74.8 |
| 4 | Enamel/dentin fracture | 13 | 11.7 |
| 5 | Enamel/dentin and pulp injury | 2 | 1.8 |
| 6 | Missing tooth due to trauma | 11 | 9.9 |
| 7 | Excluded tooth | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 111 | 100 |
Distribution of the study sample according to the cause of anterior dental trauma.
| Type |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Trips and falls | 70 | 63.1 |
| Collision with objects or person | 15 | 13.55 |
| Bicycles | 0 | 0 |
| Road traffic accident | 0 | 0 |
| Violence or fights | 2 | 1.8 |
| Do not remember | 24 | 21.6 |
| Other (specify) | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 111 | 100.0 |
The relationship between traumatic dental injury and overbite size among the studied preschool children.
| Overbite | TDI | Total |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Normal | Count | 107 | 459 | 566 | 0.681 |
| % of total | 17.8% | 76.5% | 94.3% | ||
| Open bite | Count | 4 | 30 | 34 | |
| % of total | 0.7% | 5.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Cross bite | Count | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| % of total | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total | Count | 111 | 489 | 600 | |
| % of total | 18.5% | 81.5% | 100.0% | ||
TDI: traumatic dental injury, P > 0.05 indicates no significant relation between TDI and overbite.
The relation between traumatic dental injury and overjet size among the studied preschool children.
| Size of overjet | TDI | Total |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| 0–3 mm | Count | 109 | 477 | 586 | 0.298 |
| % of total | 18.2% | 79.5% | 97.7% | ||
| 3–6 mm | Count | 2 | 12 | 14 | |
| % of total | 0.3% | 2.0% | 2.3% | ||
| More than 6 mm | Count | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| % of total | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| Total | Count | 111 | 489 | 600 | |
| % of total | 18.5% | 81.5% | 100.0% | ||
P value ≥ 0.05 indicates no significant difference between TDI and overjet size.