Literature DB >> 29976501

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Therapy Alone for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: KCSG CO 14-03.

Sun Young Kim1, Jungnam Joo2, Tae Won Kim1, Yong Sang Hong1, Jeong Eun Kim1, In Gyu Hwang3, Beom Gyu Kim4, Keun-Wook Lee5, Ji-Won Kim5, Ho-Suk Oh6, Joong Bae Ahn7, Dae Young Zang8, Dae Yong Kim9, Jae Hwan Oh9, Ji Yeon Baek10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in locally advanced rectal cancer is the standard of care. To date, the role of consolidation chemotherapy after CRT has rarely been addressed through randomized trials. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy compared with CRT alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum and cT3 or cT4 disease with any N category and no metastasis. In arm A (control arm), we planned CRT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with capecitabine followed by TME. In arm B, 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were administered 1 week after the completion of CRT before TME (capecitabine, 1700 mg/m2 per day from day 1 to 14, and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). The downstaging rate (the proportion of ypT0 to ypT2 and ypN0M0) was the primary endpoint, which was to be tested with a 1-sided type I error of 15% and with 85% power.
RESULTS: From September 2014 to February 2016, 110 patients (56 in arm A and 54 in arm B) were randomized and 108 (55 in arm A and 53 in arm B) started CRT. TME was conducted per protocol in 96 patients (52 in arm A and 44 in arm B). In arms A and B, downstaging was achieved in 21.2% and 36.4% (P = .077), respectively, and the pathologic complete response rate was 5.8% and 13.6% (P = .167), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 3.6% of patients in arm A and 9.4% of patients in arm B during the preoperative treatment phase and in 1.9% and 9.0%, respectively, during the postoperative recovery phase.
CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation chemotherapy with 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated a marginal improvement in the downstaging rate. However, a phase 3 trial of this strategy is discouraged because of the high dropout rate and safety issues.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29976501     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatment Paradigm for Patients with Locoregional mismatch Repair Proficient Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jyotsna Bhudia; Robert Glynne-Jones
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-03-21

2.  Consolidation chemotherapy may improve pathological complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jin Cui; Xue Dou; Yanlai Sun; Jinbo Yue
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Ting Jiang; Lin Xiao; Shanfei Yang; Qing Liu; Yuanhong Gao; Gong Chen; Weiwei Xiao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-06-07

4.  Differences in prognostic relevance of rectal magnetic resonance imaging findings before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Kwang-Seop Song; Dong Woon Lee; Bun Kim; Bo Yun Hur; Min Jung Kim; Min Ju Kim; Chang Won Hong; Sung Chan Park; Hyoung-Chul Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Byung Chang Kim; Kyung Su Han; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hoendervangers; J P M Burbach; M M Lacle; M Koopman; W M U van Grevenstein; M P W Intven; H M Verkooijen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Mojca Tuta; Nina Boc; Erik Brecelj; Monika Peternel; Vaneja Velenik
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15

7.  Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Maria C Riesco-Martinez; Carlos Fernandez-Martos; Cristina Gravalos-Castro; Paula Espinosa-Olarte; Anna La Salvia; Luis Robles-Diaz; Andrea Modrego-Sanchez; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Elevated and Normalized Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jianyuan Song; Zhuhong Chen; Daxin Huang; Benhua Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Cancer Stem Cell Biomarkers Predictive of Radiotherapy Response in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marzia Mare; Lorenzo Colarossi; Veronica Veschi; Alice Turdo; Dario Giuffrida; Lorenzo Memeo; Giorgio Stassi; Cristina Colarossi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Ellen Cusano; Chelsea Wong; Eddy Taguedong; Marcus Vaska; Tasnima Abedin; Nancy Nixon; Safiya Karim; Patricia Tang; Daniel Y C Heng; Doreen Ezeife
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.