Literature DB >> 29976410

Flavonoids Luteolin and Quercetin Inhibit RPS19 and contributes to metastasis of cancer cells through c-Myc reduction.

Ku-Chung Chen1,2, Wen-Hsien Hsu1,3, Jhih-Yun Ho2, Cheng-Wei Lin1,2, Cheng-Ying Chu4, Chithan C Kandaswami5, Ming-Ting Lee6, Chia-Hsiung Cheng1,2.   

Abstract

Flavonoids luteolin and quercetin can inhibit growth and metastasis of cancer cells. In our previous report, luteolin and quercetin was shown to block Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling. Here, we found luteolin and quercetin reduced protein level and transactivation activity of RPS19 in A431-III cells, which is isolated from parental A431 (A431-P) cell line. Further investigation the inhibitory mechanism of luteolin and quercetin on RPS19, we found c-Myc binding sites on RPS19 promoter. The Akt inhibitor LY294002, mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and c-Myc inhibitor 10058-F4 significantly suppressed RPS19 expression and transactivation activities. Overexpression and knockdown of c-Myc in cancer cells show RPS19 expression was regulated by c-Myc. Furthermore, Knockdown and overexpression of RPS19 was used to analyze of the function of RPS19 in cancer cells. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and metastasis abilities of cancer cells were also regulated by RPS19. These data suggest that luteolin and quercetin might inhibit metastasis of cancer cells by blocking Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling pathway to suppress RPS19-activated EMT signaling.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMT; Luteolin; Quercetin; RPS19; c-Myc

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29976410      PMCID: PMC9303038          DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Drug Anal            Impact factor:   6.157


1. Introduction

Flavonoids are widely reported to be multiple kinase inhibitors which modulate cell signaling in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and apoptosis [1-9]. The flavonoids luteolin (Lu) and quercetin (Qu) were suggested by our previous report and others as two of more effective inhibitory compounds among flavonoids [6,10,11]. According to the structure-activity-relationship (SAR) studies and molecular modeling, these two agents were found to dock in the src kinase active site. Recently, evidence indicated both Lu and Qu was inhibited metastasis of A431-III cancer cells through inhibition of Src/Cortatin, Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/c-Myc signaling and reversing the EMT process [5]. The flavonoids are polyphenolic compounds found as integral components of the human diet. They are universally present as constituents of flowering plants, particularly of food plants. The flavonoids are phenyl substituted chromones (benzopyran derivatives) consisting of a 15-carbon basic skeleton (C6–C3–C6), composed of a chroman (C6–C3) nucleus (the benzo ring A and the heterocyclic ring C). The antioxidant and anti-inflammation activities of flavonoids extracted from plants are well studied [12-19]. An impressive body of information exists on the antitumor action of plant flavonoids [6,20]. Among the flavonoids examined, Lu and Qu were found to be the two most potent agents exert anticancer activities [6]. A wealthy of evidence demonstrated that both Lu and Qu have the capacity to nullify tumor promotion events [4,5,21]. In addition, recently studies have shown that dietary flavonoids Lu and Qu could inhibit tumor progression, invasion and angiogenesis. Both Lu and Qu could reverse cadherin expression, downregulate EMT markers, expunge cell-cell interactions, suppress secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and invasiveness of tumor cells [3,21,22]. Furthermore, Lu and Qu attenuate the phosphorylation of cortactin and Src in highly invasive A431-III subline. As a consequence, there ensues a disruption of invadopodia generation and the suppression of MMPs secretion [4]. Lu and Qu inhibited a specific action in hampering kinase activities and aforementioned inhibitory effects on cancer. However, it cannot be ruled out other mechanisms contributed to these effects and which were modulated by Lu and Qu. Taking together, a positive correlation between dietary flavonoid-rich diet and lower risk of colon, prostate and breast cancer lead to a conclusion that dietary flavonoids mediate the protective effects as chemopreventive agents, and can interact with different genes and proteins to play role in chemotherapy as well [23,24]. c-Myc is a regulator of ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis [25]. c-Myc-overexpressing in fibroblasts were known to activate several ribosomal proteins [26]. c-Myc is suggested a role in enhancement of ribosomal biogenesis. Abundant expression of specific Ribosomal proteins (RPs) may influent cell proliferation. For example, overexpression of RPS3A in mouse fibroblast cell line induced tumor formation [27]. Increasing expression of ribosomal protein S8 (RPS8), ribosomal protein S12 (RPS12), ribosomal protein L23A (RPL23A), ribosomal protein L27 (RPL27) and ribosomal protein L30 (RPL30) were reported in different tumor types [25,28]. Some of these RPs were known to be regulated by c-Myc induction. The ribosomal protein L11 (RPL11) was identified as a feedback inhibitor of c-Myc [29]. Ribosomal protein S14 (RPS14) is reported to directly inhibit c-Myc transcription and its degradation was mediated by microRNA 145 (miR-145) [30]. The RPS12 was highly expressed in A431-III cancer cell and is used as a clinical biomarker for cancer detection [31]. In our previous report, RPS12 was found highly expressed in A431-III cells [21]. The highly invasive A431-III tumor subline was derived from parental A431 (A431-P) tumor cells by three successive passages through a Boyden chamber with EHS matrigel-coated membrane support [1]. The enhanced metastasis potential of this highly invasive cancer subline was found through c-Myc activation [21]. RPS19 was demonstrated as a c-Myc target gene in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and may contribute to hepatocyte transformation [32]. c-Myc was reported to regulate transcription of RPS19 by directly binding to the promoter region in HCC [32]. The singly-nucleotide polymorphism of RPS19 was correlated with risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 cancer cases [33]. c-Myc was also reported to induce EMT signaling in endometrial cancer [34]. The flavonoids Lu and Qu could suppress the metastasis of A431-III cancer cells through reducing c-Myc expression [21]. We specifically undertook current studies with a view to further evaluating the anticancer effects of Lu and Qu individually on the modulation expression of RPS expression in both A431-P and A431-III cells. Secondly, Lu and Qu were also used to analyze the inhibitory effects on RPS19 through Akt/ mTOR/c-Myc signaling. Expression of EMT markers, and the migration and invasion of A431-III cells regulated by RPS19 were also explored.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals and reagents

A431-P cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). A431-III cells were isolated from A431-P cells using a Boyden chamber [1]. RPMI-1640 and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Anti-RPS19 and anti-c-Myc antibodies were obtained from GeneTex (Irvine, TX, USA). The anti-phospho-Akt and anti-phospho-S6K antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-GADPH and anti-β-actin antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz (Capitola, CA, USA). Luteolin was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON, Canada). Quercetin was purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Agarose, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Merck-Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). Rapamycin, LY294002, and 10058-F4 were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Cell culture

A431-P (A431, ATCC CRL-1555) and A431-III cells (sub-line of A431-P cells) were described in our previous report [1]. A431-P and A431-III cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 air atmosphere at 37 °C with RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, NY, USA) containing 10% FBS (Gibco, NY, USA).

2.3. Collection of cell lysates

Cells were collected and washed three times using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in gold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.9), 1 mM EGTA, 0.8% NaCl, 0.1 mM b-glycerylphosphate, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na4P2O7, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100) containing 1 mM PMSF, 10 μg/mL aprotinin, and 10 μg/mL leupeptin.

2.4. Western blot experiment

Total cell lysates were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and then incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. A secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP; Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent kit (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using the BioSpectrum® Imaging System (UVP, Upland, CA, USA). Relative quantification of ECL signals was carried out using ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA).

2.5. In vitro migration assay

A431-P and A431-III cells (1 × 106 cells per well) were plated onto 6-well culture plates overnight. A monolayer of cultural cells was wounded by manually scratching it with a pipette tip and then further incubation with culture medium and/or chemicals at 37 °C for 24 h. The wounding was captured using a phase-contrast Olympus IX70 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a SPOT camera (Sterling Heights, MI, USA). Experiments were repeated three times for each treatment.

2.6. Amplification of full-length RPS19 complementary (c)DNA

Full-length RPS19 cDNA was obtained from A431-III cells via a PCR using a Marathon cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as previously described [35]. The following primer pairs were used for the PCR: RPS19-F (5′- GAT GCC TGG AGT TAC TGT AAA AGA CG -3′) and RPS19-R (5′- CTA ATG CTT CTT GTT GGC AGC TGC C -3′). The PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for sequencing. Full-length RPS19 was inserted into a pcDNA3-HA plasmid to generate the pcDNA3-RPS19-HA plasmid.

2.7. Luciferase assay

The 5′-upstream 1162-bp long RPS19 (RPS19-pro) was identified and isolated from genomic DNA of A431-III cells using a PCR with specific primers as follows: RPS19-pro-F (5′- ACC CAA GTA CCT GGA GAT TTC CAG TTA GAC -3′) and RPS19-pro-R (5′- GGA ACA GTG GTG GAG AAT ACT ATG ATG GCG -3′). The amplified DNA fragment was then cloned into a pGEMT-Easy vector (Promega) following sequencing. The RPS19-pro fragment was then cloned into the pGL3-Basic vector as a pGL3-RPS19-pro plasmid. The pGL3-Basic and pGL3-RPS19-pro plasmids were transfected into A431-III cells with or without the pcDNA3-cMyc-HA plasmid [21] using the PolyJet transfection reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Inhibitor-containing medium was replaced at 24 h post-transfection. Total cell lysates were harvested at 48 h post-transfection and luciferase activity was measured with a Luciferase Assay Reagent (Promega) using the Bio-Spectrum Imaging System (UVP).

2.8. Knockdown RPS19 by short hairpin (sh)RNA

RPS19 (shRPS19-1, clone ID: TRCN0000074913/ TRCN0000074915; shRPS19-2, clone ID: TRCN0000074916) and control (shGFP, clone ID: TrcN0000072178) shRNA vectors were obtained from the National RNAi core Facility at the Institute of Molecular Biology (Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan). A431-III cells were transfected with shRNA using the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Life Technology, Grand Island, NY, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.

2.9. Transwell invasion assay

Transwells with polycarbonate filters (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA) were coated with extracellular matrix (ECM) for 1 h at 25 °C. Cultural medium was added to the lower compartment of the chamber. A431-III cells (5 × 104) transfected with shRNAs of RPS19 (shRPS19-1 and shRPS19-2), control shRNA (shGFP) or the pcDNA3-cMyc-HA, pcDNA3-RPS19-HA plasmids were added to the upper compartment of the chamber at 37 °C for 24 h, after which the filter was fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in PBS and stained with crystal violet. Each experiment was repeated three times independently.

2.10. Statistical analysis

Three independent experiments were run to analyze the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For comparison between two groups, statistical analysis was determined by an unpaired Student's t-test. For comparison more than two groups, the one-way ANOVA following with Tukey's test was used. A probability of p < 0.05 is indicated by *; p < 0.01 is indicated by **; p < 0.001 is indicated by ***.

2.11. MTT assay

The A431-III cells (105 cells/well) were seeded in 48-well plates and incubated with different concentrations of flavonoids and inhibitors for 24 h. The medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS 3 times. The 200 μL of cultural medium containing 20 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and continued to culture at 37 °C for 3 h. The medium was then removed, and 200 μL of DMSO was added to dissolve the precipitate. The absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Tec, Winooski, VT, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm.

3. Results

3.1. RPS19 is highly expressed by A431-III cells

Our previous report indicated that highly invasive A431-III cells expressed higher amount of RPS12 through c-Myc activation which in turn increase the migratory and invasive abilities [21]. To determine whether RPS19, a ribosomal protein, was more highly expressed in A431-III cells, we then performed experiments and compared protein levels by Western blotting in A431-P and A431-III cells. Protein levels of RPS19 were higher in A431-III cells than A431-P cells (Fig. 1A and B). These data suggest that highly expression of RPS19 in A431-III cells might be related to the invasiveness of A431-III cells.
Fig. 1

Protein levels of ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) in A431-P and A431-III cells. A. Protein levels of RPS19 in A431-P and A431-III cells were measured by a Western blot experiment. B. The protein levels of RPS19 in A431-P and A431-III cells was analyzed by ImageJ software. Results from three independent experiments are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). * Indicates a significant difference compared to the control (p < 0.05).

3.2. RPS19 expression might be inhibited by Lu and Qu through Akt/mTOR signaling

It is well known that Lu and Qu two most potent agents exert anticancer activities that could reduce the migratory and invasive abilities of cancer cells [4,5,21,23,36-39]. In our previous report, we found Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling was activated in A431-III cells and could be inhibited by Lu and Qu. Expression of ribosomal protein RPS12 was reduced by Lu and Qu through blocking activation of Akt/mTOR signaling. The phosphorylation of Akt and mTOR could be inhibited by Lu and Qu and protein level of c-Myc was also reduced [21]. The c-Myc expression was inhibited by Lu, Qu, rapamycin and LY294002 (Fig. S2). RPS19 is also a ribosomal protein. The cytotoxicity of LY294002, rapamycin, 10058-F4, Lu and Qu in A431-III cells was shown in Figure S1. To determine whether Lu and Qu can also reduce expression of RPS19 by blocking activation of Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling, we analyzed protein levels of RPS19 after treatment with Lu and Qu at the concentration of 10 and 20 μM, respectively. Both Lu and Qu were found significantly to reduce the activation of Akt/mTOR signaling [21] compared to the control. The protein level of RPS19 was significantly reduced by treatment with 20 μM of Lu and Qu and 40 μM of Qu compared to the control (Fig. 2A and B). To elucidate whether the reduction in RPS19 by Lu and Qu is the major cause of blocking Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, several experiments were performed. First, we treated A431-III cells with the Akt inhibitor, LY294002 at the concentration of 5 and 10 μM and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin at the concentration of 5 and 10 nM. Both LY294002 and rapamycin were found to significantly reduce the activation of Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in A431-III cells [21]. Simultaneously, the protein level of RPS19 was significantly reduced by treated with 5 and 10 μM of LY294002 and also with 5 and 10 nM of rapamycin (Fig. 2C and D), respectively. These results suggest
Fig. 2

Ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) expression was inhibited by Qu, Qu through Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. A. The protein level of RPS19 in A431-III cells was measured by Western blotting after treatment with DMSO, 10 and 20 μM of Lu, or 20 and 40 μM of Qu for 24 h. B. Protein level changes of RPS19 after treatment with Lu or Qu were analyzed by ImageJ software. C. Protein levels of RPS19 in A431-III cells were measured by Western blotting after treatment with 5 and 10 nM of rapamycin or 5 and 10 μM of LY294002 for 24 h. D. Protein level changes of RPS19 after treatment with rapamycin or LY294002 were analyzed with ImageJ software. Data represent the mean (SD) of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

3.3. c-Myc activates RPS19 expression

Our previous report indicated that c-Myc exerted higher expression in A431-III cancer cells and this might regulate expression of RPS12, thus increase the invasiveness of cancer cells [21]. It's interesting to know whether c-Myc could also activates the expression of RPS19 in A431-III cancer cells in the same manner. We then analyzed the protein levels of RPS19 by overexpressing c-Myc in A431-P cells. The protein level of RPS19 significantly increased (Fig. 3A and B). By Treating of A431-III cells with the c-Myc inhibitor, 10058-F4, at the concentration of 100, 200 and 400 μM, we observed the protein level of RPS19 was significantly decreased (Fig. 3C and D). These data suggest that RPS19 expression is regulated by c-Myc.
Fig. 3

c-Myc regulates ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) expression. A. A431-P cells were transfected with 1 μg of pcDNA3-HA as the control, and 0.5 and 1.0 μg of pcDNA3-cMyc-HA. Protein levels of RPS19 was measured by Western blotting after 24 h. B. Protein level changes of RPS19 after transfection with the control or pcDNA3-cMyc-HA were analyzed with ImageJ software. C. A431-III cells were treated with DMSO, or 100, 200, and 400 μM of 10058-F4 for 24 h, and protein levels of RPS19 were measured by Western blotting. D. Protein level changes of RPS19 after treatment with DMSO or 10058-F4 were analyzed by ImageJ software. Data represent the mean (SD) of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

3.4. c-Myc activates RPS19 expression through Akt/ mTOR signaling pathway

Since c-Myc is a transcription factor and activates transcription of target gene through E-box (CANNTG) binding [40]. To test whether the expression of RPS19 is indeed activated by c-Myc through increasing transactivation activity of the RPS19 promoter, we set up a serial of experiments to explore this contention. We first analyzed and cloned the RPS19 promoter to the pGL3-basic vector to generate a pGL3-RPS19-Luc plasmid. There are six potential E-box motifs located in the 1115 bp upstream of the RPS19 promoter (Fig. 4A). After transfection of the pGL3-RPS19-Luc plasmid (0.5 and 1.0 μg) and pGL3-Basic plasmid (0.5 ug) as control into A431-P cells, the transactivation activity of the RPS19 promoter increased to 2.8-fold and 8.0-fold compared to the control and showed a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). To elucidate if the transactivation activity of the RPS19 promoter was truly activated by c-Myc, we transfected 0.5 ug of pGL3-RPS19-Luc and pcDNA3-cMyc-HA plasmid (0.25 and 0.5 μg) into A431-P cells combined with or without treatment of 10058-F4 (200 and 400 μM) as measured transactivation activity by a luciferase assay. The transactivation activity increased to 0.9-fold and 3.4-fold after transfection with 0.25 and 0.5 μg of the pcDNA3-cMyc-HA plasmid compared to the control (Fig. 4C). This activation was reduced by treatment with 200 and 400 μM of 10058-F4 (Fig. 4C). Finally, in order to analyze the transactivation activity of RPS19 in A431-III cells, we transfected 0.5 μg of the pGL3-RPS19-Luc into A431-III cells and then treated them with DMSO (control), luteolin (10 and 20 μM), quercetin (20 and 40 μM), LY294002 (5 and 10 μM) or 10058-F4 (200 and 400 μM). The transactivation activity decreased after treatment with luteolin (Fig. 5A), quercetin (Fig. 5B), LY294002 (Fig. 5C) and 10058-F4 (Fig. 5D) as compared to the control. These data suggest that the transactivation activity of RPS19 is activated by Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling pathway in A431-III cells and reduced by luteolin and quercetin.
Fig. 4

cMyc activates transactivation of ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) in A431-P cells. A. The RPS19 promoter contains six potential E-box motifs. B. Transactivation of RPS19 was measured by a luciferase assay after transfection of A431-P cells with pcDNA3-HA (control), or 0.5 and 1.0 μg of pcDNA3-cMyc-HA for 24 h in A431-P cells. C. Transactivation of RPS19 was measured by transfection of A431-III cells with pcDNA3-HA (control), 0.25 and 0.5 μg of pcDNA3-cMyc-HA, and combined treated with or without 10058-F4 A431-III cells for 24 h in A431-III cells. Statistical significance between the groups was determined from three separate experiments by an unpaired Student's t-test. Results from three independent experiments are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001). that RPS19 expression might be reduced by both Lu and Qu through the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Fig. 5

Transactivation activity of ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) is reduced by luteolin and quercetin through reduction of Akt/mTOR/cMyc signaling. Transactivation of RPS19 was measured by treatment of A431-III cells with 10 and 20 μM of luteolin (A), 20 and 40 μM of quercetin (B), 5 and 10 μM of LY294002 (C), 200 and 400 μM of 10058-F4 (D) for 24 h. Data represent the mean (SD) of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

3.5. RPS19 regulates EMT marker expression in cancer cells

In our previous reports, the EMT markers in A431-P and A431-III cells were higher expressed and could be inhibited by Lu and Qu [5,21]. In this study, we hypothesized that RPs might be also play a key role responsible for induction/acceleration of EMT process. In order to gain insights into cellular events of RPS19 and EMT markers in A431 cells, we set to explore the link between RPS19 and EMT markers, especially E-cadherin and vimentin, to determine whether RPS19 contributed to the invasiveness of cancer cells. Therefore, we analyze the protein level of these two EMT markers using RPS19 overexpression and knockdown experiments. We cloned and constructed the pcDNA3-RPS19-flag plasmid for gene expression in A431-P cells and two shRNAs of RPS19 (shRPS19-1 and shRPS19-2) for a knockdown experiment in A431-III cells. The pcDNA3-RPS19-flag plasmid at 0.5 and 1.0 μg was transfected into A431-P cells, protein levels of RPS19, E-cadherin and vimentin were analyzed by a Western blotting experiment. Over-expression of RPS19 resulted in down-regulation of E-cadherin and up-regulation of vimentin (Fig. 6A and B). Knockdown RPS19 expression by the two shRNA (shRPS19-1 and shRPS19-2) in A431-III cells show opposite results (Fig. 6A and B). These data suggest that RPS19 regulates EMT markers expressions in A431-III cancer cells.
Fig. 6

Ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) activates EMT signaling. Protein levels of RPS19, E-cadherin, and vimentin were measured by Western blotting after overexpression of RPS19 in A431-P cells (A) and RPS19 shRNA knockdown in A431-III cells (B). Protein levels of E-cadherin and vimentin from Western blotting was analyzed by ImageJ software. Data represent the mean (SD) of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

3.6. RPS19 promotes the migratory and invasiveness ability of cancer cells

In our previous reports, the migration and invasion ability in A431-III cells was higher presented and could be inhibited by Lu and Qu [4,5,21]. In this study, we also present the inhibition of migration by Lu and Qu in A431-III cells (Fig. S3). To further analyze the migratory and invasive abilities of cancer cells regulated by RPS19, we prepared wound-healing and invasion assays using A431-P and A431-III cells. The migratory ability of A431-P cells after transfection with the pcDNA3-RPS19-flag plasmid increased to 1.55-fold compared to the control (Fig. 7A and C). Knockdown of RPS19 expression by the two shRNAs (shRPS19-1 and shRPS19-2) in A431-III cells decreased the migratory abilities by 0.55 and 0.44-fold compared to the control (Fig. 7B and D). The invasive abilities of A431-P cells after transfection with the pcDNA3-RPS19-flag increased by 3.65-fold compared to the control (Fig. 7E and G). Knockdown of RPS19 expression by the two shRNA (shRPS19-1 and shRPS19-2) in A431-III cells decreased the invasive abilities by 0.38 and 0.45-fold compared to the control (Fig. 7F and H). These data suggest that RPS19 promotes the migratory and invasive abilities of cancer cells.
Fig. 7

Ribosomal protein S19 (RPS19) increases the migratory and invasive abilities of cancer cells. A wound-healing experiment was used to analyze cell migration after RPS19 overexpression in A431-P cells (A, C) and RPS19 shRNA knockdown in A431-III cells (B, D). A trans-well assay was used to analyze the invasive ability with RPS19 overexpression in A431-P cells (E, G) and RPS19 shRNA knockdown in A431-III cells (F, H). Migration and invasion cells were calculated and analyzed by ImageJ software. Statistical significance between the groups was determined from three separate experiments with an unpaired Student's t-test. Results from three independent experiments are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).

4. Discussion

Flavonoids have been widely demonstrated to prevent cancer metastasis [41]. Lu and Qu show inherent potential as chemopreventive/anti-neoplastic agents. Previously, our laboratory furnished evidence to show that Lu and Qu are the two most potent agents and have the greater capacity to nullify tumor promotion events. Recently, we demonstrated that Lu and Qu were also found to inhibit the phosphorylation of cortactin and Src in A431-III cells. As a consequence, there ensues a disruption of invadopodia generation and the suppression of MMP secretion. These changes, in concert, bring about a reduction in metastasis [5]. In our and other previous reports, it was suggested that Lu and Qu possess the same abilities to bind to ATP-binding sites in PTK [6,36,42-45]. Inhibition of migration and invasion of A431-III cells by Lu and Qu occurs through inhibition of EMT signaling [5], inhibition of Src/FAK/Cortactin signaling [4], and mTOR/c-Myc signaling [21]. Lu and Qu are also inhibited UBE2S expression and contributes to reduce migration and invasion abilities of cancer cells [22]. These inhibitions by both Lu and Qu seems to have similar structure of flavonoids. Both luteolin and quercetin processes a double bond between C2 and C3 in ring C, and −OH groups on C3′ and C4’ in its B-ring. However, quercetin have an additional −OH substitution on C3 [6]. We suggest that both Lu and Qu might contribute to inhibit RPS19 expression through Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling to reduce metastasis abilities of cancer cells. In a previous report, ribosomal proteins in a human metastasis model were analyzed using coupled 2-D liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. In a comparison of the N4A4 metastasis subline and NM2C5 non-metastatic subline. Both sublines were originally isolated from the MDA-MB-435 breast tumor cell line. Highly expression of RPS19 was detected in the N4A4 but not in the NM2C5 cell lines, which suggests that some ribosomal proteins are associated with a metastatic phenotype [46]. This metastasis model is similar to our metastasis model of cancer cells. We obtained a highly invasive A431-III sunline from A431-P cells and compared the messenger (m)RNA and protein levels between these two cell lines. Previously, we reported the metastasis ability of A431-III cells was reduced by the treatment with Lu and Qu and exhibited a dose-dependent manner [4,5,21]. These results suggest that our metastasis model was useful in analyzing metastasis inhibition by flavonoids. An increasing ribosomal protein level was reported to be associated with human cancers [25]. These ribosomal proteins are RPS12 in A431-III cancer cells [31,47]; RPL37 and RPL7a in prostate cancer [48]; RPL15 in oesophageal cancer [49]; RPL13 in gastrointestinal cancer [50]; RPL13, RPL36a, RPs8, RPL12, RPL23a, RPL27 and RPL30 in hepatocellular cancer [28]; and RPs3, RPs6, RPs8, RPs12, RPL5, RPL22, RPL26 and RPL35 in colorectal cancer [51]. Myc is a regulator of ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis [25]. The Myc protein as a transcription factor cooperates with the max protein to activate transcription of ribosomal proteins. RPL11 was reported to be activated by c-Myc in human cancers [52,53]. In our previous report, RPS12 was activated by Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling in A431-III cancer cells and increased the metastasis of cancer cells. This activation could be reduced by treatment with Lu and Qu [21]. Using this metastasis cell model, we further compared protein levels of RPS19 in A431-III and A431-P cells. Higher expression of RPS19 was detected in A431-III cells compared to A431-P cells and contributed to the metastasis of cancer cells. Treatment with Lu and Qu reduced protein levels of RPS19. We suggest that Lu and Qu can reduce metastasis by inhibiting RPS19 expression. RSP12 and RPS19 are both ribosomal protein and contributes to cancer proliferation and metastasis. Knockdown RPS12 expression in gastric cancer inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer [54]. Breast cancer samples analyzed by Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS) show that RPS12 was involved in the pathological process of breast cancer with changed expression and may be as a useful biomarker [55]. RPS12 expression was significantly increased in metastasis stage of gastric cancer rather than premalignant stage or cancer stage [56]. The protein level of RPS12 in late stage of cervical cancer biopsies were increased comparison with normal tissue [57]. RPS12 was contributed to metastasis of cervical cancer cells activated by Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling [21]. RPS19 was also higher expressed in cancers and related to malignant potential. The RPS19 cDNA was higher expressed in primary colon carcinomas tissue and associated with cancer progression and differentiation [58]. Both RPS12 and RPS19 was shown to differential expressed in primary cervical cancers [59]. The c-Myc was reported to activate cancer malignancy by regulating ribosome biogenesis [25,53,60]. In our previous report and present data, we found RPS12 and RPS19 might be activated by Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling. These results suggest that RPS12 and RPS19 were potential targets for cancer therapy. In this study, we confirmed that RPS19 was highly expressed in A431-III cells. The RPS19 contributes to migratory and invasive abilities of A431-III cells. Expression of RPS19 is transcriptionally regulated by c-Myc. Lu and Qu significantly reduced RPS19 expression. This reduction was due to the blocking Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling pathway by treatment of Lu and Qu. Our finding provided evidence of the functional role of Lu and Qu in metastasis inhibition of cervix cancer cells. In conclusion, in addition to inhibit tumor progression, invasion, angiogenesis and reverse EMT, these two flavonoids not only ablate the RPS expression, but also block Akt/mTOR/ c-Myc signaling pathway. Our study provides a reliable model to investigate and confirm the importance of RPS expression and Akt/mTOR/c-Myc signaling pathway in cancer invasion. Lu and Qu seem to have inherent potential to attenuate tumor metastasis.
  58 in total

1.  Analysis of gene expression profiles for distinct stages of intestinal-type gastric cancer using suppression subtractive hybridization and cDNA microarray.

Authors:  Xiu-Ju Sun; Kai-Lai Sun; Zhi-Hong Zheng; Dong-Mei Hao; Wei-Neng Fu; Hui-Mian Xu; Jun-Qing Chen; Xiao-Ming Li
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 2.  Flavonoids, a ubiquitous dietary phenolic subclass, exert extensive in vitro anti-invasive and in vivo anti-metastatic activities.

Authors:  Chia-Jui Weng; Gow-Chin Yen
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Cloning and characterization of full-length human ribosomal protein L15 cDNA which was overexpressed in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Q Wang; C Yang; J Zhou; X Wang; M Wu; Z Liu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-01-24       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Chemoprevention studies of the flavonoids quercetin and rutin in normal and azoxymethane-treated mouse colon.

Authors:  K Yang; S A Lamprecht; Y Liu; H Shinozaki; K Fan; D Leung; H Newmark; V E Steele; G J Kelloff; M Lipkin
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by quercetin and luteolin leads to growth inhibition and apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells.

Authors:  Lung-Ta Lee; Ying-Tang Huang; Jiuan-Jiuan Hwang; Ping-Ping H Lee; Ferng-Chun Ke; Madhavan P Nair; Chithan Kanadaswam; Ming-Ting Lee
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Investigation of MMP-2 and -9 in a highly invasive A431 tumor cell sub-line selected from a Boyden chamber assay.

Authors:  Wen-Te Kao; Chun-Yu Lin; Lung-Ta Lee; Ping-Ping H Lee; Chin-Chun Hung; Yung-Sheng Lin; Shih-Hsun Chen; Ferng-Chun Ke; Jiuan-Jiuan Hwang; Ming-Ting Lee
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  SALL4 as an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Drug Resistance Inducer through the Regulation of c-Myc in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Jing Zhang; Xiaoming Yang; Chi Fang; Huali Xu; Xiaowei Xi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Anti-cancer potential of flavonoids: recent trends and future perspectives.

Authors:  Priya Batra; Anil K Sharma
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Antifungal and antioxidant activities of organic and aqueous extracts of Annona squamosa Linn. leaves.

Authors:  Narasimharaju Kalidindi; Nagarasanakote Venkataswamy Thimmaiah; Nagepally Venkataramareddy Jagadeesh; Ramaiah Nandeep; Sathyanarayana Swetha; Bharat Kalidindi
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 6.157

10.  Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica.

Authors:  Quy Diem Do; Artik Elisa Angkawijaya; Phuong Lan Tran-Nguyen; Lien Huong Huynh; Felycia Edi Soetaredjo; Suryadi Ismadji; Yi-Hsu Ju
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.157

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Luteolin and cancer metastasis suppression: focus on the role of epithelial to mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Yaseen Hussain; Jing Hao Cui; Haroon Khan; Michael Aschner; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Philippe Jeandet
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Natural product-based radiopharmaceuticals: Focus on curcumin and its analogs, flavonoids, and marine peptides.

Authors:  Hendris Wongso
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2021-07-21

3.  UBE2S activates NF-κB signaling by binding with IκBα and promotes metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Jhih-Yun Ho; Hsin-Ying Lu; Hsing-Hsien Cheng; Yu-Chieh Kuo; Yu-Lin Amy Lee; Chia-Hsiung Cheng
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 4.  Traditional Chinese medicine as a cancer treatment: Modern perspectives of ancient but advanced science.

Authors:  Yuening Xiang; Zimu Guo; Pengfei Zhu; Jia Chen; Yongye Huang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Identification of key candidate genes and pathways in multiple myeloma by integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Haimeng Yan; Gaofeng Zheng; Jianwei Qu; Yang Liu; Xi Huang; Enfan Zhang; Zhen Cai
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Therapeutic Potential of Quercetin: New Insights and Perspectives for Human Health.

Authors:  Bahare Salehi; Laura Machin; Lianet Monzote; Javad Sharifi-Rad; Shahira M Ezzat; Mohamed A Salem; Rana M Merghany; Nihal M El Mahdy; Ceyda Sibel Kılıç; Oksana Sytar; Mehdi Sharifi-Rad; Farukh Sharopov; Natália Martins; Miquel Martorell; William C Cho
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 7.  Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Natalie Brajanovski; Keefe T Chan; Jiachen Xuan; Richard B Pearson; Elaine Sanij
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 8.  Bcl-2 Modulation in p53 Signaling Pathway by Flavonoids: A Potential Strategy towards the Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Noor Rahman; Haroon Khan; Asad Zia; Asifullah Khan; Sajad Fakhri; Michael Aschner; Karim Gul; Luciano Saso
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Anti-cancer properties of quercetin in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Parisa Maleki Dana; Fatemeh Sadoughi; Zatollah Asemi; Bahman Yousefi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.722

10.  Luteolin-7-O-Glucoside Inhibits Oral Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion by Regulating Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Expression and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway.

Authors:  Bharath Kumar Velmurugan; Jen-Tsun Lin; B Mahalakshmi; Yi-Ching Chuang; Chia-Chieh Lin; Yu-Sheng Lo; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Mu-Kuan Chen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.