| Literature DB >> 29976253 |
Suyeon Park1, Gayeon Won1, Jehyoung Kim1, Hyeun Bum Kim2, John Hwa Lee3.
Abstract
The obligate intracellular pathogen Lawsonia intracellularis (LI), the etiological agent of proliferative enteropathy (PE), poses a substantial economic loss in the swine industry worldwide. In this study, we genetically engineered an O-antigen-deficient (rough) Salmonella strain secreting four selected immunogenic LI antigens, namely OptA, OptB, LfliC, and Lhly. The genes encoding these antigens were individually inserted in the expression vector plasmid pJHL65, and the resultant plasmids were transformed into the ∆asd ∆lon ∆cpxR ∆rfaL Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) strain JOL1800. The individual expression of the selected LI antigens in JOL1800 was validated by an immunoblotting assay. We observed significant (P < 0.05) induction of systemic IgG and mucosal IgA responses against each LI antigen or Salmonella outer membrane protein in mice immunized once orally with a mixture of four JOL1800-derived strains. Further, mRNA of IL-4 and IFN-γ were highly upregulated in splenic T cells re-stimulated in vitro with individual purified antigens. Subsequently, immunized mice showed significant protection against challenge with 106.9 TCID50 LI or 2 × 109 CFU of a virulent ST strain. At day 8 post-challenge, no mice in the immunized groups showed the presence of LI-specific genomic DNA (gDNA) in stool samples, while 50% of non-immunized mice were positive for LI-specific gDNA. Further, all the immunized mice survived the virulent ST challenge, compared to a 20% mortality rate observed in the control mice. Collectively, the constructed rough ST-based LI vaccine candidate efficiently elicited LI and ST-specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity and conferred proper dual protection against PE and salmonellosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29976253 PMCID: PMC6034208 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0552-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Strain/plasmid | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| JOL990 | Lab stock | |
| JOL1800 | Lab stock | |
| JOL1809 | JOL1800 containing pJHL65 and expressing OptA | This study |
| JOL1810 | JOL1800 containing pJHL80 and expressing OptB | This study |
| JOL1811 | JOL1800 containing pJHL65 and expressing FliC | This study |
| JOL1812 | JOL1800 containing pJHL65 and expressing Hly | This study |
|
| ||
| BL21(DE3)pLysS | F−, | Promega |
| JOL232 | F− λ− ϕ80 ∆( | Lab stock |
| JOL1601 | JOL232 containing pJHL80-OptA | This study |
| JOL1902 | JOL232 containing pJHL65-OptB | This study |
| JOL1658 | JOL232 containing pJHL65-FliC | This study |
| JOL1743 | JOL232 containing pJHL65-Hly | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pET28a(+) | IPTG-inducible expression vector; Kanamycin resistant | Novagen |
| pET32a | IPTG-inducible expression vector; Kanamycin resistant | Lab stock |
| pET-optA | pET32a derivative containing | This study |
| pET-optB | pET28a(+) derivative containing | This study |
| pET-fliC | pET28a(+) derivative containing | This study |
| pET-hly | pET28a(+) derivative containing | This study |
| pJHL65 | [ | |
| pJHL80 | ||
| pJHL-OptA | pJHL80 harboring | This study |
| pJHL-OptB | pJHL65 harboring | This study |
| pJHL-FliC | pJHL65 harboring | This study |
| pJHL-Hly | pJHL65 harboring | This study |
| Primers | ||
| rfaL DEL OT F | 5′-GGATACGATAAACCGCAGTCG | This study |
| rfaL DEL OT R | 5′- AACCGTGCGCTTGCTGATAAG | This study |
| rfaL DEL IN F | 5′- ACAAGTTTAGGACTTCGCTGCC | This study |
| rfaL DEL IN R | 5′-CAGAATGGTATTATGCGGACCG | This study |
Figure 1Immunoblot analysis of optA, optB, LfliC and Lhly antigens expressed in JOL1800 derived strains, JOL1809, JOL1810, JOL1811 and JOL1812, respectively. The respective vaccine strains were grown in LB broth to mid-log phase and then the culture supernatants were collected and subjected to Western blot analysis using protein-specific hyperimmune sera raised in rabbits. The expression plasmid, pJHL65 transformed into JOL912 was used as a vector control. The predicted molecular mass of the expressed recombinant proteins were ~17 kDa for OptA, ~41.1 kDa for OptB, ~38.6 kDa for FliC and ~30 kDa for Hly. Lane M, size marker; lane C, vector control; lane OptA, a pellet of JOL1809; lane OptB, a pellet of JOL1810; lane FliC, a pellet of JOL1811; lane Hly, a pellet of JOL1812.
Figure 2Humoral immune responses specific to each purified LI antigen protein. Titers of serum IgG were measured in the mice immunized with the mixture of JOL1800 derivatives. Control, a group inoculated with PBS; immunized, groups immunized with a combined formula of four JOL1800 derivatives. The error bars indicate the standard deviation (sd). wpi: week post-immunization; *P < 0.05 compared to titers of the control group.
Figure 3Mucosal immune response. Titers of intestinal secretory IgA (sIgA) (A) and virginal sIgA (B) obtained after vaccination with a co-mixture of all the four strains. The responses measured against each LI protein by an indirect ELISA using individual recombinant proteins as coating antigens. Each data points represent mean ± standard deviation (sd) of 10 mice/group. *P < 0.05. wpi: week post-immunization. ns: non-significant.
Figure 4Humoral and mucosal immune responses specific to the OMP. Titers of serum IgG titers (a) and virginal sIgA (b) after immunization with JOL1809, JOL1810, JOL1811 and JOL1812 in the mice via an oral route. Data are the means for all mice in each group (n = 10). PBS, antibodies elicited in the non-immunized mice; OptA, antibodies specific to OptA elicited by the immunization in the mice; OptB, antibodies specific to OptB elicited by the immunization in the mice; LFliC, antibodies specific to FliC elicited by the immunization in the mice; LHly, antibodies specific to Hly elicited by the immunization in the mice. Error bars indicate standard deviation (sd). wpi: week post-immunization; P < 0.05 (vs. PBS).
Figure 5FACS analysis of splenic T lymphocytes. A Representative flow cytometry histogram plots for CD4+ and CD8+ splenic T cell populations. B Change in the T cell subpopulation in the control mice and immunized mice. Error bars indicate the sd. *P < 0.05 when the values were compared with those of non-immunized mice.
Figure 6Cytokine assay in splenocytes following in vitro re-stimulation. The mRNA transcript levels of IL-4, IFN-γ and IL-17 were evaluated in the primed splenocytes pulsed in vitro with each antigen by performing RT PCR. The values of the relative fold change of each group were expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. the non-immunized control.
Figure 7Protection efficacies of four rough ST-based LI vaccines. All the immunized and control mice groups were challenged with 106.9TCID50 LI strains at week 8 post-immunization. Protection shown by a cocktail of all the four strains. The protection against LI was assessed based on the presence of gDNA in stool samples. Protection is presented as the number of animals showing gDNA in stool samples to the total number of animals in that group. Five animals were sacrificed at each time-point indicated.
Figure 8Protection efficacies of -based LI vaccines against a virulent Typhimurium. Mice immunized with either Salmonella-based LI vaccine constructs or PBS were challenged at 6 weeks post-immunization with a virulent Salmonella strain and motility and bacterial recovery from spleen were recorded. A Motility in immunized and PBS control groups. B Percentage (%) in mouse body weight. C Bacterial load in survived mice post-challenge. Each data points represent mean ± standard deviation (sd) of 5 mice/group.