Literature DB >> 29976108

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced and TOF MR angiography for follow-up after low-profile stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Selcuk Akkaya1, Onur Akca2, Anıl Arat3, Ahmet Peker3, Sinan Balci4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-profile, self-expandable stents are used to treat wide-neck aneurysms located on the smaller distal intracranial arteries. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for follow-up after LEO Baby stent (LBS)-assisted coil embolization.
METHODS: Twenty-four aneurysms treated with LBS-assisted coil embolization were evaluated. Researchers reviewed TOF MRA and CE MRA images in terms of occlusion and stent patency. Aneurysm occlusion was graded according to Raymond-Roy classification as follows: total occlusion (grade 1), residual neck (grade 2), and residual aneurysm (grade 3). Stent patency was scored as follows: occlusion (1), stenosis (2), and normal (3). Interobserver and intermodality agreement values were determined by weighted kappa (κ) statistics.
RESULTS: Intermodality and interobserver values of TOF MRA and CE MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were perfect (κ = 1.00, p < 0.001) in terms of aneurysm occlusion. Rate of stent occlusion and stenosis in DSA, TOF, and MRA, respectively, were as follows: 0 and 12.5%, 16.6 and 70.8%, and 0 and 62.5%. Intermodality agreement values of TOF MRA and CE MRA with DSA were insignificant in terms of stent patency (κ = 0.065, p = 0.27; κ = 0.158, p = 0.15, respectively). Interobserver agreement was substantial in both TOF MRA (κ = 0.71, p < 0.001) and CE MRA (κ = 0.64, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both TOF and CE MRA techniques have strong concordance with DSA for the detection of aneurysm occlusion status. CE MRA can be used as a first-line noninvasive imaging modality due to its superiority to TOF MRA with respect to the visualization of in-stent signals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-profile stent; intracranial aneurysm; magnetic resonance angiography; neurointervention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29976108      PMCID: PMC6259350          DOI: 10.1177/1591019918785910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  28 in total

1.  The effectiveness of 3T time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up evaluations after the stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Won-Sang Cho; Sam Soo Kim; Seung Jin Lee; Sung Hun Kim
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Dual stenting using low-profile LEO baby stents for the endovascular management of challenging intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  I Akmangit; K Aydin; S Sencer; O M Topcuoglu; E D Topcuoglu; E Daglioglu; M Barburoglu; A Arat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms using Acandis Acclino stents.

Authors:  Friedhelm Brassel; Dominik Grieb; Dan Meila; Martin Schlunz-Hendann; Björn Greling; Katharina Melber
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.836

4.  Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  D Roy; G Milot; J Raymond
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.

Authors:  Jonathan Attali; Azzedine Benaissa; Sébastien Soize; Krzysztof Kadziolka; Christophe Portefaix; Laurent Pierot
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Naoaki Yamada; Katsuhiko Hayashi; Kenichi Murao; Masahiro Higashi; Koji Iihara
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  B Lubicz; M Levivier; N Sadeghi; P Emonts; D Balériaux
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.447

9.  Optimization of MR Parameters of 3D TOF-MRA for Various Intracranial Stents at 3.0T MRI.

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Hong Gee Roh; Won-Jin Moon; Young Il Chun; Chung Hwan Kang
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2011-08-31

10.  A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography Techniques for the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Stent-assisted Coil Embolization.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Thamburaj; Kevin Cockroft; Amit K Agarwal; Shyam Sabat; Paul Kalapos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-12-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Knowledge framework and emerging trends in intracranial aneurysm magnetic resonance angiography: a scientometric analysis from 2004 to 2020.

Authors:  Jiazhen Zheng; Rui Zhou; Bingyao Meng; Furong Li; Huamin Liu; Xianbo Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Usefulness of 3D T1-SPACE in Combination With 3D-TOF MRA for Follow-Up Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Pipeline Embolization Devices.

Authors:  Qiuji Shao; Qiaowei Wu; Qiang Li; Tianxiao Li; Li Li; Kaitao Chang; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Application of 3D T1-SPACE combined with 3D-TOF sequence for follow-up evaluation of stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysm.

Authors:  Qiuji Shao; Qiang Li; Qiaowei Wu; Tianxiao Li; Li Li; Kaitao Chang; Yingkun He
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2021-02-27

4.  The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters.

Authors:  Batur Halitcan; Sayin Bige; Balci Sinan; Akmangit Ilkay; Daglioglu Ergun; Alagoz Fatih; Arat Anil
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.