Literature DB >> 29975275

Outcomes of Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Autograft in Skeletally Immature Prepubescent Children.

Mininder S Kocher1, Benton E Heyworth1, Peter D Fabricant2, Frances A Tepolt1, Lyle J Micheli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are occurring in youth athletes with increasing frequency. Many ACL reconstruction procedures designed to allow for continued growth in patients with open physes have been described, but large series with mid- to long-term outcomes data are lacking. The purpose of the current study was to assess the clinical outcomes of a large cohort of prepubescent children who underwent a physeal-sparing, combined intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstruction with iliotibial (IT) band autograft over a 23-year period.
METHODS: Included in our analysis were 237 patients (240 knees) who underwent ACL reconstruction using IT band autograft at Tanner stage 1 or 2 (mean age of 11.2 ± 1.7 years). Physical examination data were analyzed for 225 of the 240 knees (mean follow-up, 25.8 months), and 137 (57%) of the knees had corresponding patient-reported clinical outcomes (patient-reported graft rupture and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee [Pedi-IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores; mean follow-up, 6.2 years). Rates of growth arrest, IT band graft-harvest morbidity, and return to sports were analyzed.
RESULTS: Physical examination revealed that 96.8% of the knees were grade A on the Lachman test and 98.8% were grade A on the pivot-shift test. Graft rupture occurred in 9 (6.6%) of 137 knees, at an average of 33.5 months (range, 8.2 months to 8.0 years) postoperatively. For patients who did not sustain a graft rupture, the mean Pedi-IKDC score was 93.3 ± 11.0, the mean Lysholm score was 93.4 ± 9.9, and the mean score on the Tegner activity scale was 7.8 (mode, 7). While lateral thigh asymmetry at the IT band harvest site was noted by 48% of the subjects, only 1.6% reported associated pain. No cases of limb-length discrepancy or angular deformity were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This procedure was associated with excellent functional outcomes, minimal risk of growth disturbance, and a low graft-rupture rate in skeletally immature prepubescent children. These results appear durable at mid- to long-term follow-up, at an average of >6 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975275     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  25 in total

1.  Iliotibial band autograft is a suitable alternative graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Thibaut Lucena; Marie Cavaignac; Vincent Marot; Louis Courtot; Christian Lutz; Emilie Bérard; Etienne Cavaignac
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction provides better knee laxity restoration but similar clinical outcomes to partial transphyseal and complete transphyseal approaches in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gherardo Pagliazzi; Marco Cuzzolin; Luca Pacchiarini; Marco Delcogliano; Giuseppe Filardo; Christian Candrian
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  [Management status of anterior cruciate ligament injury in children and adolescents].

Authors:  Jiang Wu; Wei Luo; Huifeng Zheng; Fuji Ren; Qian Zhao; Jingmin Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Femoral Physeal-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Iliotibial Band: Over-The-Top Technique.

Authors:  Felipe Galvão Abreu; Charles Pioger; Florent Franck; Benjamin Freychet; Thais D Vieira; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 5.  Which Metrics Are Being Used to Evaluate Children and Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Christopher M Brusalis; Jonathan M Schachne; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-22

6.  All-Inside Partial Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Plus an Associated Modified Lemaire Procedure Sutured to the Femoral Button.

Authors:  Manuel Leyes-Vence; Tomas Roca-Sanchez; Cesar Flores-Lozano; Gregorio Villarreal-Villareal
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-04-17

Review 7.  Comparing Outcomes Between the Over-the-Top and All-Epiphyseal Techniques for Physeal-Sparing ACL Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Stephanie E Wong; Brian T Feeley; Nirav K Pandya
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-28

Review 8.  Outcome Measures After ACL Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mette K Zebis; Susan Warming; Maria B Pedersen; Marie H Kraft; S Peter Magnusson; Martin Rathcke; Michael Krogsgaard; Simon Døssing; Tine Alkjær
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-30

9.  Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents with substantial remaining growth causes temporary growth arrest resulting in subclinical leg-length discrepancy.

Authors:  Ji Young Jeon; Jaehyung Lee; Michael Seungcheol Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Plasty in High-Risk Young Adolescents: Revisions, Subjective Evaluation, and the Role of Surgical Timing on Meniscal Preservation.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Luca Macchiarola; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Giacomo Dal Fabbro; Massimilano Mosca; Silvio Caravelli; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.