Literature DB >> 29975127

Sitting to standing postural changes: Energy expenditure and a possible mechanism to alleviate sedentary behavior.

M Wang1,2, Y Song1, J S Baker3, G Fekete4, Y Gu1,2.   

Abstract

Background and aims Sedentary lifestyles have recently been identified as potential mechanism for obesity and associated metabolic diseases linked to ill health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of standing and sitting-standing positional changes on energy cost and consequently interrupting sedentary sitting time while working. Methods A total of 26 healthy male volunteers performed normal typing and editing work for 100 min under three conditions. The conditions included sustained sitting, sustained standing, and sitting-standing alternation every 20 min using a sit-stand desk. Respiratory parameters measured included minute ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and energy expenditure (EE). Measurements were recorded using a calibrated Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. Results The mean value for VE was the highest in the standing position (VE = 13.33 ± 0.71), followed by sitting-standing alternation (VE = 12.04 ± 0.62). Both were significantly different from sitting (VE = 10.59 ± 0.69). The maximum VE and EE for standing (VE = 14.81 ± 0.43 and EE = 1.84 ± 0.10) and sitting-standing alternation (VE = 14.80 ± 0.40 and EE = 1.93 ± 0.08) were significantly higher than that of sitting (VE = 12.15 ± 0.42 and EE = 1.67 ± 0.07). No significant differences were observed in the mean VO2 among the three conditions. However, the maximum VO2 for both standing (VO2 = 5.40 ± 0.20) and sitting-standing alternation (VO2 = 5.14 ± 0.17) had shown to be significantly higher than sitting (VO2 = 4.50 ± 0.18). There were no significant differences observed in the mean EE levels between sitting (EE = 1.43 ± 0.07) and sitting-standing alternation (EE = 1.55 ± 0.08). However, the mean EE while standing (EE = 1.62 ± 0.09) significantly increased compared to sitting. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate that sitting-standing alternations may be implemented as an effective intervention to interrupt prolonged sitting while working.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy expenditure; expenditure; health benefits; sedentary behavior; sitting–standing alternation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975127     DOI: 10.1556/2060.105.2018.2.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Int        ISSN: 2498-602X            Impact factor:   2.090


  2 in total

1.  Cardiometabolic and neuromuscular analyses of the sit-to-stand transition to question its role in reducing sedentary patterns.

Authors:  Laurie Isacco; Philippe Gimenez; Gaël Ennequin; Laurent Mourot; Sidney Grosprêtre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Sedentary time and its association with risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Wu Jingjie; Lili Yang; Ye Jing; Lulu Ran; Xu Yiqing; Na Zhou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.