Shinya Morita1, Takatsugu Mizumachi2, Yuji Nakamaru2, Tomohiro Sakashita2, Satoshi Kano2, Kimiko Hoshino2, Atsushi Fukuda2, Keishi Fujiwara2, Akihiro Homma2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. shinyamorita@huhp.hokudai.ac.jp. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare survival differences between patients with external auditory canal (EAC) cancer treated according to the University of Pittsburgh modified TNM staging system and those treated in accordance with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual on the TNM staging system for cutaneous cancers of the head and neck. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-institution review of 60 patients with EAC cancer treated with curative intent between September 2002 and March 2018. Survival outcomes were measured on the basis of the two staging systems. RESULTS: The C-index values for the overall survival (OS) rate revealed that the University of Pittsburgh staging system had higher prognostic accuracy than the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system. Univariable and multivariable analysis showed that T classification according to the University of Pittsburgh staging system was an independent predictor of the OS rate (hazard ratio 5.25; 95% confidence interval 1.38-24.9; P = 0.015). Meanwhile, the AJCC staging system could not differentiate T2 from T3-4 cancers. CONCLUSION: The University of Pittsburgh staging system for patients with EAC cancer is a valuable tool for use in clinical decision-making and predicting survival outcome.
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare survival differences between patients with external auditory canal (EAC) cancer treated according to the University of Pittsburgh modified TNM staging system and those treated in accordance with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual on the TNM staging system for cutaneous cancers of the head and neck. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-institution review of 60 patients with EAC cancer treated with curative intent between September 2002 and March 2018. Survival outcomes were measured on the basis of the two staging systems. RESULTS: The C-index values for the overall survival (OS) rate revealed that the University of Pittsburgh staging system had higher prognostic accuracy than the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system. Univariable and multivariable analysis showed that T classification according to the University of Pittsburgh staging system was an independent predictor of the OS rate (hazard ratio 5.25; 95% confidence interval 1.38-24.9; P = 0.015). Meanwhile, the AJCC staging system could not differentiate T2 from T3-4 cancers. CONCLUSION: The University of Pittsburgh staging system for patients with EAC cancer is a valuable tool for use in clinical decision-making and predicting survival outcome.
Entities:
Keywords:
AJCC; Eighth edition; External auditory canal cancer; TNM classification; The University of Pittsburgh staging system
Authors: L Pfreundner; K Schwager; J Willner; K Baier; K Bratengeier; F X Brunner; M Flentje Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Friedrich Ihler; Mario Koopmann; Bernhard G Weiss; Leif Hendrik Dröge; Martin Durisin; Hans Christiansen; Daniel Weiß; Martin Canis; Hendrik A Wolff Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Cara L Lachtrupp; Anne Marie Valente; Michelle Gurvitz; Michael J Landzberg; Sarah B Brainard; Fred M Wu; Dorothy D Pearson; Keith Taillie; Alexander R Opotowsky Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-09-06 Impact factor: 5.501