| Literature DB >> 29974072 |
Xiaoli Huang1, Björn Borgström2, John Stegmayr1,3, Yasmin Abassi4, Monika Kruszyk2, Hakon Leffler3, Lo Persson5, Sebastian Albinsson5, Ramin Massoumi4, Ivan G Scheblykin6, Cecilia Hegardt7, Stina Oredsson1, Daniel Strand2.
Abstract
Tumors are phenotypically heterogeneous and include subpopulations of cancer cells with stemlike properties. The natural product salinomycin, a K+-selective ionophore, was recently found to exert selectivity against such cancer stem cells. This selective effect is thought to be due to inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway, but the mechanistic basis remains unclear. Here, we develop a functionally competent fluorescent conjugate of salinomycin to investigate the molecular mechanism of this compound. By subcellular imaging, we demonstrate a rapid cellular uptake of the conjugate and accumulation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This localization is connected to induction of Ca2+ release from the ER into the cytosol. Depletion of Ca2+ from the ER induces the unfolded protein response as shown by global mRNA analysis and Western blot analysis of proteins in the pathway. In particular, salinomycin-induced ER Ca2+ depletion up-regulates C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), which inhibits Wnt signaling by down-regulating β-catenin. The increased cytosolic Ca2+ also activates protein kinase C, which has been shown to inhibit Wnt signaling. These results reveal that salinomycin acts in the ER membrane of breast cancer cells to cause enhanced Ca2+ release into the cytosol, presumably by mediating a counter-flux of K+ ions. The clarified mechanistic picture highlights the importance of ion fluxes in the ER as an entry to inducing phenotypic effects and should facilitate rational development of cancer treatments.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29974072 PMCID: PMC6026786 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Cent Sci ISSN: 2374-7943 Impact factor: 14.553
Figure 1Design and synthesis of the fluorescent salinomycin NBD conjugates 6 and 7. brsm = based on recovered starting material.
Figure 2Biological activity of conjugates 6 and 7. (A) Dose response curves and IC50 (mean ± SE, n = 3) of conjugates 6 (black) and 7 (gray) in JIMT-1 cells obtained using an MTT-based assay. (B) Wnt/β-catenin luciferase reporter assay in Leading Light Wnt reporter cells. Columns show mean ± SE (n = 8). DMSO control = 100%. Cells were treated for 24 h. Firefly luciferase levels were normalized to Renilla luciferase levels. (C) Wnt/β-catenin luciferase reporter assay in JIMT-1 cells transfected with TOPFlash and Renilla plasmids. Cells were treated for 24 h. Columns show mean ± SE (n = 3). DMSO control = 100%. Firefly luciferase levels were normalized to Renilla luciferase levels. (D) Colony-forming efficiency (CFE) of JIMT-1 cells following treatment with conjugate 6 at IC50 (0.36 μM) for 72 h. Reported as percentage of colonies formed compared to DMSO control. Columns show mean ± SE (n = 3). (E) Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in JIMT-1 cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations for 72 h. Representative Western blots (n ≥ 3) used for densitometric scanning. SA, salinomycin (1). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
Figure 3Cellular uptake and spectroscopic properties of conjugates. (A) Fluorescence microscopy experimental setup. (B) Fluorescence decay of conjugate 6 in various environments: ⟨τ⟩amp: cell = 2.7 ns; buffer = 1.2 ns; DMSO = 1.6 ns. (C) Representative data for real-time accumulation of conjugates 6 (black) and 7 (gray) (20 μM in HBSS with 2% DMSO) in individual JIMT-1 cells as monitored by fluorescence intensity. Fluorescence intensity flashes originating from aggregates of 7 during image capture (seen as gaps in the curve) were removed for clarity. (D) Fluorescence images of representative individual cells recorded during real-time accumulation experiments of conjugate 6 and 7. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 4Imaging of fluorescent conjugate 6 in three breast cancer cell lines. Confocal and epifluorescence microscopy was carried out on JIMT-1, MCF-7, and HCC1937 cell lines. (A) Colocalization with ER-Tracker Red. Colocalization shown in orange/yellow. (B) Colocalization with Nile Red in LDs. The cells were incubated with Nile Red and images captured. The Nile Red was then bleached until no fluorescence was observed. Compound 6 was added to the medium of the cells, and images were captured ∼10 min after the imaging of Nile Red. (C, D) Absence of colocalization with Rhodamine 123 in mitochondria. The cells were incubated with Rhodamine 123, and images were captured. The Rhodamine 123 was then bleached until no fluorescence was observed. Compound 6 was added to the medium of the cells, and images were captured ∼10 min after imaging of Rhodamine 123. Panels C and D show maximum intensity projections and single optical planes, respectively. All images in panels A–D were obtained with a laser scanning confocal microscope. Scale bars = 10 μm. (E) DIC and fluorescence images of conjugate 6 in the three breast cancer cell lines were obtained with an epifluorescence microscope. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 5Salinomycin treatment increases cytosolic Ca2+ and induces ER stress. (A) Acute salinomycin treatment induced Ca2+ release from ER. JIMT-1 cells were labeled with Fluo-4 AM and imaged with confocal microscopy. Salinomycin or salinomycin methyl ester 2 was added at a 2 μM concentration in Ca2+-containing or Ca2+-free medium. Ca2+ release channels in the ER membrane were blocked with 100 μM ryanodine and 50 μM 2-APB before the addition of salinomycin. Data shown are mean ± SE (n = 4). (B) Salinomycin or salinomycin 20-ethyl carbonate 3 treatment increased cytosolic Ca2+. After 72 h of treatment at indicated concentrations, cells were stained with Fluo-3 AM and analyzed with flow cytometry. The relative fluorescence intensity representing the Ca2+ level in the cytosol was calculated. Data shown are mean ± SE (n = 4). (C) Increased PKC activity in cells treated with 0.5 μM salinomycin for 72 h. Data shown are mean ± SE (n ≥ 4). (D) Supervised hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes in JIMT-1 cells treated with 50 nM salinomycin or salinomycin 20-ethyl carbonate 3 for 72 h (n = 6). SAM analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes between the groups. Genes with q-value ≤1 and an absolute fold change ≥2 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed. Red represents relative up-regulation, and green represents relative down-regulation. (E) Top significantly enriched biological processes up-regulated in carbonate 3-treated cells. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using the AmiGO database. (F) Activation of the ATF6α pathway by salinomycin or inactive salinomycin methyl ester 2 treatment in JIMT-1 and MCF-7 cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations for 72 h. Representative Western blots (n = 4) used for densitometric scanning showing the expression of UPR-related proteins. SA, salinomycin (1). (G) CHOP-siRNA-treated JIMT-1 cells reduce the level of active β-catenin upon salinomycin treatment. Cells were transfected with CHOP-siRNA and scramble siRNA for 72 h, followed by treatment with salinomycin (5 μM) for 72 h. Representative Western blots (n ≥ 4) used for densitometric scanning showing the expression of active β-catenin and CHOP. SA, salinomycin (1). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism for Wnt/β-catenin inhibition by salinomycin.