Yajie Yang1, Muhammad Faheem1, Lili Wang1, Qinghao Meng1, Haoyan Sha2, Nan Yang3, Ye Yuan1, Guangshan Zhu1. 1. Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, P. R. China. 2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States. 3. China Faw New Energy Vehicle Branch, Changchun 130011, P. R. China.
Abstract
Ammonia (NH3) is a commonly used industrial gas, but its corrosiveness and toxicity are hazardous to human health. Although many adsorbents have been investigated for NH3 sorption, limited ammonia uptake remains an urgent issue yet to be solved. In this article, a series of multivariate covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are explored which are densely functionalized with various active groups, such as -N-H, -C=O, and carboxyl group. Then, a metal ion (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+) is integrated into the carboxylated structure achieving the first case of an open metal site in COF architecture. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals conclusive evidence for the multiple binding interactions with ammonia in the modified COF materials. Infrared spectroscopy indicates a general trend of binding capability from weak to strong along with -N-H, -C=O, carboxyl group, and metal ion. Through the synergistic multivariate and open metal site, the COF materials show excellent adsorption capacities (14.3 and 19.8 mmol g-1 at 298 and 283 K, respectively) and isosteric heat (Qst) of 91.2 kJ mol-1 for ammonia molecules. This novel approach enables the development of tailor-made porous materials with tunable pore-engineered surface for ammonia uptake.
Ammonia (NH3) is a commonly used industrial gas, but its corrosiveness and toxicity are hazardous to human health. Although many adsorbents have been investigated for NH3 sorption, limited ammonia uptake remains an urgent issue yet to be solved. In this article, a series of multivariate covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are explored which are densely functionalized with various active groups, such as -N-H, -C=O, and carboxyl group. Then, a metal ion (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+) is integrated into the carboxylated structure achieving the first case of an open metal site in COF architecture. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals conclusive evidence for the multiple binding interactions with ammonia in the modified COF materials. Infrared spectroscopy indicates a general trend of binding capability from weak to strong along with -N-H, -C=O, carboxyl group, and metal ion. Through the synergistic multivariate and open metal site, the COF materials show excellent adsorption capacities (14.3 and 19.8 mmol g-1 at 298 and 283 K, respectively) and isosteric heat (Qst) of 91.2 kJ mol-1 for ammonia molecules. This novel approach enables the development of tailor-made porous materials with tunable pore-engineered surface for ammonia uptake.
Industrial development
has led to a great demand for ammonia as
a chief raw material, with annual production exceeding 200 million
tons.[1] However, its strong causticity and
toxicity give rise to the identification of threats from industrial
emissions and spills, which can cause convulsions, coma, and death
to all vertebrates.[2] To eliminate such
hazards, engineered materials that can adsorb large amounts of ammonia
are desperately needed. Although numerous adsorbents, such as activated
carbons, zeolites, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), have
shown potential for applications in NH3 sorption, the progressive
performance of ammonia uptake remains a challenging issue.[3−7] To address this objective, two qualities are considered as vital
ingredients for an efficient adsorbent:[8] (1) a highly porous framework consisting of unique microsized pores
that can increase the physical adsorption of ammonia; and (2) effective
functional groups in the porous structure that can interact with ammonia
and favor chemical adsorption.Covalent organic frameworks (COFs)
are an emerging class of crystalline
porous materials that are composed of light elements (e.g., H, B,
C, N, O) via covalent bonds.[9−15] Using state-of-the-art molecular design, COF-based structures can
exhibit a large surface area, unique porosity, high crystallinity,
and tunable pore chemistry, with promising applications in the fields
of catalysis, sensing, optoelectricity, and gas adsorption and separation.[16−20] Therefore, one can create tailor-made binding sites through suitable
selection of building block or modification strategies for target
functions. Desirable properties, including extensive pore surface
area and tunable surface chemistry, attract great interest for the
development of novel COF-based adsorbents for NH3 sorption.Herein, we present a series of multivariate COF materials to integrate
various binding groups into the porous network for surface pore engineering.
A three-component system comprising pan class="Chemical">triformylphloroglucinol (TFP),
2,5-diaminobenzoic acid (DAA), and p-phenylenediamine
(PA-1) at different molar ratios (X = [DAA]/([DAA]
+ [PA – 1]) × 100 = 0, 17, 33, 50, and 100) is explored
to prepare [HOOC]-COFs (X = 0, 17, 33, 50, and 100), as shown in Figure . The [HOOC]17-COF, with its remarkable
NH3 adsorption capacity, was then poured into the chloride
salt to anchor Lewis centers (Ca2+, Mn2+, and
Sr2+) onto the pore surface. The metallized COF product
first obtains the open metal site to enhance the chemical adsorption
affinity for NH3 molecules by forming acidic–basic
adducts. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and infrared (IR)
spectroscopy provided solid evidence of the multiple interactions
with ammonia, including the formation of hydrogen bonds with —N—H
and —C=O and acidic–basic adducts with carboxyl
group and metal ions. Due to the synergistic effect of multivariate
components and open metal site, the COF materials exhibited considerable
total adsorption capacities for ammonia realized via multiple binding
interactions.
Figure 1
(a) Scheme for surface pore engineering of COFs with various
groups
and (b) possible pore structure of COFs with various groups (gray,
C; blue, N; red, O; yellow, metal).
(a) Scheme for surface pore engineering of COFs with various
groups
and (b) possible pore structure of COFs with various groups (gray,
C; blue, N; red, O; yellow, metal).
Results and Discussion
In this context, we
use TpPa-1 ([pan class="Chemical">HOOC]0-COF) material
as a scaffold[21,22] which features a well-defined
hexagonal structure with space group (P6/m), high BET surface area of 713 m2 g–1, and unique pore size distribution (PSD) centered at 1.50 nm calculated
by the nonlocal–density functional theory (NL–DFT) method.
Two particularly salient features of [HOOC]0-COF suggest
that it will be an excellent scaffold for the development of novel
ammonia adsorbents. (1) The unique microchannel in the porous skeleton
favors physical adsorption of ammonia via van der Waals force.[21] (2) Diverse fragments, including —N—H
and —C=O group, can serve as proton-donating or proton-accepting
groups for hydrogen-bonding interactions, which can significantly
enhance the affinity to ammonia.[23−26] As illustrated in Figure and Figure S1, [HOOC]0-COF shows a meaningful NH3 (2.56 Å) capacity of 6.85 and 9.23 mmol g–1 at 298 and 283 K, respectively. The isosteric heat of NH3 adsorption based on the Clausius–Clapeyron relation is determined
to be 43.5 kJ mol–1 from independent fits to the
283 and 298 K isotherms.
Figure 2
NH3 adsorption (solid symbols) and
desorption (open
symbols) at 1 bar and 298 K for activated samples of [HOOC]0-COF (a), [HOOC]17-COF (b), [HOOC]33-COF (c),
[HOOC]50-COF (d), [HOOC]100-COF (e), [CaOOC]17-COF (f), [MnOOC]17-COF (g), and [SrOOC]17-COF (h).
NH3 adsorption (solid symbols) and
desorption (open
symbols) at 1 bar and 298 K for activated samples of [HOOC]0-COF (a), [HOOC]17-COF (b), [HOOC]33-COF (c),
[HOOC]50-COF (d), [HOOC]100-COF (e), [CaOOC]17-COF (f), [MnOOC]17-COF (g), and [SrOOC]17-COF (h).Compared with [HOOC]0-COF, the carboxyl group is introduced
into the porous skeleton to produce the multivariate COFs by use of
different ratios of linkers. The presence of the carboxyl group in
[HOOC]-COFs was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy.
As shown in Figure S2, the consumption
of starting materials can be observed from the appearance of —N—H
bending at 1520 cm–1 and —C=O stretching
at 1625 cm–1 in the COF skeleton. The main bands
at 989 and 1657 cm–1 are assigned to the plane bending
vibration of —O—H and stretching vibration of —C=O
in the carboxyl group, respectively. CHN elemental analysis reveals
the contents of the carboxyl group in [HOOC]-COFs (X = 0, 17, 33, 50, and 100), with the
measured result in concert with theoretical calculations (Table S1). The architectural stability is manifested
by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, with no weight loss found for
each COF until decomposition at 250 °C (Figure S3). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns show the same
ordered structure as that found for TpPa-1, but the crystallinity
of [HOOC]-COF (X = 0,
17, 33, 50, and 100) decreases for increasing X,
as shown in Figure S4. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images show that [HOOC]-COFs (X = 0, 17, 33, 50, and 100) are crystallized
as microsized (1–5 μm) aggregated particles (Figure S5). The transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) images show that some of the COF samples exhibit a sheetlike
structure due to π–π stacking of the COF layers
(Figure S6).The porosity of the
COFs was measured by N2 adsorption
isotherms for the fully activated samples. The surface areas for the
[HOOC]-COFs with carboxyl group content
(X) varying from 0 to 17, 33, 50, and 100 was calculated
by the BET model to be 713, 652, 458, 279, and 150 m2 g–1, respectively (Figure S7). This descending trend in the surface area is due to the electron
withdrawing efficiency of the carboxyl group, which reduces the activity
of the coupling reaction during the polymerization process leading
to ruptures in the integration of the COF structure.[27,28] The pore sizes varied from 1.50 to 1.48, 1.44, 1.11, and 0.97 nm
as the amount of carboxyl group increased from 0 to 17, 33, 50, and
100, respectively (Figure S7).[HOOC]-COFs with X values of 17,
33, 50, and 100 showed an NH3 capacity
of 9.34, 8.21, 6.67, and 4.14 mmol g–1, respectively,
at 298 K and 1 bar (Figure ). These decreased NH3 uptakes are attributed to
the reduced porous surfaces and lack of long-range order in the [HOOC]-COFs. The [HOOC]17-COF was selected
for further investigations despite having a lower surface area (652
m2 g–1) compared to [HOOC]0-COF (713 m2 g–1); we believe this COF
should show a strong attractive interaction between the carboxyl group
(−COOH) and NH3 molecule,[8,29] this
hypothesis is confirmed by the enhanced isosteric heat of NH3 adsorption (55.3 kJ mol–1) measured at 298 and
283 K (Figure S8). Therefore, this result
clearly demonstrates the vital role of the additional functional group
(−COOH) in the COF pore surface.The [HOOC]17-COF with the best pan class="Chemical">NH3 uptake
is selected as a subject for further surface engineering to improve
the performance. Previous studies reported that Lewis centers, such
as Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+ ions on the
surface of a porous framework, may create a strong affinity for NH3 molecules.[3−8] Therefore, respective metal ions are incorporated into the [HOOC]17-COF architecture to achieve the open metal site for a larger
storage capacity by chemical adsorption. After immersing into each
chloride salt solution, a series of [MOOC]17-COF materials
were obtained: [CaOOC]17-COF, [MnOOC]17-COF,
and [SrOOC]17-COF. Infrared spectroscopy (Figure S2) for these materials presents weak bands in the
scope of 502–585 and 444–472 cm–1,
which are ascribed to the stretching vibrations of M—O and
M—N, respectively.[30] The existence
of —O—H signal at 989 cm–1 and a reduced
intensity for the —C=O band in the carboxyl group (1657
cm–1) of [MOOC]17-COFs suggest the coordination
of —C=O and —N—H groups to the metal ion
(Figure ). Based on
energy minimization optimization calculated by the Materials Studio
(MS) simulation, two O (from —C=O of —COOH and
COF skeleton) and one N (from —N—H) atoms coordinate
to one metal ion in the [MOOC]17-COF framework to form
a stabilized double six-membered ring structure (Figure ), which is consistent with
the conclusion of a previous investigation.[31]
Elemental analysis reveals the almost equal content of metal
ion
and —COOH group in [MOOC]17-COFs (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+), which is consistent with
the result of the theoretical model (Table S1). The weight losses of 2.7%, 7.3%, and 4.5% before 100 °C are
ascribed to the loss of guest molecules (Figure S3). After heating samples up to 800 °C, ca. 3.2%, 4.8%,
and 5.9% of residues remain corresponding to the [MOOC]17-COFs (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+), which
is in agreement with the results of the elemental analysis. PXRD patterns
reveal that the [MOOC]17-COFs (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+) retain the same crystallinity as the
[HOOC]17-COF even after metal ion incorporation (Figure S4). As shown in Figure S5, SEM images for the [MOOC]17-COF (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+) also show aggregated particles.
The metal ions are uniformly dispersed in the COF structure, as indicated
by no metallic nanoparticles visible in the TEM images (Figure S6). The BET surface areas are determined
to be 629, 614, and 587 m2 g–1 for [CaOOC]17-COF, [MnOOC]17-COF, and [SrOOC]17-COF,
respectively (Figure S9). This explicit
decrease in area results from the molecular weight being scaled up
along with incorporation of the Ca2+, Mn2+,
and Sr2+ ions.Upon introduction of the Ca2+, pan class="Chemical">Mn2+, or Sr2+ ions onto the pore surface,
the resulting [MOOC]17-COFs with open metal sites present
higher sorption amounts (at 298
K) of 12.25, 11.38, and 14.30 mmol g–1, respectively.
The strong affinity of open metal site is also demonstrated by the
sharp increase of uptake capacity at low pressure range (Figure S10). Likewise, after the desorption processes,
the three COF materials exhibit a hysteresis terminating with uptakes
of 1.53, 0.85, and 1.99 mmol g–1 for [CaOOC]0-COF, [MnOOC]17-COF, and [SrOOC]17-COF,
respectively. After calculation, we speculate that each Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+ ion can uphold 2.01, 1.69,
and 2.65 NH3 molecules, respectively. The Sr2+ ion possesses the highest uptake capability because of its specific
electronic structure, which favors formation of a multiple (a maximum
of 6) coordinated complex with NH3 molecules.[32−35] After interaction with NH3 molecules, the tricoordinated
Sr2+ ion in the double six-membered ring structure can
combine with three more ammonia molecules to reach its maximum coordination
structure, which is basically identical to the experimental result
of 2.65 NH3 molecules.
[SrOOC]17-COF possesses
an ultrahigh capacity of 19.8
mmol g–1 at 283 K and 1 bar (Figure S11). After introduction of the pan class="Chemical">Sr2+ ion,
the [SrOOC]17-COF shows a significant improvement in the
isosteric heat for NH3 gas (91.2 kJ mol–1). [SrOOC]17-COF reveals a decent capacity (10.92 mmol
g–1) after three consecutive adsorption/desorption
cycles (Figure S12). Such a decrease in
NH3 uptake is due to strong acid–base interactions
that unite for a certain amount of ammonia in the framework, limiting
desorption under vacuum conditions. The TGA result indicates that
[SrOOC]17-COF will desorb ammonia molecules at ∼150
°C (Figure S13) while retaining its
crystalline structure for cycle use. The bound ammonia calculated
from ca. 3.4% weight loss among 120–170 °C in the TGA
curve also agrees with the sorption calculation that each Sr2+ ion can uphold 2.73 NH3 molecules. After heated at 200
°C under vacuum for 12 h, [SrOOC]17-COF would release
the bound ammonia molecules and reabsorb ca. 14.12 mmol g–1 NH3 molecules (Figure S14).
The capacity decreased by only 7% after five cycles indicating that
[SrOOC]17-COF exhibits good reusability (Figure S15). The large adsorption capacity of [SrOOC]17-COF (∼14.30 mmol g–1 at 298 K)
is much higher than those of most other adsorbents such as MCM-41
(7.9 mmol g–1), 13X zeolite (9.0 mmol g–1), Amberlyst 15 (11.0 mmol g–1), Co2Cl2(BTDD)(H2O)2 (12.0 mmol g–1), Ni2Cl2(BTDD)(H2O)2 (12.0 mmol g–1), and PPN-6-SO3H (12.1 mmol g–1) and is close to the highest
level of ammonia adsorbents, including Mn2Cl2(BTDD)-(H2O)2 (15.5 mmol g–1), BPP-5 (17.7 mmol g–1), and Cu2Cl2BBTA (19.79 mmol g–1).[3−8,10]
Usually, the absorptivity
of a porous material is related to the
surface area and pore volume; however, none of these correlations
hold in our comparative investigations. For comparison, the classical
porous aromatic framework (PAF-1) with ultrahigh surface area (4240
m2 g–1 based on a BET model) and uniform
pore channel (1.41 nm) was demonstrated to contrast the impacts of
porosity and aromatic rings.[36] With similar
pore size but larger surface area, PAF-1 exhibits ∼0.2 mmol
g–1 capacity at 298 K.[8] It is evident that the adsorption capability of COF materials in
this work is highly dependent on the synergistic effect of multivariate
components and open metal site. XPS study affords a surface analytical
technique that can be used to accurately determine the chemical state
of each element. [HOOC]0-COF, [HOOC]17-COF,
and [SrOOC]17-COF samples for XPS were prepared by first
heating to 473 K for 24 h under vacuum, followed by exposure of the
activated COFs to a dry NH3 environment for 72 h at 283
K (Figure ).
Figure 3
XPS spectra
for [HOOC]0-COF (a, b), [HOOC]17-COF (c, d),
and [SrOOC]17-COF (e–g). Black curves
represent activated samples, and red curves represent exhausted samples
following interaction with NH3.
XPS spectra
for [HOOC]0-COF (a, b), [HOOC]17-COF (c, d),
and [SrOOC]17-COF (e–g). Black curves
represent activated samples, and red curves represent exhausted samples
following interaction with NH3.As illustrated in Figure , ammonia with a pan class="Chemical">nitrogen 1s binding energy of 397.9
eV could
not be isolated possibly because of the weak signal of gas molecules.[37] The binding energies for N 1s and O 1s in the
[HOOC]0-COF center are at 400.0 and 532.3 eV, respectively
(Figure a,b). After
NH3 (∼397.9 eV) gas adsorption, these binding energies
change to ca. 399.6 eV for N 1s and 532.0 eV for O 1s, which manifests
the barely exposed H nuclei in NH3 via the hydrogen bond
that pulls the electron cloud of the donor atom (N and O) of the framework
resulting in a decrease of the binding energies.[38,39] In [HOOC]17-COF (Figure c), N 1s photoemission in the activated sample occurs
at 400.0 eV and is decreased to 399.6 eV after exposure to an NH3 environment due to the formation of hydrogen bonds. A shoulder
peak for N 1s is located at 401.0 eV due to protonation of NH3, which can be used to identify the formation of the ammonium
(NH4+) salt.[40] The
reducing binding energies at 513.5 and 533.2 eV can be ascribed to
the O atoms in —C=O and —COOH, respectively (Figure d). The high-resolution
O 1s spectrum observed at 532.3 eV is resolved into two characteristic
peaks for —C=O in H bond and —COO– in the ammonium salt. For [SrOOC]17-COF (Figure e), the N 1s peak component
at 400.0 eV is shifted by −0.4 eV compared to the reacted N
atom, which is clearly evident of hydrogen bond formation, with protonation
of NH3 also shown at 400.8 eV because of the formation
of the ammonium salt. Coordination of the O atom to the Sr2+ ion is demonstrated by the lower shifted peak (530.9 eV) for —C=O
and the weakened intensity (533.2 eV) for the —COOH (Figure f). The N 1s and
O 1s changes for [SrOOC]17-COF in XPS spectra agree with
the formation of the stabilized double six-membered ring structure.
As for the exhausted [SrOOC]17-COF, the strong signal observed
at 532.3 eV fits perfectly with the two characteristic peaks corresponding
to —C=O in H bond and —COO– in the ammonium salt. It is evident from the data shown in Figure g that a coordinated
structure for Sr2+ with ligand atoms is formed, as the
binding energy of Sr 3d reducing from 134.5 eV (SrCl2)[41] to 134.2 eV ([SrOOC]17-COF). This
energy shift is due to capable elements clinging to the Sr2+ surface, and withdrawal of the electron cloud from the Sr atom to
the coordinated O and N atoms themselves, leading to an enhanced shielding
effect that decreases the binding energy.[42−44] After the coordination
of NH3 to Sr2+ ion, the electron cloud of the
Sr atom is pulled further toward the N atoms, resulting in a decrease
in the binding energy for the Sr atom (133.7 eV) in the NH3-adsorbed [SrOOC]17-COF.
The effect of each group
is assessed by IR spectroscopy at different
temperatures to qualitatively indicate the affinity (Figure ). After adsorption of NH3 molecules, the respective COF samples were heated from 283
K, with the temperature increased in 10 degree steps and constant
holding of the temperature for 10 min before further heating. The
effect of temperature for the exhausted sample was monitored by an
infrared detector until the temperature reached 423 K.
Figure 4
NH3 adsorption
against different temperatures at 1 bar
for activated samples of [HOOC]0-COF (a), [HOOC]17-COF (b), and [SrOOC]17-COF (c).
NH3 adsorption
against different temperatures at 1 bar
for activated samples of [HOOC]0-COF (a), [HOOC]17-COF (b), and [SrOOC]17-COF (c).From the IR spectroscopy, several features are observed as
the
exhausted sample desorbs NH3 from the framework at different
temperatures. Here, the —C—N bond (1255 cm–1) is selected as the internal standard; variation in peak intensity
is confirmed based on the ratio of the intensity of the characteristic
bond to the —C—N. As observed in Figure a, the value (relative intensity for the
—N—H bond compared to the —C—N bond) increases
from 1.0 in the original [HOOC]0-COF to ca. 1.2 for the
adsorbed-ammoniaCOF material (283 K), which indicates interaction
between the —N—H group and ammonia molecule.[45] Moreover, the ratio changes back to a value
of 1.0 after the sample is heated up to 303 K. The data show a wide
band (1630 cm–1) for —C=O in the [HOOC]0-COF structure; following adsorption of ammonia at 283 K,
the location of the maximum for the —C=O band toward
lower wavenumber (1614 cm–1) can be attributed to
the formation of hydrogen bonds. With increasing temperature to 323
K, desorption of ammonia leads to reversion of the band position back
to 1630 cm–1. Similarly, we utilize the FT-IR spectra
to probe the interactions between [HOOC]17-COF and the
ammonia adsorbate before and after adsorption (Figure b). In addition to the two characteristics
for [HOOC]0-COF, a new feature at 1430 cm–1 is observed for [HOOC]17-COF exposed to ammonia, which
can be assigned to the vibration of —N—H in NH4+.[46,47] This observation suggests that
a fraction of the ammonia molecules are converted into the ionic form
via the acid–base reaction with the carboxylic group. This
band disappeared at 363 K, indicating the removal of ammonia. As to
the [SrOOC]17-COF (Figure c), another band at 1496 cm–1 is
ascribed to the existence of a scissoring mode for the amide species,
—NH2, which is formed from the coordination of the
Sr2+ ion and ammonia.[48,49] The relative
intensity of the —NH2 bond decreases gradually from
393 K and ultimately disappears at 423 K. One can speculate that the
binding capability of —N—H, —C=O, carboxyl
group, and metal ion trends from weak to strong.
Conclusions
In summary, surface pore engineering of COF materials is explored
via the incorporation of various functional units on pore walls. Due
to the synergistic multivariate and open metal site, the porous architecture
profoundly enhances the binding affinity for ammonia molecules. Notably,
the role and tendency of the —N—H, —C=O,
—COOH, and metal ions in interactions with ammonia can guide
the functionalization of other porous materials for separation and
adsorption of ammonia. Additionally, we expect our approach based
on the “surface pore engineering” will motivate research
on utilizing COF materials in other fields, with further progress
eventually leading to industrial applications.
Experimental
Section
Synthesis of [HOOC]-COFs
2,5-Diaminobenzoic acid (DAA) and p-phenylenediamine
(PA-1) were added into a solution of triformylphloroglucinol (TFP)
(63 mg, 0.3 mmol), mesitylene (1.5 mL), dioxane (1.5 mL), and 3 M
aqueous acetic acid (0.5 mL). Molar ratios for DAA and PA-1 of 0:6,
1:5, 2:4, 3:3, and 6:0 in total amount of 0.9 mmol were used to produce
[HOOC]0-COF, [HOOC]17-COF, [HOOC]33-COF, [HOOC]50-COF, and [HOOC]100-COF, respectively.
The mixture was then frozen by using a liquid N2 bath (77
K) and degassed via three freeze–pump–thaw cycles. After
heating at 120 °C for 3 days, the precipitate was collected by
filtration and washed with copious amounts of anhydrous dimethylacetamide
(DMAC) and acetone. Finally, the resulting red powder was dried under
vacuum at 180 °C for 24 h yielding a series of [HOOC]-COF samples.
Preparation of [MOOC]17-COFs
A 0.100 g portion
of activated [HOOC]17-COF with the −COOH group (0.65
mmol g–1) was poured into a chloride salt (CaCl2, MnCl2, and SrCl2) aqueous solution
(15.6 mmol L–1, 5 mL), respectively. After the solution
was stirred for 24 h, the insoluble product was filtered out. Then,
the precipitate was thoroughly washed with water three times to afford
[MOOC]17-COFs (Ca2+, Mn2+, and Sr2+).
NH3 Release Experiment against
Temperature
[HOOC]0-COF, [HOOC]17-COF,
and [SrOOC]17-COF were heated under vacuum to approximately
473 K for
12 h and then cooled to room temperature. Next, the activated COFs
were exposed to a dry NH3 environment for 24 h at 283 K.
The respective COF samples were then heated to 283 K, with the temperature
increased 10 degrees at a time and held constant for 10 min at each
step before further heating. The effect of temperature for the exhausted
sample was monitored by an infrared detector until the temperature
reached 423 K.General experiments for the complete physical
characterization of all as-synthesized COF materials are available
in the Supporting Information.No
unexpected or unusually high safety hazards were encountered.
Authors: Christian J Doonan; David J Tranchemontagne; T Grant Glover; Joseph R Hunt; Omar M Yaghi Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Xinchen Wang; Kazuhiko Maeda; Arne Thomas; Kazuhiro Takanabe; Gang Xin; Johan M Carlsson; Kazunari Domen; Markus Antonietti Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2008-11-09 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Jeffrey F Van Humbeck; Thomas M McDonald; Xiaofei Jing; Brian M Wiers; Guangshan Zhu; Jeffrey R Long Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: N Scott Bobbitt; Matthew L Mendonca; Ashlee J Howarth; Timur Islamoglu; Joseph T Hupp; Omar K Farha; Randall Q Snurr Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Qi Sun; Briana Aguila; Lyndsey D Earl; Carter W Abney; Lukasz Wojtas; Praveen K Thallapally; Shengqian Ma Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 30.849