Literature DB >> 29973915

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in University Rugby Football Players.

Shinsuke Nirengi1, Mami Fujibayashi2, Sachiko Furuno3, Akihiko Uchibe2, Yasuharu Kawase2, Shin Sukino1, Yaeko Kawaguchi1, Satomi Minato1,4, Kazuhiko Kotani1,5, Naoki Sakane1.   

Abstract

Physical activity improves various metabolic disturbances. The effect of physical activity on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has not been defined, particularly in athletes who are able to consume a diet to increase body mass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of NAFLD and associated factors of NAFLD among male university rugby football players [n = 69, 37 forwards (FW) and 32 backs (BK)], relative to age-matched controls (CON; n = 29). For FW players exercise consists of physical contact play, such as ruck, mall, scrum, and tackle. For BK players exercise consists of sprints and endurance running. Liver function tests and bioimpedance analysis to assess body composition were performed. Subjects consuming ≤ 20 g/day of ethanol and exhibiting an aspartate transaminase (AST) level ≥ 33 U/L, and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) level ≥ 43 U/L, were considered to have NAFLD. The PNPLA3 and MTP genotypes were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The body mass index, body fat mass, and lean body mass were significantly higher in the FW group than in the BK and CON groups (P < 0.05). The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly higher in the FW group than in the CON group (P < 0.05). The prevalence of NAFLD was significantly higher in the FW group than in the BK group and CON group (18.9, 8.6, and 0.0%, respectively), whereas there were non-significant between-group differences in the frequency of the PNPLA3 and MTP genotypes. These findings indicate that rugby football players, especially those in the FW position, are at higher risk of developing NAFLD, which emphasizes the role of diet and exercise in the development of NAFLD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; NAFLD; athletes; diet; rugby football

Year:  2018        PMID: 29973915      PMCID: PMC6019459          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

Lifestyle-related metabolic diseases associated with obesity are rising worldwide. Moreover, obesity is strongly related to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in both pediatric and adult populations (1, 2). NAFLD is characterized by an excess accumulation of lipids in the liver (>5–10% of the weight of the liver) which is not due to excess alcohol consumption or steatosis (3, 4). NAFLD is an important cause of lifestyle-related metabolic diseases (5, 6). As well, the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increases the risk of liver cancer and cardiovascular-related mortality (7, 8). Thus, to lower the risk of NAFLD, strategies to understand its development are warranted (9). Risk factors for NAFLD include age, body mass index (BMI), and sex, as well as lifestyle factors (i.e., diet and exercise) and genetic factors (10–16). Exercise is generally identified as a strategy to improve NAFLD, independent of weight loss (12). The prevalence of NAFLD would be thus expected to be lower among athletes. However, athletes can consume a heavy diet to increase (or maintain) a larger body mass. As an athletic example, rugby football is a popular team contact sport (17–19). A rugby team consists of 13 players, six forwards (FW) and seven backs (BK), with FWs typically having a larger body mass than BKs. The pattern of physical exercise differs between the positions of FW and BK, as short-duration anaerobic activity (ruck, mall, scrum, and tackling) is needed at FW and sprint and endurance running is needed at BK. The dietary pattern required for position-specific body compositions is also likely to differ between these positions. Notably, the investigation of NAFLD in relation to diets accompanied by full exercise may be useful to understand the development of NAFLD. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of NAFLD among rugby football players to determine whether there are position-related factors that influence the onset of NAFLD.

Material and methods

Participants

Sixty-nine male university rugby players (37 FW and 32 BK) were enrolled in this study. All players were with the A-League, the highest level of the local league in Japan, practicing 6 days per week, 3 h per day. We also recruited 29 controls (CON) from the same university by advertising on posters; these subjects did not engage in regular exercise (Table 1). Prospective participants who habitually consumed alcohol (≥20 g/day) or had a prior history of myocardial injury [defined as a creatinine phosphokinase level >3X the upper reference limit (≥ 600 IU/L)] and chronic viral liver disease such as hepatitis B or C, were excluded. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (Fortaleza 2013). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institutional Review Board of Setsunan University (approval number: 2013–005), and all participants provided informed consent.
Table 1

Demographic, biochemical, clinical characteristics of rugby football players.

VariablesFW(n = 37)BK(n = 32)CON(n = 28)
Age, year19.5 (19.0–20.3)20.0 (19.0–21.0)20.0 (20.0–22.0)
Height, cm178.0 (173.1–181.4)170.5 (166.6–175.8)171.0 (169.3–175.0)
Weight, kg92.7 (86.5–103.0)74.0 (68.9–81.1)63.0 (57.5–70.8)
BMI, kg/m229.1 (27.3–32.8)25.3 (23.4–26.9)21.5 (20.0–24.0)
WC, cm96.3 (84.2–112.8)84.4 (78.9–89.5)73.5 (68.3–78.8)
Body fat, %21.6 (16.1–28.5)15.2 (10.6–19.7)14.0 (11.3–18.0)
Lean body mass, kg72.2 (69.1–77.5)63.9 (57.6–66.8)54.5 (49.8–59.0)
HbA1c, %5.2 (5.0–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.4)5.2 (5.0–5.3)
TC, mmol/L4.9 (4.3–5.3)4.4 (4.0–4.7)4.3 (3.8–4.7)
HDL-C, mmol/L1.4 (1.3–1.6)1.6 (1.4–1.7)1.6 (1.3–1.7)
LDL-C, mmol/L2.9 (2.4–3.4)2.6 (2.2–2.7)2.5 (2.0–2.9)
TG, mmol/L1.6 (1.2–2.7)1.3 (1.0–1.8)1.0 (0.6–1.4)
AST, IU/L22.5 (19–26.3)21.0 (19.0–24.0)18.0 (15.0–22.5)
ALT, IU/L21.5 (17.8–36.5)19.0 (13.5–28.5)17.0 (13.3–24.0)
ALP, IU/L298 (17.8–36.5)300 (238.5–340.5)232.5 (197.5–264.3)
LDH, IU/L183.0 (161.5–199.5)179 (159.5–188.5)177 (159.3–198.8)
γ-GT, IU/L24.5 (19.5–32.5)20.0 (17.0–24.5)19.0 (16.0–23.8)
CPK, IU/L149.5 (108.5–201.5)143.0 (103.5–189.5)132.0 (103.5–219.3)
CHE, IU/L371.0 (308.5–430.5)337.0 (304.5–378.5)331.5 (288.3–361.5)
UA, umol/L359.9 (319.7–416.4)339.0 (300.4–380.7)380.7 (316.7–398.5)
Adiponectin,7.6 (6.1–9.4)7.1 (5.3–9.0)
Alcohol intake, g/day0.0 (0.0–5.6)2.2 (0.0–6.2)3.0 (0.0–7.8)
Smoking habit, %16.218.814.3
PNPLA3 (CC/CG/GG), %37.8/48.6/13.540.6/50.0/9.428.6/57.1/14.3
MTP (GG/GT/TT), %64.9/35.1/0.071.9/28.1/0.075.0/25.0/0.0

FW, forwards; BK, backs; CON, control; WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; AST, aspartate amino transferase; ALT, alanine amino transferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; γ-GT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; CHE, cholinesterase; UA, uric acid; PNPLA3, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3; MTP; microsomal triacylglyceride-transfer protein

P < 0.05 vs. BK,

P < 0.05 vs. CON.

Demographic, biochemical, clinical characteristics of rugby football players. FW, forwards; BK, backs; CON, control; WC, waist circumference; TC, total cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; AST, aspartate amino transferase; ALT, alanine amino transferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; γ-GT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; CHE, cholinesterase; UA, uric acid; PNPLA3, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3; MTP; microsomal triacylglyceride-transfer protein P < 0.05 vs. BK, P < 0.05 vs. CON. Body weight and body fat content were measured using a body fat analyzer (Inbody 430, Biospace, Seoul, Korea). Waist circumference (WC) was measured midway between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest. BMI was calculated using measured weight and height (kg/m2). Handgrip strength of the dominant hand was measured using a TKK 5401 grip dynamometer (Takei Kiki Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan); three trials were completed and the largest value was used for analysis. The fastest 1 km time trial record obtained during club activities was used for analysis. Daily intake of energy and nutrients during the preceding month were measured brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) (20), as well as smoking habits, were assessed using a validated brief self-administered questionnaire.

Blood analysis

Blood glucose concentrations were measured using the hexokinase method (Serotec Co., Ltd., Hokkaido, Japan). Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, triglycerides (TG), and uric acid (UA) levels were determined by enzymatic methods (Kyowa Medex Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using the automatic biochemical analyzer (JCA-BM8060; JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). AST, alanine amino transferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and cholinesterase (CHE) levels were measured using commercial assay kits (CicaLiquid, KANTO CHEMICAL CO., INC., Tokyo, Japan). Serum adiponectin levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), with these measures obtained only in the FW and BK groups. The NAFLD is defined on the basis of the serum level of AST level ≥ 33 U/L, and/or ALT level ≥ 43 U/L as a surrogate maker for NAFLD (6, 21, 22).

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood (2.0 μl) from each participant using a DNA Extract All Reagents kit (Applied Biosystems, Yokohama, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After extraction, the genomic DNA was immediately stored at −30°. Genotyping was performed for patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3: rs738409) and microsomal triacylglyceride-transfer protein (MTP: rs180084), using an ABI prism 7300 (Applied Biosystems, Yokohama, Japan). PNPLA3 and MTP expression has previously been shown to be strongly associated with liver fat content (14–16). In brief, 5 μl GTXpress Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Yokohama, Japan), 0.5 μl SNP-specific TaqMan genotyping assay mix (Applied Biosystems, Yokohama, Japan), 2.5 μl nuclease-free H2O, and a 2.0 μl DNA solution were added per well. The denaturation began at 95°C for 20 s, with 40 cycles of incubation at 95°C for 15 s then annealing and extension at 60°C for 1 min. The allele frequencies of SNP genotypes were tested for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as median (25–75th percentile). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Scheffe's post hoc test (in parametric analysis) or Mann-Whitney U test with Kruskal–Wallis test (in nonparametric analysis) were performed to determine differences among the three groups (FW, BK, and CON). Differences between FW and BK were analyzed using a Student's t-test. Categorical variables including smoking habit, genotypes and prevalence of NAFLD, were compared using the Chi-square (χ2) test. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the the NAFLD and other measurements such as age, BMI, smoking, energy intake, TG, adiponectin and genotypes. Values were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., SPSS Statistics 20.0, Armonk, NY, U.S.A.).

Results

The clinical characteristics for the FW, BK and CON groups are summarized in Table 1. The BMI, body fat mass and lean body mass were significantly higher in the FW group than in the BK and CON groups (P < 0.05). The TC, LDL-C, TG, AST, ALT, γ-GT, and ALP levels were significantly higher in the FW group than in the CON group (P < 0.05). Handgrip strength tended to be higher in the FW group [473.3 (453.0–501.0) N], relative to the BK group [452.8 (405.2–501.8) N] (P = 0.09). The 1 km time trial was significantly slower in the FW group [237.5 (224.0–259.0) s], compared with the BK group [218.0 (211.5–222.8) s] (P < 0.05). With regard to diet, energy intake was higher in the FW (2560 ± 772 kcal/day) and BK groups (2492 ± 560 kcal/day) than in the CON group (1902 ± 691 kcal/day); all other dietary parameters were comparable among the groups. Importantly, despite, either both FW and BK had habitual vigorous exercise, the prevalence of NAFLD evaluated by AST and/or ALT was significantly higher in the FW group than in either the BK or CON group (18.9, 6.3, and 0%, respectively) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The prevalence of NAFLD was compared using the chi-squared (χ2) test.P < 0.05 vs. BK, ※P < 0.05 vs. CON.

Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The prevalence of NAFLD was compared using the chi-squared (χ2) test.P < 0.05 vs. BK, ※P < 0.05 vs. CON. There were no significant differences in PNPLA3 and MTP genotype frequencies among the groups. The genotypic distributions of PNPLA3 (χ2 = 1.7, P = 0.41) and MTP (χ2 = 3.6, P = 0.17) were in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, with frequencies similar to previously reported values for the Japanese population (16, 23). On multivariate regression analysis, NAFLD was significantly and independently correlated with BMI (Standardized β = 0.32, P < 0.05), energy intake (Standardized β = 0.31, P < 0.05), TG level (Standardized β = 0.25, P < 0.05) and adiponectin level (Standardized β = −0.23, P < 0.05) (Table 2). In a sub-analysis restricted to the FW group, NAFLD was significantly and independently correlated with BMI (Standardized β = 0.45, P < 0.05) and energy intake (Standardized β = 0.34, P < 0.05).
Table 2

Multiple regresssion analysis for NAFLD in FW and BK.

VariableβStandardized βP
Age−0.01−0.020.87
BMI0.030.32<0.05
Smoking0.050.060.60
Energy intake0.0001590.31<0.05
TG0.090.25<0.05
Adiponectin−0.03−0.23<0.05
PNPLA3−0.04−0.080.43
MTP0.020.030.78

PNPLA3, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3; MTP, microsomal triacylglyceride-transfer protein.

Multiple regresssion analysis for NAFLD in FW and BK. PNPLA3, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3; MTP, microsomal triacylglyceride-transfer protein.

Discussion

The main finding of this study was that the prevalence of NAFLD in the FW group was higher than those in the BK and CON groups. Further, BMI, TG, and adiponectin levels, as well as energy intake, were all identified as independent factors associated with NAFLD. Our findings may be surprising, as physical activity is known to confer a protective effect against non-communicable diseases (24), including NAFLD. A priori, we had anticipated that the physical exercise regime of the players enrolled in our study (6 days/week × 3 h/day) would have been sufficient to offer protection against NAFLD. Although we failed to evaluate physical activity in these subjects, FW had higher physical activity than BK [2812.0 (1670.0–2511.0] vs. 1662.5 [1447.3–2173.0] kcal/day) in 80 juniors of the same team, according to a questionnaire. FW were reported to have a higher number of contacts (1.5–2.0 times) in previous studies (25, 26). As collision-based activities have a high energy cost (27), a previous study also showed that FW had higher energy expenditure than BK, although FW reported a lower total distance (26, 28). Although the FW might report more activity, their prevalence of NAFLD is high; this may affect energy intake and body fat mass. However, total energy intake was similar between the FW and BK groups on BDHQ. Notably, BDHQ showed satisfactory ranking ability in the same group (20). However, BDHQ might be biased; therefore, the energy intake of rugby football players in this study was comparatively lower than that reported in a previous study (18). Currently, there is no accurate nutrition questionnaire for athletes because of the complex influence of sport-specific factors, such as periodized training, large portion sizes, and widespread use of rapidly evolving sports foods and supplements (29). However, a registered dietitian provided breakfast, lunch, dinner and additional nutrition for some portions of each day. The respective total energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrate intakes in the FW and BK groups were ~4880 vs. 3,920 kcal/day, 174 vs. 156 g/day, 138 vs. 135 g/day, and 735 vs. 520 g/day. This athlete-NAFLD model might support the concept of the development of NAFLD due to an imbalance between diet and exercise. Generally, the lifestyle-related diseases, including obesity and metabolic syndrome, are a cause of NAFLD (30, 31). Our study supported this general idea (30, 31); accordingly, excess energy intake, BMI, TG, and/or adiponectin [an adipocyte-driven hormone (30, 32–34)], which is increased in metabolic disorders related to lifestyle) were associated with the presence of NAFLD. Notably, excess energy intake and BMI were the influential parameters in the FW group. A previous study reported that energy restriction with weight reduction improved the symptoms of NAFLD (35). One of the mechanisms of excess energy intake associated with the development of NAFLD is a decrease in the liver energy sensor, 5′-AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) (30). Suppression of AMPK activation decreases lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation through an activation of the adipocyte triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) pathway; additionally, it increases lipogenesis through a downregulation of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) pathway (36). Rugby football is a contact sport and greater body mass is associated with a superior performance. The results of our study were consistent with previous findings of higher body fat among FWs, relative to BKs (17, 18, 37–39). Increases in body fat mass negatively correlate with power and velocity (17), as well as running endurance, which are important performance parameters for an 80-min rugby football game (played as two 40-min halves). In our cohort of rugby football players, those with a higher BMI had a slower 1 km time, indicative of a decrease in physical endurance capacity, with excess body fat (data not shown). A recent study reported that the hepatokine selenoprotein P, which is secreted in cases of NAFLD, causes aerobic exercise resistance (40). In contrast, fat-free mass is the parameter that best predicts the likelihood of being classified as an International or National player, highlighting the importance of muscle mass as a performance indicator in this sport (37). However, it is difficult to increase muscle mass without a concomitant increase in body fat mass; this increase in fat mass decreases exercise performance (38) and increases the risk for NAFLD. Thus, it is critical to consider the necessary degree of balance between health and sport performance for athletes who must increase body mass. The combination of diet and exercise treatment improves the pathogenesis of NAFLD as a general consensus (41, 42). A 9-month study, using treatment with a diet and moderate exercise, revealed a 35.2% reduction in liver fat and a significant change in hepatic enzyme levels, resulting NAFLD resolution in 40% of subjects (41). Subjects with NAFLD have generally been advised to lose 5–10% of their total body weight, via diet, and regular exercise (42). However, the ideal ratio of this combination [e.g., which treatment (diet or exercise) is superior to improve the NAFLD] remains to be determined in the real world. The ratio may also differ in various situations. Interestingly, our study showed that even the rugby football players who had a full exercise regimen developed NAFLD. This might suggest that, besides weight management, diet is more influential than exercise in the onset of NAFLD among rugby football players (especially those in a FW position); hence, the balance between diet and exercise is a key aspect in the development of NAFLD. The optimal balance of diet and exercise to prevent NAFLD might be determined for athletes. Further studies are needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms of the onset of NAFLD, as well as to determine an optimal program for the prevention of NAFLD in athletes. There are limitations to this study that may affect our interpretation of the results. First, as this study was based on field research, liver biopsy methods, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy methods (43, 44), and abdominal ultrasound methods (45) were not used to assess the NAFLD. Although we attempted to evaluate the fatty liver index (46, 47) and hepatic steatosis index (48), NAFLD was excluded in 26% and >50%, respectively, which might indicate over-evaluation because the AST might be affected by exercise; moreover, BMI and WC were extremely high (49) because rugby football players have a large amount of muscle. Second, the sample size was relatively small and was drawn from a single institution. Third, the causality of the results remains unclear, as this was a simple observational study. Fourth, we did not evaluate exercise activity and failed to estimate total energy intake by using BDHQ. The doubly labeled water method and 3-day food intake record method would be needed to investigate detailed energy and lifestyle balances. Fifth, the FW group had slightly higher CPK levels than did the BK or CON group; therefore, the prevalence of NAFLD in FW may have been overestimated. Future studies are needed to validate our findings.

Conclusion

The findings of our study indicate that even university athletes, including rugby football players (especially those in a FW position), may be at risk for NAFLD, despite their regularly high levels of physical exercise. We must further investigate the molecular mechanisms of NAFLD, as well as the effects of dietary interventions on NAFLD.

Author contributions

SN, MF, and NS designed the study. SN, MF, SF, AU, and YK collected and assembled of data. SN and NS performed the statistical analysis and prepared the manuscript. KA, SS, YK, SM, and KK did the trial management and helped to draft the manuscript with its critical review and. All authors are in agreement with the manuscript and declare that the content has not been published elsewhere.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling Editor declared a shared affiliation though no other collaboration with one of the authors KK.
  48 in total

1.  Comparison of Calorie-Restricted Diet and Resveratrol Supplementation on Anthropometric Indices, Metabolic Parameters, and Serum Sirtuin-1 Levels in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Somayyeh Asghari; Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi; Mohammad-Hossein Somi; Seyed-Mostafa Ghavami; Maryam Rafraf
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  ACTN3 GENE R577X POLYMORPHISM ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL AND ADIPONECTIN IN RUGBY PLAYERS.

Authors:  Shinsuke Nirengi; Mami Fujibayashi; Kokoro Tsuzaki; Sachiko Furuno; Akihiko Uchibe; Yasuharu Kawase; Kazuhiko Kotani; Naoki Sakane
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  The physical demands of elite English rugby union.

Authors:  Simon P Roberts; Grant Trewartha; Rob J Higgitt; Joe El-Abd; Keith A Stokes
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 4.  Adipose tissue: from lipid storage compartment to endocrine organ.

Authors:  Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  DEXA or BMI: clinical considerations for evaluating obesity in collegiate division I-A American football athletes.

Authors:  Brad S Lambert; Jonathan M Oliver; Gilbert R Katts; John S Green; Steven E Martin; Stephen F Crouse
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a challenge for pediatricians.

Authors:  Valerio Nobili; Naim Alkhouri; Anna Alisi; Claudia Della Corte; Emer Fitzpatrick; Massimiliano Raponi; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Comparison of fatty liver index with noninvasive methods for steatosis detection and quantification.

Authors:  Shira Zelber-Sagi; Muriel Webb; Nimer Assy; Laurie Blendis; Hanny Yeshua; Moshe Leshno; Vlad Ratziu; Zamir Halpern; Ran Oren; Erwin Santo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Association of the rs738409 polymorphism in PNPLA3 with liver damage and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Kikuko Hotta; Masato Yoneda; Hideyuki Hyogo; Hidenori Ochi; Seiho Mizusawa; Takato Ueno; Kazuaki Chayama; Atsushi Nakajima; Kazuwa Nakao; Akhiro Sekine
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase.

Authors:  T Yamauchi; J Kamon; Y Minokoshi; Y Ito; H Waki; S Uchida; S Yamashita; M Noda; S Kita; K Ueki; K Eto; Y Akanuma; P Froguel; F Foufelle; P Ferre; D Carling; S Kimura; R Nagai; B B Kahn; T Kadowaki
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Lycium barbarum polysaccharide attenuates high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis by up-regulating SIRT1 expression and deacetylase activity.

Authors:  Li Jia; Wang Li; Jianning Li; Yan Li; Hui Song; Yansong Luan; Hui Qi; Lirong Ma; Xiaohong Lu; Yi Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of obesity-related indices for identifying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Fangfei Xie; Yuyu Pei; Quan Zhou; Deli Cao; Yun Wang
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.876

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.