Literature DB >> 29973751

A Review of 2255 Emergency Abdominal Operations Performed over 17 years (1996-2013) in a Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit in India.

Amir Mushtaq Parray1, Peter Mwendwa1, Siddharth Mehrotra2, Vivek Mangla2, Shailendra Lalwani2, Naimish Mehta2, Amitabh Yadav2, Samiran Nundy2.   

Abstract

There is little information regarding the clinical spectrum and outcome of emergency abdominal operations from specialized units in India. We examined these in our gastrointestinal surgery and liver transplantation unit from a prospective database maintained between July 1996 and April 2013. Out of 9966 operations performed, 2255 (26%) were emergency procedures (reoperations during the same admission, e.g., for necrotizing pancreatitis were excluded). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (range 1-107) and included the following age groups: 0-18 years (n = 105, 4.7%); 19-64 years (n = 1766, 78.3%), and >65 years (n = 384, 17.0%). The majority were males (1609, 71%), and there were 646 females (29%). The most common indications were small bowel emergencies (598, 26.5%), followed by pancreatic (417, 18.5%) and colonic (281, 12.5%) emergencies. Pancreatic operations were the second commonest in the adult and middle aged group. Colorectal operations were the second commonest in the geriatric age group (>65 years). Emergency operations for other conditions were: postoperative complications following elective operations 171 (7.5%), gastroduodenal bleeding or perforation in 144 (6.3%), and liver surgery in 93 patients (4.1%) patients. In the small bowel emergencies, 223 patients (37.2%) had primary diagnosis of adhesive obstruction, gangrene in 135 patients (22.5%), perforation in 121 patients (20%), and fistula in 56 patients (9.3%). Mesenteric venous thrombosis was found to be the primary cause of small bowel emergencies, either as a primary cause in gangrene or as a secondary cause in perforations and adhesions. The postoperative mortality after emergencies was 12.6% compared to 2% in elective procedures. Mortality was significantly higher in males (14%) than females (9.6%), p < 0.005. Category wise mortality was as follows: pancreatic surgery (n = 86, 20.6%), surgery for postoperative complications (n = 33, 19.3%), duodenal surgery (n = 18, 12.5%), small intestinal surgery (n = 68, 11.4%), and colonic surgery (n = 35, 12.45%). Emergency operations comprise a significant proportion of a GI surgical unit's workload. The mortality is greatest after pancreatic operations followed by those done for postoperative complications. Despite advances in surgical and postoperative care, emergency operations for abdominal emergencies are associated with mortality which is six times higher compared to elective procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal emergency surgeries; Mesenteric ischemia; Mortality; Pancreatic necrosectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 29973751      PMCID: PMC6014947          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1567-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  23 in total

Review 1.  Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years.

Authors:  P F Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Emergency surgery: atavistic refuge of the general surgeon?

Authors:  B J Lankester; D C Britton; A G Holbrook; H C Umpleby; J J Tate; J Budd; P R Maddox; M Horrocks
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Systematic review of survival after acute mesenteric ischaemia according to disease aetiology.

Authors:  I G Schoots; G I Koffeman; D A Legemate; M Levi; T M van Gulik
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network.

Authors:  D I Saunders; D Murray; A C Pichel; S Varley; C J Peden
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Adult surgical emergencies in a developing country: the experience of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Gabriel U Chianakwana; Chima C Ihegihu; Pius I S Okafor; Stanley N C Anyanwu; Okechukwu O Mbonu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Reduction in mortality with delayed surgical therapy of severe pancreatitis.

Authors:  Werner Hartwig; Sasa-Marcel Maksan; Thomas Foitzik; Jan Schmidt; Christian Herfarth; Ernst Klar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Toxic megacolon. An analysis of 70 cases.

Authors:  J Heppell; E Farkouh; S Dubé; A Péloquin; S Morgan; D Bernard
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Emergency bowel surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Bahadir Külah; Bariş Gülgez; M Mahir Ozmen; M Vasfi Ozer; Faruk Coşkun
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Surgical intervention in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  M G Besselink; M T de Bruijn; J P Rutten; M A Boermeester; H S Hofker; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The role of open necrosectomy in the current management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a review article.

Authors:  K Vasiliadis; C Papavasiliou; A Al Nimer; N Lamprou; C Makridis
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2013-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.