| Literature DB >> 29973553 |
Jie Zou1, Qian Lin2, Chu Cheng3, Xin Zhang4, Qinghui Jin5,6, Han Jin7,8, Jinxia Wang9, Jiawen Jian10.
Abstract
Zirconia-based limiting current oxygen sensor gains considerable attention, due to its high-performance in improving the combustion efficiency of fossil fuels and reducing the emission of exhaust gases. Nevertheless, the Pt electrode is frequently used in the oxygen sensor, therefore, it restrains the broader application due to the high cost. Quite recently, La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O₃ (LSCM) has been reported to be highly active to catalyze oxygen reduction. Herein, with the intention of replacing the frequently used Pt, we studied the practicability of adapting the LSCM to zirconia-based limiting current oxygen sensor. Through comparing the electrocatalytic activity of LSCM and Pt, it is confirmed that LSCM gave analogous oxygen reactivity with that of the Pt. Then, limiting the current oxygen sensors comprised of LSCM or Pt are fabricated and their sensing behavior to oxygen in the range of 2⁻25% is evaluated. Conclusively, quick response/recovery rate (within 7s), linear relationship, and high selectivity (against 5% CO₂ and H₂O) in sensing oxygen are observed for the sensors, regardless of the sensing materials (LSCM or Pt) that are used in the sensor. Particularly, identical sensing characteristics are observed for the sensors consisting of LSCM or Pt, indicating the practicability of replacing the Pt electrode by adapting the LSCM electrode to future zirconia-based oxygen sensors.Entities:
Keywords: limiting current oxygen sensor; perovskite crystal phase; zirconia-based
Year: 2018 PMID: 29973553 PMCID: PMC6069003 DOI: 10.3390/s18072155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram of limiting current oxygen sensor.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 (LSCM) powders calcined at the temperature of 1100–1400 °C.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) LSCM powder calcined at 1100 °C; (b) Micro-structure of LSCM electrode after 1400 °C co-firing with 8YSZ; (c) Diffusion barrier of sensor; and, (d) Energy Disperse Spectroscopy (EDS) image at line scan mode.
Figure 4EIS of C-LSCM and C-Pt tested at (a) 420 °C and (b) 580 °C; and, (c) The relationship between area resistance and operating temperature of C-LSCM and C-Pt.
Figure 5Current-voltage characteristic curves of (a) S-LSCM and (b) S-Pt, measured at 580 °C, with the oxygen concentration in the range of 2–30%.
Figure 6(a) Response transient and (b) Dependency of the response signal on the oxygen concentration in the range of 2–25% for the sensors comprised of LSCM or Pt electrode; (c) Selectivity of the S-LSCM and S-Pt against 5% CO2 and H2O, at the operational temperature of 580 °C.
Compassion of the sensing behavior for the oxygen sensors using various sensing materials.
| Sensing Materials | Operating Mode | Concentration Range | Operating Temperature | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt | Amperometric/potentiometric | 0–21% | Above 350 °C | [ |
| BaFeO3 | Impedancemetric | 0.2–21% | 600 °C | [ |
| SrTi0.6Fe0.4O3− | Conductometric | 1–100% | 400–750 °C | [ |
| TiO2 | 0.05–2.5% | Below 500 °C | [ | |
| CaZr0.7Mn0.3O3 | Amperometric | 0–21% | 650–830 °C | [ |
| La0.75Sr0.25Cr0.5Mn0.5O3 | 2–25% | Above 350 °C | This research |