Literature DB >> 29972888

On confusing cause and effect in the oxygen limitation of fish.

Daniel Pauly1, William W L Cheung1.   

Abstract

This letter deals with the critique by Lefevre, McKenzie, and Nilsson (2017, 2018) of the use of Gill-Oxygen Limitation Theory (GOLT) to explain observed and predict further decreases of the maximum body size of fish under warming.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29972888     DOI： 10.1111/gcb.14383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN： 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Calcified gill filaments increase respiratory function in fishes.

Authors:  Andy J Turko; Bianca Cisternino; Patricia A Wright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The gill-oxygen limitation theory (GOLT) and its critics.

Authors:  Daniel Pauly
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Modelling ocean acidification effects with life stage-specific responses alters spatiotemporal patterns of catch and revenues of American lobster, Homarus americanus.

Authors:  Travis C Tai; Piero Calosi; Helen J Gurney-Smith; William W L Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Gill area explains deviations from body size-metabolic rate relationship in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Anna Kuparinen; Darby Gielewski; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.504
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.