Literature DB >> 29972448

Root Morphology and Number of Canals in Mandibular Central and Lateral Incisors Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Samira Saati1, Abbas Shokri1, Maryam Foroozandeh1, Jalal Poorolajal2, Nooshin Mosleh1.   

Abstract

Most failures in endodontic treatment of mandibular incisors are due to the presence of a missed canal specifically the lingual. This investigation aimed to examine the root morphology and number of canals in mandibular incisors using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Two hundred and seven patients were assessed in terms of their mandibular central and lateral incisors of CBCT. The inclusion criteria were absence of root resorption, coronal restoration or root filling and clarity and optimal resolution of images. According to the Vertucci's classification, number of roots and canals and type of canal were evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. In order to data analysis SPSS version 16 and descriptive statistics were implemented. All mandibular incisors had one root. Most central (84.5%) and lateral (78.2%) incisors had a single canal (p= 0.065). The majority of central (54.5%) and lateral (56.5%) incisors were Vertucci's type I (p= 0.102). Prevalence of one canal in males: central (84.8%), lateral (77.9%) and in females: central (84.2%), lateral (78.5%) (p= 0.518). Prevalence of Vertucci's type I in males: central (52.3%), lateral (45.3%) and in females: central (56.1%), lateral (64.4%) (p=0.188). The prevalence of two canals was 15.5% (central) and 21.8% (lateral) in mandibular incisors. The Vertucci's type I was the most typical kinds of mandibular incisors. Considering the limitations of periapical radiography in determining canal morphology, CBCT can be helpful in case of any concern regarding root canal morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29972448     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201801925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

Review 1.  Root canal anatomy of human permanent mandibular incisors and mandibular canines: A systematic review.

Authors:  Devanshi Nitin Dhuldhoya; Shishir Singh; Rajesh Satyanarain Podar; Naren Ramachandran; Romi Jain; Nikhil Bhanushali
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Aesthetic management of a fractured mandibular central incisor with two canals using fibre post.

Authors:  Guria Abhisek; Makonahalli Jaganath Bharath; Chickmagaravalli Krishnegowda Sahadev; Sanjayagouda B Patil
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-12

3.  Micro-computed tomography analysis of root canal morphology and thickness of crown and root of mandibular incisors in Chinese population.

Authors:  Min Chen; Hao Wang; Chialing Tsauo; Dingming Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Jinzhi He; Yuan Gao
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of mandibular incisors: A cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo.

Authors:  Federico Valenti-Obino; Dario Di Nardo; Linda Quero; Gabriele Miccoli; Gianluca Gambarini; Luca Testarelli; Massimo Galli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-06-01

Review 5.  Evidence of Second Canal between Permanent Mandibular Central and Lateral Incisors in China; a Systematic Review on CBCT Studies.

Authors:  Nyan M Aung; Kyaw K Myint
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-12-03

6.  Evaluation of root canal morphology in permanent maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth in Saudi subpopulation using two classification systems: a CBCT study.

Authors:  Azhar Iqbal; Mohmed Isaqali Karobari; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Osama Khattak; Sultan Metab Alshammari; Abdul Habeeb Adil; Tahir Yusuf Noorani; Hamoud Ali Algarani; Meshal Aber Alonazi; Kumar Chandan Sirivastava; Rakhi Issrani
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.747

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.