Luigi Gabrielli1,2, Sebastián Herrera3,4, Felipe Contreras-Briceño5, Julián Vega3, María Paz Ocaranza3,4, Fernando Yáñez3,4, Rodrigo Fernández3, Rodrigo Saavedra3, Marta Sitges6, Lorena García7, Mario Chiong7, Sergio Lavandero7,8, Pablo F Castro3,4. 1. Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. lgabriel@uc.cl. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. lgabriel@uc.cl. 3. Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 5. Kinesiology, Department of Health of Science, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 6. Cardiology Department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 7. Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS) and CEMC, Faculty of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 8. Cardiology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Left atrial (LA) contraction is essential for left ventricular (LV) filling during exertion. We sought to evaluate the relationship of LA contraction and exercise capacity in trained athletes. METHODS: Sixteen male marathon runners were recruited and allocated into two groups according to their previous training status (≥ or < 100 km peer week). All subjects underwent a baseline cardiopulmonary test to evaluate maximal aerobic capacity and a transthoracic echocardiography previous and immediate post-marathon. LA contractile function evaluation was accomplished by measuring the negative deformation of the post P wave strain curve (LASa). LASa change was defined as LASa pre-marathon minus LASa immediate post-marathon. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 6 years. LA volume index (39 ± 13 vs. 31 ± 5 mL/m2, p = 0.04), LV mass index (91 ± 21 vs. 73 ± 12 g/m2, p = 0.04), VO2 max (59 ± 3 vs. 50 ± 8 mL/kg/min, p = 0.036) were higher in more intensive trained group and marathon time was lower (185 ± 14 vs. 219 ± 24 min, p = 0.017). An increase in LASa after immediate post-marathon was observed in both groups, which was significantly greater in the highly trained group (18.9 ± 5.8 vs. 6.3 ± 3.5%, p < 0.003). Maximum VO2 measured previous to the marathon was inversely related to marathon time and directly correlated to LASa change (rho = 0.744, p = 0.001, rho = 0.546, p = 0.028, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with more intensive training load have larger LV mass and LA size. An increase in LA contraction was seen post-marathon, which was significantly greater in the highly trained group. This increase in the LA contraction was related to the maximum VO2 measured previous to the marathon and to performance in a highly demanding test.
PURPOSE: Left atrial (LA) contraction is essential for left ventricular (LV) filling during exertion. We sought to evaluate the relationship of LA contraction and exercise capacity in trained athletes. METHODS: Sixteen male marathon runners were recruited and allocated into two groups according to their previous training status (≥ or < 100 km peer week). All subjects underwent a baseline cardiopulmonary test to evaluate maximal aerobic capacity and a transthoracic echocardiography previous and immediate post-marathon. LA contractile function evaluation was accomplished by measuring the negative deformation of the post P wave strain curve (LASa). LASa change was defined as LASa pre-marathon minus LASa immediate post-marathon. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 6 years. LA volume index (39 ± 13 vs. 31 ± 5 mL/m2, p = 0.04), LV mass index (91 ± 21 vs. 73 ± 12 g/m2, p = 0.04), VO2 max (59 ± 3 vs. 50 ± 8 mL/kg/min, p = 0.036) were higher in more intensive trained group and marathon time was lower (185 ± 14 vs. 219 ± 24 min, p = 0.017). An increase in LASa after immediate post-marathon was observed in both groups, which was significantly greater in the highly trained group (18.9 ± 5.8 vs. 6.3 ± 3.5%, p < 0.003). Maximum VO2 measured previous to the marathon was inversely related to marathon time and directly correlated to LASa change (rho = 0.744, p = 0.001, rho = 0.546, p = 0.028, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with more intensive training load have larger LV mass and LA size. An increase in LA contraction was seen post-marathon, which was significantly greater in the highly trained group. This increase in the LA contraction was related to the maximum VO2 measured previous to the marathon and to performance in a highly demanding test.
Entities:
Keywords:
Functional cardiac capacity; Left atrium; Running performance; Trained runners
Authors: L Gabrielli; B H Bijnens; C Brambila; N Duchateau; J Marin; I Sitges-Serra; L Mont; J Brugada; M Sitges Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2016-01-10 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: F D'Ascenzi; M Cameli; M Lisi; V Zacà; B Natali; A Malandrino; S Benincasa; S Catanese; A Causarano; S Mondillo Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Antonio Pelliccia; Norimitsu Kinoshita; Cataldo Pisicchio; Filippo Quattrini; Fernando M Dipaolo; Roberto Ciardo; Barbara Di Giacinto; Emanuele Guerra; Elvira De Blasiis; Maurizio Casasco; Franco Culasso; Barry J Maron Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Luís Leite; Sofia Lázaro Mendes; Rui Baptista; Rogério Teixeira; Manuel Oliveira-Santos; Nelson Ribeiro; Rosa Coutinho; Victor Monteiro; Rui Martins; Graça Castro; Maria João Ferreira; Mariano Pego Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Maria Sanz-de la Garza; Cira Rubies; Montserrat Batlle; Bart H Bijnens; Lluis Mont; Marta Sitges; Eduard Guasch Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Laura Sanchis; Maria Sanz-de La Garza; Bart Bijnens; Genevieve Giraldeau; Gonzalo Grazioli; Josefa Marin; Luigi Gabrielli; Silvia Montserrat; Marta Sitges Journal: Eur J Sport Sci Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 4.050