Literature DB >> 29971207

Epidemiology of continuous renal replacement therapy in Korea: Results from the National Health Insurance Service claims database from 2005 to 2016.

Sehoon Park1,2, Soojin Lee2,3, Hyung Ah Jo4, Kyungdo Han5, Yaerim Kim2, Jung Nam An6, Kwon Wook Joo2,3, Chun Soo Lim3,6, Yon Su Kim1,2, Hyeongsu Kim7, Dong Ki Kim2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is an important treatment modality for severe acute kidney injury. As such, the epidemiology of CRRT in Korea needs further investigation.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, population-based study analyzing the claims data from National Health Insurance Service of Korea. All index intensive care unit admission cases of CRRT in government-designated tertiary referral hospitals in Korea from 2005 to 2016 were included. Patients with a history of renal replacement therapy or who were under 20 years old were not considered. In addition to baseline and treatment characteristics, patient outcomes, including all-cause mortality and renal survival rates, were investigated. We stratified the study patients according to 3-year time periods and major regions of the nation.
RESULTS: We included 37,337 patients who received CRRT in Korea. The overall use of CRRT increased over time, and more than 80% of cases of acute renal replacement therapy were CRRT after 2014. Seoul was the region in which the majority of CRRT (45.0%) was performed. The clinical characteristics of CRRT patients were significantly different among time-intervals and regions. Both all-cause mortality and renal survival rates after CRRT were prominently improved in the recent time periods (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CRRT is a widely used treatment strategy for severe acute kidney injury in Korea. The prognosis of CRRT patients has improved compared to the past. This epidemiological study of CRRT in Korea revealed notable trends with regard to time period and geographic region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute kidney injury; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Critical care; Dialysis; Intensive care units

Year:  2018        PMID: 29971207      PMCID: PMC6027810          DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 2211-9132


Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most important medical issues in modern medicine and is associated with patient outcomes [1,2]. The prognosis of AKI has improved over time, but a substantial portion of patients who experience AKI continue to suffer from a poor prognosis, including progression to chronic kidney disease and associated comorbidities [3]. Moreover, the risk of developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which is a critical condition for both survival and quality of life for patients, is increased in AKI patients, and this increased risk is more prominent after severe AKI events. Acute renal replacement therapy (ARRT) is a major treatment strategy for severe AKI. Recent advances in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a crucial component of ARRT in the intensive care unit (ICU), has made dialysis possible for patients with hemodynamic instability. Due to this benefit, use of CRRT in many countries has been expanded, although the limited accessibility and higher costs were considered to be drawbacks of the modality. Recent epidemiological studies have investigated the time trends and regional differences of CRRT usage in their countries [3-6]. Herein, we performed the first nationwide, population-based study of CRRT in Korea. We accessed the database of National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and collected information from all CRRT cases in government-designated tertiary referral hospitals. We investigated the differences in the use of CRRT according to time-periods and geographical regions. Moreover, we analyzed the prognosis of CRRT patients, including patient mortality and renal survival.

Methods

Ethical considerations

The institutional review boards (IRBs) of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number: E-1711-04-897) and Konkuk University (IRB number: 7001355-201708-E-050) approved this study and waived the need for informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The approach to using the government database was approved by the according government, and anonymous patient data were studied.

Study design and population

This was a nationwide population-based study performed in Korea, using the claims database of the NHIS. Korea provides national health insurance service for all people with Korean nationality. All data on insured medical services, including diagnosis codes, medications, and other charged medical procedures, are accumulated in the NHIS [7]. After appropriate approval by the organization, we reviewed the database and collected the information of patients who underwent care in an ICU and received CRRT treatment in all government-designated tertiary referral hospitals from 2005 to 2016. We included all index admission cases (the patient’s first ICU stay) in our study. We excluded: 1) pediatric patients (aged under 20 years old), 2) those who had a previous history of any renal replacement therapy including transplantation or 3) those with a history of ICU care within three years of CRRT treatment. In addition, 4) those who underwent ICU care or CRRT treatment for less than a day were not considered.

Data collection

We collected the following demographic information: age, sex, income status, and date and region of ICU admission. Information regarding comorbidities were collected following the Charlson Comorbidity Index, which was identified following the system of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10); and the index score was calculated [8]. The presence of baseline co-morbidities was assessed for one year before the enrolled CRRT treatment event, and when the diagnostic codes or related medication history existed for more than a single time, patients were considered to have the underlying comorbidity. The principal diagnosis used during the admission period was also reviewed. Information regarding the usage of common ICU care modalities, including mechanical ventilation and inotropic agents, were collected. The operations and procedures performed during the ICU admission were included in our data.

Prognosis of patients who underwent CRRT

We included all-cause mortality and progression to ESRD as prognostic outcomes. Information regarding all-cause mortality was merged from the Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) database, as the organization gathers the death dates of all people with Korean nationality. ESRD was defined as the condition in which the patient required renal replacement therapy for more than 90 days after discharge.

Statistical analysis

Collected data were stratified according to 3-year time periods: 2005 to 2007, 2008 to 2010, 2011 to 2013, and 2014 to 2016. Also, data according to the region in which government-designated tertiary referral hospitals were located, including seven metropolitan cities and seven states of Korea, were shown. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies (percentages) and analyzed by chi-squared tests. Continuous variables were shown as medians (interquartile ranges) and analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to calculate P values for trends, and time trends were investigated using this method. We used a Kaplan Meier survival curve to show the prognosis of CRRT patients, and the log-rank method to compare the prognostic outcomes between the time-intervals and regions. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was also performed to investigate the outcomes. However, regional differences were not assessed by this method, as the survival data according to region showed complex results and the assumption required for use of the Cox model were not met. Adjusted variables included age, sex, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and geographical regions. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS ver. 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Study population

From January 2005 to December 2016, 1,129,824 patients who were admitted to the ICU were screened for having undergone CRRT (Fig. 1). Among them, the total number of patients who received CRRT was 42,822 (3.8%). The final study cohort consisted of 37,337 patients who underwent CRRT for more than 24 hours, and their mean follow-up duration was 12.4 months. In-hospital mortality was identified in 22,581 (60.5%) CRRT patients, and additional 6,566 (17.6%) patients died during the follow-up period.
Figure 1

Study population

CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; RRT, renal replacement therapy.

Time trends of patients who underwent CRRT

Use of CRRT was identified in 4,667, 8,090, 11,166, and 13,414 patients in 2005 to 2007, 2008 to 2010, 2011 to 2013, and 2014 to 2016, respectively. The proportion of CRRT patients among all ARRT patients continuously increased from 62% in the 2005 to 2007 period to 80% in 2014 to 2016 (Fig. 2). With regards to the baseline characteristics of CRRT patients (Table 1), the most common underlying comorbidity was hypertension (62.1%), followed by diabetes mellitus (36.4%), pulmonary disease (27.3%), peptic ulcers (26.1%), and cancer (22.7%). Of several time trends seen in patients with underlying comorbidities, it was noteworthy that the portion of patients with cerebrovascular accidents (P < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (P < 0.001) and dementia (P < 0.001) increased over time. Other comorbidities and their trends with regard to time are shown in Table 1.
Figure 2

Use of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the acute renal replacement therapy (ARRT) from 2005 to 2016 in Korea

IRRT, intermittent renal replacement therapy, including hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of continuous renal replacement therapy patients and their time-trends

CharacteristicTotal (n = 37,337)2005—2007 (n = 4,667)2008—2010 (n = 8,090)2011—2013 (n = 11,166)2014—2016 (n = 13,414)PP for trend
Age (yr)62 (50—71)62 (50—71)64 (52—73)66 (54—75)67 (55—76)< 0.001< 0.001
 < 6013,863 (37.13)2,007 (43.00)3,207 (39.64)4,024 (36.04)4,625 (34.48)
 ≥ 6023,474 (62.87)2,660 (57.00)4,883 (60.36)7,142 (63.96)8,789 (65.52)
Male sex23,328 (62.48)3,009 (64.47)5,081 (62.81)6,917 (61.95)8,321 (62.03)0.0130.005
Income status< 0.001< 0.001
 Receiving free medical benefits2,930 (7.85)415 (8.89)500 (6.18)777 (6.96)1,238 (9.23)
 1st quartile (low)5,979 (16.01)717 (15.36)1,309 (16.18)1,794 (16.07)2,159 (16.10)
 2nd quartile6,316 (16.92)817 (17.51)1,410 (17.43)1,855 (16.61)2,234 (16.65)
 3rd quartile8,108 (21.72)1,029 (22.05)1,821 (22.51)2,479 (22.20)2,779 (20.72)
 4th quartile (high)14,004 (37.51)1,689 (36.19)3,050 (37.70)4,261 (38.16)5,004 (37.30)
Charlson Comorbidity Index2 (1—4)2 (0—4)2 (0—4)2 (1—4)2 (1—4)< 0.001< 0.001
 0—325,090 (67.20)3,359 (71.97)5,487 (67.82)7,516 (67.31)8,728 (65.07)
 ≥ 412,247 (32.8)1,308 (28.03)2,603 (32.18)3,650 (32.69)4,686 (34.93)
Baseline comorbidities
 Cerebrovascular accident4,847 (12.98)451 (9.66)1,012 (12.51)1,506 (13.49)1,878 (14.00)< 0.001< 0.001
 Acute myocardial infarction839 (2.25)143 (3.06)178 (2.20)248 (2.22)270 (2.01)< 0.001< 0.001
 CVD other than MI6,397 (17.13)788 (16.88)1,436 (17.75)1,862 (16.68)2,311 (17.23)0.5510.853
 Hypertension23,188 (62.10)2,886 (61.84)5,189 (64.14)7,338 (65.72)7,775 (57.96)< 0.001< 0.001
 Secondary hypertension231 (0.62)30 (0.64)54 (0.67)63 (0.56)84 (0.63)0.7290.740
 Diabetes13,576 (36.36)1,389 (29.76)2,955 (36.53)4,348 (38.94)4,884 (36.41)< 0.001< 0.001
 Diabetic complication4,335 (11.61)530 (11.36)996 (12.31)1,328 (11.89)1,481 (11.04)0.0090.087
 Connective tissue disease1,493 (4.00)192 (4.11)279 (3.45)500 (4.48)522 (3.89)0.0010.620
 Congestive heart failure3,079 (8.25)359 (7.69)600 (7.42)961 (8.61)1,159 (8.64)0.0010.002
 Peripheral vascular disease2,800 (7.50)211 (4.52)599 (7.40)900 (8.06)1,090 (8.13)< 0.001< 0.001
 Dementia1,655 (4.43)65 (1.39)224 (2.77)537 (4.81)829 (6.18)< 0.001< 0.001
 Pulmonary disease10,196 (27.31)1,141 (24.45)2,243 (27.73)3,322 (29.75)3,490 (26.02)< 0.0010.499
 Peptic ulcer disease9,743 (26.09)1,326 (28.41)2,364 (29.22)3,211 (28.76)2,842 (21.19)< 0.001< 0.001
 Liver disease2,316 (6.20)309 (6.62)526 (6.50)763 (6.83)718 (5.35)< 0.001< 0.001
 Severe liver disease1,378 (3.69)265 (5.68)377 (4.66)376 (3.37)360 (2.68)< 0.0010.034
 Paraplegia504 (1.35)63 (1.35)133 (1.64)152 (1.36)156 (1.16)0.0150.012
 Renal disease3,776 (10.11)423 (9.06)780 (9.64)1,201 (10.76)1,372 (10.23)0.006< 0.001
 Cancer8,478 (22.71)980 (21.00)1,981 (24.49)2,776 (24.86)2,741 (20.43)< 0.001< 0.001
 Metastatic cancer1,625 (4.35)201 (4.31)421 (5.20)539 (4.83)464 (3.46)< 0.001< 0.001
 HIV38 (0.10)2 (0.04)10 (0.12)10 (0.09)16 (0.12)0.239< 0.001

Continuous variables are shown as medians (interquartile ranges) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages).

CVD, cardiovascular disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MI, myocardial infarction.

P for trends were calculated with regards to time trends.

The principal diagnoses and treatment modalities implemented during the index admission are shown in Table 2. The common principal diagnosis categories were neoplasms/hematological diseases (23.1%), circulatory diseases (22.8%), digestive diseases (10.7%), and genitourinary diseases (10.5%). Several time trends with regards to the proportion of principal diseases were observed. The portion of CRRT patients who received mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001) or cardiac operations (P < 0.001) became less frequent in recent time periods while, by contrast, percutaneous cardiovascular procedures were more widely used with time (P < 0.001).
Table 2

Characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) care according to time periods

CharacteristicTotal (n = 37,337)2005–2007 (n = 4,667)2008–2010 (n = 8,090)2011–2013 (n = 11,166)2014–2016 (n = 13,414)PP for trend
Principal diagnosis< 0.001< 0.001
 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases3,617 (9.69)623 (13.35)982 (12.14)1,019 (9.13)993 (7.40)
 Neoplasms or hematological diseases8,630 (23.11)1,033 (22.13)2,055 (25.40)2,667 (23.89)2,875 (21.43)
 Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases651 (1.74)57 (1.22)120 (1.48)184 (1.65)290 (2.16)
 Mental and behavioral diseases69 (0.18)9 (0.19)16 (0.20)21 (0.19)23 (0.17)
 Diseases of the nervous system377 (1.01)42 (0.90)69 (0.85)134 (1.20)132 (0.98)
 Diseases of the ear and mastoid process7 (0.02)1 (0.02)1 (0.01)1 (0.01)4 (0.03)
 Diseases of the circulatory system8,499 (22.76)1,035 (22.18)1,746 (21.58)2,581 (23.11)3,137 (23.39)
 Diseases of the respiratory system3,366 (9.02)344 (7.37)662 (8.18)1,028 (9.21)1,332 (9.93)
 Diseases of the digestive system3,987 (10.68)577 (12.36)909 (11.24)1,108 (9.92)1,393 (10.38)
 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue84 (0.22)9 (0.19)18 (0.22)33 (0.30)24 (0.18)
 Diseases of the muscle and connective tissue801 (2.15)99 (2.12)172 (2.13)252 (2.26)278 (2.07)
 Diseases of the genitourinary system3,916 (10.49)569 (12.19)816 (10.09)1,128 (10.10)1,403 (10.46)
 Pregnancy-related status91 (0.24)13 (0.28)25 (0.31)28 (0.25)25 (0.19)
 Congenital diseases85 (0.23)10 (0.21)22 (0.27)22 (0.20)31 (0.23)
 Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified824 (2.21)17 (0.36)58 (0.72)246 (2.20)503 (3.75)
 Injury poisoning and other consequences of external causes1,840 (4.93)221 (4.74)357 (4.41)562 (5.03)700 (5.22)
 Factors influencing health status and contact with health services489 (1.31)8 (0.17)62 (0.77)149 (1.33)270 (2.01)
Treatment during ICU stay
 Ventilator care31,610 (84.66)4,174 (89.44)7,117 (87.97)9,451 (84.64)10,868 (81.02)< 0.001< 0.001
 Use of intravenous inotropic agents34,598 (92.66)4,326 (92.69)7,489 (92.57)10,380 (92.96)12,403 (92.46)0.5030.670
 Cardiac operations1,967 (5.27)313 (6.71)516 (6.38)537 (4.81)601 (4.48)< 0.001< 0.001
 Cardiovascular procedures2,052 (5.50)195 (4.18)405 (5.01)663 (5.94)789 (5.88)< 0.001< 0.001
 In-hospital mortality22,581 (60.48)2,959 (63.40)5,061 (62.56)6,879 (61.61)7,682 (57.27)< 0.001< 0.001

Categorical variables are shown as numbers (percentages).

P for trends were calculated with regards to time trends.

Regional differences in patients who underwent CRRT

During the study period, some tertiary referral centers were newly designated or closed by the government, and the overall number of the government-designated tertiary referral hospitals was 42 to 44. The number of CRRT patients according to geographical region and time periods is shown in Table 3. Seoul, with 14 tertiary hospitals, represented the largest portion of CRRT cases in every time period we studied (45.0%), but this fraction persistently decreased over time. This downward trend in CRRT prevalence was similar in Gangwon. However, the proportion of CRRT cases continuously increased in Busan, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Gyeonggi.
Table 3

Number of continuous renal replacement therapy patients according to time period and region

Region2005—2007 (n = 4,667)2008—2010 (n = 8,090)2011—2013 (n = 11,166)2014—2016 (n = 13,414)
Seoul (n = 16,805)2,716 (58.20)4,136 (51.12)5,095 (45.63)4,858 (36.22)
Busan (n = 4,149)500 (10.71)869 (10.74)1,232 (11.03)1,548 (11.54)
Daegu (n = 1,869)229 (4.91)394 (4.87)510 (4.57)736 (5.49)
Incheon (n = 1,059)110 (2.36)154 (1.90)246 (2.20)549 (4.09)
Gwangju (n = 2,431)161 (3.45)335 (4.14)863 (7.73)1,072 (7.99)
Daejeon (n = 766)73 (1.56)151 (1.87)227 (2.03)315 (2.35)
Ulsan (n = 317)NoneNoneNone317 (2.36)
Gyeonggi (n = 4,461)227 (4.86)966 (11.94)1,424 (12.75)1,844 (13.75)
Gangwon (n = 1,191)246 (5.27)338 (4.18)335 (3.00)272 (2.03)
Chungbuk (n = 586)94 (2.01)113 (1.40)147 (1.32)232 (1.73)
Chungnam (n = 1,273)163 (3.49)271 (3.35)369 (3.30)470 (3.50)
Jeonbuk (n = 1,180)64 (1.37)202 (2.50)444 (3.98)470 (3.50)
Jeonnam (n = 270)NoneNone93 (0.83)177 (1.32)
Gyeongnam (n = 980)84 (1.80)161 (1.99)181 (1.62)554 (4.13)

Categorical variables are shown as numbers (percentages).

The baseline characteristics of CRRT patients in major regions of Korea are shown in Table 4. There were some differences in patient characteristics; notably, Gwangju had the highest proportion of CRRT patients who were 60 years old or older. Patients who received CRRT in Seoul more frequently were in the highest quartile with regards to income status (41.7%) and had a relatively higher frequency of cancer history (29.8%). CRRT patients in Jeonnam, in which a cancer-specialized tertiary center was the only local government-designated tertiary referral hospital, had the highest incidence of cancer as a comorbidity (64.8%), which was more than twice that of other regions.
Table 4

Baseline characteristics of continuous renal replacement therapy patients according to major regions in Korea

CharacteristicSeoul (n = 16,805)Busan (n = 4,149)Daegu (n = 1,869)Incheon (n = 1,059)Gwangju (n = 2,431)Daejeon (n = 766)Ulsan (n = 317)Gyeonggi (n = 4,461)Gangwon (n = 1,191)Chungbuk (n = 586)Chungnam (n = 1,273)Jeonbuk (n = 1,180)Jeonnam (n = 270)Gyeongnam (n = 980)P value
Age (yr)64 (52–73)66 (55–75)66 (53–74)64 (52–74)69 (58–77)66 (56–75)64 (54–74)66 (52–75)65 (52–74)69 (57–77)67 (54–76)68 (56–76)68 (57–73)66 (54–74)< 0.001
 < 606,674 (39.70)1,387 (33.4)681 (36.4)443 (41.83)677 (27.85)257 (33.55)117 (36.91)1,695 (38.00)473 (39.71)181 (30.89)455 (35.74)372 (31.53)84 (31.11)367 (37.45)
 ≥ 6010,131 (60.29)2,762 (65.57)1,188 (63.56)616 (58.17)1,754 (72.15)509 (66.45)200 (63.09)2,766 (62.00)718 (60.29)405 (69.11)818 (64.26)808 (68.47)186 (68.89)613 (62.55)
Male sex10,541 (62.73)2,521 (60.76)1,127 (60.3)624 (58.92)1,491 (61.33)503 (65.67)208 (65.62)2,826 (63.35)799 (67.09)372 (63.48)775 (60.88)724 (61.36)169 (62.59)648 (66.12)< 0.001
Charlson Comorbidity2 (1–4)2 (1–4)2 (0–4)2 (0–4)2 (1–5)2 (1–5)3 (1–5)2 (0–4)2 (0–4)2 (1–4)2 (0–4)3 (1–5)3 (1–5)2 (0–4)< 0.001
Index
 011,226 (66.8)2,795 (67.37)1,302 (69.66)757 (71.48)1,530 (62.94)481 (62.79)181 (57.10)3,160 (70.84)868 (72.88)382 (65.19)922 (72.43)676 (57.29)165 (61.11)645 (65.82)
 ≥ 45,579 (33.20)1,354 (32.63)567 (30.34)302 (28.52)901 (37.06)285 (37.21)136 (42.90)1,301 (29.16)323 (27.12)204 (34.81)351 (27.57)504 (42.71)105 (38.89)335 (34.18)
Income status< 0.001
 Receiving free medical benefits1,116 (6.64)485 (11.69)118 (6.31)117 (11.05)281 (11.56)103 (13.45)13 (4.10)240 (5.38)115 (9.66)72 (12.29)37 (2.91)119 (10.08)15 (5.56)99 (10.10)
 1st quartile (low)2,500 (14.88)684 (16.49)323 (17.28)171 (16.15)437 (17.98)105 (13.71)37 (11.67)803 (18.00)206 (17.3)71 (12.12)244 (19.17)199 (16.86)46 (17.04)153 (15.61)
 2nd quartile2,623 (15.61)691 (16.65)332 (17.76)220 (20.77)437 (17.98)115 (15.01)55 (17.35)821 (18.4)243 (20.4)104 (17.75)262 (20.58)182 (15.42)54 (20.00)177 (18.06)
 3rd quartile3,555 (21.15)930 (22.42)465 (24.88)247 (23.32)450 (18.51)162 (21.15)70 (22.08)955 (21.41)285 (23.93)150 (25.60)307 (24.12)237 (20.08)65 (24.07)230 (23.47)
 4th quartile (high)7,011 (41.72)1,359 (32.75)631 (33.76)304 (28.71)826 (33.98)281 (36.68)142 (44.79)1,642 (36.81)342 (28.72)189 (32.25)423 (33.23)443 (37.54)90 (33.33)321 (32.76)
Baseline comorbidities
 Cerebrovascular accident1,927 (11.47)550 (13.26)277 (14.82)110 (10.39)414 (17.03)123 (16.06)38 (11.99)569 (12.75)128 (10.75)121 (20.65)171 (13.43)246 (20.85)25 (9.26)148 (15.10)< 0.001
 Acute myocardial infarction364 (2.17)132 (3.18)59 (3.16)15 (1.42)77 (3.17)13 (1.70)6 (1.89)64 (1.43)30 (2.52)10 (1.71)24 (1.89)13 (1.10)3 (1.11)29 (2.96)< 0.001
 CVD other than MI2,925 (17.41)788 (18.99)311 (16.64)148 (13.98)423 (17.4)143 (18.67)55 (17.35)716 (16.05)180 (15.11)100 (17.06)250 (19.64)161 (13.64)34 (12.59)163 (16.63)< 0.001
 Hypertension10,661 (63.44)2,594 (62.52)1,189 (63.62)619 (58.45)1,568 (64.50)489 (63.84)180 (56.78)2,640 (59.18)669 (56.17)373 (63.65)732 (57.50)754 (63.9)157 (58.15)563 (57.45)< 0.001
 Secondary hypertension126 (0.75)20 (0.48)17 (0.91)2 (0.19)9 (0.37)16 (2.09)0 (0)21 (0.47)3 (0.25)2 (0.34)2 (0.16)7 (0.59)4 (1.48)2 (0.20)< 0.001
 Diabetes5,878 (34.98)1,605 (38.68)642 (34.35)406 (38.34)976 (40.15)291 (37.99)113 (35.65)1,573 (35.26)430 (36.1)254 (43.34)466 (36.61)441 (37.37)91 (33.7)410 (41.84)< 0.001
 Diabetic complication1,775 (10.56)445 (10.73)274 (14.66)115 (10.86)350 (14.4)121 (15.80)25 (7.89)496 (11.12)156 (13.1)95 (16.21)157 (12.33)182 (15.42)24 (8.89)120 (12.24)< 0.001
 Connective tissue disease732 (4.36)161 (3.88)89 (4.76)24 (2.27)96 (3.95)28 (3.66)9 (2.84)168 (3.77)38 (3.19)19 (3.24)35 (2.75)51 (4.32)9 (3.33)34 (3.47)0.008
 Congestive heart failure1,260 (7.5)406 (9.79)203 (10.86)75 (7.08)245 (10.08)75 (9.79)34 (10.73)360 (8.07)100 (8.4)68 (11.6)90 (7.07)60 (5.08)12 (4.44)91 (9.29)< 0.001
 Peripheral vascular disease1,067 (6.35)379 (9.13)164 (8.77)77 (7.27)210 (8.64)71 (9.27)24 (7.57)334 (7.49)69 (5.79)43 (7.34)99 (7.78)147 (12.46)25 (9.26)91 (9.29)< 0.001
 Dementia546 (3.25)204 (4.92)87 (4.65)59 (5.57)202 (8.31)55 (7.18)15 (4.73)215 (4.82)36 (3.02)37 (6.31)65 (5.11)84 (7.12)3 (1.11)47 (4.80)< 0.001
 Pulmonary disease4,458 (26.53)1,182 (28.49)483 (25.84)243 (22.95)789 (32.46)174 (22.72)98 (30.91)1,128 (25.29)300 (25.19)163 (27.82)343 (26.94)393 (33.31)121 (44.81)321 (32.76)< 0.001
 Peptic ulcer4,489 (26.71)1,060 (25.55)473 (25.31)226 (21.34)719 (29.58)206 (26.89)82 (25.87)939 (21.05)305 (25.61)136 (23.21)273 (21.45)455 (38.56)88 (32.59)292 (29.80)< 0.001
 Liver disease1,471 (8.75)208 (5.01)58 (3.10)37 (3.49)43 (1.77)32 (4.18)22 (6.94)203 (4.55)26 (2.18)25 (4.27)51 (4.01)47 (3.98)24 (8.89)69 (7.04)< 0.001
 Paraplegia199 (1.18)76 (1.83)26 (1.39)10 (0.94)38 (1.56)21 (2.74)4 (1.26)55 (1.23)14 (1.18)11 (1.88)13 (1.02)23 (1.95)3 (1.11)11 (1.12)< 0.001
 Renal Disease1,667 (9.92)485 (11.69)198 (10.59)90 (8.5)264 (10.86)93 (12.14)20 (6.31)438 (9.82)121 (10.16)79 (13.48)98 (7.70)113 (9.58)17 (6.30)93 (9.49)< 0.001
 Cancer4,999 (29.75)815 (19.64)275 (14.71)154 (14.54)211 (8.68)147 (19.19)64 (20.19)815 (18.27)120 (10.08)94 (16.04)206 (16.18)215 (18.22)175 (64.81)188 (19.18)< 0.001
 Metastatic cancer951 (5.66)179 (4.31)44 (2.35)34 (3.21)15 (0.62)27 (3.52)4 (1.26)140 (3.14)20 (1.68)29 (4.95)60 (4.71)54 (4.58)25 (9.26)43 (4.39)< 0.001
 Severe liver disease878 (5.22)91 (2.19)52 (2.78)30 (2.83)49 (2.02)18 (2.35)9 (2.84)106 (2.38)18 (1.51)5 (0.85)19 (1.49)43 (3.64)4 (1.48)56 (5.71)< 0.001
 HIV16 (0.10)10 (0.24)0 (0)3 (0.28)1 (0.04)2 (0.26)0 (0)3 (0.07)0 (0)1 (0.17)1 (0.08)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.10)NA

Continuous variables are shown as medians (interquartile ranges) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages).

CVD, cardiovascular disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MI, myocardial infarction; NA, not applicable.

The principal diagnosis and use of ICU care modalities according to regions are shown in Table 5. Infectious diseases were relatively common in Gangwon (14.1%), and Jeonnam had the highest proportion of patients with malignancy or hematological diseases (84.8%). Daegu (29.4%) and Gwangju (26.0%) were the areas in which more than a quarter of CRRT patients had a circulatory disease as the principal diagnosis. Mechanical ventilation was relatively less frequently used for CRRT patients in Jeonnam (P < 0.001). The combined use of ventilator, inotropic agents, and CRRT during the ICU stay was identified in more 80% of CRRT patients in most regions.
Table 5

Characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) care according to major regions of Korea

CharacteristicSeoul (n = 16,805)Busan (n = 4,149)Daegu (n = 1,869)Incheon (n = 1,059)Gwangu (n = 2,431)Daejeon (n = 766)Ulsan (n = 317)Gyeonggi (n = 4,461)Gangwon (n = 1,191)Chungbuk (n = 586)Chungnam (n = 1,273)Jeonbuk (n = 1,180)Jeonnam (n = 270)Gyeongnam (n = 980)P value
Principal diagnosis< 0.001
 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases1,255 (7.47)432 (10.41)167 (8.94)109 (10.29)343 (14.11)48 (6.27)26 (8.20)437 (9.80)299 (25.10)66 (11.26)162 (12.73)157 (13.31)9 (3.33)107 (10.92)
 Neoplasms or hematological diseases5,288 (31.47)770 (18.56)305 (16.32)196 (18.51)141 (5.80)131 (17.10)55 (17.35)850 (19.05)122 (10.24)77 (13.14)163 (12.80)175 (14.83)229 (84.81)128 (13.06)
 Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases213 (1.27)63 (1.52)21 (1.12)31 (2.93)96 (3.95)15 (1.96)9 (2.84)67 (1.50)36 (3.02)19 (3.24)24 (1.89)34 (2.88)1 (0.37)22 (2.24)
 Mental and behavioral diseases41 (0.24)4 (0.10)1 (0.05)2 (0.19)2 (0.08)0 (0)0 (0)15 (0.34)2 (0.17)1 (0.17)0 (0)1 (0.08)0 (0)0 (0)
 Diseases of the nervous system164 (0.98)57 (1.37)13 (0.70)11 (1.04)21 (0.86)7 (0.91)0 (0)51 (1.14)12 (1.01)3 (0.51)9 (0.71)14 (1.19)1 (0.37)14 (1.43)
 Diseases of the ear and mastoid process2 (0.01)1 (0.02)0 (0)1 (0.09)1 (0.04)0 (0)0 (0)2 (0.04)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
 Diseases of the circulatory system3,822 (22.74)971 (23.40)549 (29.37)215 (20.30)631 (25.96)166 (21.67)76 (23.97)1,051 (23.56)223 (18.72)136 (23.21)277 (21.76)182 (15.42)3 (1.11)197 (20.10)
 Diseases of the respiratory system1,241 (7.38)381 (9.18)166 (8.88)94 (8.88)259 (10.65)67 (8.75)39 (12.30)468 (10.49)110 (9.24)60 (10.24)152 (11.94)204 (17.29)4 (1.48)121 (12.35)
 Diseases of the digestive system1,903 (11.32)393 (9.47)190 (10.17)129 (12.18)265 (10.9)64 (8.36)41 (12.93)476 (10.67)108 (9.07)53 (9.04)150 (11.78)121 (10.25)3 (1.11)91 (9.29)
 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue33 (0.20)17 (0.41)3 (0.16)2 (0.19)5 (0.21)5 (0.65)0 (0)7 (0.16)2 (0.17)2 (0.34)2 (0.16)3 (0.25)0 (0)3 (0.31)
 Diseases of the muscle and connective tissue380 (2.26)133 (3.21)47 (2.51)18 (1.70)45 (1.85)20 (2.61)4 (1.26)70 (1.57)8 (0.67)11 (1.88)13 (1.02)29 (2.46)1 (0.37)22 (2.24)
 Diseases of the genitourinary system1,263 (7.52)599 (14.44)247 (13.22)117 (11.05)355 (14.6)154 (20.10)30 (9.46)438 (9.82)124 (10.41)124 (21.16)156 (12.25)168 (14.24)15 (5.56)126 (12.86)
 Pregnancy related status39 (0.23)8 (0.19)13 (0.70)9 (0.85)3 (0.12)0 (0)0 (0)9 (0.20)0 (0)3 (0.51)3 (0.24)3 (0.25)0 (0)1 (0.10)
 Congenital diseases59 (0.35)8 (0.19)1 (0.05)0 (0)1 (0.04)1 (0.13)1 (0.32)8 (0.18)0 (0)1 (0.17)3 (0.24)2 (0.17)0 (0)0 (0)
 Abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified301 (1.79)33 (0.80)18 (0.96)40 (3.78)74 (3.04)59 (7.7)1 (0.32)107 (2.40)57 (4.79)5 (0.85)15 (1.18)36 (3.05)2 (0.74)76 (7.76)
 Injury poisoning and other consequences of external causes490 (2.92)265 (6.40)93 (4.98)55 (5.19)182 (7.49)28 (3.7)34 (10.7.)344 (7.70)85 (7.14)25 (4.27)142 (11.15)41 (3.5)2 (0.74)54 (5.5)
 Factors influencing health status and contact with health services308 (1.83)14 (0.34)35 (1.87)30 (2.83)7 (0.29)1 (0.13)1 (0.32)60 (1.34)3 (0.25)0 (0)2 (0.16)10 (0.85)0 (0)18 (1.84)
Treatment during ICU stay
 Ventilator care14,604 (86.90)3,307 (79.71)1,607 (85.98)921 (86.97)1,950 (80.21)650 (84.86)260 (82.02)3,750 (84.06)1,007 (84.55)460 (78.5)1,031 (80.99)1,040 (88.14)172 (63.70)851 (86.84)< 0.001
 Use of intravenous inotropic agents15,788 (93.95)3,755 (90.50)1,790 (95.77)1,013 (95.66)2,181 (89.72)702 (91.64)296 (93.38)4,097 (91.84)1,030 (86.48)486 (82.94)1,156 (90.81)1,149 (97.37)241 (89.26)914 (93.27)< 0.001
 Cardiac operations1,191 (7.09)116 (2.80)177 (9.47)42 (3.97)60 (2.47)21 (2.74)11 (3.47)218 (4.89)7 (0.59)16 (2.73)41 (3.22)31 (2.63)0 (0)36 (3.67)< 0.001
 Cardiovascular procedures783 (4.66)192 (4.63)146 (7.81)43 (4.06)205 (8.43)48 (6.27)17 (5.36)271 (6.07)95 (7.98)57 (9.73)102 (8.01)38 (3.22)1 (0.37)54 (5.51)< 0.001
 In-hospital mortality10,193 (60.65)2,425 (58.45)1,165 (62.33)693 (65.44)1,361 (55.99)442 (57.70)165 (52.05)2,761 (61.89)719 (60.37)299 (51.02)767 (60.25)807 (68.39)181 (67.04)603 (61.53)< 0.001

Categorical variables are shown as numbers (percentages).

Prognosis of CRRT patients

The patients’ prognoses according to time periods are shown in Fig. 3. We identified that the overall patient mortality rate was better in the most recent time period compared to the earlier time periods (P < 0.001). A similar trend was also seen regarding renal survival, as CRRT patients in 2014 to 2016 had the lowest incidence of ESRD among the studied time periods (P < 0.001). This improvement in patient prognosis over time remained significant in our multivariable model (Table 6). CRRT patients in 2014 to 2016 had a significantly lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.858; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.825–0.891; P < 0.001) and ESRD (adjusted HR, 0.580; 95% CI, 0.507–0.664; P < 0.001) when compared to those in 2005 to 2007.
Figure 3

Patient prognosis according to 3-year time-periods

A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing the all-cause mortality and renal survival rates according to time periods. The x-axes indicate years of index admission. The y-axis for all-cause mortality indicates cumulative patient survival (A) and cumulative renal survival (B).

Table 6

Prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy patients according to time periods

Adjusted HR (95% CI)P value
All-cause mortality
 2005—20071 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 2008—20100.956 (0.919—0.994)< 0.001
 2011—20130.927 (0.893—0.963)< 0.001
 2014—20160.858 (0.825—0.891)< 0.001
Renal survival
 2005—20071 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 2008—20100.790 (0.691—0.903)< 0.001
 2011—20130.740 (0.650—0.843)< 0.001
 2014—20160.580 (0.507—0.664)< 0.001

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Multivariable cox regression analysis performed after adjusting for age, sex, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and geographical region.

On the other hand, trends in prognosis according to geographical region showed complex results (Fig. 4). CRRT patients in Jeonnam, which had the highest portion of patients with cancer as a comorbidity, related to included hospital’s specialization, had relatively poor patient survival compared to other regions (P < 0.001). On the other hand, those who received CRRT in Ulsan had better overall survival than those in other regions (P < 0.001), yet the follow-up duration was the shortest in this region among the studied areas. Regional differences in renal outcome also showed diverse results. No prominent difference in renal survival was identified among the studied regions, except for that Jeonnam had a lower incidence of ESRD than other areas (P < 0.001)
Figure 4

Patient prognosis according to studied regions

Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing the all-cause mortality and renal survival rates according to geographical region. The x-axes indicated years of index admission. The y-axis for all-cause mortality indicates cumulative patient survival (A) and cumulative renal survival (B).

Discussion

The results of our study show that, in Korea, the use of CRRT has been growing rapidly in recent years, and the proportion of CRRT cases of the total number of ARRT cases has increased. Moreover, the characteristics of CRRT patients changed over time, and regional differences were present. The general prognosis of CRRT patients has improved in recent year; however, differences in CRRT outcomes according to geographical area showed diverse results. Recently, the use of CRRT has increased worldwide. The primary clinical benefit of CRRT is gradual dialysis or ultrafiltration, leading to hemodynamic stability, which is crucial in ICU patients [9,10]. Also, several other advantages, including the preservation of renal function and tolerance in patients with liver failure and increased intracranial pressure, have been proposed [11-13]. However, its limited availability and relatively higher expense were pointed out as major disadvantages of CRRT [14]. In Korea, we identified a rapid increase in the use of CRRT, and the proportion of CRRT patients among all ARRT patients, which reached 80% after 2014, was much higher than that of other nations [3,4]. One possible explanation for this phenomenon may be that we included only government-designated tertiary referral centers, not other ICUs. However, this widespread use of CRRT in Korea still merits attention. The characteristics of patients who received CRRT changed over time. We showed that an increasing number of elderly people received CRRT, and they had more comorbidities than before. The specific distributions of baseline comorbidities also changed with time, which could be related to changes in the overall incidence rates of these diseases in Korea. Clinicians should pay attention to the alternating trend of underlying diseases or a principal diagnosis of CRRT patients, as this could show that certain disease categories may become more important for CRRT patients in the future. Interestingly, despite an increase in the portion of elderly CRRT patients, the overall mortality and renal survival rates improved with time. This phenomenon was similarly shown in other cohorts, and AKI patients have also shown better clinical outcomes recently [3,4]. Advances in ICU care for sepsis and respiratory failure, which can coexist in CRRT patients, have been pointed out as a potential major reason for the improvements in AKI prognosis [15,16]. In addition, increasing implementation of CRRT in the ICU implies that expansion of treatment indications may have also contributed to the better prognosis of CRRT patients of late. Considering the recent trends, an increase in the number of survivors of severe AKI could be anticipated. Clinicians should be reminded that about 10% to 25% of CRRT patients progress to ESRD, most frequently shortly after their stay in the ICU, but also sometimes after a longer time has passed. Therefore, future studies regarding the long-term prognosis of AKI survivors after an ICU stay are warranted, and clinicians should closely monitor for possible deterioration in renal function and the development of related comorbidities in CRRT patients. Regional differences in CRRT patients were diverse. The majority of CRRT (45%) was performed in Seoul, the capital of Korea, which has 14 government-designated tertiary referral hospitals. Considering that three urban regions, Seoul, Busan, and Gyeonggi, represented 68.1% of all CRRT cases we studied, the use of CRRT was concentrated in cities, in which many government-designated tertiary referral hospitals were located, rather than suburban area. The patients’ prognoses also varied according to the geographical region. However, regional superiority could hardly be assessed, as significant differences in patient characteristics according to geographical region also existed. The clinical outcomes of CRRT according to geographical region should be investigated in a further study which includes more socioeconomic variables. There are several limitations to the current study. First, being a nationwide study in a single country, the epidemiology of CRRT may be different in other nations. Notably, the high accessibility of CRRT in Korea, which may not be similar in other countries, should be considered when interpreting our study results. Second, due to the limitations of the data from the NHIS, we could not include information on the timing of CRRT initiation or discontinuation. Further studies which include a clear investigation into the timing of the diagnosis during admission and CRRT usage may provide valuable information. Third, as we analyzed information from the national health claims database, laboratory findings were not included in our dataset. Also, clinical parameters during the ICU stay were not included. Therefore, neither laboratory variables nor information regarding the clinical course used during the index admission, both of which might have a large impact on patient prognosis, were not studied. Lastly, past medical history was identified in a relatively limited time period, due to the availability of the data. In conclusion, CRRT has been a widely used as an ARRT modality in Korea. Prognosis after CRRT has improved over time. Clinicians should understand the time trends and regional differences of CRRT patients, and appropriate distribution of medical resources and clinical attention should be considered.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Evolving practices in critical care and potential implications for management of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Kathleen D Liu; Michael A Matthay; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis*.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Stevenson; Amanda R Rubenstein; Gregory T Radin; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Allan J Walkey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Elisabeth Burdick; Melissa Honour; Joseph V Bonventre; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Changing incidence and outcomes following dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury among critically ill adults: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Eric McArthur; Neill K J Adhikari; Sean M Bagshaw; Karen E A Burns; Amit X Garg; Ziv Harel; Abhijat Kitchlu; C David Mazer; Danielle M Nash; Damon C Scales; Samuel A Silver; Joel G Ray; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Luc R Berthiaume; Anthony Delaney; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Pro/con debate: continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute kidney injury: a never-ending story yet approaching the finish?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Wim Van Biesen; Eric Hoste; Norbert Lameire
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury in Denmark 2000-2012: Time Trends of Incidence and Prevalence of Risk Factors-A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Nicholas Carlson; Kristine Hommel; Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Anne-Merete Soja; Tina Vilsbøll; Anne-Lise Kamper; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar Gislason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regional Variation in Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Dialysis in the English National Health Service from 2000 to 2015 - A National Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Nitin V Kolhe; Richard J Fluck; Andrew W Muirhead; Maarten W Taal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Data Resource Profile: The National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea.

Authors:  Sang Cheol Seong; Yeon-Yong Kim; Young-Ho Khang; Jong Heon Park; Hee-Jin Kang; Heeyoung Lee; Cheol-Ho Do; Jong-Sun Song; Ji Hyon Bang; Seongjun Ha; Eun-Joo Lee; Soon Ae Shin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  13 in total

1.  Association of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With the Risk of Ménière's Disease and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Study Using Data From the Korean National Health Insurance Service.

Authors:  Jong-Yeup Kim; Inseok Ko; Bum-Joo Cho; Dong-Kyu Kim
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Development of New Equations Predicting the Mortality Risk of Patients on Continuous RRT.

Authors:  Min Woo Kang; Navdeep Tangri; Soie Kwon; Lilin Li; Hyeseung Lee; Seung Seok Han; Jung Nam An; Jeonghwan Lee; Dong Ki Kim; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim; Sejoong Kim; Jung Pyo Lee
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-08-02

3.  Changes in acute kidney injury epidemiology in critically ill patients: a population-based cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Subin Hwang; Hyejeong Park; Youngha Kim; Danbee Kang; Ho Suk Ku; Juhee Cho; Jung Eun Lee; Wooseong Huh; Eliseo Guallar; Gee Young Suh; Hye Ryoun Jang
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  Continuous renal replacement therapy in elderly with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Kristianne Rachel P Medina-Liabres; Sejoong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

5.  Change of surfactant protein D and A after renal ischemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Islam Md Imtiazul; Redwan Asma; Ji-Hye Lee; Nam-Jun Cho; Samel Park; Ho-Yeon Song; Hyo-Wook Gil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of mortality in liver cirrhosis patients on continuous renal replacement therapy in two tertiary hospitals in Korea.

Authors:  You Hyun Jeon; Il Young Kim; Gum Sook Jang; Sang Heon Song; Eun Young Seong; Dong Won Lee; Soo Bong Lee; Hyo Jin Kim
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08-11

7.  When and why to start continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Jung Nam An; Sung Gyun Kim; Young Rim Song
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-11-01

8.  Modeling acid-base balance during continuous kidney replacement therapy.

Authors:  John K Leypoldt; Mauro Pietribiasi; Jorge Echeverri; Kai Harenski
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  The interactive effects of input and output on managing fluid balance in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Jhee; Hye Ah Lee; Seonmi Kim; Youn Kyung Kee; Ji Eun Lee; Shina Lee; Seung-Jung Kim; Duk-Hee Kang; Kyu Bok Choi; Hyung Jung Oh; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  RNA-Seq identifies condition-specific biological signatures of ischemia-reperfusion injury in the human kidney.

Authors:  Meeyoung Park; Chae Hwa Kwon; Hong Koo Ha; Miyeun Han; Sang Heon Song
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.