OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of education on optimizing medication histories in a single-center pediatric emergency department. METHODS: This was a prospective, 2-phase study of 200 patients ages 21 years and younger who presented to the pediatric emergency department in January and February 2017. In phase I of the study, 100 patients were interviewed by both a nurse and a pharmacist. Between phases I and II, the pharmacist educated each nurse and disseminated standardized education materials. In phase II, 100 additional patients were interviewed by both a nurse and a pharmacist. Discrepancies were quantified in both phases of the study. The primary outcome was the distribution of total discrepancies in medications identified. Total discrepancies were defined as a composite of medication name, dose, route, frequency, and time of last dose. RESULTS: A total of 200 medication histories were collected over phases I and II. In phase I (n = 79), the pharmacist identified 185 medications, 88 of which were also identified by the nurse. In phase II (n = 82), the pharmacist identified 180 medications, 95 of which were also identified by the nurse. The distribution of discrepancies per patient and per medication was significantly reduced in regard to dose, route, and frequency documentation. CONCLUSION: Although improvement was observed, barriers beyond a knowledge deficit exist to limit accuracy of medication histories collected by nurses.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of education on optimizing medication histories in a single-center pediatric emergency department. METHODS: This was a prospective, 2-phase study of 200 patients ages 21 years and younger who presented to the pediatric emergency department in January and February 2017. In phase I of the study, 100 patients were interviewed by both a nurse and a pharmacist. Between phases I and II, the pharmacist educated each nurse and disseminated standardized education materials. In phase II, 100 additional patients were interviewed by both a nurse and a pharmacist. Discrepancies were quantified in both phases of the study. The primary outcome was the distribution of total discrepancies in medications identified. Total discrepancies were defined as a composite of medication name, dose, route, frequency, and time of last dose. RESULTS: A total of 200 medication histories were collected over phases I and II. In phase I (n = 79), the pharmacist identified 185 medications, 88 of which were also identified by the nurse. In phase II (n = 82), the pharmacist identified 180 medications, 95 of which were also identified by the nurse. The distribution of discrepancies per patient and per medication was significantly reduced in regard to dose, route, and frequency documentation. CONCLUSION: Although improvement was observed, barriers beyond a knowledge deficit exist to limit accuracy of medication histories collected by nurses.
Authors: Patricia L Cornish; Sandra R Knowles; Romina Marchesano; Vincent Tam; Steven Shadowitz; David N Juurlink; Edward E Etchells Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-02-28
Authors: Chi Huynh; Ian C K Wong; Stephen Tomlin; David Terry; Anthony Sinclair; Keith Wilson; Yogini Jani Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: Thaciana Dos Santos Alcântara; Fernando Castro de Araújo Neto; Helena Ferreira Lima; Dyego Carlos S Anacleto de Araújo; Júlia Mirão Sanchez; Giulyane Targino Aires-Moreno; Carina de Carvalho Silvestre; Divaldo P de Lyra Junior Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2020-11-11