| Literature DB >> 29970973 |
Aleksandr Danilov1, Inna Pivovarova2, Svetlana Krotova2.
Abstract
The methodology for assessing the spatial homogeneity of ecosystems with the possibility of subsequent zoning of territories in terms of the degree of disturbance of the environment is considered in the study. The degree of pollution of the water body was reconstructed on the basis of hydrochemical monitoring data and information on the level of the technogenic load in one year. As a result, the greatest environmental stress zones were isolated and correct zoning using geostatistical analysis techniques was proved. Mathematical algorithm computing system was implemented in an object-oriented programming C #. A software application has been obtained that allows quickly assessing the scale and spatial localization of pollution during the initial analysis of the environmental situation.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29970973 PMCID: PMC6009014 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7424818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Region of research and sampling points.
Figure 2GIS-distribution of pollutants.
Figure 3Spatial-correlation function.
Estimation of homogeneity of cross-correlation function of the investigated descriptions (a fragment over of calculations is brought on 12 pairs from 55).
| Pairs | Distance between sampling points | Coefficient of pair wise correlation | Value of empiric cross-correlation function | Value of theoretical cross-correlation function |
|
| Rejection | Mean square error ( | Doubled mean square error (2 | Case, when a rejection exceeds a MSE (Δ > | Case, when a rejection exceeds a doubled MSE (Δ > 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,1-2,3 | 0,14 | 0,986 | 0,868792 | 0,988499 | 2,576362 | 1,373064 | 1,203298 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | 1 |
| 2,1-2,4 | 0,716 | 0,984 | 0,827205 | 0,941182 | 1,748302 | 1,221999 | 0,526303 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,1-2,5 | 0,963 | 0,5 | 0,809371 | 0,920891 | 1,594861 | 1,167063 | 0,427799 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,1-2,6 | 1,196 | 0,7 | 0,792549 | 0,901751 | 1,481512 | 1,119238 | 0,362274 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,1-2,7 | 1,34 | 0,99 | 0,782152 | 0,889921 | 1,421548 | 1,091341 | 0,330208 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,1-2,8 | 2,114 | 0,74 | 0,726269 | 0,826339 | 1,176481 | 0,958347 | 0,218134 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | ||
| 2,3-2,4 | 0,587 | 0,85 | 0,836519 | 0,951779 | 1,850351 | 1,252727 | 0,597625 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,3-2,5 | 0,789 | 0,7 | 0,821934 | 0,935185 | 1,698212 | 1,205259 | 0,492953 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,3-2,6 | 1,083 | 0,4 | 0,800707 | 0,911034 | 1,53357 | 1,141991 | 0,391579 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,3-2,7 | 1,241 | 0,8 | 0,7893 | 0,898054 | 1,462071 | 1,110392 | 0,351679 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | |
| 2,3-2,8 | 2,024 | 0,99 | 0,732767 | 0,833732 | 1,200254 | 0,972574 | 0,22768 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | ||
| 2,4-2,5 | 0,387 | 0,5 | 0,850959 | 0,968209 | 2,062843 | 1,303627 | 0,759216 | 0,301511 | 0,603023 | 1 | 1 |
Figure 4Example of calculations in the software.