| Literature DB >> 29970867 |
Qiansi Chen1, Meng Li2, Chen Wang3, Zefeng Li4, Jiayang Xu5, Qingxia Zheng6, Pingping Liu7, Huina Zhou8.
Abstract
Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) is a traditional Andean crop with great potential for various sanitarian and medical functions, which is attracting increased research attention. The majority of previous Maca studies were focused on biochemistry and pharmacodynamics, while the genetic basis of its unique characteristics lagged due to a lack of genome information. The authors perform gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis in the hypocotyls of three Maca ecotypes and identify 79 compounds. Among them, 62 compounds have distinct profiles among Maca ecotypes. To reveal the underlying regulatory mechanism of the chemical composition differences, de novo transcriptome sequencing is performed and the transcription profiles of three Maca ecotypes are comparatively analyzed. Functional analysis indicates several key pathways, including “starch and sucrose metabolism,” “phenylpropanoid biosynthesis,” “phenylalanine metabolism” and “plant-pathogen interaction,” are involved in regulating the chemical compositions of Maca. Combining metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis indicates transcription factors such as MYB and WRKY and mediators such as protein kinase and bifunctional inhibitors might be critical regulators of chemical composition in Maca. The transcriptome reference genome and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) obtained in this study might serve as an initial step to illustrate the genetic differences in nutrient component, secondary metabolites content, medicinal function and stress resistance in Maca.Entities:
Keywords: Maca; glucosinolate; hypocotyl; metabolome; transcriptome
Year: 2018 PMID: 29970867 PMCID: PMC6071217 DOI: 10.3390/genes9070335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Principal Component Analysis (PCA), partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) analysis and permutation tests of Maca metabolite profiling data. (A) Photograph shows the three different Maca ecotypes. (B) PCA analysis, scores plot of principal components analysis of different ecotypes of Maca. (C) PLS-DA score plots, based on metabolite profiling data of different ecotypes of Maca. (D) Permutation tests of PLS-DA models, the permutation tests were carried out with 200 random permutations. Each point represents a metabolite profile of a biological replicate.
Figure 2Metabolite profiles in Maca ecotypes. (A) The profiles of 62 metabolites in different Maca ecotypes. (B) The similarities and differences of metabolite composition among Maca ecotypes.
Functional annotation of Maca hypocotyl transcriptome.
| Annotated Databases | Unigenes | ≥300 nt | ≥1000 nt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nr | 71,550 | 59,091 | 28,515 |
| COG | 49,846 | 42,993 | 24,192 |
| KEGG | 8287 | 8117 | 6133 |
| GO | 57,433 | 48,655 | 24,362 |
| Swiss-Prot | 51,936 | 43,669 | 23,091 |
| All | 73,113 | 59,614 | 28,548 |
Figure 3Transcription profiles in Maca ecotypes. (A)The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among Maca ecotypes. (B) The similarities and differences of the number of DEGs among Maca ecotypes. (C) Comparison of the transcriptomes among Maca ecotypes by the heat map.
Figure 4Functional annotation of DEGs based on gene ontology (GO) categorization. The DEGs were enriched in different GO terms. The GO terms such as “cell part,” “binding,” “catalytic activity,” “biological regulation,” “cellular process,” “metabolic process” and “response to stimulus,” include most highly enriched DEGs.
Specially expressed genes in Maca ecotypes.
| Gene ID | Specially Expressed In 1 | Swissprot Annotation | GO Annotation |
|---|---|---|---|
| c29661_g1_i1 | B | Unknown | - |
| c34272_g1_i2 | B | Unknown | - |
| c36979_g1_i2 | B | No vein-like protein | - |
| c43742_g2_i1 | B | Plastidic glucose transporter 4 | - |
| c43908_g1_i6 | B | DNA ligase | DNA recombination (GO:0006310) |
| c34364_g1_i4 | Y | Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein | Cell wall (GO:0005618) |
| c36217_g1_i3 | Y | Disease resistance-responsive, dirigent domain-containing protein | Defense response (GO:0006952) |
| c39509_g4_i3 | Y | Zinc ion binding | - |
| c42330_g1_i1 | Y | Probable fructokinase-5 | Ribokinase activity (GO:0004747) |
| c51221_g3_i1 | Y | Transposon Ty3-I Gag-Pol polyprotein | - |
| c34798_g1_i3 | V | Unknown | Microtubule-based movement (GO:0007018) |
| c36120_g1_i1 | V | Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon TNT 1-94 | - |
| -c40810_g1_i1 | V | Chalcone synthase | Oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114) |
| c67803_g1_i1 | V | Unknown | - |
| c8503_g1_i1 | V | Transcription factor MYB75 | DNA binding transcription factor activity (GO:0003700) |
| c41540_g2_i3 | BV | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 8 | Proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (GO:0043161) |
| c41853_g5_i1 | BV | Unknown | - |
| c42101_g1_i7 | BV | Annexin D8 | Response to water deprivation (GO:0009414) |
| c47327_g1_i3 | BV | Unknown | - |
| c48799_g1_i1 | BV | Aspartic proteinase-like protein 1 | Anchored component of membrane (GO:0031225) |
| c13374_g1_i1 | BY | Unknown | - |
| c20825_g2_i1 | BY | Unknown | - |
| c21560_g1_i1 | BY | Early light-induced protein 1, chloroplastic | Cytoplasm (GO:0005737) |
| c33991_g1_i2 | BY | Unknown | - |
| c46340_g2_i8 | BY | Ultraviolet-B receptor UVR8 | Nucleotide-excision repair (GO:0006289) |
| c36101_g2_i1 | YV | 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase | - |
| c36695_g1_i1 | YV | Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon TNT 1-94 | - |
| c40657_g2_i3 | YV | Thioredoxin O1, mitochondrial | Brassinosteroid biosynthetic process (GO:0016132) |
| c43332_g1_i8 | YV | Tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein | Response to sucrose (GO:0009744) |
| c45635_g1_i2 | YV | Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase domain-containing protein 3 | NADP + binding (GO:0070401) |
| c49680_g2_i2 | YV | Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon TNT 1-94 | Golgi apparatus (GO:0005794) |
1 B, Y AND V represents black, yellow and violet Maca, respectively. “-” represents no match annotations in GO analysis.
Figure 5Distribution of differentially expressed transcription factors in Maca ecotypes.
Figure 6Connection network between regulatory genes and metabolites. The networks between metabolome and transcriptome data were visualized by the Cytoscape software (The Cytoscape Consortium, San Diego, CA, USA, version 2.8.2). Metabolites were divided into groups and DEGs were divided into clusters. Red lines represent positive correlations and grey lines represent negative correlations.