| Literature DB >> 29970357 |
Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes1, Sandra van Dulmen2,3,4, Espen Andreas Brembo4, Hilde Eide4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Web-based interventions are becoming an alternative of treatment aimed to support behavioral changes and several advantages over traditional treatments are reported. New ways of delivering an intervention may result in new challenges regarding monitoring of treatment fidelity (TF) which is essential to ensure internal and external validity. Despite the importance of the theme, only a few studies in this field are reported.Entities:
Keywords: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; Web-based; diabetes mellitus type 2; mHealth; mobile phone; treatment fidelity
Year: 2018 PMID: 29970357 PMCID: PMC6053615 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy subprocesses.
| Subprocess | Definition |
| Values | The deeply meaningful elements in a person's life. Values concern the ideals we have and how we want to live. |
| Committed action | Specific and concrete action plans guided by one's values, which also takes into account and anticipate barriers on the way. |
| Acceptance | Openness to experience, urges, emotions, and thoughts allowing them to come and go without a struggle. |
| Contact with the present moment | Being fully aware of the psychological and environmental events with openness, interest, receptiveness and without judgment. |
| Self as context | Allows people to be aware of psychological content without linking it to their personal identity. |
| Cognitive defusion | A process where people learn how to gain a perspective regarding one's thoughts, and thus manage to see their own thoughts as an outside observer and therefore avoid being affected by them. |
Overview of the diabetes mellitus type 2 pilot study by Nes et al [23,24].
| Protocol | Description |
| Aim | To develop and test the feasibility of a mobile phone delivered intervention based on ACT to support self-management in persons with diabetes mellitus type 2. |
| Design | This was a feasibility pilot study. The intervention lasted for 12 weeks and started with a personal instructional meeting followed by daily e-diaries and feedback via a mobile phone. At a scheduled diary-completion time and to access the feedback, the participant received a short message service (SMS) text message with a link to a secure website. In this website, the diary questions could be answered and submitted back to the server, and the available feedback message could be read. There were 4 audio files with mindfulness and relaxation exercises available on the mobile phones. |
| Diaries | The participants completed the e-diaries 3 times daily. The diaries included 16-19 questions chosen for supporting self-monitoring (level of blood glucose, diet, medicine, and achieved activities) and awareness of health behavior, thoughts, feelings and applied self-management strategies. Most of the questions were answered by choosing predefined alternatives or by scoring on a 6-point Likert scale. The diaries also included a comment field giving participants the opportunity to write a short personal message to the therapist. |
| Feedback | A therapist had immediate access to submitted diaries and used the situational information to formulate personalized feedback based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The purpose of the diaries and the situational feedback was to stimulate self-management. Daily written situational feedback (except weekends) was given during the first month followed by weekly feedback during the next 2 months. A multi-disciplinary group supported the development of the feedback during the first period of the study. The therapist used information from the 3 latest submitted diaries. There was no limitation on the length of the feedback. |
| Therapist | A nurse that was trained in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. |
| Setting and recruitment | The intention was to recruit persons with type 2 diabetes through general practitioners and to include 10-15 participants to test the feasibility of the intervention in this patient group. Because of the difficulty in recruiting participants through their general practitioners, the social network of the researchers was also informed about the project and persons were asked if they knew potential candidates. The potential candidates with type 2 diabetes that met the inclusion criteria received a letter describing the study. Those interested in participating met the responsible researcher and received additional information. After receiving complementary information, the patients who agreed to participate in the project signed an informed consent form. All patients were followed by and received standard care from their general practitioners. |
| Outcomes | The primary outcome was the level of glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1c). This blood test shows the average level of blood sugar over the previous 2 to 3 months. This indicates how well a person with diabetes is being controlled over time. |
| Study Sample and Data Collection | Of the 11/15 (73.3%) participants included in the study completed the intervention. The data were collected at researcher’s and general practitioner’s office. The baseline in the first meeting with the patients (T1) and immediately after 12-week intervention period (T2). The participants were interviewed twice. The first time halfway through and the second time at the end of intervention period. |
| Statistical Analysis | Descriptive statistics as means and frequencies were calculated using IBM SPSS version 18 statistical software. A descriptive summary of the information extracted from the interviews was made, the content was analyzed, and themes identified. |
| Effect | Most of the participants reported positive life style changes. The response rate to daily registration entries was good and few technical problems were encountered. The mean HBA1c level the week before inclusion was 7.4% (SD 1.1%) and 6.9% (SD 0.8%) at the end of intervention. More detailed results regarding outcomes are reported elsewhere [ |
| Feasibility | At the end of the intervention, the participants received a questionnaire to assess their experience with the study. The questionnaire had 5 main areas with the number of items varying from 8 to 20: (1) participation in the project (12 items), (2) use of mobile phone (20 items), (3) daily diaries (12 items), (4) the received feedback (12 items), and (5) self-management (8). The scoring range in the answers was on 5-point Likert scales from 0 ‘‘totally disagree’’ to 5 ‘‘totally agree.’’ The mean for participation in the project was 4.2 (SD 0.5), for the use of a mobile phone it was 3.3 (SD 0.2), for diaries it was 4.4 (SD 0.4), for feedback it was 4.0 (SD 0.5), and for self-management it was 3.4 (SD 0.6). The participants also answered 7 questions about the project structure. There were 2 semi-structured interviews with each participant performed. |
| Conclusion | The described intervention is feasible and was evaluated as supportive and meaningful. The developed mobile phone application seems a promising tool for supporting patients with type 2 diabetes to make important lifestyle changes. |
Assessment of treatment fidelity strategies developed by Borrelli and colleagues [28].
| Treatment fidelity strategies | Present | Absent | Not Applicable | ||
| Treatment design | |||||
| Length of contact session(s) | X | — | — | ||
| Number of contacts | X | — | — | ||
| Content of treatment | X | — | — | ||
| Duration of contact over time | X | — | — | ||
| Length of contact session(s) | — | — | X | ||
| Number of contacts | — | — | X | ||
| Content of treatment | — | — | X | ||
| Duration of contact over time | — | — | X | ||
| Mention of provider credentials | X | — | — | ||
| Mention of a theoretical model or clinical guidelines on which the intervention is based | X | — | — | ||
| Description of how providers were trained | X | — | — | ||
| Standardized provider training | X | — | — | ||
| Measured provider skill acquisition post training | — | X | — | ||
| Described how provider skills maintained over time | X | — | — | ||
| Included method to ensure that the content of the intervention was being delivered as specified | X | — | — | ||
| Included method to ensure that the dose of the intervention was being delivered as specified | X | — | — | ||
| Included mechanism to assess if the provider adhered to the intervention plan | X | — | — | ||
| Assessed nonspecific treatment effects | X | — | — | ||
| Used treatment manual | X | — | — | ||
| Assessed subject comprehension of the intervention during the intervention period | X | — | — | ||
| Included a strategy to improve subject comprehension of the intervention above and beyond what is included in the intervention | X | — | — | ||
| Assessed subject’s ability to perform the intervention skills during the intervention period | X | — | — | ||
| Included a strategy to improve subject performance of intervention skills during the intervention period | X | — | — | ||
| Assessed subject performance of the intervention skills assessed in settings in which the intervention might be applied | X | — | — | ||
| Assessed strategy to improve subject performance of the intervention skills in settings in which the intervention might be applied | X | — | — | ||
Figure 1Refined coding scheme.
Codebook with refined codes definitions.
| Processes and strategies | Code | Definition | |
| Values | V | Stimulate patient’s reflection on their own values and the values’ impact on their life. Helping the patient to identify the difference between goals and values. Stimulate awareness of gratitude and enthusiasm regarding feelings for increasing awareness of values. | |
| Committed action | CA | Encourage the patient to committed behavior related to their own values through reflecting on strategies related to well-planned actions, barriers and follow-up. Stimulate planning of activities in the form of value-oriented goals. | |
| Contact with present moment | PM | Stimulate breathing exercises for relaxation and variety in activities. Stimulate attention and awareness of internal and external experiences in the present moment. | |
| Cognitive defusion | CD | Stimulate awareness of thought processes instead thought content. Stimulate understanding in thought content as a result of the context in which thoughts are a product of the specific situation(s). | |
| Acceptance | AC | Encourage the patient to make active choices to act in accordance with their values, despite the difficult thoughts, emotions and physical sensations that are unpleasant, but which we cannot directly eliminate or reduce. | |
| Self as context | SC | Stimulate the patient be aware of psychological content without linking it to their personal identity, creating a sense of distance between one’s self and one’s thoughts. | |
| Behavioral support | BS | Support the patient in the change process by recognizing the patient's willingness and efforts to change behavior. Motivate the patient in the change process through the use of praise and positive words. Provide confirmation of the patient's coping strategies. Encourage the patient to be their own supporter by practicing self-talk. Use specific records from patient diary forms in order to deliver a Message. Summarize developments during the follow-up period to emphasize key elements. | |
| Advise | AD | Give specific and constructive advice for appropriate behavior or to specific situation. | |
| Empathic statements | ES | Recognize the patient's experiences and feelings, showing empathy, understanding and respect. | |
| Stimulate participation | SP | Encourage patient to provide written information to ensure the most individualized follow-up. | |
| General information | GI | Provide information of a general, not therapeutic purpose | |
| Educational information | EI | Explain scientific purpose and significance related to advice, training and or intervention | |
Example of feedback text messages divided in text segments. AD: advise; BS: behavioral support; CA: committed action; EI: education information; ES: empathetic statements; GI: general information.
| Feedback Text Messages Number | Code | Text segments |
| 3 | CA | Hi. Yesterday I wrote a little about life values. If one of your life values is to achieve better health, you may set up some goals to live by according to this life value. An example of this might be that you may eat and drink according to your physician’s recommendation. The goals should not be extensive, but narrow and feasible. The mobile phone you borrowed from the project has several utilities. Have you tried to use the software for diabetes that is uploaded there? You can, for example, set up goals regarding food and drink for the day and for the week. At the end of the day, record what you have eaten and been drinking, and the system provides feedback (smile faces), depending on how you performed in relation to your own personal goals. |
| 3 | EI | The software uses the terms high and low carbs. It may be a little unclear what these terms mean, so I'm going to give you a little explanation now. High carbs are carbohydrates that are rapidly absorbed by the body and rapidly increases blood sugar. Examples of drink and food that contain a lot of carbohydrates are sugary drinks like soft drinks and pasta respectively. Low carbs are carbohydrates that are slowly absorbed by body and give a slower blood sugar rise like bread with a lot of whole grains and fiber and vegetables. |
| 3 | GI | In the manual you received from Ann in the beginning of the project you can also find this explanation with other examples. |
| 3 | ES | Feel free to write in the text field if you have any questions! Have a nice day. Regards Helen. |
| 4 | BS | Hi. It looks to me like you have a plan for the day concerning taking of your medications, blood sugar control and eat and drink as recommended. I see that you manage to achieve these goals. That’s great! |
| 4 | CA | You wrote in the middle of the day yesterday that you were at work, and that you had the opportunity to do physical exercises. Do you want to increase your activity level? Yesterday I wrote about setting up goals according to your life values. The goals shall not be to extensive, but narrow and achievable. Even when you set goals that you believe are achievable, there may be barriers that impede you from reaching them. It may be helpful to think about any barriers in relation to the goals you set up to yourself. Barriers may include time, effort or different thoughts and feelings. Time Barriers are anything that prevent many people from moving toward their goals. Can you think of any barriers that impede you from reaching your goals? Challenging work and a hectic schedule are barriers that prevent people being as physically active as they want. If you experience the same, you may reflect on what strategies you can use to reach your goals, despite the fact that time is limited. |
| 4 | GI | A long weekend is coming up and you will not get feedback until Monday. I will take a look at the diaries you will fill out during these days, to give you feedback on Tuesday. |
| 4 | AD | During this period, I would suggest that you reflect on what I have written to you in the feedback text messages so far. This because reflection can lead to awareness of things that are important to you. I wish you a nice Pentecost weekend! Regards Helen |
Distribution of the codes used in the interrater reliability analyses. Dashes indicate the absence of codes. AC: acceptance; AD: advise; BS: behavioral support; CA: committed action; CD: cognitive defusion; EI: education information; ES: empathetic statements; GI: general information; PM: contact with present moment; SC: self as context; SP: stimulate participation; V: values.
| Code | V | CA | PM | CD | AC | SC | BS | AD | ES | SP | GI | EI | SUM |
| V | 29 | — | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32 |
| CA | 3 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 49 |
| PM | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| CD | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 17 |
| AC | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| SC | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| BS | — | 2 | 2 | 3 | — | — | 75 | — | 7 | — | — | — | 89 |
| AD | — | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | 29 | 1 | — | — | — | 34 |
| ES | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | — | — | — | 12 |
| SP | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 7 | — | — | 8 |
| GI | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | 45 | — | 53 |
| EI | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | 30 | 32 |
| SUM | 32 | 52 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 76 | 30 | 23 | 9 | 45 | 32 | 336 |
Overview of all data material coded. Dashes indicate the absence of codes. AC: acceptance; AD: advise; BS: behavioral support; CA: committed action; CD: cognitive defusion; EI: education information; ES: empathetic statements; GI: general information; P: participant; PM: contact with present moment; SC: self as context; SP: stimulate participation; TF: total feedback messages; TTS: total of text segments; V: values.
| P | TF | V | CA | PM | CD | SC | AC | BS | AD | ES | SP | CC | GI | EI | TTS |
| 1 | 21 | 6 | 14 | — | 2 | — | — | 14 | 7 | 4 | 2 | — | 11 | 2 | 62 |
| 2 | 25 | 12 | 22 | 3 | — | — | — | 29 | 8 | 27 | 7 | — | 15 | 5 | 128 |
| 3 | 15 | 3 | 7 | — | 2 | — | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 | — | 9 | 6 | 49 |
| 4 | 18 | 7 | 13 | — | — | — | — | 14 | 2 | 2 | 9 | — | 12 | 3 | 62 |
| 5 | 27 | 4 | 12 | — | 3 | — | 2 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 6 | — | 6 | 6 | 69 |
| 6 | 26 | 6 | 14 | — | 3 | — | 4 | 18 | 10 | — | 1 | — | 6 | 2 | 64 |
| 7 | 13 | 2 | 4 | — | — | — | — | 12 | 2 | 7 | — | — | 5 | 7 | 39 |
| 8 | 27 | 5 | 12 | 2 | — | 1 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 3 | — | 5 | 10 | 59 |
| 9 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | — | 3 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 3 | — | 8 | 7 | 66 |
| 10 | 28 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | — | 15 | 3 | 4 | 1 | — | 6 | 8 | 60 |
| 11 | 27 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 1 | — | 6 | 6 | 64 |
| SUM | 251 | 64 | 124 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 164 | 62 | 66 | 39 | — | 89 | 62 | 722 |