| Literature DB >> 29970084 |
Paolo Motta1,2, Thibaud Porphyre3, Saidou M Hamman4, Kenton L Morgan5, Victor Ngu Ngwa6, Vincent N Tanya7, Eran Raizman8, Ian G Handel9, Barend Mark Bronsvoort3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, livestock transhumance represents a key adaptation strategy to environmental variability. In this context, seasonal livestock transhumance also plays an important role in driving the dynamics of multiple livestock infectious diseases. In Cameroon, cattle transhumance is a common practice during the dry season across all the main livestock production zones. Currently, the little recorded information of the migratory routes, grazing locations and nomadic herding practices adopted by pastoralists, limits our understanding of pastoral cattle movements in the country. GPS-tracking technology in combination with a questionnaire based-survey were used to study a limited pool of 10 cattle herds from the Adamawa Region of Cameroon during their seasonal migration, between October 2014 and May 2015. The data were used to analyse the trajectories and movement patterns, and to characterize the key animal health aspects related to this seasonal migration in Cameroon.Entities:
Keywords: Cameroon; Cattle; GPS; Livestock movements; Transhumance
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29970084 PMCID: PMC6029425 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1515-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Cattle herds identified in the Adamawa Region of Cameroon in October and November 2014
| Herd/Collar number | Location (village of origin) | Administrative Division | Collar deployment date | Herd size | Tracked Animal and age (years) | Transhumance completed and survey carried out | Complete GPS data retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1299 | Likok | Vina | 18/11/2014 | 45 | cow (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1300 | Belel | Vina | 25/10/2014 | 57 | cow (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1301 | Nyambaka | Vina | 24/10/2014 | 35 | bull (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1302 | Likok | Vina | 03/11/2014 | 40 | bull (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1303 | Margol | Vina | 03/11/2014 | 71 | cow (5y) | Yes | No |
| 1304 | Mbe | Vina | 03/11/2014 | 71 | cow (4y) | No | No |
| 1305 | Dir | Mbere | 05/11/2014 | 93 | bull (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1307 | Lougga | Vina | 19/11/2014 | 50 | cow (6y) | Yes | No |
| 1308 | Martap | Vina | 08/11/2014 | 45 | cow (4y) | Yes | Yes |
| 1350 | Banyo | Mayo Banyo | 30/11/2014 | 33 | bull (4y) | Yes | No |
Date of deployment of the GPS device depended on the date of start of the transhumance, the availability of the herds' owners and locations of these herds. In brackets are reported the ages of the cattle (in year) that were selected to be tracked
Fig. 1Transhumance trajectories of the 6 tracked herds that undertook seasonal migration in Central Cameroon (October 2014–May 2015) and that successfully recorded a full dataset. The trajectories of each GPS collar are displayed with a different colour on the section of the Cameroonian map. The black X indicates the starting point of the transhumance. Panel a displays the trajectories over the map of Cameroon, while Panel b focuses on the Regions of Central Cameroon
Distances travelled by the cattle herds during transhumance in Central Cameroon (October 2014–May 2015)
| Herd/Collar number | Total distance covered (km) | Median distance per day (km) | Shortest distance between origin and destination (Km) | Transhumance duration (weeks) | Final num. Transhumance destination |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1299 | 746 | 4.14 (SD 2.21) | 170.9 | 26 | Centre Region |
| 1300 | 730 | 3.32 (SD1.74) | 53.3 | 32 | North Region |
| 1301 | 763 | 3.97 (SD 2.03) | 154.0 | 29 | East Region |
| 1302 | 633 | 3.23 ( SD2.01) | 172.7 | 28 | Centre Region |
| 1305 | 649 | 3.55 (SD 1.91) | 115.5 | 27 | East Region |
| 1308 | 726 | 3.63 (SD 1.56) | 157.1 | 29 | Centre Region |
The total distance covered during the entire period of observation, the median distance travelled per day (standard deviation in brackets) and the distance between the two most far apart locations are all reported in kilometers. The duration of the transhumance, in weeks, is estimated from the week the herds left the grazing location in the Adamawa Region until the week they returned to same location
Fig. 2Speed of movement of the transhumant herds tracked between October 2014 and May 2015 in Central Cameroon (in km/hour). a: Distribution of the recorded speed of movements at each GPS captured location for the tracked cattle (km/hour on the x-axis and counts on the y-axis). b: Boxplot of the recorded speed of movements at each GPS captured location for each tracked cattle (x axis). For each box the dots refer to the recorded speed at each GPS captured location, the upper and lower hinges correspond to the 1st and 3rd quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles) and the horizontal line to the median value
Fig. 3Daily distances covered by the transhumant herds in Central Cameroon between October 2014 and May 2015. a: Distribution of the daily distances walked by the tracked cattle (distance in km on the x-axis and counts on the y-axis). b: Boxplot of the daily distance travelled by each tracked cattle (x-axis). For each box the dots refer to the the daily distance for each day of observation, the upper and lower hinges correspond to the 1st and 3rd quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles) and the horizontal line to the median value
Fig. 4Mean and ranges of the daily distances walked during each week of the transhumance period between October 2014 and May 2015 in Central Cameroon. For each tracked cattle the mean estimated daily distance walked during each week of observation is represented by the middle line while the upper and lower lines represent, respectively, the largest and shortest distances walked in each weeks
Fig. 5Hot spot analysis of the locations visited during the transhumance period between October 2014 and May 2015 in Central Cameroon. On the left side of the figure the trajectories of each GPS collar are displayed with a different colour on the section of the Cameroonian map. On the right side two-dimensional density plots of the recorded GPS locations. The trajectories are displayed by the dots of different colour representing the GPS locations recorded per each collar. The intensity of the colour reflects the occurrence (count) of GPS recordings (counts of observations) at each specific area (e.g.: most of the GPS locations of collars number 1301 and 1302 were recorded in two locations while, on the contrary, the GPS locations of collar 1305 were mainly recorded in 5 areas). In both sides of the figure the black X indicates the starting point of the transhumance
Fig. 6Encounters with other animal species and common health problems reported during transhumance in Central Cameroon (October 2014–May 2015). a and b report the frequency of specific answers from each of the 9 interviewees. c and d report the sum of the times animals species and diseases were mentioned by the 9 interviewees. a: Reported number of cattle herds encountered on average every day during the trekking towards transhumance destinations or returning towards the usual grazing locations. The plot displays the answers of the interviewees and the red line refers to the number of reports by the 9 interviewees. b: Reported number of cattle herds encountered on average every day during grazing activities at the transhumance destination. The plot displays the answers of the interviewees and the red line refers to the number of reports by the 9 interviewees. c: Reported species of domestic and wild animals encountered during the transhumance. The plot displays the animal species and the red line refers to the number of reports by the interviewees. d: Reported health problems faced by the herds during the transhumance. The plot displays the reported health problems and the red line refers to the number of reports by the interviewees
Number of herdsmen reporting cattle death and trade during the transhumance period (October 2014–May 2015). NH: Number of herdsmen reporting events; NC: Number of cattle involved in each reported event
| Reported events | NH | NC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Causes of cattle losses | Accident | 5 | 7 |
| Diseases | 4 | 6 | |
| Plant Intoxication | 3 | 10 | |
| Cattle trade | Sale (within market) | 4 | 13 |
| Sale (outside market) | 2 | 4 | |
| Purchase (within market) | 0 | 0 | |
| Purchase (outside market) | 0 | 0 |
Reported cattle losses during transhumance were stratified by the cause of death as diagnosed by herdsmen. Reported trade events during transhumance were stratified by whether animals were sold (or purchased) within or outside the trading system (livestock markets)