| Literature DB >> 29969987 |
Erika T Ebbs1, Eric S Loker2, Sara V Brant2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physa acuta is a globally invasive freshwater snail native to North America. Prior studies have led to conflicting views of how P. acuta populations are connected and genetic diversity is partitioned globally. This study aims to characterize phylogeographic and population genetic structure within the native range of P. acuta, elucidate its invasion history and assess global patterns of genetic diversity. Further, using meta-analytic methods, we test the 'Enemy-Release hypothesis' within the P. acuta - digenetic trematode system. The 'Enemy-Release hypothesis' refers to the loss of native parasites following establishment of their host within an invasive range. Population genetic data is combined with surveys of trematode infections to map range-wide trematode species richness associated with P. acuta, and to identify relevant host-population parameters important in modeling host-parasite invasion.Entities:
Keywords: Enemy-release; Invasion genetics; Mitochondrial marker; Parasite invasion; Parasite richness; Physa; Physidae; Trematode
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29969987 PMCID: PMC6029401 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1208-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Map of sampled populations. Colors denote the Freshwater Ecological Complexes from which P. acuta populations were collected
Fig. 2Relationships of recovered cox1 haplotypes. minimum spanning network of 88 P. acuta haplotypes. The network is shaded to depict the split between clade A (pink) and B (green), within each clade haplogroups are denoted as I –VII. b. BI phylogeny of all 88 haplotypes. Nodes with a posterior probability of ≥95% are denoted by a black circle. Haplotypes are colored by the FWEC from which they were collected
Summary of range-wide population statistics, cox1
| Region/Population | FWEC | N | H | Hd | S | K | π | Θw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native Range | ||||||||
| USA | ||||||||
| Gila River, AZ | COL | 3 | ||||||
| Denver Area, CO | COL | 2 | ||||||
| Fremont Co., CO | COL | 2 | ||||||
| Chaffee Co., CO | COL | 1 | ||||||
| Gafield Co., CO | COL | 1 | ||||||
| Mesa Co., CO | COL | 1 | ||||||
| Rio Blanco Co., CO | COL | 1 | ||||||
| Yuma Co., CO | COL | 1 | ||||||
|
| 12 | 11 | 0.98 | 54 | 17.16 | 0.0337 | 0.035 | |
| Woodward Park, CA | COA | 8 | ||||||
| Los Banos WMA, CA | COA | 2 | ||||||
| Coyote Creek, CA | COA | 3 | ||||||
|
| 13 | 13 | 1 | 69 | 18.45 | 0.0363 | 0.044 | |
| New Harmony, IN | MIS | 2 | ||||||
| Okoboji Lake, IA | MIS | 1 | ||||||
| Reynolds County, MO | MIS | 1 | ||||||
| Medicine Lake, MN | MIS | 1 | ||||||
| Bench Creek Pond, MT | MIS | 10 | ||||||
| Mormon Lake, NE | MIS | 12 | ||||||
| Big Horn River, WY | MIS | 1 | ||||||
| Stillwater, OK | MIS | 5 | ||||||
|
| 24 | 21 | 0.989 | 86 | 13.93 | 0.02736 | 0.0453 | |
| Stillwater NWR, NV | GRB | 2 | ||||||
|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 0.0393 | 0.0393 | |
| Carson Nat. Fr., NM | RIO | 3 | ||||||
| Bosque Del Apache, NM | RIO | 9 | ||||||
| Shady Lakes, NM | RIO | 2 | ||||||
| Bitter Lake, NM | RIO | |||||||
|
| 13 | 12 | 0.987 | 49 | 14.65 | 0.0278 | 0.029 | |
| Philadelphia, PA | ATL | 2 | ||||||
| Charles Towne Landing SP, SC | ATL | 7 | ||||||
|
| 9 | 9 | 1 | 33 | 10.58 | 0.021 | 0.024 | |
| Canada | ||||||||
| Point Peele NP, ON | STL | 1 | ||||||
| Niagra River, ON | STL | 3 | ||||||
|
| 4 | 3 | 0.833 | 14 | 8.167 | 0.016 | 0.015 | |
|
| 73 | 68 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Invasive Range | ||||||||
| Cuba | IR | 3 | ||||||
| Chile | IR | 10 | ||||||
| Lake Titicaca, Peru | IR | 1 | ||||||
|
| 14 | 6 | 0.604 | 13 | 2.879 | 0.0056 | 0.008 | |
| Kisumu, Kenya | IR | 4 | ||||||
|
| 4 | 3 | 0.833 | 5 | 2.5 | 0.00493 | 0.005 | |
| France | IR | 4 | ||||||
| Greece/Macadonia | IR | 23 | ||||||
| Netherlands | IR | 1 | ||||||
|
| 28 | 7 | 0.696 | 35 | 8.132 | 0.016 | 0.0177 | |
| New Zealand | IR | 1 | ||||||
| Australasia | IR | 2 | ||||||
|
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 0.0118 | 0.012 | |
| South Korea | IR | 1 | ||||||
| Thailand | IR | 1 | ||||||
| Singapore | IR | 3 | ||||||
| Maylasia | IR | 3 | ||||||
|
| 7 | 2 | 0.286 | 6 | 1.714 | 0.0034 | 0.005 | |
| Iraq | IR | 2 | ||||||
| Iran | IR | 12 | ||||||
|
| 14 | 7 | 0.813 | 29 | 8.66 | 0.017 | 0.018 | |
|
| 70 | 28 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 143 | 96 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Regional abbreviations: NR native range, IR invasive range, C&S AM Central and South America, AF Africa, EU Europe, NZ/OZ New Zealand and Australia, MD Middle East, FWEC refers to Freshwater Ecological Complexes; COL Colorado FWEC, COA Coastal FWEC, MISS Mississippi FWEC, GRB Great Basin FWEC, RIO Rio Grande FWEC, ATL Atlantic FWEC and STL St. Lawrence FWEC. Population statistic abbreviations: N number of individuals sampled, H, number of haplotypes, Hd, haplotype diversity, S, segregating sites, K, average sequence divergence, π, nucleotide diversity, Θw, Wattersons estimator per site, Italicized numbers refer to population averages. (*) Indicates a statistically significant value (P < 0.05)
Analysis of Molecular Variance
| Source of Variation | d.f. | % Variation | Fixation indices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Among Regions | 6 | 3.19 | ΦCT = 0.093 | 0.183 |
| Among Populations within Regions | 28 | 27.3 | ΦSC = 0.282 | < 0.001 |
| Within Populations | 110 | 69.52 | ΦST = 0.305 | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Among Regions | 6 | 4.27 | ΦCT = 0.043 | 0.228 |
| Among Populations within Regions | 14 | 19.18 | ΦSC = 0.20 | < 0.001 |
| Within Populations | 55 | 76.55 | ΦST = 0.235 | < 0.001 |
Pairwise genetic distances and ΦST values
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Rio Grande |
| 0.0673 | 0.0167 |
|
|
| −0.0706 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.0288 |
| 2. Coastal | 0.0366 |
| 0.05412 |
|
| 0.0269 |
|
| 0.1509 |
|
|
| −0.0085 |
| 3. Colorado | 0.0338 | 0.0398 |
|
|
|
| −0.0897 |
| 0.24643 |
|
|
| 0.0623 |
| 4. Mississippi | 0.34 | 0.0364 | 0.0387 |
|
| 0.01138 | 0.022 |
| 0.0745 | 0.00036 |
|
| −0.0125 |
| 5. Atlantic | 0.0356 | 0.0364 | 0.0418 | 0.0283 |
| 0.0773 | 0.2032 |
|
|
| 0.0944 |
| 0.0199 |
| 6. St. Lawrence | 0.0295 | 0.0305 | 0.0348 | 0.0241 | 0.0211 |
| 0.1199 | 0.0586 | 0.2199 |
|
| −0.006 | −0.0158 |
| 7. Great Basin | 0.031 | 0.0328 | 0.0346 | 0.0327 | 0.0337 | 0.0281 |
| 0.2469 | 0.2587 | 0.4986 | 0.4948 | 0.2333 | −0.1357 |
| 8. Europe | 0.0298 | 0.0325 | 0.0366 | 0.0251 | 0.023 | 0.0175 | 0.0288 |
| 0.1726 | 0.0994 |
| 0.0291 | 0.0932 |
| 9. Australasia | 0.031 | 0.035 | 0.0373 | 0.025 | 0.022 | 0.0186 | 0.0311 | 0.0184 |
| 0.4158 |
| 0.1178 | −0.0355 |
| 10. Asia | 0.0249 | 0.027 | 0.0318 | 0.017 | 0.0143 | 0.0116 | 0.0233 | 0.012 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.0567 |
|
| 11. Africa | 0.0343 | 0.036 | 0.0414 | 0.0277 | 0.016 | 0.02 | 0.0327 | 0.0221 | 0.02 | 0.01375 |
|
| 0.2029 |
| 12. Middle East | 0.0317 | 0.0332 | 0.0378 | 0.0258 | 0.0228 | 0.0178 | 0.031 | 0.0181 | 0.019 | 0.0124 | 0.0228 |
| 0.06245 |
| 13. S. & C. America | 0.0311 | 0.0323 | 0.038 | 0.0243 | 0.0146 | 0.0173 | 0.0286 | 0.019 | 0.0174 | 0.0103 | 0.0056 | 0.0195 |
|
Pairwise within and between FWEC/region genetic distances are shown in the lower diagonal. Within genetic distances are italicized. Pairwise ΦST values are shown in the upper diagonal, values with a p-value ≤0.05 are bolded
Fig. 3Bayesian Skyline Plots. Effective size over time plots estimated in BEAST using a Bayesian Skyline prior using a mutation rate of 1% (1e-6) per million years. Mean values are shown and confidence values were excluded for clarity. The x-axis indicates time in ‘thousand years ago’ (kya). a. Range-wide estimates for North America (grey, n = 79), Central and South America (lime green, n = 13), Eurasia (pink, n = 49) and Africa and Oceania (blue, n = 7). North America dataset ran for 50,000,000 generations, Eurasia 20,000,000 generations, Central/South America and Africa/Australasia ran for 5,000,000 generations. b. Estimates of recovered Clades, Clade A (pink, n = 116) and B (dark green, n = 33) compared to total (grey, n = 149). The total dataset and Clade A ran for 80,000,000 generations, Clade B ran for 10,000,000 generations. c. Estimates by FWECs sampled: Rio Grande (red, n = 16), Coastal (blue, n = 13), Colorado (purple, n = 11), Atlantic (orange, n = 9), Mississippi (green, n = 26), the Great Basin and St. Lawrence FWECs were excluded because of low sample size. All FWEC datasets were run for 5,000,000 generations, with the exception of Atlantic (3000,000). Bayesian skyline plots were constructed in TRACER, the data was exported and visualized using Excel
Fig. 4Invasion timeline of Physa acuta. 1. Absence of Physa acuta shells from European fossil deposits older than 18th Century [115]. 2. Described by Draparnaud [7] near Bordeaux, France. Anderson [87] posits likelihood of introduction from Mississippi USA via the cotton trade. 3. Trade between USA and France ends during Napoleonic wars, trade with England and USA begins. 4. First reports of P. acuta in England [88, 89]. 5. Reports of P. acuta all over United Kingdom by the later half of 20th Century [116–119] 6–12. Primary citations for these reports are listed in Additional File 7
Reports of infection and trematode species richness of Physa acuta as first intermediate
| Country | Citation | # Individuals Surveyed | # Patent Infections | Prevalence |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| New Mexico (Bosque del Apache) | This study | 1200 | 78 | 0.065 | 5 |
| New Mexico (Eagles Nest) | This study | 65 | 5 | 0.07 | 2 |
| Nebraska | This study | 120 | 16 | 0.13 | 4 |
| Montana | This study | 165 | 3 | 0.018 | 2 |
| Wyoming | This study | 26 | 8 | 0.31 | 1 |
| Colorado | This study | 300 | 5 | 0.017 | 3 |
| Mexico | Barragán-Sáenz et al. 2009 | 496 | 109 | 0.22 | 5 |
| | |||||
| New Zeland | Mitchell & Leung 2015 | 810 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Benin | Ibikounlé et al. 2009 | 345 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Czech Republic | Faltýnková 2005 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | Abo-Madyan et al. 2005 | na | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | Bin Dajem 2009 | 704 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | Dahesh & Farid | na | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| France | Gerard et al. 2003 | 413 | 1 | 0.0024 | 1 |
| Germany | Faltýnková and Hass 2006 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iceland | Skinnerson et al. 2008 | 737 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iran | Athari et al. 2006 | 3560 | 8 | 0.0022 | 1 |
| Kenya | Loker & Laidemitt, unpublished data | 589 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Morocco | Laamrani et al. 2005 | na | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Zeland | This study | 1480 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Spain | Toledo et al. 1998 | 2717 | 1 | 0.00037 | 1 |
| Zambia | Phiri et al. 2007 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
na data not given, S observed species richness calculated by the number of unique trematode families observed
Matrix of correlation coefficients.
|
|
|
|
| π | Ɵ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.8 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.77 | |
|
|
| 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.97 | 0.98 | |
|
|
|
| 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.56 | |
|
| 0.0614 | 0.06 | 0.096 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| π |
|
|
| 0.061 | 1 | |
| Ɵ |
|
|
| 0.061 |
|
Pearson’s correlation coefficients are shown in the upper diagonal and corresponding p-values, adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction, are shown in the lower diagonal. p-values ≤0.05 are bolded. *Indicates p-values that significant under the BH correction, but not significant under the more conservative Bonferroni correction