Qiong-Feng Chen1, Xiao-Dong Kuang2, Qi-Feng Yuan3, Hua Hao4, Ting Zhang1, Yong-Hong Huang1,5, Xiao-Yan Zhou1,5. 1. 1 Department of Pathophysiology, Medical College of Nanchang University, China. 2. 2 Department of Pathology, Medical College of Nanchang University, China. 3. 3 The Second Clinical Medical College, Nanchang University, China. 4. 4 Department of Pathology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China. 5. 5 Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology, China.
Abstract
Previous studies have reported that lipoxin A4 (LXA4) and the angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], and its receptor Mas [ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas] axis play important protective roles in acute lung injury (ALI). However, there is still no direct evidence of LXA4-mediated protection via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis during ALI. This work was performed using an LPS-induced ALI mouse model and the data indicated the following. First, the animal model was established successfully and LXA4 ameliorated LPS-induced ALI. Second, LXA4 could increase the concentration and activity of ACE2 and the levels of Ang-(1-7) and Mas markedly. Third, LXA4 decreased the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and reactive oxygen species while increasing IL-10 levels. Fourth, LXA4 inhibited the activation of the NF-κB signal pathway and repressed the degradation of inhibitor of NF-κB, the phosphorylation of NF-κB, and the translocation of NF-κB. Finally, and more importantly, BOC-2 (LXA4 receptor inhibitor), MLN-4760 (ACE2 inhibitor), and A779 (Mas receptor antagonist) were found to reverse all of the effects of LXA4. Our data provide evidence that LXA4 protects the lung from ALI through regulation of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis.
Previous studies have reported that lipoxin A4 (LXA4) and the angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], and its receptor Mas [ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas] axis play important protective roles in acute lung injury (ALI). However, there is still no direct evidence of LXA4-mediated protection via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis during ALI. This work was performed using an LPS-induced ALImouse model and the data indicated the following. First, the animal model was established successfully and LXA4 ameliorated LPS-induced ALI. Second, LXA4 could increase the concentration and activity of ACE2 and the levels of Ang-(1-7) and Mas markedly. Third, LXA4 decreased the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and reactive oxygen species while increasing IL-10 levels. Fourth, LXA4 inhibited the activation of the NF-κB signal pathway and repressed the degradation of inhibitor of NF-κB, the phosphorylation of NF-κB, and the translocation of NF-κB. Finally, and more importantly, BOC-2 (LXA4 receptor inhibitor), MLN-4760 (ACE2 inhibitor), and A779 (Mas receptor antagonist) were found to reverse all of the effects of LXA4. Our data provide evidence that LXA4 protects the lung from ALI through regulation of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis.
Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are
inflammatory responses that take place in the lung and can cause severe hypoxemia
and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema.[1] ALI and ARDS are major causes of acute respiratory failure in critically illpatients. Despite improvements in supportive care, mortality rates due to ALI and
ARDS are high, with approximately 2.82 deaths per 100,000 persons in the United
States in 2013.[2] For these reasons, it is necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying ALI
and ARDS, which may spur the discovery of efficacious therapeutic interventions. It
is generally accepted that the vital pathogenesis of ALI is inflammation, which is
accompanied by infiltration and accumulation of inflammatory cells, pro-inflammatory
cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and activation of the NF-κB signaling
pathway.[3-5]Lipoxins (LXs) are products of arachidonic acid metabolism secreted mainly through
cell-to-cell interactions during lipoxygenase-dependent processes.[6,7] The interaction of lipoxin
A4 (LXA4) and its receptor has a direct anti-inflammatory
effect and other activities that promote inflammation resolution in several
inflammatory models.[8-10] Several
studies have suggested that LXs and their analogs display protective effects in
ALI.[11-13] However, the mechanisms that
mediate the beneficial effect of LXs in ALI have not been elucidated fully.The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), which comprises the angiotensin
I-converting enzyme (ACE)-AngII-AT1R axis and the angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2
(ACE2)-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, is well known for its vital and bidirectional roles in
the urinary and cardiovascular systems. Recent reports indicate that ACE2,
angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], and its receptor Mas are detectable in normal lung
tissue and, upon lung injury, their expressions change and are positively correlated
with the degree of lung injury.[14,15] Furthermore, some studies have
suggested that the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis has a protective effect in ALI, so ACE2
and Ang-(1-7) are considered some of the most promising new targets for intervention
during ALI.[16-18]In our previous study, we observed that BML-111, the agonist of the LXA4
receptor, could up-regulate and activate the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in the liver.[19] However, whether the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis is involved in the
LXA4-mediated protective process against ALI is still unclear. Here,
we used a LPS-induced ALImouse model to explore the role and interaction of
LXA4 and the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in ALI. Finally, to gain a
better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the action of LXA4,
we also investigated whether BOC-2 (LXA4 receptor inhibitor), MLN-4760
(ACE2 inhibitor), and A779 (Mas receptor antagonist) attenuated the protective
effects of LXA4.
Materials and methods
Reagents
LPS (Escherichia coli 055:B5) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO, USA). Lipoxin A4 (LXA4) (5S,
6R, 15S-trihydroxy-7E,
9E, 11Z,
13E-eicosa-tetraenoic acid) was from Cayman Chemical (Ann
Arbor, MI, USA), BOC-2 (LXA4 receptor antagonist) was from GenScript
(Piscataway, NJ, USA), A779 (selective inhibitor of the Mas receptor) was from
Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA), and MLN-4760 (ACE2 antagonist) was from Merck
Millipore (Cambridge, UK). The myeloperoxidase (MPO) kit was from Nanjing
Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The ACE2 activity assay kit
was from Genmed Scientifics (Arlington, VA, USA). ELISA kits for ACE2,
Ang-(1-7), inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10), and ROS were from
Cloud-Clone (Houston, TX, USA). Nuclear Transfer Assay Kit of NF-κB Activation
was from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The primary Abs against
Ang-(1-7), Mas, and β-actin were from Cloud-Clone. Primary Abs against NF-κB
p65, p-p65, and inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB-α) were from Cell Signaling Technology
(Danvers, MA, USA). The Eastep Super Total RNA Extraction Kit, Easy Script
First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Super Mix Kit, and TransStarat Tip Green qPCR Super
Mix Kit were all from Promega (Madison, WI, USA).
Animals
All experimental procedures were performed according to institutional animal
guidelines. The experimental protocols were approved by the institutional animal
care and use committee and appropriate measures were taken to minimize pain and
stress to the animals. Sixty adult male Kun Ming (KM) mice (4–6 wk old, 20–30 g)
were obtained from the Animal Center of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China),
raised in an environmentally controlled room with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle,
and allowed free access to food and water in temperature-controlled rooms
(25 ± 1℃).
Experimental groups
Sixty mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) as
follows: (1) in the control group, animals received 10 ml/kg saline by
intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection; (2) in the LPS group, animals received
10 mg/kg LPS by i.p. injection; in the (3) LPS + LXA4 group, animals
received 100 µg/kg LXA4 by tail vein injection 30 min prior to
receiving 10 mg/kg LPS i.p.; (4) in the LPS + LXA4 + BOC-2 group,
animals received 50 µg/kg BOC-2 by tail vein injection prior to receiving
100 µg/kg LXA4 by tail vein injection, followed by 10 mg/kg LPS after
30 min after LXA4 administration; (5) in the
LPS + LXA4 + A779 group, animals received 10 µg/kg A779 by tail vein
injection prior to receiving 100 µg/kg LXA4 by tail vein injection,
followed by 10 mg/kg LPS after 30 min after LXA4 administration; and
(6) in the LPS + LXA4 + MLN-4760 group, animals received 1 mg/kg
MLN-4760 by tail vein injection prior to receiving 100 µg/kg LXA4 by
tail vein injection, followed by 10 mg/kg LPS 30 min after LXA4
administration.
Morphological evaluation
Lung tissues that were not subjected to bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)
collection were selected and washed with cold PBS, fixed with 10%
paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in a series of graded ethanols, embedded in
paraffin wax, cut into 5 µm slices, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Histopathological features of the samples were assessed using light
microscopy.
Estimation of wet/dry ratio of the lungs
The inferior lobe of the right lung was excised immediately upon sacrifice,
rinsed in PBS, and weighed to determine the wet mass. The lung was then
desiccated for 72 h at 60℃ in an oven. Subsequently, the lung was weighed and
the procedure was repeated several times until the stable mass value was
considered the dry mass. The ratio of the wet-to-dry mass of lung was calculated
to quantify the extent of pulmonary edema.
Measurement of pulmonary MPO activity
Tissue-associated MPO activity was determined as an indicator of neutrophil
infiltration. Briefly, liver tissues were homogenized and then centrifuged at
30,000 g for 30 min. The pellet was re-suspended in another
potassium phosphate buffer (50 mmol/l, pH 6.0) with 0.5% hexadecyltrimethyl
ammonium bromide. Samples were centrifuged at 20,000 g for
15 min at 4℃ and supernatants were collected. The activities of MPO in the
livers were assayed by measuring absorbance at 460 nm. Results were expressed as
units of MPO per gram of wet tissue.
ACE2 activity detection
Lung tissues were prepared to determine extent of ACE2 activation according to
manufacturer’s instructions (Genmed Scientifics, Wilmington, DE, USA). First,
50 mg of frozen lung tissue was washed with 1 ml of reagent A and the lung
tissue samples were homogenized in 500 µl of reagent B. Then, the supernatant of
the samples was obtained by centrifugation at 1500 g for 10 min
at 4℃ and the concentration of protein was measured using a bicinchoninic acid
(BCA) kit. Next, the supernatant of the samples was mixed thoroughly with 80 µl
of reagent B. Subsequently, 180 µl of reagent C and 50 µl of reagent E were
added to the tubes and samples were incubated at 37℃ for 15 min in the dark.
Finally, 20 µl of reagent D or 100 µg of protein was added to the tubes and
mixed for 10 s and the optical density was measured at 340 nm using a microplate
reader.
ELISA
BALF and serum samples were collected for measurement of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10
levels using ELISA kits. In addition, the concentrations of ACE2 and Ang-(1-7)
and the level of ROS in the lung tissues were also assessed using ELISA kits.
Serum was acquired by centrifugation of blood samples at 550 g
for 10 min. After preparation of the standard reagents by serial dilution, 50 µl
of standard solution or sample and 50 µl of detection reagent A were added to
the tubes, mixed thoroughly, and incubated for 1 h at 37℃. Thereafter, the
microplates were washed three times. Next, 100 µl of detection reagent B was
added, samples were mixed thoroughly, incubated for 0.5 h at 37℃, and washed
five times. Soon afterward, 90 µl of tetramethylbenzidine substrate was added to
the samples, mixed, and incubated for 10 min in the dark. Finally, 50 µl of
stopping buffer was added and the optical density was measured at 450 nm. The
concentration was assessed in reference to the standard curve.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Immunofluorescence was used to assess the activation of NF-κB in optimal cutting
temperature compound-embedded tissue sections (6 µm thickness). The samples were
prepared according to the instructions included in the nuclear transfer assay
kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). The lung sections were incubated with primary Abs
against NF-κB and then with biotin secondary Abs. Finally, the handled slices
were observed under a confocal microscope.
Western blot analysis
Lung tissue samples (100 mg) were lysed and homogenized in 1 ml of
radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer with phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride to
obtain the total protein [to assay the expression of Ang-(1-7), p65, p-p65, and
IκBα] and the membrane protein (to assay the expression of Mas). The protein
concentrations were measured using a BCA protein assay kit and proteins (30 µg)
were transferred electrophoretically onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (200
mA for 2 h at 4℃) following separation on a 10% sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel. The membranes were blocked in Tris-buffered saline
plus Tween 20 (TBST) containing 5% nonfat dry milk at 25 ± 1℃ (room temperature)
for 2 h, followed by an overnight (≥12 h) incubation at 4℃ with specific primary
Abs [Ang-(1-7), Mas, p65, p-p65, or IκBα]. The following day, the membranes were
washed thoroughly with TBST three times and then incubated for an additional
1.5 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs (1:5000 dilution) at
room temperature. Subsequently, membranes were washed three times with TBST and
bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence according to the
manufacturer's protocol (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
RNA isolation and real-time PCR analysis
For PCR analysis, lung tissues were prepared for RNA isolation using an Eastep
Super Total RNA Extraction Kit and then cDNAs were synthesized by reverse
transcription of 1 µg total RNA using an Easy Script First-Strand cDNA Synthesis
SuperMix Kit Transgen. Subsequently, the mRNA level of Mas was quantified using
the Bio-Rad iCyCler real-time PCR7500 machine with SYBR Green technology.
Transgen and the primers for Mas and internal control GAPDH were synthesized by
Kingsbury Biological Technology Company. Gene expression was measured using the
ΔΔCT method and was normalized to internal control GAPDH mRNA levels. The primer
sequences were as follows: GAPDH forward primer: 5′-AGAGGGATGCTGCCCTTACC-3′;
GAPDH reverse primer: 5′-ATCCGTTCACACCGACCTTC-3′; Mas forward primer:
5′-CCATGAGGAACTGGGAGGAG-3′; and Mas reverse primer:
5′-GACAGAGGGCTAGAGGCTTG-3′.
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as the means ± SEM from three or more independent
experiments unless specified otherwise. The differences between groups were
evaluated using one-way ANOVA with SPSS version 17.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). In
all analyses, P values < 0.05 were considered statistically
significant.
Results
LXA4 protects lungs from LPS-induced ALI
To assess the effect of LXA4 on lung injury and the relationship
between LXA4 and the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis on ALI,
histopathological changes, wet/dry ratio, total protein in BALF, white cell
count in the blood, and MPO activities were examined. LPS stimulation induced
the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lungs with markedly swollen
sections and broadening tissue gap (Figure 1a). In addition, higher wet/dry
ratios (Figure 1b),
total protein in BALF (Figure
1c), white cell count in the blood, and MPO activities (Figure 1d) were observed
with LPS stimulation compared with controls. However, treatment with
LXA4 inhibited the inflammatory response (Figure 1a, d, and e), reduced the degree of lung edema
(Figure 1a and b), and attenuated
vascular damage (Figure
1d). Conversely, treatment with BOC-2 (a specific inhibitor of the
receptor of LXA4), A779 (a selective Mas receptor inhibitor), and
MLN-4760 (ACE2 antagonist) could abolish all of the protective effects of
LXA4 (Figure
1). These data indicated that LXA4 protected lungs from
LPS-induced ALI effectively and the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis may play an
important role in this process.
Figure 1.
LXA4 protects against LPS-induced ALI effectively. Shown are: (a)
Histological changes of lung tissue (hematoxylin and eosin, 200×),
(b) wet/dry ratio, (c), total protein concentration in BALF, (d)
white cell count in the blood, and (e) MPO activity. Data are
presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and
**P < 0.01 compared with control group,
#P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01
compared with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 protects against LPS-induced ALI effectively. Shown are: (a)
Histological changes of lung tissue (hematoxylin and eosin, 200×),
(b) wet/dry ratio, (c), total protein concentration in BALF, (d)
white cell count in the blood, and (e) MPO activity. Data are
presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and
**P < 0.01 compared with control group,
#P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01
compared with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 up-regulates and activates the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI
To determine whether the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis was involved in the
LXA4-mediated protection during LPS-induced ALI, we evaluated the
concentrations and activities of ACE2 and gene and protein expression levels of
Ang-(1-7) and its receptor Mas in lung tissues through Western blot, ELISA, and
quantitative PCR. Compared with the control group, LPS stimulation decreased
ACE2 activities and contents in lung tissues significantly (Figure 2a and b), whereas the changes of Ang-(1-7) and
Mas were negligible except for the results of Western blot (Figure 2c–f). Additionally, administration of
LXA4 up-regulated and activated the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis
significantly, including increasing the content and activity of ACE2 and
up-regulating the mRNA and protein expression levels of Ang-(1-7) and Mas in
lung tissues (Figure 2).
However, BOC-2, A779, and MLN-4760 counteracted all of the effects of
LXA4 (Figure
2).
Figure 2.
LXA4 up-regulate and activates the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. (a) The activities of ACE2 in lung tissue were
observed via kits. (b and c) The contents of ACE2 (b) and Ang-(1-7)
(b) in the lung tissue were examined via ELISA. (d and e) The
expression levels of Ang-(1-7) and Mas in lung tissue were examined
via Western blot. (f) Mas mRNA expression levels were determined via
quantitative PCR. Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared
with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 up-regulate and activates the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. (a) The activities of ACE2 in lung tissue were
observed via kits. (b and c) The contents of ACE2 (b) and Ang-(1-7)
(b) in the lung tissue were examined via ELISA. (d and e) The
expression levels of Ang-(1-7) and Mas in lung tissue were examined
via Western blot. (f) Mas mRNA expression levels were determined via
quantitative PCR. Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared
with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 regulates LPS-induced inflammation via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas
axis in ALI
Inflammation is known to play critical roles in LPS-induced ALI. To determine
whether the mechanism by which LXA4 exerts its protective effect on
LPS-induced lung injury was related to the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, we examined
the concentrations of pro-inflammatory factors, including TNF-α and IL-1β, and
the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the serum and BALF. The data
indicated that LXA4 decreased LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-1β (Figure 3a–d) while increasing the level of
expression of IL-10 (Figure
3e and f) in
the serum and BALF. We also evaluated the levels of ROS in the lungs. LPS
stimulation rendered ROS expression significantly more abundant than in the
control group, but the ROS levels were reduced upon treatment with
LXA4 (Figure
4). Nevertheless, A779 and MLN-4760, inhibitors of the
ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, offset the protective effects of LXA4 (Figures 3 and 4). Expectedly, BOC-2, an
inhibitor of the LXA4 receptor, also blocked the effect of
LXA4 (Figures
3 and 4).
Collectively, these data indicated that LXA4 could protect lungs from
LPS-induced ALI through the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis.
Figure 3.
LXA4 regulates LPS-induced inflammation via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas
axis in ALI. (a and b) The concentrations of TNF-α in the BALF (a)
and serum (b). (c and d) The concentrations of IL-1β in the BALF (c)
and serum (d). (e and f) The concentrations of IL-10 in the BALF (e)
and serum (f). Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, #P < 0.05 and
##P < 0.01 compared with LPS group,
ΔP < 0.05 and ΔΔP < 0.01
compared with LPS + LXA4 group.
Figure 4.
LXA4 regulates LPS-induced ROS via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
ALI. The expression of ROS in the lung tissue was determined via
assay kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data are
presented as means ± SEM. **P < 0.01 compared
with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared with LPS
group, ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 regulates LPS-induced inflammation via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas
axis in ALI. (a and b) The concentrations of TNF-α in the BALF (a)
and serum (b). (c and d) The concentrations of IL-1β in the BALF (c)
and serum (d). (e and f) The concentrations of IL-10 in the BALF (e)
and serum (f). Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, #P < 0.05 and
##P < 0.01 compared with LPS group,
ΔP < 0.05 and ΔΔP < 0.01
compared with LPS + LXA4 group.LXA4 regulates LPS-induced ROS via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
ALI. The expression of ROS in the lung tissue was determined via
assay kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data are
presented as means ± SEM. **P < 0.01 compared
with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared with LPS
group, ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
LXA4 inhibits NF-κB pathway via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI
The NF-κB pathway controls the initiation and development of inflammation, so we
examined pathway activation, including the levels of IκB, NF-κB p65, and p-p65,
via Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis. The results indicated that LPS
administration could activate the NF-κB pathway, including inducing the
degradation of IκB (Figure
5a and b),
the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 (Figure 5c and d), and the transposition of p65 (Figure 6). However,
treatment with LXA4 repressed the effects of LPS (Figures 5 and 6). Nevertheless,
treatment with A779 and MLN4760, inhibitors of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, and
BOC-2, an inhibitor of the LXA4 receptor, could all abolish the
effects of LXA4 (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 5.
LXA4 inhibits NF-κB pathways via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. (a and b) The expression levels of IκBα in lung
tissues were examined by Western blot (a) and optical density (b)
analysis. (c and d) The expression levels of p65 and p-p65 in lung
tissues were examined by Western blot (c) and optical density (d)
analysis. Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared
with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.
Figure 6.
LXA4 inhibits NF-κB translocation via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. Shown is immunofluorescence analysis of NF-κB
translocation. Immunostaining was performed with P65 (in red) and
nuclei were stained with DAPI (in blue). The images were observed
under a magnification of 630×.
LXA4 inhibits NF-κB pathways via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. (a and b) The expression levels of IκBα in lung
tissues were examined by Western blot (a) and optical density (b)
analysis. (c and d) The expression levels of p65 and p-p65 in lung
tissues were examined by Western blot (c) and optical density (d)
analysis. Data are presented as means ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
compared with control group, ##P < 0.01 compared
with LPS group, ΔP < 0.05 and
ΔΔP < 0.01 compared with LPS + LXA4
group.LXA4 inhibits NF-κB translocation via the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in
LPS-induced ALI. Shown is immunofluorescence analysis of NF-κB
translocation. Immunostaining was performed with P65 (in red) and
nuclei were stained with DAPI (in blue). The images were observed
under a magnification of 630×.
Discussion
LXA4 was the first lipid mediator identified and has dual effects of
anti-inflammation and pro-resolution of inflammation.[20,21] LXA4 is produced at
sites of lung inflammation in the upper and lower airways and the
vasculature.[22,23] In response to inflammation, in airway epithelial cells,
15-LOX-derived 15-S-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid can be transformed
by neutrophil 5-LOX to an unstable epoxytetraene intermediate, which is converted to
LXA4 and LXB4 by enzymatic hydrolysis.[24] LXA4 works by binding specifically and reversibly to ALX/FPR2, a
G-protein-coupled receptor.[24-26]Our data demonstrated clearly that LXA4 exerts potent protective effects
in lung after LPS challenge, which was consistent with the changes observed in
histopathologic evaluation (Figure
1a), pulmonary edema (Figure 1b), and microvascular permeability (Figure 1c), in addition to neutrophil
infiltration, including white blood cells in BALF and lung MPO activity (Figure 1d and e). We also found that
treatment of mice with LXA4 could increase the activity and concentration
of ACE2 (Figure 2) and the
expression levels of Ang-(1-7) and its receptor Mas (Figure 2) markedly. Third, LXA4
was found capable of increasing the expression of anti-inflammatory IL-10 (Figure 3), but decreased the
levels of pro-inflammatory TNF-α, IL-1β, and ROS (Figures 3 and 4) and inhibited the NF-κB signal pathway,
including repressing the degradation of I-κB, the phosphorylation of NF-κB, and the
translocation of NF-κB (Figures
5 and 6).
Finally, our data provided evidence that A779 and MLN4760, inhibitors of the
ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, and BOC-2, an inhibitor of the LXA4 receptor,
could abolish the effects of LXA4 (Figures 1–6), suggesting that the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis played an essential role
in the protective effects of LXA4 on ALI in mice and this was ALX/FPR2
dependent.ACE2 is a major member of the renin–angiotensin system.[27] Renin induces the production of angiotensin I (Ang I), and (Ang I) can
transfer to angiotensin II (Ang II) through ACE [27]. ACE2 is the homolog of ACE,
but it negates the activity of ACE via induction of Ang II degradation to Ang-(1-7),
which binds to its receptor, Mas, and counteracts the effects of Ang II.[27] The protective roles of ACE2 and Ang-(1-7) in lung disease have been
confirmed in previous works and have been reported to occur mainly via
anti-inflammation and anti-oxidation effects.[16-18,28-34] It is well known that
inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and the upstream NF-κB signal pathway
activation are vital aspects of ALI. It has been reported recently that the
ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis could repress inflammation, reduce the production of ROS,
and inhibit NF-κB signal pathway.[35-39] Further, various studies have
demonstrated that LXA4 can repress the inflammatory response,[40-42] decrease the production of
ROS,[43,44] and control
the NF-κB signal pathway.[45,46] Consistent with other reports, our results demonstrate that
LXA4 was capable of increasing the amount of IL-10 (Figure 3), but decreased
TNF-α, IL-1β, and ROS levels (Figures 3 and 4) and inhibited the degradation of IκB, the
phosphorylation of NF-κB, and the translocation of NF-κB (Figures 5 and 6). Furthermore, the data demonstrated that
LXA4 could up-regulate and activate the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis
(Figure 2). More
importantly, A779 and MLN4760, inhibitors of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis, abolished
all effects of LXA4, including protection against ALI, regulation of
inflammation, and inhibition of the NF-κB signal pathway. These results suggested
that LXA4 protected lungs from ALI through regulating the
ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis and the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis might be upstream of the
NF-κB signal pathway. The possible underlying mechanisms of LXA4 in
controlling ALI are depicted in Figure 7. We posit that the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis may be a novel and
key target of LXs.
Figure 7.
The summary of this research.
The summary of this research.In summary, the present study provides evidence that LXA4 can promote the
resolution of ALI in mice through the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in part via FPR2/ALX.
This research increases our understanding of the functions and mechanisms of LXs,
which is beneficial because it supports the early application of LXs in clinical
treatment in ALI and other inflammatory diseases. In addition to LXs themselves, the
pro-resolving mediators ACE/Ang-(1-7)/Mas have potential as new therapeutic
approaches for patients with ALI and ARDS.
Authors: Guadalupe Ortiz-Muñoz; Beñat Mallavia; Adriaan Bins; Mark Headley; Matthew F Krummel; Mark R Looney Journal: Blood Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Minjian Chen; Maziar Divangahi; Huixian Gan; Daniel S J Shin; Song Hong; David M Lee; Charles N Serhan; Samuel M Behar; Heinz G Remold Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Rafael I Jaén; Sergio Sánchez-García; María Fernández-Velasco; Lisardo Boscá; Patricia Prieto Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Isabella Zaidan; Luciana P Tavares; Michelle A Sugimoto; Kátia M Lima; Graziele L Negreiros-Lima; Lívia Cr Teixeira; Thais C Miranda; Bruno Vs Valiate; Allysson Cramer; Juliana Priscila Vago; Gabriel H Campolina-Silva; Jéssica Am Souza; Laís C Grossi; Vanessa Pinho; Maria Jose Campagnole-Santos; Robson As Santos; Mauro M Teixeira; Izabela Galvão; Lirlândia P Sousa Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-01-11