Ashish Goyal1, Ranjit Chauhan2. 1. Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA. Electronic address: ashish.goyal@lanl.gov. 2. Virology Researcher, St Johns, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Out of several phases of HBV infection, the least understood phase is occult hepatitis B virus infection. The paucity of data due to non-availability of biological tissues and the prerequisite of ultra-sensitive assays for the detection of occult hepatitis B virus infection prompted us to utilize mathematical modeling in determining mechanisms that lead to occult hepatitis B virus infection and characteristics of HBV infection during occult hepatitis B virus infection. METHODS: We proposed two mathematical models (M1 and M2), considering two different phenomenon for episomal maintenance and accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in infected hepatocytes: (i) M1 - recirculation of the relaxed circular DNA/double-stranded linear DNA from cytoplasm to the nucleus, and (ii) M2 - reinfection of infected hepatocytes with virions. We further incorporated the dynamics of integrated Hepatitis B virus DNA (iHBV) to investigate its role in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the main mechanism for the spread of infection during occult hepatitis B virus infection is cell-to-cell transmission and not cell-free virus transmission. A significant viral suppression (of at least 99% from its peak production values) was essential but not sufficient in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection under M1; however under M2, the viral suppression was neither sufficient nor essential as the inhibition of the production of HBsAg without viral suppression can also explain the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Our analysis also revealed that occult hepatitis B virus infection seropositive cases are more likely to progress into liver cirrhosis compared to occult hepatitis B virus infection seronegative cases. The iHBV was found to be mostly silent (by either being absent or non-productive for HBsAg) during occult hepatitis B virus infection. CONCLUSION: The viral suppression is neither essential nor sufficient to explain the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection on its own. Not only the viral suppression but the inhibition -of the production and the export of HBsAg from cccDNA and iHBV also plays an important role in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. This is the first study, which incorporates the dynamics of iHBV and shows that HBV primarily spreads via cell-cell transmission during occult hepatitis B virus infection.
BACKGROUND: Out of several phases of HBV infection, the least understood phase is occult hepatitis B virus infection. The paucity of data due to non-availability of biological tissues and the prerequisite of ultra-sensitive assays for the detection of occult hepatitis B virus infection prompted us to utilize mathematical modeling in determining mechanisms that lead to occult hepatitis B virus infection and characteristics of HBV infection during occult hepatitis B virus infection. METHODS: We proposed two mathematical models (M1 and M2), considering two different phenomenon for episomal maintenance and accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in infected hepatocytes: (i) M1 - recirculation of the relaxed circular DNA/double-stranded linear DNA from cytoplasm to the nucleus, and (ii) M2 - reinfection of infected hepatocytes with virions. We further incorporated the dynamics of integrated Hepatitis B virus DNA (iHBV) to investigate its role in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the main mechanism for the spread of infection during occult hepatitis B virus infection is cell-to-cell transmission and not cell-free virus transmission. A significant viral suppression (of at least 99% from its peak production values) was essential but not sufficient in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection under M1; however under M2, the viral suppression was neither sufficient nor essential as the inhibition of the production of HBsAg without viral suppression can also explain the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Our analysis also revealed that occult hepatitis B virus infection seropositive cases are more likely to progress into liver cirrhosis compared to occult hepatitis B virus infection seronegative cases. The iHBV was found to be mostly silent (by either being absent or non-productive for HBsAg) during occult hepatitis B virus infection. CONCLUSION: The viral suppression is neither essential nor sufficient to explain the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection on its own. Not only the viral suppression but the inhibition -of the production and the export of HBsAg from cccDNA and iHBV also plays an important role in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. This is the first study, which incorporates the dynamics of iHBV and shows that HBV primarily spreads via cell-cell transmission during occult hepatitis B virus infection.