Barnaby Nelson1,2, Emily Li1,2, David C Cicero3, Łukasz Gawęda4,5, Jessica A Hartmann1,2, Danny Koren6, Andrea Polari1,2,7, Thomas J Whitford8, Suzie Lavoie1,2. 1. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 2. Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Parkville. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Department of Psychiatry, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 6. Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 7. Orygen Youth Health Clinical Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 8. Department of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: The Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalous Self-Experiences (IPASE) is a self-report measure of minimal self-disturbance. The aim of the current report was to assess the construct validity of the scale by examining its convergent validity with the gold-standard measure of minimal self-disturbance, the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE), and its discriminant validity. METHOD: The sample consisted of 46 participants (21 ultra-high risk for psychosis patients, 14 first episode psychosis patients, 11 healthy controls). Correlations between the clinical instruments were examined. RESULTS: The IPASE correlated strongly with general psychopathology and positive psychotic symptoms, moderately with negative symptoms, and weakly with manic symptoms. The strongest correlation (r = 0.92) was apparent between IPASE and EASE total scores. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data indicate construct validity of the IPASE, demonstrating both convergent and discriminant validity. The IPASE may be suitable as a screener measure for minimal self-disturbance, but should not be used as a replacement to measure the construct of minimal self-disturbance, which requires considerable psychopathological sophistication.
AIM: The Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalous Self-Experiences (IPASE) is a self-report measure of minimal self-disturbance. The aim of the current report was to assess the construct validity of the scale by examining its convergent validity with the gold-standard measure of minimal self-disturbance, the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE), and its discriminant validity. METHOD: The sample consisted of 46 participants (21 ultra-high risk for psychosispatients, 14 first episode psychosispatients, 11 healthy controls). Correlations between the clinical instruments were examined. RESULTS: The IPASE correlated strongly with general psychopathology and positive psychotic symptoms, moderately with negative symptoms, and weakly with manic symptoms. The strongest correlation (r = 0.92) was apparent between IPASE and EASE total scores. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data indicate construct validity of the IPASE, demonstrating both convergent and discriminant validity. The IPASE may be suitable as a screener measure for minimal self-disturbance, but should not be used as a replacement to measure the construct of minimal self-disturbance, which requires considerable psychopathological sophistication.
Authors: Mario Maj; Jim van Os; Marc De Hert; Wolfgang Gaebel; Silvana Galderisi; Michael F Green; Sinan Guloksuz; Philip D Harvey; Peter B Jones; Dolores Malaspina; Patrick McGorry; Jouko Miettunen; Robin M Murray; Keith H Nuechterlein; Victor Peralta; Graham Thornicroft; Ruud van Winkel; Joseph Ventura Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 49.548