Hanna Ribbing Wilén1, Johannes Blom2, Jonas Höijer3, Rolf Hultcrantz4. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Trauma and Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but number of tests and cut-off level differ by program. The aim was to evaluate CRC screening with two FIT samples in average-risk 60-year-old men and women and to investigate hemoglobin (Hb) level in correlation to adenoma characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort from Screening of Swedish Colons trial where participants with at least one of two FIT samples ≥10 μg Hb/g are offered colonoscopy. FIT levels and colonoscopy findings were assessed in multivariable analyses. Cut-off levels 10-80 μg Hb/g for one and two samples were assessed. FIT levels and advanced neoplasia (AN) were investigated by gender. RESULTS: A total of 12 383 participated and 1182 positives (551 women) completed colonoscopy diagnosing 27 (2.3%) CRC and 269 (23%) advanced adenomas (AA). Median FIT level was 241.0 and 23.8 for CRC and AA compared with 13.4-15.8 in other subgroups (P = 0.002) correlating with adenoma size (P = 0.038). CRC was detected in 22 and 19 subjects for the first sample at cut-off 20 and 40 μg Hb/g, compared with 20 and 17 for the mean of two samples at cut-off 40 and 80 μg Hb/g (P < 0.05). Men had more AN (CRC + AA), (P = 0.003). In women, similar number of AN would be detected with cut-off lowered from 40 to 20 or from 80 to 40 μg Hb/g, requiring additional 26-34% colonoscopies. CONCLUSION: In average-risk 60-year-olds, FIT was higher in participants with AN and correlated with adenoma size. FIT screening with one sample at low cut-off detected more CRC than two samples at higher cut-off. Applying lower cut-off in women to equalize gender differences in AN would result in considerable increase in colonoscopy workload.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but number of tests and cut-off level differ by program. The aim was to evaluate CRC screening with two FIT samples in average-risk 60-year-old men and women and to investigate hemoglobin (Hb) level in correlation to adenoma characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort from Screening of Swedish Colons trial where participants with at least one of two FIT samples ≥10 μg Hb/g are offered colonoscopy. FIT levels and colonoscopy findings were assessed in multivariable analyses. Cut-off levels 10-80 μg Hb/g for one and two samples were assessed. FIT levels and advanced neoplasia (AN) were investigated by gender. RESULTS: A total of 12 383 participated and 1182 positives (551 women) completed colonoscopy diagnosing 27 (2.3%) CRC and 269 (23%) advanced adenomas (AA). Median FIT level was 241.0 and 23.8 for CRC and AA compared with 13.4-15.8 in other subgroups (P = 0.002) correlating with adenoma size (P = 0.038). CRC was detected in 22 and 19 subjects for the first sample at cut-off 20 and 40 μg Hb/g, compared with 20 and 17 for the mean of two samples at cut-off 40 and 80 μg Hb/g (P < 0.05). Men had more AN (CRC + AA), (P = 0.003). In women, similar number of AN would be detected with cut-off lowered from 40 to 20 or from 80 to 40 μg Hb/g, requiring additional 26-34% colonoscopies. CONCLUSION: In average-risk 60-year-olds, FIT was higher in participants with AN and correlated with adenoma size. FIT screening with one sample at low cut-off detected more CRC than two samples at higher cut-off. Applying lower cut-off in women to equalize gender differences in AN would result in considerable increase in colonoscopy workload.
Authors: Olusegun I Alatise; Anna J Dare; Patrick A Akinyemi; Fatimah B Abdulkareem; Samuel A Olatoke; Gregory C Knapp; T Peter Kingham Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 38.927
Authors: Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Catherine L Saunders; Deborah Thompson; Sophie Whyte; Simon Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Hanyue Ding; Jiaye Lin; Zijun Xu; Xiao Chen; Harry H X Wang; Liwen Huang; Junjie Huang; Zhijie Zheng; Martin C S Wong Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Noel Pin-Vieito; Laura García Nimo; Luis Bujanda; Begona Román Alonso; María Ángeles Gutierrez-Stampa; Vanessa Aguilar-Gama; Isabel Portillo; Joaquín Cubiella Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.623