Literature DB >> 29968869

Biocompatibility of polymer-based biomaterials and medical devices - regulations, in vitro screening and risk-management.

Mélisande Bernard1, Emile Jubeli, Michael D Pungente, Najet Yagoubi.   

Abstract

Biomaterials play an increasing role in modern health care systems. Biocompatibility poses a significant challenge for manufacturers of medical devices and contemporary intelligent drug delivery technologies from materials development to market approval. Despite a highly regulated environment, biocompatibility evaluation of biomaterials for medical devices is a complex task related to various factors that include mainly chemical nature and physical properties of the material, the contact tissue and duration of contact. Although international standards, such as ISO 10993-1, are generally employed to prove regulatory compliance needed for market clearance or for initiating clinical investigations, they may not offer sufficient guidance, or risk-management perspective when it comes to choosing materials or appropriate in vitro biocompatibility screening methods when developing medical devices. The global normative approach towards the biocompatibility evaluation of medical devices is presented in this review, with a focus on in vitro studies. Indeed, a risk-management approach towards the judicial choice of in vitro tests throughout the development and production of medical devices and drug delivery systems will facilitate rapid regulatory approval, avoid unnecessary animal studies, and ultimately reduce risks for patients. A detailed overview towards the construction of a comprehensive biological evaluation plan is described herein, with a focus on polymer-based materials used in medical applications. Polymeric materials offer a broad spectrum of applications in the manufacturing of medical devices. They are extensively employed within both conventional and innovative drug delivery systems with superior attributes supporting robust, extended use capacity, capable of meeting specific requirement such as adhesion, drug release, and more. Various methods of biocompatibility assessment are detailed within, with an emphasis on scientific analysis. This review may be of interest to those involved in the design, manufacturing and in vitro testing of medical devices and innovative drug delivery technologies, specifically with respect to a risk-management approach towards the biocompatibility assessment of polymer-based devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29968869     DOI: 10.1039/c8bm00518d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Sci        ISSN: 2047-4830            Impact factor:   6.843


  25 in total

1.  Self-crosslinkable chitosan-hyaluronic acid dialdehyde nanoparticles for CD44-targeted siRNA delivery to treat bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ye Liang; Yonghua Wang; Liping Wang; Zhijuan Liang; Dan Li; Xiaoyu Xu; Yuanbin Chen; Xuecheng Yang; Hongbo Zhang; Haitao Niu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-09-08

2.  Extraction With Sweat-Sebum Emulsion as a New Test Method for Leachables in Patch-Based Medical Devices, Illustrated by Assessment of Isobornylacrylate (IBOA) in Diabetes Products.

Authors:  Herbert Fink; Nuno M de Barros Fernandes; Jörg Weissmann; Manfred Frey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-01

3.  Combination strategies for antithrombotic biomaterials: an emerging trend towards hemocompatibility.

Authors:  Morgan Ashcraft; Megan Douglass; YuJie Chen; Hitesh Handa
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 4.  Biocompatibility Evolves: Phenomenology to Toxicology to Regeneration.

Authors:  Lars Crawford; Meghan Wyatt; James Bryers; Buddy Ratner
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 5.  Biocompatibility of Polyimides: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Catalin P Constantin; Magdalena Aflori; Radu F Damian; Radu D Rusu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Cell Type-Specific Adhesion and Migration on Laser-Structured Opaque Surfaces.

Authors:  Jörn Schaeske; Elena Fadeeva; Sabrina Schlie-Wolter; Andrea Deiwick; Boris N Chichkov; Alexandra Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis; Meike Stiesch; Andreas Winkel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Design of Bio-Conjugated Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine Applications: From Polymer Scaffold to Biomolecule Choice.

Authors:  Vittoria Chimisso; Miguel Angel Aleman Garcia; Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar; Ionel Adrian Dinu; Cornelia G Palivan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Rapid custom prototyping of soft poroelastic biosensor for simultaneous epicardial recording and imaging.

Authors:  Bongjoong Kim; Arvin H Soepriatna; Woohyun Park; Haesoo Moon; Abigail Cox; Jianchao Zhao; Nevin S Gupta; Chi Hoon Park; Kyunghun Kim; Yale Jeon; Hanmin Jang; Dong Rip Kim; Hyowon Lee; Kwan-Soo Lee; Craig J Goergen; Chi Hwan Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Intrinsically Biocompatible Polymer Systems.

Authors:  Marek Kowalczuk
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 10.  Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremie D Oliver; Shihai Jia; Leslie R Halpern; Emily M Graham; Emma C Turner; John S Colombo; David W Grainger; Rena N D'Souza
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.