Luís Miguel Silva1, Henrique Pereira Neiva1,2, Mário Cardoso Marques1,2, Mikel Izquierdo3, Daniel Almeida Marinho1,2. 1. Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. 2. Research Centre in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Covilhã, Portugal. 3. Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Tudela, Spain. mikel.izquierdo@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In team sports, it is imperative that the warm-up improves acute explosive performance. However, the exact strategies, methods, and consequences of different warm-up practices remain unclear. A time delay between the warm-up and match and during half-time could negate the positive metabolic effects of the warm-up. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize and analyze the potential effects of strategies during a warm-up (before match), post-warm-up (time between the end of warm-up and the start of a match), and re-warm-up (half-time break within a match) on explosive performance in team sports. Furthermore, we examined optimal warm-up strategies based on the included studies. METHODS: We performed a search of four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect) for original research articles published between January 1981 and August 2017. A total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The results of the included studies were recalculated to determine effect sizes using Cohen's d. RESULTS: A warm-up comprising 8 sets of 60-m sprints (- 2.19%, d = 1.20) improved sprint performance. Additionally, 7 min of dynamic exercises after 5 min of jogging improved sprint (- 7.69%, d = 1.72), jumping (8.61%, d = 0.61), and agility performance (- 6.65%, d = 1.40). The use of small-sided games also seems to be a valid strategy, especially for jumping performance (6%, d = 0.8). These benefits resulted from the warm-up strategies combined with some passive rest (between 2 and 10 min) before the main performance. In this post-warm-up period, the use of heated garments could result in better outcomes than simple rest (- 0.89%, d = 0.39). However, if the transition was longer than 15 min, before entering the match, performing a re-warm-up with short-term explosive tasks to reactivate was the most effective approach (- 1.97%, d = - 0.86). At half-time, heated garments maintained better sprint (- 1.45%, d = 2.21) and jumping performance (3.13%, d = 1.62). CONCLUSION: Applying properly structured strategies in the warm-up and avoiding a long rest in the post-warm-up improves explosive performance. Studies tend to recommend a short active warm-up strategy (10-15 min), gradually increasing intensity (~ 50-90% of maximum heart rate), and the use of heated garments soon after the warm-up to maintain muscle temperature. However, 2 min of active re-warm-up with short-term sprints and jumps should be needed for transitions longer than 15 min (~ 90% of maximum heart rate). Last, at the half-time re-warm-up, combining heated garments to maintain muscle temperature and performing an active strategy, with explosive tasks or small-sided games for 5 min before re-entering the game, resulted in better explosive performance than 15 min of resting.
BACKGROUND: In team sports, it is imperative that the warm-up improves acute explosive performance. However, the exact strategies, methods, and consequences of different warm-up practices remain unclear. A time delay between the warm-up and match and during half-time could negate the positive metabolic effects of the warm-up. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize and analyze the potential effects of strategies during a warm-up (before match), post-warm-up (time between the end of warm-up and the start of a match), and re-warm-up (half-time break within a match) on explosive performance in team sports. Furthermore, we examined optimal warm-up strategies based on the included studies. METHODS: We performed a search of four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect) for original research articles published between January 1981 and August 2017. A total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The results of the included studies were recalculated to determine effect sizes using Cohen's d. RESULTS: A warm-up comprising 8 sets of 60-m sprints (- 2.19%, d = 1.20) improved sprint performance. Additionally, 7 min of dynamic exercises after 5 min of jogging improved sprint (- 7.69%, d = 1.72), jumping (8.61%, d = 0.61), and agility performance (- 6.65%, d = 1.40). The use of small-sided games also seems to be a valid strategy, especially for jumping performance (6%, d = 0.8). These benefits resulted from the warm-up strategies combined with some passive rest (between 2 and 10 min) before the main performance. In this post-warm-up period, the use of heated garments could result in better outcomes than simple rest (- 0.89%, d = 0.39). However, if the transition was longer than 15 min, before entering the match, performing a re-warm-up with short-term explosive tasks to reactivate was the most effective approach (- 1.97%, d = - 0.86). At half-time, heated garments maintained better sprint (- 1.45%, d = 2.21) and jumping performance (3.13%, d = 1.62). CONCLUSION: Applying properly structured strategies in the warm-up and avoiding a long rest in the post-warm-up improves explosive performance. Studies tend to recommend a short active warm-up strategy (10-15 min), gradually increasing intensity (~ 50-90% of maximum heart rate), and the use of heated garments soon after the warm-up to maintain muscle temperature. However, 2 min of active re-warm-up with short-term sprints and jumps should be needed for transitions longer than 15 min (~ 90% of maximum heart rate). Last, at the half-time re-warm-up, combining heated garments to maintain muscle temperature and performing an active strategy, with explosive tasks or small-sided games for 5 min before re-entering the game, resulted in better explosive performance than 15 min of resting.
Authors: Liam P Kilduff; Charlotte V Finn; Julien S Baker; Christian J Cook; Daniel J West Journal: Int J Sports Physiol Perform Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 4.010
Authors: Margherita Raccuglia; Alex Lloyd; Davide Filingeri; Steve H Faulkner; Simon Hodder; George Havenith Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Luiz H Palucci Vieira; Felipe B Santinelli; Christopher Carling; Eleftherios Kellis; Paulo R P Santiago; Fabio A Barbieri Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Domingo Jesús Ramos-Campo; João Malta; Guillermo Olcina; Rafael Timón; Armando Raimundo; Pablo Tomas-Carus Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria H Gil; Henrique P Neiva; Nuno D Garrido; Felipe J Aidar; Maria S Cirilo-Sousa; Mário C Marques; Daniel A Marinho Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Samuel P Hills; Jon N Radcliffe; Martin J Barwood; Shawn M Arent; Carlton B Cooke; Mark Russell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luís Branquinho; Ricardo Ferraz; Bruno Travassos; Mário C Marques Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joel Barrera; Hugo Sarmento; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Adam Field; António J Figueiredo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Samuel P Hills; Steve Barrett; Richard G Feltbower; Martin J Barwood; Jon N Radcliffe; Carlton B Cooke; Liam P Kilduff; Christian J Cook; Mark Russell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bruno Ribeiro; Ana Pereira; Pedro P Neves; António C Sousa; Ricardo Ferraz; Mário C Marques; Daniel A Marinho; Henrique P Neiva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 3.390