| Literature DB >> 29967720 |
Jusun Hwang1,2, Nicole L Gottdenker2, Dae-Hyun Oh1, Ho-Woo Nam3, Hang Lee1, Myung-Sun Chun1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supplemental feeding of free-roaming animals, including wildlife and feral or stray animals, is well known to have a substantial impact on various aspects of animal ecology including habitat use, activity patterns, and host-pathogen interactions. Among them, an increased population density (PD) of animals receiving supplemental food raises concerns regarding the transmission of pathogens in these host populations. The primary aim of this study was to investigate how supplemental feeding is associated with host PD and prevalence of pathogens with different transmission modes in urban stray cats. We hypothesized that supplemental feeding would be positively associated with host PD and the prevalence of pathogens with density-dependent transmission modes compared with pathogens with transmission modes that are considered relatively density-independent.Entities:
Keywords: Cat caretaker activity; Feline pathogen; Host population density; Supplemental feeding; Urban ecology; Urban stray cat
Year: 2018 PMID: 29967720 PMCID: PMC6022734 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Transmission modes of studied pathogens.
| Pathogens | Transmission modes | Relative position of pathogens on continuum of transmission modes |
|---|---|---|
| Feline calicivirus (FCV) | Aerosol in close proximity, direct contact with contaminated objects or infected cats | |
| Feline herpesvirus (FHV) | Aerosol in close proximity, direct contact with contaminated objects or infected cats | |
| Feline leukemia virus (FeLV) | Saliva, aerosol in close proximity | |
| Prey consumption contact with contaminated abiotic materials (e.g., feces) | ||
| Feline parvovirus (FPV) | Saliva, blood, urine, and feces | |
| Vector-borne, mostly flea | ||
| Hemoplasma | Through saliva and/or arthropod vectors | |
| Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) | Aggressive behavior during breeding seasons-saliva and bite wounds |
Note:
Specific transmission routes of studied pathogens and its relative position along the continuum between density-dependent and frequency-dependent transmission.
Principal components (PC1 and PC2) eigenvalues and PC loadings for the CCA parameters.
| PC1 | PC2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | 3.12 | 1.41 |
| Percentage variation explained | 0.39 | 0.18 |
| Eigenvectors | ||
| Matriculation rate | 0.45 | −0.27 |
| Property tax | 0.46 | −0.11 |
| Proportion of survey respondents | 0.37 | −0.42 |
| Proportion of respondents taking care of more than ten cats | 0.24 | 0.58 |
| Proportion of cat caretakers with more than five years of experience | 0.29 | 0.39 |
| Provide food supplement daily in a regular manner | 0.27 | 0.41 |
| Provide food in areas further than a 100-m radius from their house | 0.25 | −0.27 |
| Subjective score about the intensity of the CCA in his/her residing district | 0.42 | 0.08 |
Figure 1CCA (PC1) in the districts of Seoul based on the PCA result.
The six districts selected are; GN, SC, and MP (high CCA districts; yellow), and GC, DDM, and SD (lower CCA districts; blue). District SP and GD was excluded from the study site due to logistical reasons.
Figure 2Map of Seoul showing the 6 districts where the study was performed.
We modified a source figure produced by “Stefan-Xp” under the following copyright permission. “Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled the GNU Free Documentation License. The GNU Free Documentation License (GNU FDL or simply GFDL) is a copyleft license for free documentation, designed by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the GNU Project.”
High CCA districts in red letters and low CCA districts in blue letters.
Estimated population densities (95% confidence intervals) and proportion of observed cats with the sterilization mark from the six districts (CCA indicated in parenthesis; high-H, low-L).
| District (CCA) | Site ID | Area (km2) | Estimated cat density (95% CI cats per km2) | Proportion of sterilized cats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GN (H) | GN1 | 0.14 | 155 (127–246) | 0.24 |
| GN2 | 0.17 | 168 (132–288) | 0.68 | |
| SC (H) | SC1 | 0.19 | 185 (151–295) | 0.30 |
| SC2 | 0.17 | 172 (129–312) | 0.22 | |
| MP (H) | MP1 | 0.15 | 166 (146–232) | 0.14 |
| MP2 | 0.18 | 182 (155–280) | 0.58 | |
| DDM (L) | DDM1 | 0.18 | 132 (126–172) | 0.19 |
| DDM2 | 0.13 | 175 (152–266) | 0.00 | |
| GC (L) | GC1 | 0.19 | 189 (158–289) | 0.22 |
| GC2 | 0.16 | 206 (167–328) | 0.08 | |
| SD (L) | SD1 | 0.18 | 243 (209–349) | 0.00 |
| SD2 | 0.21 | 268 (189–466) | 0.10 |
Note:
Calculated as “number of observed cats with an ear mark/number of total observed cats.”
Figure 3Cat population density estimates (95% confidence intervals) from the 12 survey sites.
Prevalence (%), 95% confidence interval and sample size (n)) of each pathogen from the stray cats in the six studied districts (Letter inside the parentheses indicates the CCA of each district; H-high, L-low).
| District | Prevalence (%), 95% confidence interval and sample size ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIV | Feline Hemoplasma | FPV | FeLV | FCV | FHV-1 | |||
| GN (H) | 0% (0.00–0.05, | 26.0% (0.15–0.39, | 42.0% (0.29–0.56, | 6.0% (0.02–0.15, | 59.0% (0.45–0.72, | 42.0% (0.28–0.56, | 100% (0.95–1.00, | 100% (0.95–1.00, |
| SC (H) | 6.0% (0.02–0.15, | 38.0% (0.26–0.52, | 30.0% (0.19–0.44, | 6.0% (0.02–0.15, | 76.0% (0.63–0.86, | 36.0% (0.24–0.50, | 92.0% (0.82–0.97, | 94.0% (0.85–0.98, |
| MP (H) | 6.0%, (0.02–0.15, | 48.0% (0.35–0.62, | 42.0% (0.29–0.56, | 6.3% (0.02–0.16, | 75.5% (0.64–0.87, | 12.0% (0.03–0.21, | 98.0% (0.91–1.00, | 96.0% (0.88–0.99, |
| DDM (L) | 4.0% (0.01–0.12, | 28.0% (0.17–0.41, | 32.0% (0.20–0.46, | 4.0% (0.01–0.12, | 94.0% (0.85–0.98, | 20.0% (0.11–0.33, | 100% (0.95–1.00, | 100% (0.95–1.00, |
| GC (L) | 4.0% (0.01–0.12, | 28.0% (0.17–0.41, | 34.0% (0.22–0.48, | 12.0% (0.05–0.23, | 80.0% (0.67–0.89, | 14.0% (0.07–0.26, | 92.0% (0.82–0.97, | 100% (0.95–1.00, |
| SD (L) | 1.9% (0.00–0.09, | 26.9% (0.16–0.5, | 28.8% (0.18–0.42, | 12.0% (0.05–0.23, | 90.0% (0.80–0.96, | 15.4% (0.08–0.27, | 86.0% (0.75–0.94, | 100% (0.95–1.00, |
AICc values and AICc weights of the most parsimonious candidate models (models within 2 units of the ΔAICc) testing the effect of the explanatory variables (sex, population density (pd), and CCA) on the prevalence of the eight studied pathogens.
| Pathogen | Model | K | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeLV | 4 | 318.97 | 0.00 | 0.62 | |
| sex + pd + CCA | 5 | 320.80 | 1.84 | 0.25 | |
| FPV | CCA | 3 | 294.25 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| sex + CCA | 4 | 294.57 | 0.31 | 0.34 | |
| Hemoplasma | 4 | 375.39 | 0.00 | 0.35 | |
| sex | 3 | 375.50 | 0.12 | 0.33 | |
| sex + pd | 4 | 376.86 | 1.48 | 0.17 | |
| 4 | 159.77 | 0.00 | 0.34 | ||
| sex | 3 | 160.29 | 0.52 | 0.26 | |
| sex + CCA | 4 | 161.64 | 1.87 | 0.13 | |
| FCV | 3 | 117.76 | 0.00 | 0.38 | |
| pd + sex | 4 | 118.19 | 0.43 | 0.31 | |
| pd + CCA | 4 | 119.47 | 1.71 | 0.16 | |
| FHV-1 | 4 | 47.73 | 0.00 | 0.27 | |
| CCA | 3 | 47.81 | 0.09 | 0.25 | |
| sex + pd + CCA | 5 | 48.16 | 0.43 | 0.21 | |
| sex + CCA | 4 | 48.30 | 0.57 | 0.20 | |
| FIV | 2 | 96.56 | 0.00 | 0.37 | |
| pd | 3 | 98.34 | 1.78 | 0.15 | |
| CCA | 3 | 98.48 | 1.93 | 0.14 | |
| sex | 3 | 98.52 | 1.96 | 0.14 | |
| 2 | 392.20 | 0.00 | 0.25 | ||
| CCA | 3 | 392.85 | 0.65 | 0.18 | |
| pd | 3 | 392.98 | 0.78 | 0.17 | |
| sex | 3 | 393.87 | 1.67 | 0.11 |
Note:
pd, population density; CCA, cat caretaker activity.
Model-averaged parameter estimates included in the most parsimonious models (models within 2 units of the ΔAICc) for each pathogen.
| Coefficient | S.E. | Upper CI | Lower CI | Odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA; | −0.81 | 0.30 | −1.42 | −0.20 | 0.44 | <0.01 |
| −0.74 | 0.29 | −1.32 | −0.17 | 0.48 | 0.01 | |
| pd | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.41 |
| CCA; | 1.12 | 0.31 | 0.52 | 1.74 | 3.08 | <0.01 |
| sex; male | −0.35 | 0.30 | −0.93 | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.24 |
| CCA; low | −0.37 | 0.25 | −0.91 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 0.15 |
| 0.79 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 1.30 | 2.23 | <0.01 | |
| pd | −0.00 | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.67 |
| CCA; low | 0.38 | 0.45 | −0.50 | 1.27 | 1.47 | 0.40 |
| −1.11 | 0.49 | −2.07 | −0.14 | 0.33 | 0.03 | |
| pd | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.00 | 0.02 | 1.01 | 0.08 |
| CCA; low | 0.38 | 0.82 | −1.28 | 1.99 | 1.47 | 0.64 |
| sex; male | −0.63 | 0.55 | −1.70 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.25 |
| −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 | |
| CCA; low | 27.53 | 2701.87 | −5268.04 | 5323.11 | 9.08 × 1011 | 0.99 |
| sex; male | −1.25 | 1.14 | −3.49 | 0.99 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Pd | −0.18 | 0.13 | −0.43 | 0.07 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| CCA; low | −0.14 | 0.65 | −1.28 | 1.25 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| sex; male | 0.14 | 0.65 | −1.25 | 1.28 | 1.01 | 0.98 |
| Pd | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| CCA; low | −0.29 | 0.25 | −0.77 | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.24 |
| sex; male | −0.19 | 0.25 | −0.67 | 0.29 | 0.83 | 0.44 |
| Pd | −0.00 | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.35 |