| Literature DB >> 29967348 |
Dawn M Dudley1, Koen K Van Rompay2,3, Lark L Coffey4, Amir Ardeshir5, Rebekah I Keesler5, Eliza Bliss-Moreau5, Peta L Grigsby6, Rosemary J Steinbach6, Alec J Hirsch7,8, Rhonda P MacAllister9, Heidi L Pecoraro10, Lois M Colgin10, Travis Hodge9, Daniel N Streblow11,12, Suzette Tardif13, Jean L Patterson14, Manasi Tamhankar14, Maxim Seferovic15, Kjersti M Aagaard15,16, Claudia Sánchez-San Martín17, Charles Y Chiu17,18, Antonito T Panganiban19,20, Ronald S Veazey21, Xiaolei Wang21, Nicholas J Maness22, Margaret H Gilbert23, Rudolf P Bohm23, Kristina M Adams Waldorf24, Michael Gale25,26, Lakshmi Rajagopal27,28, Charlotte E Hotchkiss29, Emma L Mohr30, Saverio V Capuano31, Heather A Simmons31, Andres Mejia31, Thomas C Friedrich31,32, Thaddeus G Golos31,33, David H O'Connor34,35.
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is associated with congenital defects and pregnancy loss. Here, we found that 26% of nonhuman primates infected with Asian/American ZIKV in early gestation experienced fetal demise later in pregnancy despite showing few clinical signs of infection. Pregnancy loss due to asymptomatic ZIKV infection may therefore be a common but under-recognized adverse outcome related to maternal ZIKV infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29967348 PMCID: PMC6082723 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0088-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440
Average rates of fetal demise among different nonhuman primate cohorts infected with ZIKV during pregnancy
| ZIKV isolate | Dose (PFU) | Route of inoculation | Ave. inoculation gestational age (GA) | Ave. inoculation GA w/fetal demise | Fetal Demise n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhesus macaque (n=6) | Brazil SPH_2015 + PRVABC59 | 4 ×103 | IA+IV | 48 | 46 | 4 (66.7) |
| Rhesus macaque (n=4) | Brazil SPH_2015 | 2 ×105 | IA+IV | 61 | 41 | 1 (25) |
| Rhesus macaque (n=2) | FP/2013 | 1×104 | SC | 33 | N/A | 0 |
| Rhesus macaque (n=2) | FP/2013 | 1×104 | SC | 112 | N/A | 0 |
| Rhesus macaque (n=12) | PRVABC59 | 1×103 | SC | 30 | 30 | 2 (16.7) |
| Rhesus macaque (n=8) | PRVABC59 | 1×104 | SC | 45 | 48 | 2 (25) |
| Rhesus macaque (n=6) | PRVABC59 | 1×105 | SC | 49 | 54 | 1 (16.7) |
| Rhesus macaque (n=2) | PRVABC59 | 1×105 | SC | 115 | N/A | 0 |
| Rhesus macaque (n=1) | PRVABC59 | 5×107 | SC | 50 | 50 | 1 (100) |
| Pigtail macaque (n=2) | FSS 13025_Cambodia | 5×107 | SC | 101 | N/A | 0 |
| Pigtail macaque (n=3) | Brazil 2015 Fortaleza | 5×107 | SC | 61 | N/A | 0 |
| Common marmoset (n=2) | Brazil SPH_2015 | 2.5×105 | IM | 76 | 76 | 2 (100) |
IA=intra-amniotic; IV=intravenous; SC=subcutaneous; N/A=not applicable
Rates of spontaneous abortion or stillbirth in healthy breeding colony rhesus (CNPRC, ONPRC, WNPRC) and pigtail (WaNPRC) macaques
| Institution | Breeding season | Spontaneous loss | Total pregnancies | Percent losses (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WNPRC | 2012 | 20 | 114 | 17.5 |
| 2013 | 11 | 113 | 9.7 | |
| 2014 | 10 | 142 | 7.0 | |
| 2015 | 10 | 103 | 9.7 | |
| 2016 | 12 | 124 | 9.7 | |
| 2017 (partial) | 15 | 117 | 12.8 | |
| Weighted average | 10.9 | |||
| CNPRC | 2008-2009 | 19 | 235 | 8.1 |
| 2009-2010 | 23 | 242 | 9.5 | |
| 2010-2011 | 15 | 210 | 7.14 | |
| 2011-2012 | 23 | 230 | 10.0 | |
| 2012-2013 | 24 | 173 | 13.9 | |
| 2013-2014 | 15 | 165 | 9.1 | |
| 2014-2015 | 18 | 128 | 14.1 | |
| 2015-2016 | 10 | 187 | 5.4 | |
| 2016-2017 (partial) | 11 | 192 | 5.7 | |
| Weighted average | 9.0 | |||
| ONPRC | 2007 | 6 | 47 | 12.8 |
| 2008 | 3 | 36 | 8.3 | |
| 2009 | 0 | 37 | 0.0 | |
| 2010 | 1 | 18 | 5.6 | |
| 2011 | 1 | 11 | 9.1 | |
| 2012 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | |
| 2013 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | |
| 2014 | 0 | 20 | 0.0 | |
| 2015 | 1 | 39 | 2.6 | |
| 2016 | 1 | 75 | 1.3 | |
| 2017 (partial) | 1 | 50 | 2.0 | |
| Weighted average | 4.0 | |||
| WaNPRC | 2014 | 13 | 114 | 11.4 |
| 2015 | 7 | 91 | 7.7 | |
| 2016 | 15 | 122 | 12.3 | |
| 2017 (partial) | 7 | 58 | 12.1 | |
| Weighted average | 10.9 |
Included pregnancies were confirmed >GD 30 and delivered by cesarean section
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves comparing survival rates between macaques exposed to Zika virus under different conditions. a. Macaques exposed to Zika virus originating from Brazil (BR) (red) or Puerto Rico (PR) (black). b. Macaques exposed to Zika virus on or before gestational day 55 (red) or after gestational day 55 (black). NE-not estimable due to zero events in one group. c. Macaques exposed to Zika virus with a duration of maternal plasma viremia less than or equal to 14 days post-infection (black) or duration of viremia greater than 14 days post-infection (red) (WNPRC and CNPRC only). d. Macaques exposed to Zika virus by intraamniotic (IA) and intravenous injection (IV) (red) or subcutaneous injection (SC) (black). Hazard ratio (HR) and p-value based on log-rank test are reported.