Literature DB >> 29967220

Optomotor steering and flight control requires a specific sub-section of the compound eye in the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta.

Sean Copley1, Kalyanasundaram Parthasarathy1, Mark A Willis2.   

Abstract

While tracking odor plumes, male hawkmoths use optic flow cues to stabilize their flight movements with respect to their environment. We studied the responses of freely flying moths tracking odor plumes in a laboratory wind tunnel and tethered moths in an optomotor flight simulator to determine the locations on the compound eye on which critical optic flow cues are detected. In these behavioral experiments, we occluded specific regions of the compound eye and systematically examined the moths' behavior for specific deficits in optic flow processing. Freely flying moths with the dorsal half of the compound eye painted were unable to maintain stable flight and track the wind-borne odor plume. However, the plume tracking performance of moths with the ventral half of their compound eyes painted was the same as unpainted controls. In a matched set of experiments, we presented tethered moths with moving vertically oriented sinusoidal gratings and found that individuals with their eyes unpainted, ventrally painted and medially painted all responded by attempting optomotor-driven turns in the same proportion. In contrast, individuals with their compound eyes dorsally painted, laterally painted and completely painted showed no optomotor turning response. We decreased the contrast of the visual stimulus and found that this relationship was consistent down to a contrast level of 2.5%. We conclude that visual input from the dorso-lateral region of the moth's visual world is critical for successful maintenance of flight stability and that this species' visual environment must meet or exceed a contrast ratio of 2.5% to support visual flight control.
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flight; Odor plume; Optic flow; Pheromone; Tracking; Vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967220     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.178210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Fruit flies increase attention to their frontal visual field during fast forward optic flow.

Authors:  Nicholas Palermo; Jamie Theobald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ventral motion parallax enhances fruit fly steering to visual sideslip.

Authors:  Carlos Ruiz; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Fuelling on the wing: sensory ecology of hawkmoth foraging.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Stöckl; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field.

Authors:  Nicholas P Burnett; Marc A Badger; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.