Literature DB >> 29966914

Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage.

Bodo Winter1, Marcus Perlman2, Asifa Majid3.   

Abstract

Researchers have suggested that the vocabularies of languages are oriented towards the communicative needs of language users. Here, we provide evidence demonstrating that the higher frequency of visual words in a large variety of English corpora is reflected in greater lexical differentiation-a greater number of unique words-for the visual domain in the English lexicon. In comparison, sensory modalities that are less frequently talked about, particularly taste and smell, show less lexical differentiation. In addition, we show that even though sensory language can be expected to change across historical time and between contexts of use (e.g., spoken language versus fiction), the pattern of visual dominance is a stable property of the English language. Thus, we show that across the board, precisely those semantic domains that are more frequently talked about are also more lexically differentiated, for perceptual experiences. This correlation between type and token frequencies suggests that the sensory lexicon of English is geared towards communicative efficiency.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embodied cognition; Lexicon; Perception; Sensory words; Sight; Word frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29966914     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

1.  Knowledge of animal appearance among sighted and blind adults.

Authors:  Judy S Kim; Giulia V Elli; Marina Bedny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.

Authors:  Bill Thompson; Seán G Roberts; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-10

3.  Limitations in odour simulation may originate from differential sensory embodiment.

Authors:  Artin Arshamian; Patricia Manko; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Dutch sensory modality norms.

Authors:  Laura J Speed; Marc Brybaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 5.  A Special Class of Experience: Positive Affect Evoked by Music and the Arts.

Authors:  Emery Schubert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Augmented Modality Exclusivity Norms for Concrete and Abstract Italian Property Words.

Authors:  Piermatteo Morucci; Roberto Bottini; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Why Is There So Much More Research on Vision Than on Any Other Sensory Modality?

Authors:  Fabian Hutmacher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

8.  Research on Open Oral English Scoring System Based on Neural Network.

Authors:  Xin Wang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-23

9.  The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.

Authors:  Dermot Lynott; Louise Connell; Marc Brysbaert; James Brand; James Carney
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.