| Literature DB >> 29966325 |
Wenying Zhang1, Jian Sang2, Jie Cheng3, Siyu Ge4, Shuai Yuan5, Glenn V Lo6, Yusheng Dou7.
Abstract
A deactivation channel for laser-excited 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) was studied by semiclassical dynamics. Results indicate that the excited state resulting from an electronic transition from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular mrbital (LUMO) is deactivated via pyramidalization of the activated N atom in a nitro group, with a lifetime of 2.4 ps. An approximately 0.5-electron transfer from the aromatic ring to the activated nitro group led to a significant increase of the C⁻NO₂ bond length, which suggests that C⁻NO₂ bond breaking could be a trigger for an explosive reaction. The time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) method was used to calculate the energies of the ground and S₁ excited states for each configuration in the simulated trajectory. The S₁←S₀ energy gap at the instance of non-adiabatic decay was found to be 0.096 eV, suggesting that the decay geometry is close to the conical intersection.Entities:
Keywords: TATB; TD-DFT; charge transfer; energetic materials; nonradiative deactivation; semiclassical dynamic; vibrational relaxation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29966325 PMCID: PMC6099943 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Snapshots for the deactivation of the excited state of the 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) molecule following irradiation with a laser pulse of 3.2 eV photon energy and fluence of 32.94 J·m−2. Cyan: C, blue: N, red: O, white: H.
Figure 2Variations with time of (a) the orbital energy and (b) electron populations of the HOMO-1, HOMO, LUMO, and LUMO+1 of TATB molecule.
Figure 3Variations with time of (a) C2–N8 bond length and (b) valence electrons of C2 and N8 atoms in the activated nitro group.
Figure 4Distribution contours of (a) charge and (b) kinetic energy of each atom of TATB at current excited state. Atomic labeling displayed in the x-axis is the same as in Figure 1a. The hydrogen atoms were ignored.
Figure 5(a) Comparison between the energy gap of LUMO–HOMO and N8 atom pyramidalization; (b) variations with time of N8–O13 and N8–O14 bond lengths.
Figure 6(a) S0 and S1 potential energy surface along with simulation trajectory from TD-B3LYP/cc-pVDZ calculation; (b) the detailed variations of S0 and S1 potential energy surface near the deactivation point (relative to the S0 minimum (−0.91 eV) shown in (a); (c) the structure at the conical intersection (CI); (d) the minimum energy pathway from the Franck–Condon (FC) point to the CI.