| Literature DB >> 29966282 |
Fernando Lloret1,2,3, David Eon4, Etienne Bustarret5, Alexandre Fiori6, Daniel Araujo7.
Abstract
Epitaxial lateral growth will be required if complex diamond-based device architecture, such as, for example, Metal-oxide-semiconductor Field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) or epitaxial lateral overgrowth (ELO) substrates, need to be developed for high-power applications. To this end, undoped and doped non-planar homoepitaxial diamond were overgrown on (001)-oriented diamond-patterned substrates. Defects induced by both the heavy boron doping and three-dimensional (3D) growth were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At high methane and boron concentrations, threading dislocations with Burgers vectors b = 1/6 ⟨211⟩, b = 1/2 ⟨110⟩, or both were observed. Their generation mechanisms were established, revealing boron proximity effects as precursors of dislocations generated in boron-doped samples and providing clues as to the different Burgers vectors. The concentration ranges of boron and methane resulting in good crystalline quality depended on the plane of growth. The microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (MPCVD) growth conditions and the maximum boron concentration versus plane orientation yielding a dislocation-free diamond epitaxial layer were determined.Entities:
Keywords: MPCVD; TEM; boron-doped diamond; diamond; diamond growth; dislocations; lateral diamond growth; selective diamond growth
Year: 2018 PMID: 29966282 PMCID: PMC6070895 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph of one of the substrates after inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) process.
Figure 2(a) Bright-field cross-section micrograph of sample 1 with the lamella oriented along the {011} pole. A black dashed line marks the initial shape of the etched cylinder. The region framed by a white dashed square is enlarged in the right-hand inset. (b) Weak-beam micrograph of sample 2 with the lamella oriented along the {011} pole, recorded under two beam conditions using the reflection. Lateral growth orientation is marked by a white arrow. (c) Weak-beam micrograph of sample 2 with the lamella oriented along the {011} pole, recorded under two beam conditions using the reflection. Three white arrows mark dislocations invisible in the reflection. White dashed lines mark the initial shape of the etched truncated cone (“disk”) in both micrographs. The vertical (and defect-free) [001]-oriented growth is also marked by a white arrow.
Figure 3(a) Weak-beam micrograph of sample 3 with the lamella oriented along the {011} pole, recorded under two beam conditions using the reflection. (b) Weak-beam micrograph of sample 3 with the lamella oriented along the {011} pole, recorded under two beam conditions using the reflection. Lateral growth orientation is marked by a white arrow. White dashed lines mark the initial shape of the etched cylinder in both micrographs. (c) Dark-field micrograph of sample 4 with the lamella oriented along the {001} pole, recorded under two beam conditions using the reflection. A high density of defects is observed arising from the doped layer. This is clearer in the inset displaying an enlarged image of the white dashed–framed region. White arrows in the inset marks some of the dislocations generated in the doped layers.
Figure 4Density of dislocations as a function of the boron doping level of p+ layers obtained in [15], where circles correspond to samples grown along the <100> direction and stars correspond to samples grown along the <111> direction. Points highlighted by black circles correspond to the samples studied in regions grown along the <100> and <111> directions, respectively. Results from sample 4 are represented as a vertical dashed line, because it was not possible to determine the density of dislocations generated on each single orientation.