Literature DB >> 29966040

Perinatal outcomes following cell-free DNA screening in >32 000 women: Clinical follow-up data from a single tertiary center.

Dong Liang1, Ying Lin1, Fengchang Qiao1, Hang Li1, Yan Wang1, Jingjing Zhang1, An Liu1, Xiuqing Ji1, Dingyuan Ma1, Tao Jiang1, Ping Hu1, Zhengfeng Xu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidy was clinically introduced in 2011. We aim to focus on the follow-up information from a single tertiary center undergoing genome-wide cfDNA screening to evaluate this technology.
METHOD: A total of 32 431 cases were retrospectively reviewed. The screening was performed using a BGI protocol, and the cfDNA results were analyzed together with the pregnancy outcomes, confirmatory testing results, and ultrasound findings.
RESULTS: Of the 32 431 cfDNA screening cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 287 (82.2%) cases with high-risk cfDNA results, 85 (94.4%) cases with copy number variation (CNV) and rare autosomal trisomy (RAT) results, and 26 060 (81.5%) cases with low-risk cfDNA results. Among them, 234 with high-risk cfDNA results chose invasive testing, revealing 169 true positive cases. In cases with CNV and RAT results, 45 cases underwent invasive diagnosis, revealing six pathogenic CNVs and three uniparental disomies. In cases with low-risk cfDNA results, three false negative cases were confirmed.
CONCLUSION: Cell-free DNA screening appears to be effective in detecting the common autosomal aneuploidies, but one-third of our cohort with high-risk results rejected confirmatory testing. Our data provide information on the clinical experience of large-scale whole-genome cfDNA screening that has global relevance for the implementation of this technology.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29966040     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  13 in total

1.  The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications.

Authors:  Jianli Zheng; Haiyan Lu; Min Li; Yongjuan Guan; Fangfang Yang; Mengjun Xu; Jingjing Dong; Qinge Zhang; Ning An; Yun Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Potential influence of parental copy number variations on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT): two case reports.

Authors:  Yiming Qi; Jiexia Yang; Yaping Hou; Rong Hu; Dongmei Wang; Haishan Peng; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  An enrichment method to increase cell-free fetal DNA fraction and significantly reduce false negatives and test failures for non-invasive prenatal screening: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Dong Liang; Yangyi Chen; Ying Lin; Fengchang Qiao; Hang Li; Ting Wang; Chunfang Peng; Donghong Luo; Hailiang Liu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing: experience on 36,456 singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Luigia De Falco; Annalaura Torella; Giovanni Savarese; Pasquale Savarese; Raffaella Ruggiero; Anna Conte; Vera Fico; Marco Torella; Antonio Fico
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Central China.

Authors:  Ganye Zhao; Peng Dai; Conghui Wang; Lina Liu; Xuechao Zhao; Xiangdong Kong
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-26

6.  Pregnancy outcomes of rare autosomal trisomies results in non-invasive prenatal screening: clinical follow-up data from a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Ping Hu; Hang Li; Chunyu Luo; Dong Liang; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.310

7.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

8.  Analyzing false-negative results detected in low-risk non-invasive prenatal screening cases.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Dong Liang; Yan Wang; Hang Li; An Liu; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Analysis of cell-free DNA in a consecutive series of 13,607 routine cases for the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in a single center in Germany.

Authors:  Heike Borth; Anna Teubert; Ralf Glaubitz; Sarah Knippenberg; Nargül Kutur; Thomas Winkler; Bernd Eiben
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Initial Clinical Experience with NIPT for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies and Large Copy Number Variations.

Authors:  Thomas Harasim; Teresa Neuhann; Anne Behnecke; Miriam Stampfer; Elke Holinski-Feder; Angela Abicht
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.