A natural pH gradient caused by marine CO2 seeps off the Methana peninsula (Saronikos Gulf, eastern Peloponnese peninsula) was used as a natural laboratory to assess potential effects of ocean acidification on coccolithophores. Coccolithophore communities were therefore investigated in plankton samples collected during September 2011, September 2016 and March 2017. The recorded cell concentrations were up to ~50 x103 cells/l, with a high Shannon index of up to 2.8, along a pH gradient from 7.61 to 8.18, with values being occasionally <7. Numerous holococcolithophore species represented 60-90% of the surface water assemblages in most samples during September samplings. Emiliania huxleyi was present only in low relative abundances in September samples, but it dominated in March assemblages. Neither malformed nor corroded coccolithophores were documented. Changes in the community structure can possibly be related to increased temperatures, while the overall trend associates low pH values with high cell densities. Our preliminary results indicate that in long-termed acidified, warm and stratified conditions, the study of the total coccolithophore assemblage may prove useful to recognize the intercommunity variability, which favors the increment of lightly calcified species such as holococcolithophores.
A natural pH gradient caused by marine CO2 seeps off the Methana peninsula (Saronikos Gulf, eastern Peloponnese peninsula) was used as a natural laboratory to assess potential effects of ocean acidification on coccolithophores. Coccolithophore communities were therefore investigated in plankton samples collected during September 2011, September 2016 and March 2017. The recorded cell concentrations were up to ~50 x103 cells/l, with a high Shannon index of up to 2.8, along a pH gradient from 7.61 to 8.18, with values being occasionally <7. Numerous holococcolithophore species represented 60-90% of the surface water assemblages in most samples during September samplings. Emiliania huxleyi was present only in low relative abundances in September samples, but it dominated in March assemblages. Neither malformed nor corroded coccolithophores were documented. Changes in the community structure can possibly be related to increased temperatures, while the overall trend associates low pH values with high cell densities. Our preliminary results indicate that in long-termed acidified, warm and stratified conditions, the study of the total coccolithophore assemblage may prove useful to recognize the intercommunity variability, which favors the increment of lightly calcified species such as holococcolithophores.
The cumulative emissions in anthropogenic CO2 from 1870 to 2014 totaled about 545 GtC; almost half of these emissions remain in the atmosphere and increase the potential to enhance climate change [1]. In addition, the oceans absorb approximately 30% of the atmospheric CO2 produced by anthropogenic activities [1-4]. As a result, the concentration of bicarbonate ions is increasing; causing simultaneous reduction in carbonate ions, decline of ocean pH and lowering of the calcium carbonate saturation state (Ω) of both calcite and aragonite [e.g., 1, 2, 5, 6]. During the last 200 years, surface ocean pH has fallen almost 0.1 units to a current day global average of approximately 8.2 [7]. The associated ocean acidification with surface pH predicted to fall by up to 0.77 units till 2250 [e.g., 8, 9] comprises a major threat for marine ecosystems, particularly for marine calcifiers and consequently for the global biogeochemical cycles [5, 10–12]. Up to now, several studies investigated the acidification effects on both benthic [5, 13] and planktonic marine organisms [5, 14–21], however few of them have dealt with in situ field data [22-25].The semi-enclosed Mediterranean Sea is a small-scale ocean with high environmental variability and steep physicochemical gradients, all increasing towards the east [26, 27]. Particularly, the eastern Mediterranean basin lies in a climatological transition zone under the influence of both tropical and mid-latitude climate processes [28], making it highly sensitive to global climate change. Future climate scenarios predict a temperature increase larger than the global average value, reduced precipitation and increase of the interannual variability [1].Both acidification and warming are expected to affect marine ecosystems of the Mediterranean Sea, mostly by altering microbial nutrient cycling, carbon fixation, primary production rates and therefore plankton community structure [29, 30], with documented consequences on biodiversity [31]. Interestingly, the Mediterranean offers the unique opportunity to study gradients of long-term acidification at marine volcanic CO2 vents lacking toxic sulphur compounds that are abundant especially around Italy and Greece. The first in situ field data results from Ischia site in the Tyrrhenian Sea [23, 32] revealed a dramatic shift in benthic community composition along a pH gradient with a collapse in species diversity and loss of functional groups as CO2 levels increase. Additional sites are now being used to test observations initially made at Ischia; e.g. Vulcano in Italy [25, 33–36] and Methana in Greece [37, 38]. CO2 seeps have also been shown to be useful for studying the effects of ocean acidification on plankton organisms, although CO2 levels may vary spatially and temporally around the seeps.Coccolithophores (planktonic photoautotrophic protists) are currently the dominant calcifying organisms in the Mediterranean waters [39-41], an environment supersaturated with respect to calcite and aragonite [42]. They produce minute calcium carbonate plates called coccoliths, which are arranged around the individual cells forming the coccospheres. As it has been shown from a number of culture studies, coccolithophores have complex life cycles involving alternation between a haploid holococcolith-producing Mg-rich phase and a diploid heterococcolith-producing phase [43, 44]. The species composition in the Aegean Sea (NE Mediterranean) is relatively diverse and dominated mainly by the species Emiliania huxleyi [45], which is featured by more heavily calcified coccoliths during the cold winter-spring season [46]. High numbers of holococcolithophore cell densities seem to be the main feature of late spring-early autumn coccolithophore assemblages in the thermally stratified Aegean surface layers [45]. Scattered field studies so far [25], have shown coccolithophores to decrease significantly with decreasing pH; also species diversity progressively weakened as CO2 levels increased and Ωcalcite was lowered. Furthermore, malformed and corroded E. huxleyi coccoliths were related to low pH waters [25].The present study aims to investigate the state and composition of coccolithophore communities under naturally acidified conditions. Main goals are to document potential effects on the assemblages along a natural CO2 gradient off Methana marine volcanic vent field, in order to investigate how coccolithophores respond to increased CO2 levels in oligotrophic areas and to assess whether responses to ocean acidification were modulated by seasonality. This may be of broader interest as nutrient-poor regions are expected to expand worldwide due to increased thermal stratification of ocean waters caused by ongoing climate change.
Study area
The Saronikos Gulf covers an area of approximately 2600 km2 of complex bathymetry and geometry (Fig 1). The outer gulf, at the SE, is connected to the Aegean Sea and has depths gradually decreasing towards the inner gulf and the Attica coast from about 200 m to 100 m. The western gulf displays great depth variability, with depths locally exceeding 400 m and water masses being exchanged through the passages between Aegina and Salamina islands to the north and Aegina Island and Methana peninsula to the south (Fig 1A). Saronikos Gulf is characterized by robust seasonal flows that are induced by thermohaline effects and density contrasts with inflowing Aegean waters, and can be modified by the wind [47]. In summer an anticyclonic and a cyclonic flow exists throughout the gulf above and below the pycnocline, whereas in winter and early spring an anticyclonic flow prevails in the upper ~100 m (Fig 1B). The predominant northerly winds in summer and winter push the inner gulf eastward seasonal jet to the south, whereas northwesterly, westerly, and southerly winds favor the northward meandering of the seasonal jet in the inner gulf [47].
Fig 1
Study area.
A. Map of the central Aegean Sea (NE Mediterranean) with sampling sites visited in the present study; Methana represents the western end of the Aegean Volcanic Arc. Image resource: NASA Worldview. The inlet map presents the dominant tectonic structure of the Aegean Sea domain [48]. B. Bathymetry and hydrography of Saronikos Gulf. Bathymetry data are provided by HCMR (Hellenic Centre for Marine Research). The map was designed with ArcGiS software (ESRI) v.10.4. Hydrographic data are redrawn from [46]. C. Sample location around Methana peninsula. Image resource: NASA Worldview.
Study area.
A. Map of the central Aegean Sea (NE Mediterranean) with sampling sites visited in the present study; Methana represents the western end of the Aegean Volcanic Arc. Image resource: NASA Worldview. The inlet map presents the dominant tectonic structure of the Aegean Sea domain [48]. B. Bathymetry and hydrography of Saronikos Gulf. Bathymetry data are provided by HCMR (Hellenic Centre for Marine Research). The map was designed with ArcGiS software (ESRI) v.10.4. Hydrographic data are redrawn from [46]. C. Sample location around Methana peninsula. Image resource: NASA Worldview.The volcanic area of Methana is located at the eastern Peloponnese peninsula within the southwestern area of inner Saronikos Gulf and represents the western end of the Aegean Volcanic Arc (Fig 1A [48]). The last eruption on Methana was in 230 BC as described by the ancient Greek geographer Pausanias; an active submarine volcano NW of Methana peninsula has been discovered lately [49]. On Methana peninsula there are thermal springs and mofettes and the coastal area at the northern part is still hydrothermally active with gas emissions of mainly carbon dioxide and smaller amounts of nitrogen, carbon monoxide and methane [37, 50]. The seawater chemistry together with the seasonal variability of macroalgal communities at CO2 seeps off Methana have already been monitored from 2011 to 2013 [37], showing that seawater pH decreased to levels predicted for the end of this century at the seep site with no confounding gradients in Total Alkalinity, salinity, temperature or wave exposure. Free sulphide concentrations were below the measurable limit (1 μM) [37]. In contrast, the samples near Loutra thermal baths (south eastern part of the peninsula) had a concentration of free sulphides of 35 μM [37].
Materials and methods
44 water samples were collected with a single Hydrobios oceanographic bottle from 8 coastal stations off Methana peninsula during September 2011, September 2016, and March 2017, (Fig 1C and Table 1). Sampling permission was issued by the Municipality of Troizina-Methana. All samplings were conducted under mild weather conditions, i.e. with no prevailing winds. Stations P1, P2 and P3 represent the main area featured by low pH conditions due to CO2 emissions; P4 and P5 are pristine stations, whereas F1 was situated within an enclosed embayment hosting a small fish aquaculture plant. Stations L5 and R1 are affected by thermal springs (releasing sulphides and radium, respectively).
Table 1
Sample information.
Stations’ location, sampling dates, physicochemical parameters, total coccolithophore density (cells l-1) resulting from both inverted microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy techniques and coccolithophore diversity (H’) based on SEM countings.
station
latitude (°N) longitude (°E)
date
water depth (m)
Temperature (°C)
Salinity (psu)
Chl-a (μg l-1)
inverted microscope countings (cells l-1)
SEM countings (103 cells l-1)
Shannon Wiener index (H’)
P1
37°38'17.91"
9/2016
0
26.1
37.2
no data
no data
no data
23°21'36.18"
3/2017
0
15.4
38.1
0.288
200
6.87
0.84
9/2016
2
27.1
37.1
0.21
1680
39.22
2.19
3/2017
2
15.2
38.8
no data
no data
6.46
0.91
9/2011
5
no data
no data
24.41
2.04
9/2016
5
26.5
38.2
0.164
1280
24.26
1.80
3/2017
5
15.3
39.1
0.81
360
10.06
0.80
P2
37°38'18.29"
9/2016
0
26.3
38.4
no data
no data
no data
23°22'2.80"
3/2017
0
15.3
38.3
no data
2600
4.54
1.13
9/2011
5
no data
no data
5.01
1.31
9/2016
2
27.3
38.3
0.182
1240
24.85
2.53
3/2017
2
15.1
38.5
0.469
4356
6.58
1.15
9/2016
5
26.5
37.9
0.177
15.903
22.52
2.24
3/2017
5
15.5
38.6
no data
2760
5.30
1.24
P3
37°38'28.17"
9/2016
0
26.6
38.5
no data
no data
no data
23°21'30.71"
3/2017
0
15.5
38.5
no data
no data
1.99
0.75
9/2016
2
27.5
38.2
0.112
1280
18.18
1.47
3/2017
2
14.7
38.5
0.575
no data
2.38
1.11
9/2016
10
26.5
38.7
0.183
2600
29.55
2.31
3/2017
10
14.7
38.6
no data
no data
3.66
0.94
9/2016
20
27.3
38.7
0.128
720
31.48
1.71
3/2017
20
14.6
38.4
0.961
1000
2.25
0.97
9/2016
40
24.6
38.6
0.271
1680
35.42
2.71
3/2017
40
14.7
38.2
1.303
720
3.85
0.77
9/2016
60
22.7
38.8
0.043
no data
19.39
1.67
3/2017
60
14.8
38.8
0.598
1680
1.67
0.16
P4
37°34'41.26"
9/2016
0
26.2
38.5
no data
no data
no data
23°20'51.39"
3/2017
0
15.3
38.6
no data
no data
no data
9/2016
2
27.2
37.8
0.03
1440
20.15
2.28
3/2017
2
14.7
38.2
0.328
3520
8.76
0.71
9/2016
10
27.1
38.2
0.018
2680
14.20
2.10
3/2017
10
14.4
38.3
no data
no data
9.65
1.06
9/2016
20
26.3
38.3
0.025
no data
11.45
2.48
3/2017
20
14.5
38.6
0.558
1080
7.76
1.12
9/2016
40
25.5
38.7
0.039
no data
25.56
2.84
3/2017
40
14.4
38.6
1.367
4560
8.02
0.56
9/2016
60
21.2
37.9
0.118
1160
22.96
2.29
3/2017
60
14.6
38.6
2.340
2600
7.29
0.41
P5
37°34'39.69"
9/2016
0
26.2
38.5
no data
no data
no data
23°20'45.11"
3/2017
2
15.1
38.4
no data
2320
no data
9/2016
2
26.7
38.9
no data
880
31.48
2.01
3/2017
10
14.6
38.6
no data
5880
4,38
0.68
9/2016
5
26.3
38
no data
880
30.43
2.44
3/2017
20
14.5
38.2
no data
2600
no data
R1
37°35'13.96"
9/2016
2
27.2
38
no data
2400
17.90
2.20
23°23'54.37"
3/2017
2
17
38.3
no data
no data
no data
9/2016
5
27.3
38.2
no data
2840
19.15
2.07
3/2017
5
16.3
38.5
no data
no data
5.8
0.92
F1
37°34'47.92"
9/2016
2
27.4
38.6
no data
5920
53.58
2.73
23°23'36.69"
3/2017
2
16.7
37.5
no data
1760
no data
9/2016
5
26.8
38
no data
27960
no data
3/2017
5
15.7
38.5
no data
1760
9.24
1.12
L5
37°3'26.30"
9/2016
3
27.2
37.9
no data
1800
21.09
2.16
23°22'12.30"
Sample information.
Stations’ location, sampling dates, physicochemical parameters, total coccolithophore density (cells l-1) resulting from both inverted microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy techniques and coccolithophore diversity (H’) based on SEM countings.Temperature, salinity and pH were measured using a multiprobe (YSI 63). The probe was calibrated before use with pH 4.01, 7.01 and 10.01 NBS standards; the uncertainty in using the NBS scale for seawater pH measurements (approximately 0.05) was considered acceptable [37]. Mineral nutrients were measured according to Strickland and Parsons [51] and Rimmelin and Moutin [52]. The amount of chlorophyll-a that corresponded to the 0.2–2.0 μm and >2.0 μm size classes was measured fluorometrically [53].The calcium carbonate saturation state (Ω) of both calcite and aragonite were calculated with CO2Sys program configured for Excel by Pierrot et al. [54] using the current pH, temperature, salinity, phosphate and silicate measurements and the total alkalinity (AT) values resulted from monitoring of the site in 2011–2013 [37]. The set of carbonic acid apparent dissociation constants (K1 and K2) [55], the equilibrium constant of hydrogen fluoride [56], the stability constant of the hydrogen sulfate ion [57] and the boron to chlorinity ratio [58] were chosen.For total phytoplankton analysis, 25 ml of seawater per sample were examined by inverted microscope [59, 60]. Cell density was calculated as cells l-1.For coccolithophore analysis, in each sampling station 2 liters of seawater were filtered on Whatman cellulose nitrate filters (47 mm diameter, 0.45μm pore size). Salt was removed by washing the filters with about 2 ml of mineral water. The filters were dried open and stored in plastic Petri dishes.Out of a total of 44 samples, 33 samples have been analyzed using a Zeiss DSM 940A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at the University of Bremen, Department of Geosciences. A small piece of each filter (~1 cm2) was cut out, fixed on double-sided adhesive carbon tape to an aluminum stub and sputter coated with Au/Pd. The analysis of the filters was performed at 10 kV and more than 100 coccospheres were counted when possible at 3000x magnification. Coccolithophore cell densities were calculated as follows: Number of coccospheres l-1 = FxC/AxV, with F = filtration area (mm2), C = number of counted coccospheres, A = counted area (mm2) and V = filtered volume (l).Eleven samples have been examined in a Jeol JSM 6360 SEM (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment). A piece of each filter approximately 8x8 mm2 was attached to a copper electron microscope stub using a double sided adhesive tape and coated with Au. All the individual coccospheres occurring on the examined filter area were identified and counted. The absolute abundances of coccolithophore densities (cells l-1) were calculated following Jordan & Winter [61], by scaling up the raw counts from a known scanned area. Identification of coccolithophore species generally followed the taxonomic guides of Young et al. [62] and Malinverno et al. [63].While processing the data, all samples have been grouped in two depth classes (0–20 m and 40–60 m). Shannon Wiener diversity index (H’) was calculated using Past.exe 1.23 software [64] for the different depth classes in each sampling station.
Results
Temperature, salinity, pH, carbonate saturation state, nutrients and chl-a
Water temperatures during September 2016 sampling displayed relatively high values, between 22.7° C, in 60 m, and 27.5° C, in 2 m, whereas in March 2017 temperatures mostly varied within a smaller range (14.4–15.5; Table 1). Salinity was generally > 38 psu (range 37.1–38.9 psu), with lower values observed mostly in September sampling (Table 1).Median pH values varied between 7.61 and 8.18 during September samplings, whereas even lower values (<7) have been recorded for the seep area (2011: 6.53, 2016: 6.93, station P1; Table 2) that are associated with undersaturated conditions in both calcite and aragonite [37]. In March sampling, median values varied between 7.17 and 7.92 (Table 2). It has been shown [37] that the pH variability in the area off Methana is mainly attributed to changes of the CO2 vent emissions and other factors (e.g. hydrogen sulphide) that would affect both pH and AT are practically missing. The additions of CO2 gas alter the carbonate system equilibria leaving AT constant. Assuming that AT remains relatively constant in the area (stations P1-P5) and using our pH, salinity, temperature and nutrients data, we did a rough estimation of the saturation state of both carbonate minerals with CO2Sys for the 2016–17 sampling, which shows Ω<1 in station P1 where pH minimum values have been recorded (Table 2). Nutrient and chl-a concentrations for all analyzed samples showed the typical oligotrophic summer Aegean Sea conditions, whereas in March the content of NO2 +NO3 reflects the seasonal nutrient enrichment and the consequent increase in chl-a (Table 2).
Table 2
Seawater carbonate chemistry, average nutrient concentrations and total chl-a values in the sampling sites.
station
SEEP (P1)
P2
P3
P3
P4
P4
P5
F1
R1
L5
depth interval (m)
0–20
0–20
0–20
40–60
0–20
40–60
0–20
0–20
0–20
0–20
sampling period
Sept-2011 (n = 40)
Sept-2016 (n = 3)
March 2017 (n = 3)
Sept-2011 (n = 26)
Sept-2016 (n = 3)
March2017 (n = 3)
Sept-2016 (n = 4)
March2017 (n = 4)
Sept-2016 (n = 2)
March2017 (n = 2)
Sept-2016 (n = 4)
March2017 (n = 4)
Sept-2016 (n = 2)
March2017 (n = 2)
Sept-2016 (n = 3)
March2017 (n = 3)
Sept-2016 (n = 2)
March2017 (n = 2)
Sept-2016 (n = 3)
March2017 (n = 3)
Sept-2016 (n = 1)
pH min
6.53*
6.93
7.61
7.27*
7.57
7.65
7.66
7.73
7.81
7.66
8.15
7.83
8.09
7.82
8.15
7.86
7.95
7.20
8.06
7.08
7.80
ΩArmin
0.09*
0.51
1.03
0.57*
1.40
1.12
1.72
1.31
2.10
1.13
4.39
1.60
3.57
1.57
4.34
1.71
Ωcamin
0.13*
0.34
1.60
0.88*
2.11
1.74
2.59
2.03
3.19
1.75
6.59
2.49
5.42
2.44
6.54
2.65
pH median
7.69*
7.61
7.69
7.88*
7.66
7.70
7.73
7.73
7.84
7.71
8.17
7.85
8.10
7.84
8.18
7.92
7.99
7.39
8.13
7.17
7.80
ΩArmedian
1.16*
1.51
1.23
2.3*
1.69
1.25
1.99
1.31
2.23
1.25
4.54
1.67
3.63
1.64
4.57
1.93
Ωcamedian
2.45*
2.27
1.91
3.5*
2.54
1.94
2.99
2.03
3.39
1.95
6.83
2.60
5.52
2.54
6.88
3.00
pH max
7.99*
7.61
7.77
8.13*
7.66
7.70
7.76
7.77
7.87
7.75
8.21
8.02
8.11
7.85
8.22
7.95
8.03
7.57
8.14
7.60
7.80
ΩArmax
3.45*
1.51
1.46
4.05*
1.69
1.25
2.12
1.42
2.37
1.36
4.86
2.36
3.70
1.67
4.89
2.05
Ωcamax
5.20*
2.27
2.26
6.10*
2.54
1.94
3.18
2.21
3.60
2.12
7.30
3.67
5.62
2.59
7.36
3.19
NO3+ NO2
0.12*
0.02
15.22
0.14*
0.03
15.32
0.04
15.49
0.08
15.71
0.04
16.38
0.05
16.21
16.40
0.07
16.02
0.24
16.27
NH4
0.23*
0.14
0.42
0.26*
0.06
0.29
0.18
1.72
0.07
0.92
0.07
1.33
0.06
1.43
2.00
0.10
0.56
0.14
0.34
PO4
0.025*
0.00
0.10
0.03*
0.02
0.08
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.16
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.57
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.06
0.03
SiO2
4.02*+
0.54
0.87
6.37*+
0.74
0.35
0.54
0.79
0.75
2.52
0.73
0.19
0.72
0.57
0.22
0.38
0.65
2.15
0.61
total chl-a
0.374
no data
0.358
0.980
0.423
1.536
0.314
1.902
0.073
0.886
0.157
3.708
* data from Baggini et al. (2014)
+ values referring to SiO4
* data from Baggini et al. (2014)+ values referring to SiO4
Total phytoplankton and coccolithophores
Inverted microscope total phytoplankton identifications (Fig 2) were performed for both September 2016 and March 2017 samplings. During September period Dinophyceae and Coccolithophores (Haptophyceae) were the dominant groups relative to Bacillariophyceae. All groups showed highest abundances in station F1, whereas the latter group was totally missing from stations P3, P5 and L5. In March 2017, Bacillariophyceae displayed higher values than Dinophyceae; values still indicate an oligotrophic environment. Coccolithophores were relatively higher in respect to September sampling but still represented a minor assemblage component.
Fig 2
The structure of plankton community.
Abundance (cells l-1) of the major plankton groups Dinophyceae, Bacillariophyceae and the Coccolithophores component, during the two sampling periods.
The structure of plankton community.
Abundance (cells l-1) of the major plankton groups Dinophyceae, Bacillariophyceae and the Coccolithophores component, during the two sampling periods.During the warm-period samplings (September 2011, 2016; S1 and S2 Appendixs), SEM analyses revealed a total of 73 coccolithophore species out of which 34 were holococcolithophores.Total coccospheres (Tables 1 and 3) reached up to 25 x 103 cells l-1 at P1/5 m in September 2011, whereas maximum values exceeded 39 x 103 cells l-1 in P1/2 m during September 2016 (max. mean values 31.74 x 103 cells l-1 in P1/0–20 m; Table 3). The maximum cell abundances of the latter sampling have been documented for station F1/2 m (54 x 103 cells l-1).
Table 3
Coccolithophore community structure.
Hetrococcolithophore and holococcolithophore densities in the different sampling periods and the different sampling sites in Methana and Andros Island.
Station
Water depth class (m)
Time period
Mean total coccospheres 103 cells l-1
Mean total holococcolithophores 103 cells l-1
Mean total holococcolithophore percentage
Mean total heterococcolithophores 103 cells l-1
Mean total heterococcolithophore percentage
P1
0–20
Sept-2011
24.41
18.31
75.00
6.1
25
P1
0–20
Sept-2016
31.74
25.06
80.97
6.68
19.03
P1
0–20
March-2017
7.80
0.00
0.00
7.8
100
P2
0–20
Sept-2011
5.01
0.56
11.11
4.45
88.88
P2
0–20
Sept-2016
23.68
9.15
65.78
8.10
34.22
P2
0–20
March-2017
5.47
0.00
0.00
5.47
100
P3
0–20
Sept-2016
26.41
22.26
84.03
4.14
15.97
P3
0–20
March-2017
2.57
0.00
0.00
2.57
100
P3
40–60
Sept-2016
27.40
5.05
14.84
22.35
85.16
P3
40–60
March-2017
2.76
0.00
0.00
2.76
100
P4
0–20
Sept-2016
15.27
8.74
57.84
6.53
42.16
P4
0–20
March-2017
8.72
0.00
0.00
8.72
100
P4
40–60
Sept-2016
24.26
5.50
22.25
18.76
77.75
P4
40–60
March-2017
7.65
0.00
0.00
7.65
100
P5
0–20
Sept-2016
30.96
21.91
70.71
9.05
29.29
P5
0–20
March-2017
4.38
0.49
11.11
3.89
88.89
F1
0–20
Sept-2016
26.79
11.94
64.37
6.59
36.63
F1
0–20
March-2017
9.24
0.00
0.00
9.24
100
R1
0–20
Sept-2016
18.52
11.35
42.35
15.44
57.65
R1
0–20
March-2017
5.80
4.09
70.59
1.71
29.41
L5
0–20
Sept-2016
21.09
13.25
62.86
7.83
37.14
L5
0–20
March-2017
no data
no data
no data
no data
no data
ANDROS-T3-1
0–20
Aug-2001
9.99
2.69
29.33
7.30
70.67
ANDROS-T3-1
0–20
Aug-2002
6.85
2.61
37.67
4.24
62.33
ANDROS-T1-100
0–15
Sept-2004
8.99
3.82
39.56
5.17
60.44
Coccolithophore community structure.
Hetrococcolithophore and holococcolithophore densities in the different sampling periods and the different sampling sites in Methana and Andros Island.Concerning species composition, Syracosphaera spp. comprised 30–60% of the total coccolithophore assemblage during September 2011, followed by Rhabdosphaeraceae; interestingly E. huxleyi was totally absent (Fig 3 and S1 Appendix). Holococcolithophores exceeded 18 x 103 cells l-1 (>70%) at P1/5 m (Table 3 and S1 Appendix), with Algirosphaera robusta HOL (“Sphaerocalyptra quadridentata”) being the dominant taxon with up to 8.55 x 103 cells l-1, 35% of the coccolithophore assemblage (Fig 3 and S1 Appendix).
Fig 3
Coccolithophore species composition.
Relative abundance of coccolithophore species during September 2011 sampling, September 2016 and March 2017 samplings. Image resource: NASA Worldview.
Coccolithophore species composition.
Relative abundance of coccolithophore species during September 2011 sampling, September 2016 and March 2017 samplings. Image resource: NASA Worldview.During September 2016, stations P1-P3 were characterized by the presence of both hetero- and holococcolithophore species with the latter exhibiting particularly high values (Fig 3and Tables 1 and 3). Numerous different holococcolithophore species (see S2 Appendix) were representing more than 60% of the surface water assemblages in most samples. Water collected close to the main CO2 seeps had the highest concentrations of holococcolithophores (max. ~30 x103 cells l-1, 90% in relative abundance; P1-5 m). Algirosphaera robusta HOL was again dominating the coccolithophore communities exceeding 40–50% in P1/0-20 m and P3/0-20 m (up to 16.5 x 103 cells l-1; S1 Appendix). It presented increased values (>30%) in P5/0-20 m and it was also abundant (>40%) in R1/0-20 m (8 x 103 cells l-1).Out of the heterococcolithophores, Syracosphaeraceae and Rhabdosphaeraceae were contributing usually > 10% to the assemblages (S1 Appendix and Table 2). In contrast, Emiliania huxleyi displayed very low cell densities during the September 2016 sampling with minimum cell concentrations of 0.6 x 103 cells l-1 in P1, P2/0–20 m (<1%), and maximum abundances of ~6 x 103 cells l-1 at F1/0–20 m. In March 2017, total coccospheres displayed much lower values (Table 1; max. 10 x 103 cells l-1 at P1/0–20 m and F1/0–20 m and max. mean values 9.24 x 103 cells l-1 at F1/0–20 m; Table 3).Species composition was completely different in March 2017 in comparison to September samplings, with E. huxleyi being dominant with values >60% in all stations. Syracosphaeraceae represented the second most important group, whereas holococcolithophores were practically absent.H’ index median values were mostly >1 and > 2 for September 2011 and September 2016 datasets, whereas they were <1 for March 2017 samples (Table 1).
Discussion
The Methana vent site represents an extended submarine volcanic field area of CO2 seeps with observed effects of ocean acidification. Recent data on the macroalgal community of the Methana seep site have shown that benthic communities decreased in calcifying algal cover and increased in brown algal cover with increasing pCO2 [37] and skeletal degradation in sea urchin species was observed followed by remarkable increases in skeletal manganese levels [38].Within our coccolithophore study, both September samplings off Methana have taken place in distinctively warm, oligotrophic and stratified waters. Values of pH below 8 vary both spatially and seasonally in an extended area around Methana peninsula; the P1 station that represents a shallow area with documented CO2 bubbles seeping from the sea floor (37, this study]) constantly displayed low pH values and Ω<1 (Table 2). Current flows at this part of Saronikos Gulf are very weak during the warm period (10 cm/sec; Fig 1B) and as having a NW direction [47] do not essentially affect the study area at the northwestern part of Methana peninsula, especially during the September samplings. Hence, it is anticipated that coccolithophore assemblages, given that as nannoplanktonic organisms up to a few days or weeks (De Vargas et al., 2004) [65] with mobility functions ranging between 0.1 and 10 m per day (Young, 1994) [66], are practically exposed in the acidified water bodies around the vent area throughout their entire life duration. Surprisingly, despite the low pH values and the undersaturated conditions in both calcite and aragonite, especially at station P1 (Table 2), holococcolithophores are thriving in higher numbers (Fig 4; max. ~30 x103 cells l-1) than what has been observed in similar environmental settings with “normal” pH values at the coastal environments off Andros Island, central Aegean Sea, where holococcolithophore total abundance was up to 6.1 x 103 cells l-1 in the warm-period samplings (Fig 1A and Table 3) [67, 68]). Our data off Methana indicate that both holococcolithophores (during the warm season; Fig 4) and heterococcolithophores (mostly E. huxleyi, during the cold months; Fig 4) are unaffected in terms of abundance by low pH environment and presumably undersaturated conditions and also maintain their coccolith structure intact (Fig 5). Corroded coccospheres of both hetero- and holococcolithophore specimens have been found as very rare (<1%; Fig 6). The striking difference in community structure between September and March represents the seasonal variability of the Aegean Sea with E. huxleyi and Syracosphaeraceae prevailing in the high cell density and low diversity assemblages during the winter and early spring, under low temperatures and higher nutrient concentrations [45 ] (Tables 1 and 2, data in S1 Appendix). Interestingly holococcolithophores and especially A. robusta HOL display increasing trend with lower pH, whereas diversity is showing a weak decreasing trend apparently associated with the dominance of A. robusta HOL (Fig 7). Our findings are thus in contrast to coccolithophore field data from the Vulcano vent site [25], which revealed a progressive decrease in coccolithophore diversity and cell concentration with decreasing pH and Ω calc values. Furthermore, in that study corroded and malformed specimens of E. huxleyi were observed near the seeps (pH 6.84, Ω<1); nevertheless, the authors have also reported holococcolithophores to be found at the lowest pH stations.
Fig 4
Coccolithophore community structure.
Heterococcolithophore-holococcolithophore ratios in the sampling sites during the different sampling periods.
Fig 5
Coccolithophores of Methana acidified environments.
1. E. huxleyi, P1-5 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 2. E. huxleyi, P2-5 m, March 2017 (pH<8). 3. Pontosphaera syracusana, P2-2 m, March 2017. 4. Syracosphaera halldalii, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 5. Syracosphaera ossa, P1-2 m, September 2016. 6. Algyrosphaera robusta HOL, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 7. Syracosphaera mediterranea, P1-2 m, September 2016 Ωmin<1). 8. Rhabdosphaera clavigera, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 9. Algyrosphaera robusta, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 10. Syracolithus ponticuliferus, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 11. Algyrosphaera robusta HOL, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 12. Syracosphaera mediterranea HOL wettsteinii type, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1).
Fig 6
Coccolithophore corroded specimens in Methana acidified environments (Ω<1).
1. Rhabdosphaera clavigera, P2-2 m, September 2016. 2. Syracosphaera pulchra, P2-8 m, September 2011. 3. Syracosphaera pulchra, P2-20 m, September 2011. 4. Syracosphaera mediterranea HOL (hellenica), P1-20 m, September 2011. 5. Emiliania huxleyi, P1-2 m, September 2016. 6. Homozygosphaera arethusae, P1-2 m, September 2016.
Fig 7
Corellation of various coccolithophore groups and coccolithophore diversity with in situ pH data.
Holococcolithophores and particularly A. robusta HOL showed a clear increasing trend with lower pH during the warm period (September 2016), forcing diversity (H’) to display an opposite pattern. (obtained p values below 0.05 indicate statistically significant correlation at the 95% confidence level).
Heterococcolithophore-holococcolithophore ratios in the sampling sites during the different sampling periods.
Coccolithophores of Methana acidified environments.
1. E. huxleyi, P1-5 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 2. E. huxleyi, P2-5 m, March 2017 (pH<8). 3. Pontosphaera syracusana, P2-2 m, March 2017. 4. Syracosphaera halldalii, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 5. Syracosphaera ossa, P1-2 m, September 2016. 6. Algyrosphaera robusta HOL, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 7. Syracosphaera mediterranea, P1-2 m, September 2016 Ωmin<1). 8. Rhabdosphaera clavigera, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 9. Algyrosphaera robusta, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 10. Syracolithus ponticuliferus, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 11. Algyrosphaera robusta HOL, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1). 12. Syracosphaera mediterranea HOL wettsteinii type, P1-2 m, September 2016 (Ωmin<1).
Coccolithophore corroded specimens in Methana acidified environments (Ω<1).
1. Rhabdosphaera clavigera, P2-2 m, September 2016. 2. Syracosphaera pulchra, P2-8 m, September 2011. 3. Syracosphaera pulchra, P2-20 m, September 2011. 4. Syracosphaera mediterranea HOL (hellenica), P1-20 m, September 2011. 5. Emiliania huxleyi, P1-2 m, September 2016. 6. Homozygosphaera arethusae, P1-2 m, September 2016.
Corellation of various coccolithophore groups and coccolithophore diversity with in situ pH data.
Holococcolithophores and particularly A. robusta HOL showed a clear increasing trend with lower pH during the warm period (September 2016), forcing diversity (H’) to display an opposite pattern. (obtained p values below 0.05 indicate statistically significant correlation at the 95% confidence level).The notably high abundance of holococcolithophores, that are known to form high-Mg coccoliths, as extracellular coccolithophore calcifiers [69, 70] at Methana site is quite unexpected as ocean waters with an Ω <1.0 normally lead to carbonate dissolution [e.g. 17, 71, 72, 73]. Whitman Miller et al. [74] have stated that as the saturation state reduces, biomineralisation is expected to become more energetically expensive. Indeed, Gibbs et al. [75] have used the distribution of the extracellular calcifying holococcoliths across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, as a novel indicator of biomineralization in order to assess ocean acidification response. Although extracellular calcification may be more sensitive to changes in seawater chemistry, Gibbs et al. [75] showed that the effects of ocean acidification were only evidenced when paired with elevated temperatures, in accordance with the outcome of previous studies [e.g. 11, 76, 77,78]. Interestingly, similar findings were observed during a mesocosm experiment performed at the CRETACOSMOS mesocosm facility in HCMR Crete, where acidification alone (amendment to IPCC 2100 predictions) seemed to produce a short term enhancement of total phytoplankton biomass; warming alone had a similar effect but on primary production while acidification coupled to warming (greenhouse effect) seemed to further enhance the observed responses of phytoplankton community to each climatic stressor, respectively [79]. In addition, an earlier study of Feely et al. [80] already suggested that the response of marine calcifiers to decreasing calcium carbonate saturation state will be species-specific, depending on environmental parameters such as light, temperature and available nutrients, carbonate mineralogy and calcification mechanisms. In the haptophytes, heteromorphic life cycles with alternation of haploid and diploid stages produced via meiosis and syngamy are widespread or even ubiquitous [81, 82]. At present, limited numbers of complete life cycles are known in extant coccolithophores [67, 82–87]. However, strong evidence suggests that the ecological preferences of the haploid and diploid generation are distinct. The K-selected group of holococcolithophores is more common and diverse under increased light conditions in the surface layers of oligotrophic, warm and stratified environments [45, 68,88–89] and increases in abundance towards shallower depths [e.g., 67].Recent field data from a Mediterranean transect [90] verified the ability of coccolithophore haplo-diploid life cycle to adapt to the relatively high calcite saturation state, high temperature, stratified and oligotrophic south-eastern Mediterranean waters. Methana field data from the present study provide evidence of spectacular resistance of holococcolithophores in decreased pH conditions (Figs 5 and 6).Noel et al. [91] already suggested the importance of seawater temperature and chemical composition in coccolithophore life-cycle transitions, however thriving of high-Mg holococcolithophores in low-saturated waters of a dinoflagellate dominated-world (Fig 2), needs further explanation, especially when a certain holococcolithophore species, A. robusta HOL with distinctively high Mg values [70], is prevailing (Fig 5). As temperature has proven to play the crucial role to potential acidification impacts [75], it appears that our field data, although preliminary, document negligible acidification effects in oligotrophic to ultra-oligotrophic waters and temperatures below 28° C. Apparently a simple temperature threshold does not adequately explain holococcolithophore distribution and the low nutrient availability in relation to saturation variability should be taken into account; however this remains to be further tested by advanced environmental monitoring and laboratory bioassay experiments.
Conclusions
Assemblages of living coccolithophores were investigated off Methana, eastern Peloponnese peninsula (Greece), along a pH gradient formed by natural CO2 seeps. High numbers of holococcolithophore species were dominating the assemblages in the surface water during September. Assemblages were unaffected by low pH environment and undersaturated conditions; surprisingly, holococcolithophores and in particular Algirosphaera robusta HOL displayed an increasing trend with lower pH. Emiliania huxleyi was present only in low relative abundances in September samples, whereas it was more common in March. However, no malformed and very few corroded coccoliths were observed. Changes in the community structure should rather be related to increased temperatures and nutrient content, while the overall trend associates low pH values with high cell densities. Only diversity showed a weak decreasing trend, apparently associated with the dominance of A. robusta HOL.
Coccolithophore absolute abundances (10 3 cells l-1) and relative abundances (%) at the investigated samples.
Authors: F Boatta; W D'Alessandro; A L Gagliano; M Liotta; M Milazzo; R Rodolfo-Metalpa; J M Hall-Spencer; F Parello Journal: Mar Pollut Bull Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.553
Authors: Bärbel Hönisch; Andy Ridgwell; Daniela N Schmidt; Ellen Thomas; Samantha J Gibbs; Appy Sluijs; Richard Zeebe; Lee Kump; Rowan C Martindale; Sarah E Greene; Wolfgang Kiessling; Justin Ries; James C Zachos; Dana L Royer; Stephen Barker; Thomas M Marchitto; Ryan Moyer; Carles Pelejero; Patrizia Ziveri; Gavin L Foster; Branwen Williams Journal: Science Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Vivienne R Johnson; Bayden D Russell; Katharina E Fabricius; Colin Brownlee; Jason M Hall-Spencer Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: James C Orr; Victoria J Fabry; Olivier Aumont; Laurent Bopp; Scott C Doney; Richard A Feely; Anand Gnanadesikan; Nicolas Gruber; Akio Ishida; Fortunat Joos; Robert M Key; Keith Lindsay; Ernst Maier-Reimer; Richard Matear; Patrick Monfray; Anne Mouchet; Raymond G Najjar; Gian-Kasper Plattner; Keith B Rodgers; Christopher L Sabine; Jorge L Sarmiento; Reiner Schlitzer; Richard D Slater; Ian J Totterdell; Marie-France Weirig; Yasuhiro Yamanaka; Andrew Yool Journal: Nature Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richard A Feely; Christopher L Sabine; Kitack Lee; Will Berelson; Joanie Kleypas; Victoria J Fabry; Frank J Millero Journal: Science Date: 2004-07-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Cecilia Baggini; Maria Salomidi; Emanuela Voutsinas; Laura Bray; Eva Krasakopoulou; Jason M Hall-Spencer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristy J Kroeker; Rebecca L Kordas; Ryan Crim; Iris E Hendriks; Laura Ramajo; Gerald S Singh; Carlos M Duarte; Jean-Pierre Gattuso Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Marco Milazzo; Riccardo Rodolfo-Metalpa; Vera Bin San Chan; Maoz Fine; Cinzia Alessi; Vengatesen Thiyagarajan; Jason M Hall-Spencer; Renato Chemello Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.379