Literature DB >> 29964185

Reproducibility of corticokinematic coherence.

Harri Piitulainen1, Mia Illman2, Kristina Laaksonen3, Veikko Jousmäki4, Nina Forss5.   

Abstract

Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) between limb kinematics and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals reflects cortical processing of proprioceptive afference. However, it is unclear whether strength of CKC is reproducible across measurement sessions. We thus examined reproducibility of CKC in a follow-up study. Thirteen healthy right-handed volunteers (7 females, 21.7 ± 4.3 yrs) were measured using MEG in two separate sessions 12.6 ± 1.3 months apart. The participant was seated and relaxed while his/her dominant or non-dominant index finger was continuously moved at 3 Hz (4 min for each hand) using a pneumatic movement actuator. Finger kinematics were recorded with a 3-axis accelerometer. Coherence was computed between finger acceleration and MEG signals. CKC strength was defined as the peak coherence value at 3 Hz form a single sensor among 40 pre-selected Rolandic gradiometers contralateral to the movement. Pneumatic movement actuator provided stable proprioceptive stimuli and significant CKC responses peaking at the contralateral Rolandic sensors. In the group level, CKC strength did not differ between the sessions in dominant (Day-1 0.40 ± 0.19 vs. Day-2 0.41 ± 0.17) or non-dominant (0.35 ± 0.16 vs. 0.36 ± 0.17) hand, nor between the hands. Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) values indicated excellent inter-session reproducibility for CKC strength for both dominant (0.86) and non-dominant (0.97) hand. However, some participants showed pronounced inter-session variability in CKC strength, but only for the dominant hand. CKC is a promising tool to study proprioception in long-term longitudinal studies in the group level to follow, e.g., integrity of cortical proprioceptive processing with motor functions after stroke.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinematics; Magnetoencephalography; Movement evoked field; Proprioception; Repeatability; Somatosensory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29964185     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  More comprehensive proprioceptive stimulation of the hand amplifies its cortical processing.

Authors:  Maria Hakonen; Timo Nurmi; Jaakko Vallinoja; Julia Jaatela; Harri Piitulainen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Gating Patterns to Proprioceptive Stimulation in Various Cortical Areas: An MEG Study in Children and Adults using Spatial ICA.

Authors:  Jaakko Vallinoja; Julia Jaatela; Timo Nurmi; Harri Piitulainen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  MEG-Derived Symptom-Sensitive Biomarkers with Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability.

Authors:  Don Krieger; Paul Shepard; Ryan Soose; Ava Puccio; Sue Beers; Walter Schneider; Anthony P Kontos; Michael W Collins; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  Reproducibility of Rolandic beta rhythm modulation in MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Mia Illman; Kristina Laaksonen; Veikko Jousmäki; Nina Forss; Harri Piitulainen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Symptom-Dependent Changes in MEG-Derived Neuroelectric Brain Activity in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Chronic Symptoms.

Authors:  Don Krieger; Paul Shepard; Ryan Soose; Ava M Puccio; Sue Beers; Walter Schneider; Anthony P Kontos; Michael W Collins; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.