Literature DB >> 29963762

Prevalence and risk factors for bluetongue in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.

Thaís G da Silva1, Michele S Lima1, Massimo Spedicato2, Irene Carmine2, Liana Teodori2, Alessandra Leone2, Maira S N Martins1, Fernando G Buchala3, Klaus S Hellwig3, Adriana H de Campos Nogueira Romaldini1, Eliana De Stefano1, Giovanni Savini2, Edviges M Pituco1.   

Abstract

Bluetongue (BT), caused by Bluetongue virus (BTV), is a disease that affects ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats and deer. BTV is transmitted by female midges of the genus Culicoides. In Brazil, information on the prevalence of BTV in cattle is limited, so the objective of this work was to identify BTV serotypes in cattle. The State of São Paulo was divided into seven cattle-producing regions, and in each of them, 300 cattle farms were randomly selected. One animal from each farm (out of a total of 1,598 farms) was selected and its sera tested by virus neutralization technique against BTV serotypes (1-24 and 26) for determining antibody titre. Moreover, for each sampled farm, an epidemiological questionnaire was submitted to verify the type of cattle production and the zootechnical and sanitary practices carried out, which could be associated with a higher risk of BTV infection. In this study, antibodies (percentage, [95% confidence interval]) were identified against 11 serotypes: BTV-1 (22.15%, [15.72-27.92]), BTV-2 (31.03%, [26.65-37.98]), BTV-3 (18.96%, [12.42-24.90]), BTV-4 (24.90% [19.41-29.12]), BTV-9 (6.82%, [1.45-11.72]), BTV-12 (7.50%, [2.82-12.51]), BTV-17 (23.90%, [17.35-29.35]), BTV-19 (10.20%, [4.62-5.56]), BTV-21 (30.66%, [25.00-36.00]), BTV-22 (12.14%, [5.91-18.55]), BTV-26 (57.00%, [51.41-63.59]). In this study, for the first time in Brazil serological evidence of the presence of serotypes BTV-2, BTV-9, BTV-21 and BTV-26 is reported. The variable 'new cattle entering herd' was considered a risk factor for the occurrence of infection (OR = 2.183, 95% CI = 1.6-2.9).
© 2018 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Bluetongue viruszzm321990; Brazil; seroprevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963762      PMCID: PMC6236132          DOI: 10.1002/vms3.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 2053-1095


Introduction

Bluetongue (BT) is an infectious viral disease affecting wild and domestic ruminants. It is caused by Bluetongue virus (BTV), a species of the genus Orbivirus transmitted mainly by adult female Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) (Takamatsu et al. 2003). The BTV genome consists of 10 linear segments of dsRNA (Seg‐1 to Seg‐10); it encodes seven structural proteins (VP‐1 to VP‐7) and five non‐structural proteins (NS1, NS2, NS3/NS3a, NS4 and S10‐ORF2) and the virus particle is surrounded by three concentric protein layers (Maan et al. 2007; Attoui et al. 2012). VP‐2 and VP‐5 are the most variable proteins in BTV, and VP‐2 contains most of the epitopes responsible for the specific antibody neutralization reaction generated by the vertebrate host, and is therefore used to identify different serotypes of BTV (Maan et al. 2011). To date, 27 serotypes have been widely recognized, and two new putative serotypes, BTV‐28 and BTV‐29, have been proposed (Maan et al. 2015; Bumbarov et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2016). Infection in cattle and goats is usually asymptomatic, but the disease can cause severe clinical signs and death in sheep and deer (Darpel et al. 2007). BT is included in the list of diseases of immediate notification to the World Organization for Animal Health, due to the considerable socioeconomic concern and great importance for the international trade of animals and their byproducts (OIE 2017a,b). Economic losses associated with BTV infection are directly caused by reductions in animal productivity, death and commercial losses due to restrictions of animal movements (Walton 2004). Mortality, abortion, medication, veterinary and additional labour services, as well as the drop of production registered in 6 months, led to a loss of US$ 6,700 (Balaro et al. 2014a,b). In South America, BTV was isolated in Argentina (BTV‐4), French Guiana (BTV‐1, ‐2, ‐6, ‐10, ‐12, ‐13, ‐17 and ‐24) and Ecuador (BTV‐9, ‐13, ‐18) (Legisa et al. 2013; Viarouge et al. 2014; Verdezoto et al. 2017). Serotypes BTV‐1, ‐3, ‐4, ‐12, ‐14, ‐17, ‐18, ‐19 and ‐22, associated with the deaths of pygmy brocket deers (Mazama nana), were also identified in Brazil, in 2015 and 2016 (Groocock & Campbell 1982; Guimarães et al. 2017). The State of São Paulo is located in the southeastern region of Brazil (21°49′47″S, 49°12′27″W). It is characterized by a hot and humid climate throughout the year. It has a cattle population which represents approximately 5% of the national cattle population, corresponding to the largest meat consumer market in the country (ABIEC, 2015). Although there are several serological studies confirming that BT is endemic in the State (Nogueira et al., 2016; Lobato et al. 2015), there is still a knowledge gap regarding the serotypes circulating in Brazil. In this regard, this study aims to estimate the prevalence of different BTV serotypes and to identify the risk factors for BT in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Material and methods

A cross‐sectional study was conducted between May and November 2011, in which the State of São Paulo was divided into seven cattle‐producing regions (Fig. 1), according to the different breeding, operational and logistic systems as determined by the Animal Health Service of the state of São Paulo (Coordenadoria de Defesa Agropecuária – CDA). In each region, serum samples were collected from female bovines aged 24 months or older in the context of the bovine brucellosis control study in the State of São Paulo (Dias et al. 2016).
Figure 1

Map of the State of São Paulo showing the division into regions (Dias et al. 2009).

Map of the State of São Paulo showing the division into regions (Dias et al. 2009). This study was carried out following the ethical guidelines adopted by the Brazilian Society of Laboratory Animal Sciences and the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (SBCAL/COBEA), and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Biological Institute, São Paulo, Protocol Number 66/08. In the Bovine Viruses Laboratory (LVB), of the Center for Research and Development of Animal Health of the Biological Institute in São Paulo, Brazil, a solid phase ELISA (CFS ELISA) screening test (Panaftosa, Rio de Janeiro) was performed as a selection criterion. One positive animal was selected from 1598 farms (total 1598 sera) and tested by virus neutralization test (VNT) at the OIE Reference Laboratory for Bluetongue, Teramo (Italy) to evaluate the presence of neutralizimg antibodies against BTV serotypes (1–24 and 26). Briefly, sera are heat‐inactivated at 56°C for 30 min in a bain‐marie before testing. Subsequently, they were serially diluted twofold in an appropriate medium (MEM added with antibiotics and foetal calf serum) from an initial dilution of 1:10 up to 1:1280. Subsequently, an equal volume of 50 μL OIE standard reference BTV serotypes (100–300 TCID50) (reference strains obtained from Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, South Africa) was added to each well. After 1 h incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, approximately 104 VERO cells were added per well in a volume of 100 μL of MEM containing antibiotics and plates incubated as previously described. Positive and negative control sera, virus control wells and cell control wells were included in each neutralisation session. Beginning from the third day, plates were scored for the degree of cytopathic effect (CPE) observed in the virus control wells (back titration from 100 to 300 TCID50) and for the titre of the reference positive (expected titre ± 1 dilution factor) and negative sera (no neutralisation). A sample was considered positive when it showed more than 75% of CPE neutralisation at the lowest dilution (1:10). The serum titre was defined as the highest serum dilution capable of neutralising more than 75% CPE in the tissue culture. Antibody titre was expressed as the log10 of the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution able to inhibit at least 75% of the virus CPE (Savini et al. 2004).

Risk factors

For each sampled farm, a questionnaire was completed to generate data on its sanitary and zootechnical practices. All information generated in the field and in the laboratory was entered into a database. In this cross‐sectional study, the risk factors evaluated were: (i) type of cattle production (beef, dairy or mixed); (ii) type of operation (confined, semi‐confined and extensive); (iii) type of milking (manual, mechanical at the foot of the cow, mechanical in a milking parlour); (iv) use of artificial insemination and/or natural breeding; (v) presence of wild animals, including deer; (vi) presence of sheep/goats; (vii) abortions in the last 12 months; (viii) sale of animals for breeding; (ix) slaughter of adult animals; (x) new cattle entering herd; (xi) purchase of breeding stock; (xii) pasture rental; (xiii) sharing rights of way, such as access to water and salt; (xiv) pasture in common with other properties; (xv) presence of flooded areas that cattle have access to; (xvi) concentration of cattle in small areas; (xvii) calving pens; (xviii) classification of property; (xix) veterinary care. For the study of the risk factors associated with BTV, the epidemiological questionnaire variables were first submitted to an exploratory data analysis using the chi‐square test X2 (univariate). Variables with a significance level of 80% or greater (P ≤ 0.20) were added to the final multivariate logistic regression model (regression). Risk factors for BTV were considered as variables with a significance level greater than or equal to 95% (P ≤ 0.05) in the final model. All calculations were made using SPSS 2.2 and EpiInfo 7.0 software.

Results

All animals screened were ELISA positive. Neutralizing antibodies (percentage, [95% confidence interval]) were identified for 11 serotypes: BTV‐1 (22.15%, [15.72–27.92]), BTV‐2 (31.03%, [26.65–37.98]), BTV‐3 (18.96%, [12.42–24.90]), BTV‐4 (24.90% [19.41–29.12]), BTV‐9 (6.82%, [1.45–11.72]), BTV‐12 (7.50%, [2.82–12.51]), BTV‐17 (23.90%, [17.35–29.35]), BTV‐19 (10.20%, [4.62–15.56]), BTV‐21 (30.66%, [25.00–36.00]), BTV‐22 (12.14%, [5.91–18.55]), BTV‐26 (57.00%, [51.41–63.59]). Table 1 shows the percentage of reactive and non‐reactive animals and the respective neutralizing antibody titres for BTV serotypes (BTV‐1, ‐2, ‐3, ‐4, ‐9, ‐12, ‐17, ‐19, ‐21, ‐22 and ‐26) in the seven regions of the State of São Paulo in 2011.
Table 1

Neutralizing antibody titers in bovine sera from the State of São Paulo, Brazil (2011) against BTV serotypes

Antibody TiterBTV1BTV2BTV3BTV4BTV9BTV12BTV17BTV19BTV21BTV22BTV26
<1:10(75.5) 1207(67.2) 1074(80.2) 1282(74.1) 1184(91.5) 1462(91.5) 1462(75.1) 1201(87.7) 1403(67.2) 1074(86.1) 1376(40.6) 650
1:10(14.5) 233(20.3) 324(14.5) 231(16.1) 258(4.7) 75(6.4) 102(16.7) 267(7.5) 120(23.0) 368(7.1) 114(37.6) 602
1:20(5.2) 83(8.4) 134(3.2) 52(6.0) 96(1.4) 23(0.9) 11(5.2) 84(2.0) 33(6.1) 98(2.7) 44(14.8) 238
1:40(2.1) 33(1.9) 30(1.2) 19(2.2) 34(0.6) 9(0.4) 6(1.7) 28(0.4) 7(1.1) 18(1.9) 31(3.5) 56
1:80(0.2) 4(0.6) 10(0.06) 1(0.2) 4(0.1) 2(0.06) 1(0.06) 1(0.1) 3(0.3) 1(0.3) 2(0.9) 9
1:160(0.06) 100(0.2) 400(0.1) 2000(0.2) 4
1:32000000000(0.2) 400
1:640000000000(0.1) 3(0.1) 2
1:128000(0.06) 120000(0.3) 100
Toxic(1.3) 20(0.7) 10(0.4) 7(0.3) 4(0.6) 10(0.6) 9(0.4) 7(0.6) 11(1.1) 19(0.7) 12(0.8) 14
Insufficient(1.1) 17(1.0) 16(0.3) 5(0.7) 12(1.1) 17(0.4) 7(0.5) 8(1.3) 21(0.9) 15(1.0) 16(1.4) 23
Total1598 (100%)

Numbers in brackets are percentages.

Neutralizing antibody titers in bovine sera from the State of São Paulo, Brazil (2011) against BTV serotypes Numbers in brackets are percentages. Results of the univariate analysis (Table 2) and the final logistic regression model (Table 3) indicated new cattle entering herd [2183 (odds ratio), 1619–2945 (95% confidence interval)] as a risk factor.
Table 2

Univariate (chi‐square) analysis of cattle herds reactive and non‐reactive to BTV in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, in 2011, considering non‐statistically significant variables (P < 0.20)

Variable% (BTV reactive)% (non‐BTV reactive)Total P
Farm type
Meat13.0% (83)87.0% (555)6380.95
Dairy13.5% (76)86.5% (486)562
Mixed88.7% (353)11.3% (45)398
Type of operation
Extensive12.8% (175)87.2% (1195)13700.48
Semi‐extensive12.6% (27)87.4% (187)214
Confined14.3% (2)85.7% (12)14
Type of milking
Mechanical12.6% (79)87.4% (546)6250.51
Manual5.0% (1)95.0% (19)20
Manual and mechanical16.3% (15)83.7% (77)92
13.6% (109)86.4% (695)804
Artificial insemination (AI)
Does not use AI12.9% (192)87.1% (1300)14920.91
Uses AI and bulls88.7% (63)11.3% (8)71
Only uses AI11.4% (4)88.6% (31)35
Presence of sheep and goats
Yes11.3% (33)88.7% (261)2940.40
No13.1% (171)86.9% (1133)1304
Presence of wild animals
Yes11.0% (75)89.0% (607)6820.13
No14.1% (129)85.9% (787)916
Presence of deer
Yes10.0% (22)90.0% (199)2210.51
No13.2% (182)86.8% (1195)1377
Abortions within the last 12 months
No13.0% (176)86.9% (1177)13530.35
Yes9.2% (14)90.8% (139)153
Not known15.4% (14)84.6% (77)91
Entry of new cattle into herd
No8.9% (85)91.1% (871)9560.00
Yes81.4% (522)18.6% (119)641
Purchase of breeding stock
No11.2% (129)88.8% (1032)11610.016
Yes17.2% (75)82.8% (361)436
Sale of breeding stock
No12.7% (177)87.3% (1219)13960.81
Yes13.4% (27)86.6% (175)202
Slaughter of adults
No11.9% (133)88.1% (989)11220.19
Yes14.9% (71)85.1% (405)476
Pasture rental
No12.6% (167)87.4% (1161)13280.84
Yes13.7% (37)86.3% (233)270
Common grazing
No12.6% (173)87.4% (1201)13740.42
Yes13.8% (31)86.2% (193)224
Sharing rights of way with other farms
No13.0% (173)87.0% (1167)13400.31
Yes12.0% (31)88.0% (227)258
Flooded areas
No12.7% (140)87.3% (967)11070.85
Yes13.1% (64)86.9% (426)490
Concentrated cattle
No12.7% (187)87.3% (1294)14810.37
Yes14.5% (17)85.5% (100)117
Calving pens
No13.5% (169)86.5% (1087)12560.61
Yes12.3% (35)87.7% (250)285
Veterinary care
No11.4% (122)88.6% (954)10760.11
Yes15.7% (82)84.3% (440)522
Watering places shared with other farms
No12.4% (164)87.6% (1162)13260.22
Yes14.7% (40)85.3% (232)272
Farm type
Rural12.7% (179)87.3% (1232)14110.86
With some settlements14.8% (13)85.2% (75)88
Urban periphery12.1% (12)87.9% (87)99
Table 3

Final model of multivariate logistic regression of risk factors (Odds Ratio) for BTV in bovines of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, in the year of 2011

VariablesORCI (95%) P
Entry of new cattle into herd2183[1619–2945]0.00
Univariate (chi‐square) analysis of cattle herds reactive and non‐reactive to BTV in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, in 2011, considering non‐statistically significant variables (P < 0.20) Final model of multivariate logistic regression of risk factors (Odds Ratio) for BTV in bovines of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, in the year of 2011

Discussion

Since the beginning of the 1980′s, with the first report of the presence of BTV in Brazil, many seroprevalence studies have been carried out in the State of São Paulo, with reports of high prevalence of BTV‐reactive cattle and sheep, proving that the virus is endemic and is widely distributed throughout the State of São Paulo (Groocock & Campbell 1982; Cunha 1990; Arita et al. 1992; Nogueira et al. 2009, 2016). In the present study, a high seroprevalence of BTV‐reactive bovines was detected, with the identification of antibodies specific for 11 serotypes (BTV‐1, ‐2, ‐3, ‐4, ‐9, ‐12, ‐17, ‐19, ‐21, ‐22 and ‐26), indicating the circulation of several serotypes in the seven cattle‐producing regions (Table 1). In a seroprevalence study conducted in the State of São Paulo, 100% of reactive bovines were detected by ELISA and 86% of bovines reactive to BTV‐4 by means of VN. Although they detected only BTV‐4, the authors suggested the presence other serotypes in the State (Nogueira et al. 2016). In 2011 and 2013, recurrent outbreaks of BT were reported in sheep in the State of Rio de Janeiro, where BTV‐4 serotype was identified (Balaro et al. 2014a,b). In this study, specific antibodies against BTV‐1, 4 and 17 were detected. In 2014, BTV‐1, 4 and 17 serotypes were identified in sheep with clinical signs (Guimarães et al. 2017), confirming the findings of this study. In the analysis of the prevalence of BTV serotypes for the seven regions of the State of São Paulo, regions 1, 2 and 3 (Fig. 1) presented prevalence for all serotypes identified in this study. These regions are located in the western part of the state with intensive cattle production, and recognized as the main beef cattle area in the state, with large farms and intensive cattle marketing also associated with the presence of refrigerated slaughterhouses (IBGE, 2016). In these regions, the large presence of cattle is favourable for maintaining the BTV cycle, since bovines, due to their long‐lasting viraemia, are sources of infection for the vector for a long period (Mayo et al. 2010). In a seroepidemiological survey in sheep in the city of Araçatuba (region 1), Nogueira et al. (2009) identified prevalences >60% by ELISA and IDGA, confirming that the animals in this region have antibodies against BTV, but asymptomatic. The BTV‐12 had already been identified in sheep with clinical signs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul (Antoniassi et al. 2010). BTV‐3, ‐19 and ‐22 serotypes identified in this study had already been reported in 2016 in an ecological reserve in the State of Paraná, infecting pygmy brocket deers (Mazama nana) with clinical signs followed by death. This information reinforces the importance of carrying out seroepidemiological surveys and sanitary surveillance in rainforest areas where there is movement of wild animals, mainly deer, susceptible to BTV, which can be infected because they are very close to areas used for cattle breeding. BTV‐17 was identified for the first time in the State of São Paulo. In 2016, Matos et al. (2016) published for the first time in Brazil the complete sequence of BTV‐17, isolated from sheep in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Analysis of the nucleotide sequences indicated the occurrence of rearrangements of this strain with other BTV serotypes of the Americas. In addition to the serotypes mentioned above, the results of this study confirm the first occurrence of specific antibodies against the following serotypes in Brazil: BTV‐2, BTV‐9, BTV‐21 and BTV‐26. In an experimental study, Batten et al. (2014) described BTV‐26 transmission by direct contact in goats, but more studies are needed to clarify the modes of transmission of this serotype in Brazil. The State of São Paulo is located in a region with a tropical and subtropical climate, with high temperature and humidity throughout the year. These climatic characteristics associated with intensive cattle production in the region allow multiplication and constant maintenance of vector populations in the environment. The annual culicoides generations are influenced mainly by rain and temperature, which create vector breeding areas, and can increase transmission rates during rainy and hot periods (Mellor 2000). In China, in a BTV seroprevalence study in Asian sheep, bisons and yaks (Bos grunniens), the authors observed that seasonality was a risk factor for BTV infection, with summer and fall at higher risk (Ma et al. 2017). Low prevalence of BTV antibodies in cattle and sheep has been observed in regions of Brazil where the climatic conditions are unfavourable to the development of vector insects (Alves et al. 2009; Souza et al. 2010). A large part of South America is located in an endemic area for the occurrence of BTV, and serological and molecular studies indicate that the virus is present in countries such as Argentina, Ecuador, French Guiana (Legisa et al. 2013; Lobato et al. 2015; Verdezoto et al. 2017). ‘Entry of new cattle into herds’ was identified as a risk factor (P = 0.00) associated with the prevalence of BTV in herds, indicating the importance of sanitary control of animals that may be in viraemic when introduced into the herd, or come from disease‐free areas and are introduced into herds in areas where the virus or certain serotypes are endemic. The animals were 24 months of age or older, and no clinical signs were observed. Some studies have suggested that seroprevalence of BT increases with the age of the animals, and is probably a reflection of the longer exposure to the vector and the virus, which can lead to multiple infections (Ward et al. 1994; González et al. 2000). BTV is a notifiable disease, causing restrictions on semen trade and movement of live animals. This study increases our knowledge of the disease, both by identifying circulating serotypes and by determining their distribution in Brazil. High seroprevalence of BTV was identified in the seven regions of the state of São Paulo, and knowledge of the prevailing serotypes will be decisive for the implementation of infection control strategies such as targeted vaccination. However, further multidisciplinary studies including entomological, climatic and epidemiological approaches are required, with a view to the effective implementation of active surveillance and health programs for BTV in Brazil. ‘Entry of new cattle into herds’ was identified as a risk factor associated with the prevalence of BTV in herds. To date, we described, for the first time in Brazil, serological evidence of the presence of serotypes BTV‐2, BTV‐9, BTV‐21 and BTV‐26.

Source of funding

This study did not receive funding from public or private sector agencies.

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Experimentation on Animals of Biological Institute of São Paulo and conducted in accordance with national and international guidelines on handling animals.

Contributions

Design of the experiments: Thaís Garcia da Silva, Giovanni Savini and Edviges Maristela Pituco. Samples collection: Fernando Gomes Buchala, Klaus Saldanha Hellwing, Adriana Hellmeister de Campos Nogueira Romaldini, Eliana De Stefano and Maira de Souza Nunes Martins. Experiments: Thaís Garcia da Silva, Michele dos Santos Lima, Massimo Spedicato, and Irene Carmine. Cell culture preparation: Liana Teodori, Alessandra Leone. Manuscript draft and Revison: Thaís Garcia da Silva, Michele dos Santos Lima and Edviges Maristela Pituco.
  24 in total

1.  The history of bluetongue and a current global overview.

Authors:  T E Walton
Journal:  Vet Ital       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.101

2.  Identification of bluetongue virus serotypes 1, 4, and 17 co-infections in sheep flocks during outbreaks in Brazil.

Authors:  Lorena Lima Barbosa Guimarães; Júlio César Câmara Rosa; Ana Carolina Diniz Matos; Raquel Aparecida S Cruz; Maria Isabel Maldonado Coelho Guedes; Fernanda Alves Dorella; Henrique César Pereira Figueiredo; Saulo Petinatti Pavarini; Luciana Sonne; Zélia Inês Portela Lobato; David Driemeier
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Detection and isolation of Bluetongue virus from commercial vaccine batches.

Authors:  Velizar Bumbarov; Natalia Golender; Oran Erster; Yevgeny Khinich
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  A possible overwintering mechanism for bluetongue virus in the absence of the insect vector.

Authors:  H Takamatsu; P S Mellor; P P C Mertens; P A Kirkham; J N Burroughs; R M E Parkhouse
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.891

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of bluetongue virus serotype 4 field isolates from Argentina.

Authors:  D Legisa; F Gonzalez; G De Stefano; A Pereda; M J Dus Santos
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Bluetongue and other orbiviruses in South America: gaps and challenges.

Authors:  Zélia Inês Portela Lobato; Maria Isabel Maldonado Coelho Guedes; Ana Carolina Diniz Matos
Journal:  Vet Ital       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.101

7.  Clinical signs and pathology shown by British sheep and cattle infected with bluetongue virus serotype 8 derived from the 2006 outbreak in northern Europe.

Authors:  K E Darpel; C A Batten; E Veronesi; A E Shaw; S Anthony; K Bachanek-Bankowska; L Kgosana; A bin-Tarif; S Carpenter; U U Müller-Doblies; H-H Takamatsu; P S Mellor; P P C Mertens; C A L Oura
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Identification of bluetongue virus and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus serotypes in French Guiana in 2011 and 2012.

Authors:  Cyril Viarouge; Renaud Lancelot; Germain Rives; Emmanuel Bréard; Manuelle Miller; Xavier Baudrimont; Virginie Doceul; Damien Vitour; Stéphan Zientara; Corinne Sailleau
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Novel bluetongue virus serotype from Kuwait.

Authors:  Sushila Maan; Narender S Maan; Kyriaki Nomikou; Carrie Batten; Frank Antony; Manjunatha N Belaganahalli; Attia Mohamed Samy; Ammar Abdel Reda; Sana Ahmed Al-Rashid; Maha El Batel; Chris A L Oura; Peter P C Mertens
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Bluetongue Virus Infection in Tibetan Sheep and Yaks in Tibetan Plateau, China.

Authors:  Jian-Gang Ma; Xiao-Xuan Zhang; Wen-Bin Zheng; Ying-Tian Xu; Xing-Quan Zhu; Gui-Xue Hu; Dong-Hui Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  An updated review on bluetongue virus: epidemiology, pathobiology, and advances in diagnosis and control with special reference to India.

Authors:  Mani Saminathan; Karam Pal Singh; Jaynudin Hajibhai Khorajiya; Murali Dinesh; Sobharani Vineetha; Madhulina Maity; At Faslu Rahman; Jyoti Misri; Yashpal Singh Malik; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Raj Kumar Singh; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  Type-specific seroprevalence of bluetongue in India during 2018 and 2019.

Authors:  G Naresh; Kalyani Putty; Y Narasimha Reddy; Y Krishna Jyothi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-10-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.