| Literature DB >> 29963492 |
Ramat Braimah1, Abdurrazaq Taiwo1,2, Adebayo Ibikunle1, Taoreed Oladejo3, Mike Adeyemi4, Francis Adejobi5, Siddiq Abubakar1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) is a joint pathology caused by bony and/or fibrous adhesion of the joint apparatus, resulting in partial or total loss of function.Entities:
Keywords: Ankylosis; Arthroplasty; Incision; Osteotomy; Temporomandibular joint
Year: 2018 PMID: 29963492 PMCID: PMC6024065 DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.3.112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 1225-1585
Age and gender distribution of patients with temporomandibular joint ankylosis
| Age group (yr) | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5–10 | 7 (19.4) | 8 (22.2) | 15 (41.7) |
| 11–15 | 7 (19.4) | 1 (2.8) | 8 (22.2) |
| 16–20 | 4 (11.1) | 4 (11.1) | 8 (22.2) |
| 21–25 | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 3 (8.3) |
| 26–30 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) |
| 31–35 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| Total | 21 (58.3) | 15 (41.7) | 36 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=6.069, degree of freedom=5, P=0.300.
Distribution of site and etiology of temporomandibular joint ankylosis
| Site | Fall | RTA | MEI | CO | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right unilateral | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 3 (8.3) | 0 | 5 (13.9) |
| Right unilateral+maxilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (8.3) | 3 (8.3) |
| Left unilateral | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 3 (8.3) |
| Left unilateral+maxilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) |
| Bilateral | 13 (36.1) | 5 (13.9) | 3 (8.3) | 1 (2.8) | 22 (61.1) |
| Bilateral+maxilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (5.6) |
| Total | 16 (44.4) | 7 (19.4) | 6 (16.7) | 7 (19.4) | 36 (100) |
(RTA: road traffic accident, MEI: middle ear infection, CO: cancrum oris)
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=37.667, degree of freedom=15, P=0.001.
Fig. 1A. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) view of right temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA). B. 3D CT view of left TMJA. C. CT coronal view showing right TMJA.
Fig. 2A. Bramley-Al-Kayat incision for access to temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA). B. Post-rami incision in gap arthroplasty for access to TMJA. C. Temporalis muscle/fascia for gap arthroplasty. D. Masseter muscle for gap arthroplasty.
Distribution of types of incisions used to access the ankylotic mass
| Incision | Frequency, n (%) |
|---|---|
| Post-rami | 9 (25.0) |
| Post-rami+upper buccal sulcus | 2 (5.6) |
| Bramley-Alkayat | 15 (41.7) |
| Bramley-Alkayat+upper buccal sulcus | 1 (2.8) |
| Bramley-Alkayat+post-rami | 1 (2.8) |
| Pre-auricular | 7 (19.4) |
| No incision1 | 1 (2.8) |
| Total | 36 (100) |
1‘No incision’ was made because brisement force was used to open the mouth.
χ2=119.012, degree of freedom=30, P=0.000.
Distribution of procedure conducted and interpositional material utilized
| Procedure | Masseter | Temporalis fascia | Temporalis muscle | None | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramus+condyle | 9 (25.0) | 2 (5.6) | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 12 (33.3) |
| Ramus+maxilla | 2 (5.6) | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 6 (16.7) |
| Ramus+coronoid | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 2 (5.6) | 2 (5.6) | 5 (13.9) |
| Condyle | 0 | 9 (25.0) | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 12 (33.3) |
| None | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) |
| Total | 11 (30.6) | 14 (38.9) | 5 (13.9) | 6 (16.7) | 36 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=38.479, degree of freedom=15, P=0.001.
Distribution of degree of intraoperative mouth opening and type of procedure
| Mouth opening (cm) | Ramus | Ramus+maxilla | Ramus+condyle | Ramus+coronoid | Condylar | None | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| 3.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 2 (5.6) |
| 3.5 | 3 (8.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (8.3) | 0 | 6 (16.7) |
| 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.6) |
| 3.8 | 2 (5.6) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.6) | 3 (8.3) | 0 | 7 (19.4) |
| 4.0 | 1 (2.8) | 3 (8.3) | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 7 (19.4) |
| 4.2 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (5.6) | 0 | 3 (8.3) |
| 4.5 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| 4.6 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| 5.0 | 2 (5.6) | 2 (5.6) | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 6 (16.7) |
| Total | 10 (27.8) | 6 (16.7) | 2 (5.6) | 5 (13.9) | 12 (33.3) | 1 (2.8) | 36 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=45.614, degree of freedom=45, P=0.333.
Distribution of procedure conducted and complications
| Procedure | Hemorrhage | Facial nerve palsy | Re-ankylosis | None | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramus+condyle | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 11 (30.6) | 12 (33.3) |
| Ramus+maxilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (16.7) | 6 (16.7) |
| Ramus+coronoid | 2 (5.6) | 0 | 0 | 3 (8.3) | 5 (13.9) |
| Condyle | 2 (5.6) | 0 | 0 | 10 (27.8) | 12 (33.3) |
| None | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| Total | 4 (11.1) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 30 (83.3) | 36 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=45.28, degree of freedom=15, P=0.000.
Distribution of type of incision and complications
| Type of incision | Hemorrhage | Facial nerve palsy | Re-ankylosis | None | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-ramus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 (25.0) | 9 (25.0) |
| Post-ramus+upper buccal sulcus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 (33.3) | 12 (33.3) |
| Bramley-Al-Kayat | 4 (11.1) | 0 | 0 | 11 (30.6) | 15 (41.7) |
| Bramley-Al-Kayat+upper buccal sulcus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) |
| Bramley-Al-Kayat+post-ramus | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| Brisement | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.8) | 0 | 1 (2.8) |
| Preauricular | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (19.4) | 7 (19.4) |
| Total | 4 (11.1) | 1 (2.8) | 1 (2.8) | 30 (83.3) | 36 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%).
χ2=78.080, degree of freedom=18, P=0.000.
Fig. 3A. Ramus ostectomy for release of temporomandibular joint ankyloses (TMJA). B. Intraoperative inter-incisal distance achieved in TMJA.