Literature DB >> 29963393

The influence of the trocar choice on post-operative acute pain after thoracoscopy.

Andrea Dell'Amore1, Alessio Campisi1, Domenica Giunta1, Stefano Congiu1, Niccolò Daddi1, Giampiero Dolci1, Niccolò Barbera2, Letizia Bacchi Reggiani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute post-operative pain following thoracic surgery procedures is still an unresolved problem despite the introduction of minimally invasive procedures such as video assisted surgery. Until now it is never investigated if different surgical instruments could influence post-operative pain. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of different type of trocar on post-operative pain in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized single center study. We identified 53 patients randomized into three groups underwent single port thoracoscopy for malignant pleural effusion with drainage of the fluid and talc poudrage. The three groups differ for the trocar type, rigid, flexible and wound protector.
RESULTS: We compared the postoperative pain between the three groups in which there was no statistical difference. Rigid trocar seems to give a more stable level of pain during the days, flexible trocar gains more pain in the first few hours, however the pain at discharge decreases significantly, reaching the similar values, in all the three groups. The association between pain at discharge and operative time or days of drainage was analyzed by means of linear regression, no statistically significant difference was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that different type of trocars during video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) produces similar level of acute postoperative pain. In future, further randomized study with a great number of patients enrolled needs to confirm our results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracoscopy; postoperative pain; thoracic surgery; trocar; video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963393      PMCID: PMC5994453          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2018.05.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  17 in total

1.  Assessment and follow-up of intercostal nerve damage after video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Tetsuya Sakai; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Naoya Yamasaki; Tsutomu Tagawa; Mariko Mine; Yoshisada Shibata; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  A new approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy "the caudal position".

Authors:  Giampiero Dolci; Andrea Dell'Amore; Niccolò Daddi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Ten-year experience on 644 patients undergoing single-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gaetano Rocco; Nicola Martucci; Carmine La Manna; David R Jones; Giuseppe De Luca; Antonello La Rocca; Arturo Cuomo; Rosanna Accardo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Morten Bendixen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Christian Kronborg; Claus Andersen; Peter Bjørn Licht
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Pain and recovery are comparable after either uniportal or multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an observation study.

Authors:  Philip J McElnay; Mat Molyneux; Rakesh Krishnadas; Timothy J P Batchelor; Douglas West; Gianluca Casali
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Geometric and ergonomic characteristics of the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-03

7.  A questionnaire study investigating the prevalence of the neuropathic component of chronic pain after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Michael F Maguire; Andrew Ravenscroft; David Beggs; John P Duffy
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: analgesic effectiveness and role in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Teruya Komatsu; Atsunari Kino; Mari Inoue; Terumasa Sowa; Koji Takahashi; Takuji Fujinaga
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgical resection of malignant lung tumors.

Authors:  R J Lewis; R J Caccavale; G E Sisler; J W Mackenzie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway.

Authors:  Bernd M Muehling; Gisela L Halter; Hubert Schelzig; Rainer Meierhenrich; Peter Steffen; Ludger Sunder-Plassmann; Karl-Heinz Orend
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  1 in total

1.  Advantages associated with the use of a wound retractor compared to a rigid trocar inserted via the camera port during video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Kamiyoshihara; Hitoshi Igai; Ryohei Yoshikawa; Fumi Ohsawa; Tomohiro Yazawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.