| Literature DB >> 29963315 |
Su Jung Jung1, Nam Kyu Kim2, Dong-Hyeon Lee3, Soon Il Hong4, Jong Kyu Lee1.
Abstract
Two-hundred and fifty-five strains of actinomycetes isolated from soil samples were screened for their antagonistic activities against four well-known wood decay fungi (WDF), including a brown rot fungus, Gloeophyllum trabeum and three white rot fungi Donkioporia expansa, Trametes versicolor, and Schizophyllum commune. A dual culture assay using culture media supplemented with heated or unheated culture filtrates of selected bacterial strains was used for the detection of their antimicrobial activity against four WDF. It was shown that Streptomyces atratus, S. tsukiyonensis, and Streptomyces sp. greatly inhibited the mycelial growth of the WDF tested compared with the control. To evaluate the biocontrol efficacy of S. atratus, S. tsukiyonensis, and Streptomyces sp., wood blocks of Pinus densiflora inoculated with three selected Streptomyces isolates were tested for weight loss, compression strength (perpendicular or parallel to the grain), bending strength, and chemical component changes. Of these three isolates used, Streptomyces sp. exhibited higher inhibitory activity against WDF, especially G. trabeum, as observed in mechanical and chemical change analyses. Scanning electron microscopy showed that cell walls of the wood block treated with Streptomyces strains were thicker and collapsed to a lesser extent than those of the non-treated control. Taken together, our findings indicate that Streptomyces sp. exhibits the potential to be used as a biocontrol agent for wood decay brown rot fungus that causes severe damage to coniferous woods.Entities:
Keywords: Actinomycetes; antagonistic activity; brown rot fungi; white rot fungi
Year: 2018 PMID: 29963315 PMCID: PMC6023252 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1468056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
Wood decay fungi used for testing the antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp.
| Culture collection No. | Species |
|---|---|
| TPML 13119 (KACC 46180, CBS 236.91) | |
| TPML 12104 (KACC 46194, CBS 164.27) | |
| TPML 13123 (KACC 46294, CBS 103.20) | |
| TPML 11015 |
Identity of five Streptomyces spp. isolated in this study.
| Species | Culture collection No. | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|
| TPML 13102 | MG923820 | |
| TPML 13104 | MG923821 | |
| TPML 13105 | MG923822 | |
| TPML 13106 | MG923823 | |
| TPML 13108 | MG923824 | |
| TPML 13094 | MG972195 |
Antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. against four WDF.
| Tested WDF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture collection No. | ||||
| TPML 13102 | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| TPML 13104 | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
| TPML 13105 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| TPML 13106 | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| TPML 13108 | +++ | ++ | ++ | + |
| TPML 13094 | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
45 mm < + ≤ 65 mm; 25 mm < ++ ≤ 45 mm; +++ ≤ 25 mm.
Suppression rate (%) of the growth of WDF.
| Antagonistic microorganism | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fungi (Control) | ||||||||||||||||
| Wood decay fungi | ||||||||||||||||
| H | U | H | U | H | U | H | U | H | U | H | U | H | U | H | U | |
| 72.8 | 77.7 | 51.4 | 64.1 | 61.1 | 65.9 | 57.4 | 68.0 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 13.1 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 13.6 | 18.4 | |
| 53.5 | 76.4 | 36.5 | 54.0 | 42.6 | 54.2 | 42.0 | 59.5 | 46.0 | 43.1 | 13.6 | 16.9 | 44.7 | 46.4 | 3.1 | 9.5 | |
| 21.9 | 27.6 | 13.8 | 24.9 | 19.8 | 28.6 | 70.3 | 76.3 | 12.9 | 29.3 | 12.6 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 23.9 | |
| 61.3 | 68.0 | 38.0 | 42.7 | 51.5 | 58.4 | 9.9 | 15.9 | 27.1 | 38.8 | 6.9 | 3.0 | 21.7 | 0.2 | 14.4 | 14.8 | |
Figure 1.Comparison of the weight loss (%) of Pinus densiflora wood blocks treated with the selected Streptomyces spp. at 120 days after inoculation with Gloeophyllum trabeum. Means with the same letter on the bar are not significantly different, as analyzed with Tukey’s honestly significance difference test (p = .017 at 95% confidence interval).
Figure 2.Comparison of the compression strength (perpendicular or parallel to the grain) of Pinus densiflora wood blocks subjected to treatment with selected Streptomyces spp. for 120 days after inoculation with Gloeophyllum trabeum. Means with the same letter on the bar are not significantly different based on Tukey’s honestly significance difference test (p = 1.708e−05 and 2.536e−05 at 95% confidence interval for compression strength perpendicular and parallel to the grain, respectively).
Figure 4.Analysis of changes in the chemical components, including lignin and holocellulose, at 120 days after inoculation with Gloeophyllum trabeum on the wood block of Pinus densiflora treated with the selected Streptomyces spp. (p < 2e−16 at 95% confidence interval).
Figure 5.Scanning electron micrographs (×150, ×1000, and ×5000) of cross-sections of Pinus densiflora specimens at 120 days after its inoculation with Gloeophyllum trabeum. Blocks treated with Streptomyces sp. 1 (A–C) and the non-treated controls (D–F). (A, D) bar 200 μm; (B, E) bar 20 μm; (C, F) bar 10 μm.