| Literature DB >> 29963143 |
Zongtao Yu1,2,3, Hankui Chen3, Yong Zhu4, Junmei Ai3, Yan Li3, Wei Gu5, Jeffrey A Borgia6,7, Jicai Zhang1,2, Bin Jiang4, Wei Chen8, Youping Deng2,4,9.
Abstract
Lipids are known to serve important roles in energy storage, membrane structure and signal transduction as well as in human cancers. In the present study, lipidomics was employed in order to identify plasma lipid markers for the early detection of lung cancer. Mass spectrometry was performed to profile 390 individual lipids in 44 plasma samples obtained from a training discovery cohort, which included 22 patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCC) and 22 high-risk individuals. An additional cohort that included 22 high-risk individuals and 22 patients with SqCC was further used for validation. During the training stage, a total of 20 distinct lipids that were significantly distributed between the high-risk and SqCC cases, were identified. A panel of 2 lipid markers (C18:2 cholesterol esters and sphingomyelin 22:0) were then further defined using the training accuracy values of 95.5% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity and 95.2% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The validation accuracy values applied for the additional cohort were 93.9% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity and 98.7% AUC. Thus, in the present study, 2 lipid markers that were able to discern SqCC patients from high-risk individuals with a high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, were identified. These results may provide vital information for the development of a quick and safe blood test for the early diagnosis of SqCC.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; cancer screening; lipidomics; plasma lipids; squamous cell lung carcinoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29963143 PMCID: PMC6019901 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Patient characteristics in all of the samples used in the training and validation stages.
| Training stage | Validation stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | SqCC (n=22) | High risk (n=22) | SqCC (n=22) | High risk (n=22) |
| Sex (n) | ||||
| Male | 11 | 11 | 15 | 16 |
| Female | 11 | 11 | 7 | 6 |
| Race (n) | ||||
| Caucasian | 18 | 21 | 14 | 19 |
| Noncaucasian | 4 | 1 | 8 | 3 |
| Age (years) | ||||
| Median | 62.95 | 64.14 | 56.75 | 73.44 |
| Range | 49–81 | 51–82 | 69–82 | 49–73 |
| Smoking history | ||||
| Median (years) | 59.17 | 47.04 | 52.90 | 32.28 |
| Nonsmoker (n) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tumor stage (n) | ||||
| Stage I | 12 | − | 14 | − |
| Stage II | 4 | − | 1 | − |
| Stage III | 6 | − | 7 | − |
SqCC, squamous cell lung cancer.
Top 20 significantly differentiated lipid species for SqCC at the training stage.
| SqCC (n=22) | High risk (n=22) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipids | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Fold change | P-value |
| C16:0 CE | 0.9420 | 1.2608 | 1.0668 | 1.3492 | 1.1325 | 3.72×102 |
| C18:2 CE | 0.7879 | 1.2590 | 1.0644 | 1.3780 | 1.3509 | 1.00×104 |
| C20:4 CE | 0.8406 | 1.6088 | 1.3211 | 1.5260 | 1.5717 | 4.01×102 |
| C22:6 CE | 0.6812 | 1.7158 | 1.0093 | 1.6120 | 1.4815 | 1.01×102 |
| ePC (34:2) | 0.9868 | 1.2485 | 1.0113 | 1.3051 | 1.0248 | 2.84×102 |
| ePC (34:3) | 0.9634 | 1.3843 | 1.0373 | 1.3540 | 1.0768 | 1.31×102 |
| ePC (36:2) | 0.9727 | 1.3327 | 1.1001 | 1.2649 | 1.1310 | 1.80×103 |
| ePC (38:1) | 0.9520 | 1.3552 | 1.1049 | 1.2919 | 1.1605 | 1.07×102 |
| ePC (38:2) | 0.9768 | 1.3698 | 1.0456 | 1.2906 | 1.0705 | 1.60×102 |
| LPC (16:0) | 0.8984 | 1.6525 | 1.0497 | 1.4053 | 1.1685 | 1.88×102 |
| LPC (18:0) | 0.8089 | 1.7651 | 1.0159 | 1.3465 | 1.2559 | 3.80×103 |
| LPC (18:2) | 0.8585 | 1.8515 | 1.3798 | 1.5443 | 1.6072 | 2.00×104 |
| PC (34:2) | 1.0402 | 1.2913 | 1.1308 | 1.3081 | 1.0871 | 8.00×104 |
| PC (36:2) | 0.9491 | 1.3070 | 1.1489 | 1.3165 | 1.2105 | 2.00×104 |
| PC (36:4) | 0.9536 | 1.5849 | 1.2294 | 1.4101 | 1.2892 | 4.70×102 |
| PC(38:6) | 0.8903 | 1.4371 | 0.8598 | 1.5768 | 1.0355 | 1.54×102 |
| PC (40:7) | 0.8869 | 1.5719 | 0.9436 | 1.4884 | 1.0639 | 8.20×103 |
| PI (38:4) | 0.9769 | 1.4808 | 0.9588 | 1.3437 | 0.9814 | 4.59×102 |
| SM (16:1) | 0.9819 | 1.2954 | 1.1346 | 1.2007 | 1.1556 | 2.48×102 |
| SM (22:0) | 0.5988 | 1.3069 | 0.9607 | 4.3199 | 1.6045 | 1.30×103 |
Concentrations are presented as pmol/µl. The 2 lipids C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 shown in bold were selected for further study in the validation stage. SqCC, squamous cell lung cancer; CE, cholesterol esters; PC, phosphatidylcholine; ePC, PC with one ether-linked (alkyl or alkenyl) chain; LPC, lyso-PC; PI, phosphatidylinositol; SM, sphingomyelin;.
Figure 1.Box plots of C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 concentrations in the training and validation SqCC cohorts and high-risk controls. The mean concentrations of the 2 lipids C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 were measured in high-risk controls and patients with SqCC during the (A and B) training and (C and D) validation stages, respectively. The y-axis values were log2-transferred mean concentrations following normalization. CE, cholesterol esters; SM, sphingomyelin; SqCC, squamous cell lung cancer. A Student's unpaired t-test was performed to compare the two groups. **P<0.01.
Figure 2.AUC values of C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 for SqCC prediction in the training and validation cohorts. The AUC values in SqCC prediction for C18:2 CE (top), SM 22:0 (middle) and the 2 combined lipid markers (bottom) in the (A) training and (B) validation samples. AUC, area under the curve; CE, cholesterol esters; SM, sphingomyelin; SqCC, squamous cell lung cancer.
Predictive values of the 2 lipid markers at the training stage.
| Lipid markers | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | OR | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18:2 CE | 0.864 | 0.545 | 0.800 | 0.655 | 7.6 | 0.725 |
| SM (22:0) | 0.909 | 0.773 | 0.895 | 0.800 | 34.0 | 0.841 |
| C18:2 CE + SM (22:0) | 0.955 | 0.909 | 0.952 | 0.913 | 210.0 | 0.952 |
The predictive values of C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 were analyzed separately and combined. CE, cholesterol esters; SM, sphingomyelin; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, odds ratio; AUC, area under the curve.
Predictive values of the 2 lipid markers at the validation stage.
| Lipid markers | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | OR | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18:2 CE | 0.625 | 0.786 | 0.786 | 0.625 | 6.11 | 0.777 |
| SM (22:0) | 0.938 | 0.893 | 0.962 | 0.833 | 125.00 | 0.915 |
| C18:2 CE + SM (22:0) | 0.938 | 0.929 | 0.963 | 0.882 | 195.00 | 0.987 |
The predictive values of C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 were analyzed in the validation samples. CE, cholesterol esters; SM, sphingomyelin; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; OR, odds ratio; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 3.Hierarchical clustering analysis of C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 in all samples in the training and validation cohorts. The GeneSpring 12.6 program was used to perform hierarchical clustering analysis. The SqCC patients are represented in green on the left and the high-risk controls are in shown in yellow on the right. The C18:2 CE and SM 22:0 levels ranged from the lowest at −2.37 (deep blue) to the highest at 2.37 (deep red). CE, cholesterol esters; SM, sphingomyelin; SqCC, squamous cell lung cancer.
Figure 4.Sources of variation presented as the characteristic differences between the squamous cell lung cancer cohorts and high-risk cohorts used in the present study. (A) Unmatched samples (all 88 samples) and (B) matched training samples (n=44 training stage samples).