Literature DB >> 29963098

Molecular Evaluation of a Case of Fasciola hepatica in Wild Boar in Southwestern Iran: A Case Report.

Bahador Sarkari1,2, Majid Mansouri1, Shamsi Noorpisheh Ghadimi1, Samaneh Abdolahi Khabisi3, Abdolla Doshmanziari1.   

Abstract

Wild boars may be infected with several zoonotic parasitic infections including Fasciola spp. We reported a case of Fasciola infection in a wild boar in Bushehr Province in southwestern Iran. The sample was isolated from the liver of a hunted wild boar. A few of adult worms were fixed and stained. DNA was extracted from apical and lateral parts of the worms and PCR amplified, targeting NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) and cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) mitochondrion genes. Although the worm was quite long and looked much similar to F. gigantica, sequencing and analysis of PCR products of nad1 and cox1 genes revealed that the isolate has the most similarity with F. hepatica. This is the first report of molecular evaluation of Fasciola spp. from wild boar in Iran.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fasciola hepatica; Iran; Wild boar

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963098      PMCID: PMC6019598     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

Genus Fasciola (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea) has a worldwide distribution and is considered as a liver fluke in a wide range of animals (1). F. hepatica and F. gigantica are two main species of parasites which infect both humans and animals. These two zoonotic flukes transmitted through water and food, contaminated with worm metacercaria (2). Fascioliasis is one of the most important worm infections in some of tropical countries, with infection rates of up to 90% in animals (1, 2). In some parts of Africa, and in few of other countries, including Iran, human and animal infections are a major health problem (3–5). The most recently reported incidence rate of human infection by this parasite is about 17 million cases. The disease is emerging as one of the most important parasitic diseases in the northern part of Iran (4). Overlapped distributions of F. hepatica and F. gigantica in Asia and co-infection with the two species in buffalo in northern Iran have been reported (1, 6, 7). Infection of wild boars with Fasciola spp. has been reported from different areas of the world (8–11). In Iran, Fasciola infection was revealed in 3.5% of wild boars in north of the country, but the isolates have not been genetically confirmed (11). So far, there has been no molecular study to determine the genotype of Fasciola isolated from wild boars in Iran and this is the first report of molecular evaluation of Fasciola isolated from wild boars in Iran. DNA sequencing of nad1 and cox1 mitochondrial genes is useful markers for determining the genotypes and interspecies variations of these two species of Fasciola (12–14). Here we report a case of Fasciola in a wild boar in the southern province of Bushehr in Iran, determined by molecular method, targeting these two mitochondrion genes.

Case Report

Fasciola adult worms were isolated from the liver of a hunted wild boar, in Bushehr Province, southern Iran (Fig. 1). The grossly visible flukes were collected. The isolated worms were stored either in 70% alcohol, for molecular studies, or in 10% formalin for morphometric analysis. A few of samples were stained with FAAL (formalin, azocarmine, alcohol, and lactic acid) and were mounted by polyvinyl alcohol medium and photographed (Fig. 2). The isolated worms were similar and there was no much heterogeneity in their shape or sizes.
Fig. 1:

Fasciola adult worms in the liver of wild boar

Fig. 2:

Fasciola hepatica isolated from the wild boar liver. A: unstained; B: stained with FAAL(Original)

Fasciola adult worms in the liver of wild boar Fasciola hepatica isolated from the wild boar liver. A: unstained; B: stained with FAAL(Original)

Molecular evaluation

To extract the genomic DNA, apical and lateral parts of the adult worms were completely removed while the reproductive area was excluded. Specimens were completely crushed and then DNA was extracted manually, using the phenol-chloroform method. Extraction was performed using 15 μL of proteinase K and 300 μL of lysis buffer (50 ml of Tris-HCl (100 Mm), pH = 8; 1 mM of EDTA, pH= 8; 1% Tween 20). DNA was precipitated with 100% alcohol, re-suspended in 100 μL of distilled water, and stored at −20 °C until use. A 438 bp fragment from mitochondrial cox1 gene and a 535 bp fragment from mitochondrial nad1 genes were amplified by 5′–ACGTTGGATCATAAGCGTG-3′: forward and 5′-CCTCATCCAACATAACCTCT-3′: reverse primers. PCR reaction was performed with a final volume of 25 mL containing 12.5 μL of master mix, 1 μL of each primer, 8.5 μL of distilled water and 2 μL of DNA. The thermocycler was programmed for PCR reaction as follows: an initial denaturation cycle at 94 °C for 2 min; 30 denaturation cycles at 94 °C for 1 min; annealing at 55 °C for 1.5 min; extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. Amplicons were analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel. DNAs from F. hepatica isolated from sheep in Iran, previously identified based on ITS1, ITS2, cox1, and nad1 genes, were included as positive controls in the PCR assays (13, 14). DNA was purified from the gel, using Vivantis DNA purification kit (Vivantis Technologies Sdn. Bhd. Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia) based on the manufacturers’ instructions. PCR product was sequenced in both directions, with the same primers used for amplification, to determine the Fasciola species. Sequences were aligned, using CLCS Qiagen software, and compared with those of existing cox1 and nad1 reference sequences related to the genotypes of Fasciola spp. available in the GenBank.

PCR-RFLP analysis

A PCR-RFLP method was used to specifically distinguish Fasciola species in ITS1 with RsaI restriction enzyme, as previously described (13). The PCR result revealed a 438 bp fragment from mitochondrial cox1 gene and a 535 bp fragment from mitochondrial nad1 gene (Fig. 3). PCR-RFLP pattern with RsaI produced a 360, 100 and 60 bp fragments corresponding to F. hepatica (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3:

PCR-amplified mitochondria gene fragments of Fasciola spp. isolated from wild boar. Lane 1: nad1 gene of Fasciola isolated from the wild boar; lane 2, nad1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from the sheep (positive control); lane 3: cox1 gene of Fasciola isolated from the wild boar; lane 4: cox1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from the sheep (positive control); lane 5: molecular marker; lane 6 negative control

Fig. 4:

RFLP pattern of PCR products of F. hepatica digested by RsaI enzyme. Lane 1 and 4: molecular marker; Lane 2: F. hepatica (positive control) isolated from sheep liver (Fars Province); Lane 3: negative control; Lane 5: F. hepatica isolated from wild boar in the current study

PCR-amplified mitochondria gene fragments of Fasciola spp. isolated from wild boar. Lane 1: nad1 gene of Fasciola isolated from the wild boar; lane 2, nad1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from the sheep (positive control); lane 3: cox1 gene of Fasciola isolated from the wild boar; lane 4: cox1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from the sheep (positive control); lane 5: molecular marker; lane 6 negative control RFLP pattern of PCR products of F. hepatica digested by RsaI enzyme. Lane 1 and 4: molecular marker; Lane 2: F. hepatica (positive control) isolated from sheep liver (Fars Province); Lane 3: negative control; Lane 5: F. hepatica isolated from wild boar in the current study The sequence of cox1 isolate showed 97% identity with available sequences of F. hepatica, including KU946983, F. hepatica reported from Iran; and KX021278, F. hepatica isolated from cattle in Iran; KR422385, F. hepatica isolated from bison (Poland) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5:

Alignment of sequences of the cox1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from wild boar in the southern state of Bushehr, Iran. KX907139: F. hepatica isolated from wild boar (current study); KU946983.1: F. hepatica reported from Iran; KX021278.1: F. hepatica isolated from cattle, Iran; KR422385.1: F. hepatica isolated from bison (Poland)

Alignment of sequences of the cox1 gene of F. hepatica isolated from wild boar in the southern state of Bushehr, Iran. KX907139: F. hepatica isolated from wild boar (current study); KU946983.1: F. hepatica reported from Iran; KX021278.1: F. hepatica isolated from cattle, Iran; KR422385.1: F. hepatica isolated from bison (Poland) The sequence of nad1 of the isolate showed the most identity with available sequences of F. hepatica including KR422395.1 (from Ovis aries in Poland), AF216697.1 (from Australia), KR422396.1 (from Ovis aries in Poland), GQ356032.1 (from ovine in Iran), and GQ175362.1 (from Iran). The sequence data for the cox1 gene obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers of KX907139.

Discussion

Fascioliasis is a foodborne neglected parasitic disease caused by F. hepatica and F. gigantica. In Europe, America, and Australia, only F. hepatica is a matter of concern while overlapping of both F. hepatica and F. gigantica has been observed in some regions of Africa and Asia, including Iran (6, 12). Wild boars may be infected with a few of parasitic infections including Fasciola species (8, 15–19). From the economic point of view, fascioliasis is important in sheep and cattle, but from the epidemiological perspective, the disease is important in other animals including the wild boars. Fasciola may infect numerous domestic and wild animals, but susceptibility and pathology may be different based on the animal species (20). The host animal species strongly influence the phenotype of adult and also eggs of Fasciola. This is connected to the differences in size of the liver duct in the different hosts (21). Fasciola infections in pigs, swine and wild boars have been reported from different areas of the world (8, 10, 11, 18, 22, 23). 1.3% of pigs in an area of Hunan Province in China were infected with F. hepatica (22). F. hepatica in wild boars has been reported in southern Germany (18). F. hepatica was reported in wild boars from Belorussian Polesie (24). In UK, F. hepatica has been reported in the bile duct of wild boars with increased diameter of bile ducts (10). Of 3021 livers of feral pigs examined in Sicily (Italy), 79 were regarded as having F. hepatica (23). F. hepatica infection was reported in 54 out of 3021 (4.37%) of a wild population of black pigs in Italy (23). A study about wild boar helminthic fauna in Tapada Nacional de Mafra (Portugal) revealed that 60.8% (14 out of 23 cases) of the animals were infected with F. hepatica (25). In Iran, infection with F. gigantica has been reported in 2 out of 57 examined wild boars (11). The fluke species determined merely based on the morphometric features and no molecular evaluation has been performed on the isolates (11). In our previous study about helminth parasites of wild boars in Bushehr province, no case of Fasciola infection was detected in any of 25 studied wild boars (16). The current study describes the genotype of Fasciola isolated from a wild boar, killed by local hunter in southwestern of Iran. This is the first report concerning the molecular evaluation of Fasciola isolated from wild boars in Iran. In a study in Galicia (Spain), 40 out of 358 (11.2%) of wild boars have been parasitized by F. hepatica (8). Only 40% of the infected animals had F. hepatica eggs in their stools. Coprological detection of F. hepatica antigen revealed the coproantigens in 62.9% of the animals. By evaluating the percentage of hatching eggs, wild boars were considered as a very likely secondary reservoir for fascioliasis in that area. Morphometric analysis of the isolate revealed that F. hepatica in wild boar in that area has a normal development with its own characteristics. The gravidity and development of F. hepatica from wild boars were similar to those of sheep and cattle isolates (8). Wild boars are very likely to have a role in the epidemiology of fascioliasis in area where these animals are infected with this fluke. Pigs may have a high transmission capacity of Fasciola to other animals or human. The metacercaria viability in pigs was similar to those of sheep and cattle isolates (20). Pigs and donkeys were considered as the second reservoirs for fascioliasis in Bolivian Altiplano where the highest prevalence of human fascioliasis occurs (26). In fact, the normal fluke development in wild boars and shedding of viable F. hepatica eggs suggests that these animals may act as a secondary reservoir for F. hepatica (8, 20). These animals may contribute to the contamination of the environment through passing of parasite eggs. Body length of 11.93–25.29 (17.01±3.43) and body width of 3.9–9.09 (7.03±1.19) were reported for F. hepatica isolated from wild boars (8). These parameters have been smaller in sheep and longer in cattle isolates. The maximum size reached by F. hepatica in wild boars has been bigger than that of sheep isolates (8). Wild boar bile duct is not unsuitable niche for development of F. hepatica. Pathological changes of fascioliasis in pigs does not include sever fibrous or calcification reaction (10). This allows the parasite to dilate the bile duct lumen and survive (23). Increase in the diameter of the bile duct was noticed in the infected boar in UK (10). F. hepatica isolated from the wild boar in the current study was quite larger than those isolated from cattle and sheep in nearby areas in Iran. This is consistent with report which showed that F. hepatica from wild boars is larger than those isolated from sheep (8). In the current study, molecular evaluation confirmed the species of the isolate as F. hepatica. This is the main species of Fasciola isolated from wild boars so far. Although the infection of wild boars was reported in Iran with F. gigantica, the species has not properly been confirmed since only morphometric analysis has been done and this approach is not appropriate for discrimination of these two species of Fasciola (13, 14).

Conclusion

F. hepatica infection in wild boars might contribute to the contamination of the environment and have a considerable role in the epidemiology of fascioliasis in the region.
  25 in total

1.  Findings of Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758 in wild animals in Belorussian Polesie.

Authors:  V V Shimalov; V T Shimalov
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Comparative infectivity of Fasciola hepatica metacercariae from isolates of the main and secondary reservoir animal host species in the Bolivian Altiplano high human endemic region.

Authors:  M A Valero; S Mas-Coma
Journal:  Folia Parasitol (Praha)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.122

3.  Macracanthorhynchus hirudinaceus: the most common helminthic infection of wild boars in southwestern Iran.

Authors:  B Sarkari; M Mansouri; M Najjari; A Derakhshanfar; Gh Mowlavi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-01-14

4.  Correlation between egg-shedding and uterus development in Fasciola hepatica human and animal isolates: applied implications.

Authors:  María Adela Valero; Miroslava Panova; Ignacio Pérez-Crespo; Messaoud Khoubbane; Santiago Mas-Coma
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Phenotypic analysis of adults of Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica and intermediate forms from the endemic region of Gilan, Iran.

Authors:  K Ashrafi; M A Valero; M Panova; M V Periago; J Massoud; S Mas-Coma
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Distribution of Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica in the endemic area of Guilan, Iran: Relationships between zonal overlap and phenotypic traits.

Authors:  Keyhan Ashrafi; M Adela Valero; Raquel V Peixoto; Patricio Artigas; Miroslava Panova; Santiago Mas-Coma
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Natural trematode infestation in feral Nebrodi Black pigs: pathological investigations.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Capucchio; Deborah Catalano; Vincenzo Di Marco; Miriam Russo; Vincenzo Aronica; Amedeo Tomaselli; Alessandro Lazzara; Stefano Amedeo; Frine Eleonora Scaglione; Bruno Dore; Franco Guarda
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  The Endemicity of Human Fascioliasis in Guilan Province, Northern Iran: the Baseline for Implementation of Control Strategies.

Authors:  Keyhan Ashrafi; Farshid Saadat; Sandra O'Neill; Behnaz Rahmati; Hadid Amin Tahmasbi; John Pius Dalton; Abolhassan Nadim; Mohsen Asadinezhad; Sayed Mahmood Rezvani
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Molecular and Morphological Characterization of Fasciola spp. Isolated from Different Host Species in a Newly Emerging Focus of Human Fascioliasis in Iran.

Authors:  Reza Shafiei; Bahador Sarkari; Seyed Mahmuod Sadjjadi; Gholam Reza Mowlavi; Abdolali Moshfe
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Epidemiology of Human Fascioliasis and Intestinal Helminthes in Rural Areas of Boyer-Ahmad Township, Southwest Iran; A Population Based Study.

Authors:  Ghasem Hosseini; Bahador Sarkari; Abdolali Moshfe; Mohammad Hossein Motazedian; Samaneh Abdolahi Khabisi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.429

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neobalantidium coli: First molecular identification from the Eurasian wild boar, Sus Scrofa in Bushehr Province, Southwestern Iran.

Authors:  Shamsi Noorpisheh Ghadimi; Mohammad R Abedini; Bahador Sarkari; Amir Savardashtaki; Fattaneh Mikaeili
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.