| Literature DB >> 29963025 |
Shi Wu1, Jiahui Huang1, Qingping Wu1, Feng Zhang1,2, Jumei Zhang1, Tao Lei1, Moutong Chen1, Yu Ding1, Liang Xue1.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen associated withEntities:
Keywords: MLST; S. aureus; antimicrobial resistance; enterotoxin; spa typing; vegetable
Year: 2018 PMID: 29963025 PMCID: PMC6011812 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1The locations of the sampling sites for this study in China.
Prevalence and levels of Staphylococcus aureus in different retail vegetables.
| Tomato | 6.36 (7/110) | BJC2063 | 4.3 | 1.10 |
| CDC2563 | 0.36 | |||
| XNC3013 | 0.3 | |||
| SJZC3263 | < 0.3 | |||
| LSC3363 | < 0.3 | |||
| XGC3513 | 2.3 | |||
| SYC3813 | < 0.3 | |||
| Cucumber | 1.56 (2/128) | ZCC65 | 12 | 7.15 |
| TYC2115 | 2.3 | |||
| Lettuce | 15.48 (13/84) | SZN295 | 2.1 | 1.87 |
| ZJN395 | 2.3 | |||
| HYC463 | 0.92 | |||
| HYN497 | 0.74 | |||
| STJ1741 | 4.3 | |||
| SGC1813 | 4.3 | |||
| HYC1863 | 0.3 | |||
| HKC513 | < 0.3 | |||
| HKN545 | < 0.3 | |||
| SYN595 | 0.36 | |||
| NNC663 | 3.5 | |||
| SYJ3841 | 4.3 | |||
| LSC4291 | 0.92 | |||
| Caraway | 2.30 (2/87) | XGC3514 | < 0.3 | 23.18 |
| CCJ4090 | 46 | |||
| Others | 0 (0/10) | – | – | 0.00 |
| Total | 5.73 (24/419) | – | – | 3.85 |
Results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests of Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from retail vegetables in China.
| β-Lactams | Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) | ≤19 | – | ≥20 | 8 (26.7) | – | 22 (73.3) |
| Ampicillin (AMP) | ≤28 | – | ≥29 | 28 (93.3) | – | 2 (6.7) | |
| Cefepime (FEP) | ≤14 | 15–17 | ≥18 | 3 (10.0) | 2 (6.7) | 25 (83.3) | |
| Cefoxitin (FOX) | ≤21 | – | ≥22 | 5 (16.7) | – | 25 (83.3) | |
| Penicillin G (P) | ≤28 | – | ≥29 | 28 (93.3) | – | 2 (6.7) | |
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | ≤14 | 15–17 | ≥18 | 5 (16.7) | 6 (20.0) | 19 (63.3) | |
| Aminoglycosides | Amikacin (AK) | ≤14 | 15–16 | ≥17 | 1 (3.3) | 6 (20.0) | 23 (76.7) |
| Gentamicin (CN) | ≤12 | 13–14 | ≥15 | 5 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 25 (83.3) | |
| Kanamycin (K) | ≤13 | 14–17 | ≥18 | 10 (33.3) | 9 (30.0) | 11 (36.7) | |
| Streptomycin (S) | ≤11 | 12–14 | ≥15 | 7 (23.3) | 18 (60.0) | 5 (16.7) | |
| Phenicols | Chloramphenicol (C) | ≤17 | 18–20 | ≥21 | 7 (23.3) | 8 (26.7) | 15 (50.0) |
| Lincosamides | Clindamycin (DA) | ≤14 | 15–20 | ≥21 | 7 (23.3) | 3 (10.0) | 20 (66.7) |
| Macrolides | Erythromycin (E) | ≤13 | 14–22 | ≥23 | 12 (40.0) | 2 (6.7) | 16 (53.3) |
| Telithromycin (TEL) | ≤18 | 19–21 | ≥22 | 6 (20.0) | 5 (16.7) | 19 (63.3) | |
| Fluoroquinolones | Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | ≤15 | 16–20 | ≥21 | 7 (23.3) | 3 (10.0) | 20 66.7) |
| Norfloxacin (NOR) | ≤12 | 13–16 | ≥17 | 5 (16.7) | 3 (10.0) | 22 (73.3) | |
| Tetracyclines | Tetracycline (TE) | ≤14 | 15–18 | ≥19 | 13 (43.3) | 0 (0.0) | 17 (56.7) |
| Oxazolidinones | Linezolid (LZD) | ≤20 | – | ≥21 | 0 (0.0) | – | 30 (100) |
| Ansamycins | Rifampicin (RD) | ≤16 | 17–19 | ≥20 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) | 29 96.7) |
| Sulfonamides | Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole 1:19 (SXT) | ≤10 | 11–15 | ≥16 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100) |
| Quinolones | Quinupristin/dalfopristin (QD) | ≤15 | 16–18 | ≥19 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | 28 (93.3) |
| Glycopeptides | Teicoplanin (TEC) | ≤10 | 11–13 | ≥14 | 0 (0.0) | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) |
| Nitrofurantoins | Nitrofurantoin (F) | ≤14 | 15–16 | ≥17 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100) |
| Fusidic acid (FD) | ≤24 | – | ≥25 | 3 (10.0) | – | 27 (90.0) | |
| Antimicrobial | 1-5Antimicrobial | 11 | |||||
| 6-10Antimicrobial | 10 | ||||||
| 11-15Antimicrobial | 6 | ||||||
| 16-24Antimicrobial | 3 | ||||||
R, resistant; I, intermediate resistance; S, susceptibility. The zone diameter was the standard from the CLSI of Staphylococcus spp.
Distributions of the 18 types of SE genes in vegetable S. aureus isolates in China.
| Classic SE genes | 8 (26.7) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (25.0) | 4 (26.7) | – | |
| 11 (36.7) | 5 (62.5) | 1 (25.0) | 3 (20.0) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| 25 (83.3) | 8 (100.0) | 4 (100.0) | 10 (66.7) | 3 (100.0) | ||
| 3 (10.0) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | – | – | ||
| 3 (10.0) | 2 (25.00) | 1 (25.0) | – | – | ||
| Non-classic SE genes:egc cluster | 17 (56.7) | 7 (87.5) | 2 (50.0) | 5 (33.3) | 3 (100.0) | |
| 7 (23.3) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 2 (13.3) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| 26 (86.7) | 8 (100.0) | 4 (100.0) | 11 (73.3) | 3 (100.0) | ||
| 11 (36.7) | 7 (87.5) | 1 (25.0) | 3 (20.0) | – | ||
| 2 (6.7) | 2 (25.0) | – | – | – | ||
| 2 (6.7) | 2 (25.0) | – | – | – | ||
| Non-classic SE genes: other SE genes | 15 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | 4 (100.0) | 7 (46.7) | – | |
| 14 (46.7) | 8 (100.0) | 2 (50.0) | 1 (6.7) | 3 (100.0) | ||
| 9 (30.0) | 4 (50.0) | – | 3 (20.0) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| 16 (53.3) | 7 (87.5) | 4 (100.0) | 5 (33.3) | – | ||
| 15 (50.0) | 5 (62.5) | 3 (75.0) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (100.0) | ||
| 21 (70.0) | 8 (100.0) | 4 (100.0) | 7 (46.7) | 2 (66.7) | ||
| 10 (33.3) | 6 (75.0) | 1 (25.0) | – | 3 (100.0) | ||
Allelic profile of vegetable S. aureus isolates for MLST and spa typing.
| MLST | ST188 | 7 (23.3) | 1 (3.3) | 3 (10.0) | 3 (10.0) | – |
| ST1 | 5 (16.7) | 2 (6.7) | – | 3 (10.0) | – | |
| ST7 | 5 (16.7) | – | – | 4 (13.3) | 1 (3.3) | |
| ST59 | 4 (13.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.7) | |
| ST6 | 3 (10.0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| ST72 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | |
| ST398 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| ST20 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | ||
| ST630 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| ST15 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| ST2196 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | |
| t189 | 7 (23.3) | 1 (3.3) | 3 (10.00) | 3 (10.0) | – | |
| t091 | 4 (13.3) | – | – | 3 (10.0) | 1 (3.3) | |
| t127 | 3 (10.0) | 2 (6.7) | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t437 | 4 (13.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.7) | |
| t114 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t16895 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t1987 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | |
| t2874 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t10419 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | |
| t2467 | 1 (3.3) | – | 1 (3.3) | – | – | |
| t701 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t304 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | ||
| t377 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t803 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
| t3092 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | – | – | – | |
| t034 | 1 (3.3) | – | – | 1 (3.3) | – | |
Figure 2The UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) tree of the 7 multi-locus sequence typing loci of vegetable S. aureus isolates. S*, susceptible. This tree was generated using the S.T.A.R.T (version 2).