M Luctkar-Flude1, A Aiken2, M A McColl3, J Tranmer1. 1. School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON. 2. Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. 3. School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
Abstract
Purpose: As cancer centres move forward with earlier discharge of stable survivors of early-stage breast cancer (bca) to primary care follow-up, it is important to address known knowledge and practice gaps among primary care providers (pcps). In the present qualitative descriptive study, we examined the practice context that influences implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines for providing such care. The purpose was to determine the challenges, strengths, and opportunities related to implementing comprehensive evidence-based bca survivorship care guidelines by pcps in southeastern Ontario. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 pcps: 10 physicians and 9 nurse practitioners. Results: Thematic analysis revealed 6 themes within the broad categories of knowledge, attitudes, and resources. Participants highlighted 3 major challenges related to providing bca survivorship care: inconsistent educational preparation, provider anxieties, and primary care burden. They also described 3 major strengths or opportunities to facilitate implementation of survivorship care guidelines: tools and technology, empowering survivors, and optimizing nursing roles. Conclusions: We identified several important challenges to implementation of comprehensive evidence-based survivorship care for bca survivors, as well as several strengths and opportunities that could be built upon to address those challenges. Findings from our research could inform targeted knowledge translation interventions to provide support and education for pcps and bca survivors.
Purpose: As cancer centres move forward with earlier discharge of stable survivors of early-stage breast cancer (bca) to primary care follow-up, it is important to address known knowledge and practice gaps among primary care providers (pcps). In the present qualitative descriptive study, we examined the practice context that influences implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines for providing such care. The purpose was to determine the challenges, strengths, and opportunities related to implementing comprehensive evidence-based bca survivorship care guidelines by pcps in southeastern Ontario. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 pcps: 10 physicians and 9 nurse practitioners. Results: Thematic analysis revealed 6 themes within the broad categories of knowledge, attitudes, and resources. Participants highlighted 3 major challenges related to providing bca survivorship care: inconsistent educational preparation, provider anxieties, and primary care burden. They also described 3 major strengths or opportunities to facilitate implementation of survivorship care guidelines: tools and technology, empowering survivors, and optimizing nursing roles. Conclusions: We identified several important challenges to implementation of comprehensive evidence-based survivorship care for bca survivors, as well as several strengths and opportunities that could be built upon to address those challenges. Findings from our research could inform targeted knowledge translation interventions to provide support and education for pcps and bca survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; clinical practice guidelines; evidence-based guidelines; knowledge translation; primary care; qualitative research; survivorship care
Authors: Thomas E Elliott; Barbara A Elliott; Ronald R Regal; Colleen M Renier; Irina V Haller; Byron J Crouse; Martha T Witrak; Patricia B Jensen Journal: Cancer Pract Date: 2002 Mar-Apr
Authors: Carolyn D Runowicz; Corinne R Leach; N Lynn Henry; Karen S Henry; Heather T Mackey; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado; Rachel S Cannady; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Stephen B Edge; Linda A Jacobs; Arti Hurria; Lawrence B Marks; Samuel J LaMonte; Ellen Warner; Gary H Lyman; Patricia A Ganz Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Lise Fillion; Sandra Cook; Anne-Marie Veillette; Marie de Serres; Michèle Aubin; François Rainville; Margaret Fitch; Richard Doll Journal: Can Oncol Nurs J Date: 2012
Authors: Azzurra Massimi; Corrado De Vito; Ilaria Brufola; Alice Corsaro; Carolina Marzuillo; Giuseppe Migliara; Maria Luisa Rega; Walter Ricciardi; Paolo Villari; Gianfranco Damiani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz; Antonio José Jiménez-Vílchez; Mirian Santamaría-Peláez; Luis A Pérula-de Torres; María Victoria Olmo-Carmona; María Teresa Muñoz-García; Presentación Jorge-Gutiérrez; Jesús Serrano-Merino; Esperanza Romero-Rodríguez; Lorena Rodríguez-Elena; Raquel Refusta-Ainaga; María Pilar Lahoz-Sánchez; Belén Miró-Palacios; Mayra Medrano-Cid; Rosa Magallón-Botaya; Luis A Mínguez-Mínguez; Josefa González-Santos; Jerónimo J González-Bernal Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-16 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Leah K Lambert; Lynda G Balneaves; A Fuchsia Howard; Stephen L K Chia; Carolyn C Gotay Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz; Luis Ángel Pérula-de-Torres; Jesús Serrano-Merino; Antonio José Jiménez-Vílchez; María Victoria Olmo-Carmona; María Teresa Muñoz-García; Cruz Bartolomé-Moreno; Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez; Rosa Magallón-Botaya Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: K Decker; R Moineddin; C Kendell; R Urquhart; N Biswanger; P Groome; M L McBride; M Winget; M Whitehead; E Grunfeld Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.497