| Literature DB >> 29962089 |
Maja M Dethlefsen1, Caroline M Kristensen1, Anna S Tøndering1, Signe B Lassen1, Stine Ringholm1, Henriette Pilegaard1.
Abstract
Hepatic autophagy has been shown to be regulated by acute exercise and exercise training. Moreover, high-fat diet-induced steatosis has been reported to be associated with impaired hepatic autophagy. In addition, autophagy has been shown to be regulated by acute exercise and exercise training in a PGC-1α dependent manner in skeletal muscle. The aim of this study was to test the hypotheses that high-fat high-fructose (HFF) diet changes hepatic autophagy and mitophagy, that exercise training can restore this through a PGC-1α-mediated mechanism, and that acute exercise regulates autophagy and mitophagy in the liver. Liver samples were obtained from liver-specific PGC-1α KO mice and their littermate Lox/Lox mice fed a HFF diet or a control diet for 13 weeks. The HFF mice were either exercise trained (ExT) on a treadmill the final 5 weeks or remained sedentary (UT). In addition, half of each group performed at the end of the intervention an acute 1 h exercise bout. HFF resulted in increased hepatic BNIP3 dimer and Parkin protein, while exercise training increased BNIP3 total protein without affecting the elevated BNIP3 dimer protein. In addition, exercise training reversed a HFF-induced increase in hepatic LC3II/LC3I protein ratio, as well as a decreased PGC-1α mRNA level. Acute exercise increased hepatic PGC-1α mRNA in HFF UT mice only. In conclusion, this indicates that exercise training in part reverses a HFF-induced increase in hepatic autophagy and capacity for mitophagy in a PGC-1α-independent manner. Moreover, HFF may blunt acute exercise-induced regulation of hepatic autophagy.Entities:
Keywords: Acute exercise; Liver PGC-1α KO; autophagy; exercise training; high-fat high-fructose; liver; mitophagy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29962089 PMCID: PMC6026591 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
PGC‐1α exon 3‐5 mRNA in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high‐fat high‐fructose diet (HFF UT) for 13 weeks
| Group | PGC‐1α exon 3‐5 mRNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lox/Lox | PGC‐1α LKO | ||
| CON UT | Sed | 1.01 ± 0.1 | 0.01 ± 0.0 |
| HFF UT | Sed | 0.66 ± 0.1 | 0.01 ± 0.0 |
| HFF UT | Ex | 0.92 ± 0.1 | ND |
| HFF ExT | Sed | 0.87 ± 0.1 | 0.01 ± 0.0 |
| HFF ExT | Ex | 0.94 ± 0.1 | 0.01 ± 0.0 |
Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex). Values are presented as means ± SE, n = 9–10. PGC‐1α exon 3–5 mRNA primers used are located within exon 3–5 which are deleted in PGC‐1α LKO mice.
Figure 3AMPK hr172 phosphorylation normalized to AMPKα1 (A), mTOR er2448 phosphorylation normalized to mTOR (B), LC3II/LC3I protein ratio (C), p62 (D), Parkin (E) and BNIP3 monomer (F) protein content in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a high fat – high fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex). Protein content is given as arbitrary units (AU). Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 8–10. ¤: Significantly different from HFF UT Sed within given genotype, P < 0.05. §: Significantly different from HFF UT Ex within given genotype, P < 0.05. A line and P‐value designates a main effect, P < 0.05. Two‐way ANOVA: AMPK hr172 phosphorylation / AMPKα1, intervention P = 0.003; genotype P = 0.698; interaction P = 0.984. mTOR er2448 phosphorylation / mTOR, intervention P = 0.034; genotype P = 0.869; interaction P = 0.679. LC3II/LC3I, intervention P = 0.141; genotype P = 0.817; interaction P = 0.534. p62, intervention P = 0.433; genotype P = 0.348; interaction P = 0.200. Parkin, intervention P = 0.029; genotype P = 0.187; interaction P = 0.228. BNIP3 monomer, intervention P < 0.001; genotype P = 0.617; interaction P = 0.599. GAPDH, intervention P = 0.401; genotype P = 0.459; interaction P = 0.908. Three‐way ANOVA: AMPK hr172 phosphorylation / AMPKα1, Acute Ex P < 0.001; mTOR er2448 phosphorylation / mTOR, ExT P = 0.004. Parkin, ExT x Acute Ex P = 0.028. BNIP3 monomer, ExT P = 0.013; Acute Ex P = 0.002.
Figure 5PGC‐1α mRNA content in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high‐fat high‐fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT) (A). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex) (B). mRNA is normalized to single‐stranded (ss) DNA. Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 8–10. *Significantly different from CON UT, P < 0.05. ¤: Significantly different from HFF UT, P < 0.05. Two‐way ANOVA: PGC‐1α mRNA (A), HFF P = 0.015; ExT P = 0.002. PGC‐1α mRNA (B), ExT x Acute Ex P = 0.021.
Effect of Exercise training and acute exercise
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| AMPKα1 protein (AU) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| mTOR protein (AU) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
| ULKSer317 phos/ULK1 protein (AU) | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.4 |
| ULKSer757 phos/ULK1 protein (AU) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| ULK1 protein (AU) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
| LC3I protein (AU) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| LC3II protein (AU) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| BNIP3 total protein (AU) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
| BNIP3 dimer protein (AU) | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
| DRP1 protein (AU) | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| Beclin1 protein (AU) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| GAPDH protein (AU) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
AMPKα1, mTOR, ULKSer317 phosphorylation/ULK1, ULKSer757 phosphorylation/ULK1, ULK1, LC3I, LC3II, BNIP3 total, BNIP3 dimer, DRP1, Beclin1, and GAPDH protein content in liver from liver specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a high‐fat high‐fructose diet for 13 weeks. Half of the mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex). Protein content is given as arbitrary units (AU). Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 8–10.
Significantly different from HFF ExT Sed within given genotype, P < 0.05.
Significantly different from Lox/Lox within given group, P < 0.05.
Main effect of acute exercise, P < 0.05.
Main effect of exercise training, P < 0.05.
Interaction: the acute exercise effect depended on the genotype, P < 0.05.
Two‐way ANOVA: AMPKα1, intervention P = 0.931; genotype P = 0.663; interaction P = 0.311. mTOR, intervention P = 0.028; genotype P = 0.376; interaction P = 0.964. ULKSer317 phosphorylation / ULK1, intervention P = 0.401; genotype P = 0.774; interaction P = 0.396. ULKSer757 phosphorylation / ULK1, intervention P = 0.605; genotype P = 0.318; interaction P = 0.839. ULK1, intervention P = 0.141; genotype P = 0.342; interaction P = 0.580. LC3I, interaction P = 0.015. LC3II, intervention P = 0.736; genotype P = 0.323; interaction P = 0.636. BNIP3 total, intervention P = 0.011; genotype P = 0.411; interaction P = 0.526. BNIP3 dimer, intervention P = 0.019; genotype P = 0.355; interaction P = 0.488. DRP1, intervention P = 0.805; genotype P = 0.911; interaction P = 0.088. Beclin1, intervention P = 0.194; genotype P = 0.558; interaction P = 0.838. GAPDH, intervention P = 0.401; genotype P = 0.459; interaction P = 0.908. Three‐way ANOVA: AMPKα1, Acute Ex P < 0.001. mTOR, ExT P = 0.003. ULK1, ExT P = 0.031. LC3I, ExT x Acute Ex P = 0.019; Acute Ex x geno P = 0.001. BNIP3 total, ExT P = 0.014. BNIP3 dimer, ExT P = 0.012; Acute Ex P = 0.025. DRP1, Acute Ex x geno P = 0.009.
Figure 1Body weight gain in liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high‐fat high‐fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 9–10. *: Significantly different from CON UT, P < 0.05. ¤: Significantly different from HFF UT, P < 0.05. Genotype P = 0.697; intervention P = 0.001; interaction P = 0.583.
Figure 2LC3I (A), LC3II (B), LC3II/LC3I protein ratio (C), p62 (D), BNIP3 total (E), BNIP3 dimer protein (F) and Parkin (G) protein content in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high fat – high fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). Representative blots for proteins A–G (H). Protein content is given as arbitrary units (AU). Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 8–10. *: Significantly different from CON UT within given genotype, P < 0.05. ¤: Significantly different from HFF UT within given genotype, P < 0.05. #: Significantly different from Lox/Lox within given group, P < 0.05. A line designates a main effect, P < 0.05. Two‐way ANOVA: LC3I, intervention P = 0.003; genotype P = 0.011; interaction P = 0.662. LC3II, intervention P = 0.027; genotype P = 0.248; interaction P = 0.569. LC3II/LC3I, intervention P = 0.001; genotype P = 0.201; interaction P = 0.555. p62, intervention P = 0.148; genotype P = 0.025; interaction P = 0.486. BNIP3 total, intervention P < 0.001; genotype P = 0.100; interaction P = 0.814. BNIP3 dimer, intervention P < 0.001; genotype P = 0.443; interaction P = 0.405. Parkin, intervention P = 0.014; genotype P = 0.703; interaction P = 0.820. GAPDH, intervention P = 0.573; genotype P = 0.240; interaction P = 0.640.
Effect of HFF and exercise training
| CON UT | HFF UT | HFF ExT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lox/Lox | PGC‐1α LKO | Lox/Lox | PGC‐1α LKO | Lox/Lox | PGC‐1α LKO | |
| DRP1 protein (AU) | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| Beclin1 protein (AU) | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| BNIP3 monomer protein (AU) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| GAPDH protein (AU) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
DRP1, Beclin1, BNIP3 monomer, and GAPDH protein content in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high‐fat high‐fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). Values are presented as mean ± SE, n = 8–10.
Significantly different from CON UT within given genotype, P < 0.05. ¤: Significantly different from HFF UT within given genotype, P < 0.05. Two‐way ANOVA: DRP1, intervention P = 0.908; genotype P = 0.803; interaction P = 0.430. Beclin1, intervention P = 0.411; genotype P = 0.575; interaction P = 0.961. BNIP3 monomer, intervention P < 0.001; genotype P = 0.143; interaction P = 0.636. GAPDH, intervention P = 0.573; genotype P = 0.240; interaction P = 0.640.
Figure 6Representative blots of DRP1 protein, Beclin1 protein, BNIP3 monomer and dimer protein and GAPDH protein in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet (CON) or a high‐fat high‐fructose (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT).
Figure 4Representative blots of AMPK hr172 phosphorylation, AMPKα1 protein, mTOR er2448 phosphorylation, mTOR protein, LC3I protein, LC3II protein, p62 protein, Parkin protein, BNIP3 monomer and dimer protein in liver from liver‐specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a control diet ( ) or a high fat – high fructose diet (HFF) for 13 weeks. Half of the HFF mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex).
Figure 7Representative blots of AMPKα1 protein, mTOR protein, DRP1 protein, ULK er317 phosphorylation, ULK er757 phosphorylation, ULK1 protein, LC3I protein, LC3II protein, BNIP3 monomer and dimer protein, Beclin1 protein and GAPDH protein in liver from liver specific PGC‐1α knockout (LKO) and littermate control (Lox/Lox) mice fed a high‐fat high‐fructose diet for 13 weeks. Half of the mice performed treadmill exercise training the last 5 weeks (HFF ExT), the other half remained untrained (HFF UT). By the end of the 13 weeks, the two groups were again divided into sedentary (HFF UT Sed and HFF ExT Sed) groups and groups performing a 1 h acute running bout (HFF UT Ex and HFF ExT Ex).