Romain Bourcier1, Mickael Mazighi2, Julien Labreuche3, Robert Fahed2, Raphael Blanc2, Benjamin Gory4, Alain Duhamel3, Gaultier Marnat5, Suzana Saleme6, Vincent Costalat7, Serge Bracard4, Hubert Desal1, Arturo Consoli8, Michel Piotin2, Bertrand Lapergue8. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Guillaume et René Laennec University Hospital, Nantes, France. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University Lille, CHRU Lille, Lille, France. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France. 5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France. 7. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 8. Department of Stroke Center and Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Versailles and Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Journal of Stroke 2018;20(2):268-276https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2018.00192On page 271, in Table 1, the value ‘1115 (65–151)’ of subgroup ‘Imaging to groin puncture’ and column heading ‘SVS (–)’ was input incorrectly. The correct value is ‘115 (65–151).’We apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Authors: I Derraz; M Pou; J Labreuche; L Legrand; S Soize; M Tisserand; C Rosso; M Piotin; G Boulouis; C Oppenheim; O Naggara; S Bracard; F Clarençon; B Lapergue; R Bourcier Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 3.825