S Höring1, B Löffler2, M W Pletz3, S Rößler3,4, S Weis3,5,6, B T Schleenvoigt3. 1. Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. steffen.hoering@med.uni-jena.de. 2. Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 3. Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 4. Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany. 5. Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 6. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Here, we report the case of an HIV positive patient under a dual antiretroviral drug regimen with tenofovir disoproxil and darunavir/ritonavir with stable clinical, virological, and immunological response over 126 weeks. Dual antiretroviral therapy has the advantage of reduced toxicity and lower health care costs, treatment failure and fostering drug resistance are perceived risks. Optimal drug combinations and indication criteria for dual treatment remain controversial. Nevertheless, first clinical trials indicate non-inferiority for combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. This case presents the combination of tenofovir disoproxil in combination with a protease inhibitor as a new potential dual treatment regimen. METHOD: We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis of trials comparing dual to triple ART. RESULTS: Literature review revealed nine studies in which dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and an NRTI was compared to triple therapy. We performed a meta-analysis of six trials that reported a 48-week follow-up. In treatment-naïve patients as well when ART switch was assessed, there was no difference in the treatment success in patients with dual ART versus triple. CONCLUSION: We conclude that dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and NRTI is safe and effective. The use of tenofovir in dual treatment as described in our case needs to be assessed in future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Here, we report the case of an HIV positive patient under a dual antiretroviral drug regimen with tenofovir disoproxil and darunavir/ritonavir with stable clinical, virological, and immunological response over 126 weeks. Dual antiretroviral therapy has the advantage of reduced toxicity and lower health care costs, treatment failure and fostering drug resistance are perceived risks. Optimal drug combinations and indication criteria for dual treatment remain controversial. Nevertheless, first clinical trials indicate non-inferiority for combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. This case presents the combination of tenofovir disoproxil in combination with a protease inhibitor as a new potential dual treatment regimen. METHOD: We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis of trials comparing dual to triple ART. RESULTS: Literature review revealed nine studies in which dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and an NRTI was compared to triple therapy. We performed a meta-analysis of six trials that reported a 48-week follow-up. In treatment-naïve patients as well when ART switch was assessed, there was no difference in the treatment success in patients with dual ART versus triple. CONCLUSION: We conclude that dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and NRTI is safe and effective. The use of tenofovir in dual treatment as described in our case needs to be assessed in future clinical trials.
Authors: Victoria A Johnson; Vincent Calvez; Huldrych F Günthard; Roger Paredes; Deenan Pillay; Robert Shafer; Annemarie M Wensing; Douglas D Richman Journal: Top Antivir Med Date: 2011-11
Authors: J R Arribas; P-M Girard; N Paton; A Winston; A-G Marcelin; D Elbirt; A Hill; M B Hadacek Journal: HIV Med Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: José A Perez-Molina; Rafael Rubio; Antonio Rivero; Juan Pasquau; Ignacio Suárez-Lozano; Melcior Riera; Miriam Estébanez; Jesús Santos; José Sanz-Moreno; Jesús Troya; Ana Mariño; Antonio Antela; Jordi Navarro; José Navarro; Herminia Esteban; Santiago Moreno Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Federico Pulido; Esteban Ribera; María Lagarde; Ignacio Pérez-Valero; Rosario Palacios; José A Iribarren; Antoni Payeras; Pere Domingo; José Sanz; Miguel Cervero; Adrián Curran; Francisco J Rodríguez-Gómez; María J Téllez; Pablo Ryan; Pilar Barrufet; Hernando Knobel; Antonio Rivero; Belén Alejos; María Yllescas; José R Arribas Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 9.079