Literature DB >> 29960719

Use of Group Concept Mapping to Identify Patient Domains of Uncertainty That Contribute to Emergency Department Use.

Kristin L Rising, Shannon K Doyle, Rhea E Powell, Amanda M B Doty, Marianna LaNoue, Angela M Gerolamo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prior research suggests that uncertainty related to symptoms is a driver of emergency department (ED) use, and that patients often leave the ED with uncertainty not being addressed. Our objective was to engage patients to identify domains that contribute to feelings of uncertainty and decisions to use the ED.
METHODS: We used Group Concept Mapping, a quasi-qualitative/quasi-quantitative method, to elicit patients' views on how uncertainty related to experiencing symptoms contributes to decisions to access the ED. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants who either sought treatment at the ED twice within a 30-day period, or visited both the ED and a primary care provider at least once within the past year.
RESULTS: Thirty-four participants engaged in two rounds of Group Concept Mapping during which participants participated in structured brainstorming of ideas, followed by ranking and clustering of ideas into domains. The first round generated 47 idea statements reflecting uncertainty about consequences, severity, emergency room services, primary care options, finances, and psychologic concerns. The second round generated 52 idea statements reflecting uncertainty about self-management, causation, diagnosis and treatment plan, trust in the provider and institution, accessibility, and alternative care options. DISCUSSION: Factors that contribute to uncertainty and decision-making about ED use are both intrinsic (ie, cause, symptom severity) and extrinsic (ie, finances, accessibility). These domains can inform approaches to measure the uncertainty that patients experience, and to design and test interventions for nurses and other providers to help manage patient uncertainty during acute illness.
Copyright © 2017 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department use; Emergency nursing; Patient uncertainty; Quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Hannah Lunn; Geoff Wong; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 7.418

2.  The power of the group: comparison of interviews and group concept mapping for identifying patient-important outcomes of care.

Authors:  Kristin L Rising; Marianna LaNoue; Alexzandra T Gentsch; Amanda M B Doty; Amy Cunningham; Brendan G Carr; Judd E Hollander; Lori Latimer; Larry Loebell; Gail Weingarten; Neva White; Geoffrey Mills
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Identifying Emergency Department Symptom-Based Diagnoses with the Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  Benjamin H Slovis; Danielle M McCarthy; Garrison Nord; Amanda Mb Doty; Katherine Piserchia; Kristin L Rising
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Patient and public involvement in numerical aspects of trials (PoINT): exploring patient and public partners experiences and identifying stakeholder priorities.

Authors:  Beatriz Goulao; Hanne Bruhn; Marion Campbell; Craig Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.